Particle image velocimetry measurements around a 7-m-long ship model focus on the flow within the attached liquid sheet, upstream of the point at which the bow wave separates from the model. Performed in a towing basin at a Reynolds number of 1.6×107 and a Froude number of 0.30 (both based on ship length L), these measurements expand upon previous work by examining the bow wave flow at a higher Reynolds number than before. Further, the increased scale of the model and the flow allows finer observation of the flow structure. Individual vector maps show a growing region of negative vorticity originating at the toe of the wave. This shear layer, which first appears at X/L=0.0619, penetrates further into the wave as X/L increases but curves upward to remain close to the forward face. Positive vorticity appears on the top of the wave and at the ship boundary. Repeated runs at X/L=0.0690 produce mean flow and turbulent stress data for this three-dimensional spilling wave. Normal and shear Reynolds stresses are concentrated at the forward face of the wave in the same region as the negative vorticity. The magnitudes of the Reynolds stresses are consistent with theoretical expectations, with maximum vrms and wrms attaining 16% and 11% of the local fluid speed, respectively. The correlation coefficient of −vw is between 0.5 and 0.7 in the turbulent region, indicating the presence of coherent structures. Although the Reynolds stresses penetrate deeply into the bow wave, turbulent production is concentrated in a small region at the toe. Changing from a fixed coordinate system to a system that shifts with the free surface causes the Reynolds stresses and turbulent production to form thinner regions closer to the free surface with no reduction in intensity. Calculations of the three-dimensional velocity on the free surface in the ship frame of reference indicate that it turns sharply at the toe of the bow wave and that the forward face forms a three-dimensional region of separated flow. Energy losses of 30% are experienced at the toe.

1.
H.
Miyata
and
T.
Inui
, “
Nonlinear ship waves
,”
Adv. Appl. Mech.
24
,
215
(
1984
).
2.
M. S.
Longuet-Higgins
, “
Capillary rollers and bores
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
240
,
659
(
1992
).
3.
M. S. Longuet-Higgins, “The initiation of spilling breakers,” in Proceedings of the IAHR International Symposium: Waves—Physical and Numerical Modeling, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 21–24 Aug. 1994, pp. 24–48.
4.
J. H.
Duncan
,
V.
Philomin
,
M.
Behres
, and
J.
Kimmel
, “
The formation of spilling breaking water waves
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
2558
(
1994
).
5.
D. G. Dommermuth and R. Mui, “The vortical structure of a breaking gravity-capillary wave,” in Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Santa Barbara, CA, 21–25 Aug. 1994, pp. 17–23.
6.
J. C.
Lin
and
D.
Rockwell
, “
Instantaneous structures of a breaking wave
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
2877
(
1994
).
7.
J. C.
Lin
and
D.
Rockwell
, “
Evolution of a quasi-steady breaking wave
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
302
,
29
(
1995
).
8.
D.
Dabiri
and
M.
Gharib
, “
Experimental investigation of the vorticity generation within a spilling water wave
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
330
,
113
(
1997
).
9.
J. W.
Hoyt
and
R. H. T.
Sellin
, “
The hydraulic jump as a mixing layer
,”
J. Hydraul. Eng.
115
,
1607
(
1989
).
10.
M. L.
Banner
and
D. H.
Peregrine
, “
Wave breaking in deep water
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
25
,
373
(
1993
).
11.
R.
Cointe
and
M. P.
Tulin
, “
A theory of steady breakers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
276
,
1
(
1994
).
12.
E. P.
Rood
, “
Interpreting vortex interactions with a free surface
,”
Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Eng.
116
,
91
(
1994
).
13.
E. P. Rood, “Sources of vorticity on the shear-free free-surface boundary of viscous irrotational flows,” in Proceedings of the ASME Symposium on the Interaction of Surface Waves, Currents, Bodies, and Wakes at or Near a Free Surface, San Francisco, CA, 1995.
14.
D. H. Peregrine and I. A. Svendsen, “Spilling breakers, bores, and hydraulic jumps,” in Proceedings of the 16th Coastal Engineering Conference (ASCE, Hamburg, Germany, 1978).
15.
R. R.
Dong
,
J.
Katz
, and
T. T.
Huang
, “
On the structure of bow waves on a ship model
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
346
,
77
(
1997
).
16.
E. M.
Pogozelski
,
J.
Katz
, and
T. T.
Huang
, “
The flow structure around a surface piercing strut
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
1387
(
1997
).
17.
R. J.
Adrian
, “
Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
23
,
261
(
1991
).
18.
R. R.
Dong
,
S.
Chu
, and
J.
Katz
, “
Quantitative visualization of the flow structure within the volute of a centrifugal pump, Part A: Technique
,”
Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Eng.
114
,
390
(
1992
).
19.
L. Bertuccioli, G. I. Roth, T. R. Osborn, and J. Katz, “Submersible PIV system using fiber optic laser delivery and a digital camera,” in Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 1997 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division, FED Vol. 13. ASME Paper No. FEDSM97-3079.
20.
G. I. Roth, Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University, 1998.
21.
G. I. Roth, D. Hart, and J. Katz, “Feasibility of using the L64720 video motion estimation processor (MEP) to increase efficiency of velocity map generation for PIV,” in Laser Anemometry—1995 edited by T. T. Huang, J. Turner, M. Kawahashi, and M. Volkan Otugen (ASME, New York, 1995), pp. 387–393.
22.
R. C.
Ertekin
,
W. C.
Webster
, and
J. V.
Wehausen
, “
Waves caused by a moving disturbance in a shallow channel of finite width
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
169
,
275
(
1986
).
23.
R. C. Ertekin and Z. M. Qian, “Numerical grid generation and upstream waves for ships in restricted waters,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Hiroshima, Japan, 1989 (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990), pp. 421–436.
24.
H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley, A First Course in Turbulence (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1972).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.