When a stiff rectangular card is dropped in still air with its long axis horizontal, it often settles into a regular mode of motion; while revolving around its long axis it descends along a path that is inclined to the vertical at a nearly constant angle. We show experimentally that the tumbling frequency Ω of a card of length l, width w and thickness d(l≫w≫d) scales as Ω∼d1/2w−1, consistent with a simple dimensional argument that balances the drag against gravity.

1.
J. C. Maxwell, Scientific Papers of J. C. Maxwell (Dover, New York, 1940), Vol. 1, p. 115.
2.
J. C. Maxwell, Scientific Papers and Letters of J. C. Maxwell (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990), p. 560. In one of the letters, Maxwell begins by saying “As to the strip of paper, I suppose many must have dropped since the invention of paper, but fruitlessly, quia carent vate sacro,” quoting Horace. In another letter by Kelvin to Stokes, we find the statement “I thought first, and am now again nearly convinced, that the generation of rotary motion here is inexplicable without taking into account the viscosity of air.”
3.
N. E.
Zhukovskii
, “
On the fall in air of light prolate bodies rotating about their longitudinal axes
,”
Collected Works, Glav. Red. Aviats. Lit.
5
,
100
(
1937
).
4.
P. Dupleich, “Rotation in free fall of rectangular wings of elongated shape,” NACA Technical Memo No. 1201 (1941).
5.
W.
Willmarth
,
N.
Hawk
, and
R.
Harvey
, “
Steady and unsteady motions of wakes in falling disks
,”
Phys. Fluids
7
,
197
(
1914
).
6.
J. D.
Iverson
, “
Autorotating flat plate wings
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
92
,
327
(
1979
).
7.
A. M. O.
Smith
, “
On the motion of a tumbling body
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
20
,
73
(
1953
).
8.
H. J.
Lugt
, “
Autorotation
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
15
,
123
(
1983
).
9.
K. J. Niklas, Plant Biomechanics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
10.
J.
Larmor
, “
On hydro-kinetic symmetry
,”
Q. J. Pure Appl. Math.
XX
,
261
(
1884
).
11.
Y.
Tanabe
and
K.
Kaneko
, “
Behavior of a falling paper
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
73
,
1372
(
1994
).
12.
L.
Mahadevan
,
H.
Aref
, and
S. W.
Jones
, “
Comment on ‘Behavior of a Falling Paper’ (with reply)
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
75
,
1420
(
1995
).
13.
L.
Mahadevan
, “
Tumbling of a falling card
,”
C.R. Acad. Sci., Ser. IIb: Mec., Phys., Chim., Astron.
323
,
729
(
1996
).
14.
S. B.
Field
,
M.
Klaus
,
M. G.
Moore
, and
F.
Nori
, “
Chaotic dynamics of falling disks
,”
Nature (London)
388
,
252
(
1997
).
15.
A.
Belmonte
,
H.
Eisenberg
, and
E.
Moses
, “
From flutter to tumble: Inertial drag and froude similarity in falling paper
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
81
,
345
(
1998
).
16.
J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
17.
This picture is reminiscent of the behavior of a conservative pendulum which is capable of oscillations or rotations depending on its initial energy; the main difference is that the angular variable describing the orientation of the strip is twice that of the analogous pendulum Ref. 19.
18.
Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, edited by S. Goldstein (Oxford University Press, New York, 1938), Vol. II, Chap. 10.
19.
H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Dover, New York, 1945), Chap. X.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.