The interaction of a near-critical axisymmetric incompressible swirling flow in a straight pipe with small inlet azimuthal vorticity perturbations is studied. Certain flow conditions that may reflect the physical situation are prescribed along the pipe inlet and outlet. It is first demonstrated that under these conditions a regular-expansion solution in terms of the small azimuthal vorticity perturbations has a singular behavior around the critical swirl. This singularity infers that large-amplitude disturbances may be induced by the small perturbations when the incoming flow to the pipe has a swirl level around the critical swirl. In order to understand the nature of flows in this swirl range, a small-disturbance analysis is developed. It shows that under the prescribed inlet/outlet conditions, a small but finite inlet azimuthal vorticity perturbation breaks the transcritical bifurcation of solutions of the Euler equations at the critical swirl into two branches of perturbed solutions. When the azimuthal vorticity perturbations are positive these branches show a regular behavior. However, when they are negative, the perturbed branches fold at limit points near the critical swirl, with a finite gap between the two branches, and no near-columnar equilibrium state can exist for an incoming flow with swirl close to the critical level. The flow must develop large disturbances in this swirl range. Beyond this range, two equilibrium states may exist under the same inlet/outlet conditions. When the negative inlet vorticity perturbations become larger in their size, this special behavior uniformly changes into a branch of single equilibrium state for each incoming swirl. The relevance of the results to the appearance of the axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a pipe and the control of this phenomenon using inlet vorticity perturbations is also discussed. The results suggest that, in general, positive inlet azimuthal vorticity perturbations may be used to delay vortex breakdown to higher swirl levels whereas negative perturbations induce the appearance of vortex breakdown at levels below the critical swirl.

1.
M. G.
Hall
, “
Vortex breakdown
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
4
,
195
(
1972
).
2.
S.
Leibovich
, “
Vortex stability and breakdown: survey and extension
,”
AIAA J.
22
,
1192
(
1984
).
3.
M.
Escudier
, “
Vortex breakdown: observations and explanations
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
25
,
189
(
1988
).
4.
T. Sarpkaya, “Vortex breakdown and turbulence,” AIAA Pap. 95-0433 (1995).
5.
Z. Rusak and S. Wang, “Review of theoretical approaches to the vortex breakdown phenomenon,” AIAA Pap. 96-2126 (1996).
6.
H. B. Squire, “Analysis of the vortex breakdown phenomenon,” Miszallaneen der angewandten mechanik (Akademie, Berlin, 1960), pp. 306–312.
7.
T. B.
Benjamin
, “
Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
14
,
593
(
1962
).
8.
S.
Leibovich
, “
Weakly nonlinear waves in rotating fluids
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
42
,
803
(
1970
).
9.
S.
Leibovich
and
A.
Kribus
, “
Large amplitude wavetrains and solitary waves in vortices
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
216
,
459
(
1990
).
10.
J. J.
Keller
,
W.
Egli
, and
W.
Exley
, “
Force- and loss-free transitions between flow states
,”
ZAMP
36
,
854
(
1985
).
11.
S.
Wang
and
Z.
Rusak
, “
The dynamics of a swirling flow in a pipe and transition to axisymmetric vortex breakdown
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
340
,
177
(
1997
).
12.
S.
Wang
and
Z.
Rusak
, “
On the stability of an axisymmetric rotating flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
1007
(
1996
).
13.
S.
Wang
and
Z.
Rusak
, “
On the stability of non-columnar swirling flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
1017
(
1996
).
14.
Z.
Rusak
,
S.
Wang
, and
C. H.
Whiting
, “
The evolution of a perturbed vortex in a pipe to axisymmetric vortex breakdown
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
366
,
211
(
1998
).
15.
P. S.
Beran
and
F. E. C.
Culick
, “
The role of non-uniqueness in the development of vortex breakdown in tube
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
242
,
491
(
1992
).
16.
P. S.
Beran
, “
The time-asymptotic behavior of vortex breakdown in tubes
,”
Comput. Fluids
23
,
913
(
1994
).
17.
J. M.
Lopez
, “
On the bifurcation structure of axisymmetric vortex breakdown in a constricted pipe
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
3683
(
1994
).
18.
D. L.
Darmofal
, “
Comparisons of experimental and numerical results for axisymmetric vortex breakdown in pipes
,”
Comput. Fluids
25
,
353
(
1996
).
19.
M. Golubitsky and D. G. Schaeffer, Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, Vol. I, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), Vol. 51.
20.
S.
Wang
and
Z.
Rusak
, “
The effect of slight viscosity on near critical swirling flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
1914
(
1997
).
21.
Z.
Rusak
,
K. P.
Judd
, and
S.
Wang
, “
The effect of small pipe divergence on near critical swirling flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
2273
(
1997
).
22.
Ch.
Bruecker
and
W.
Althaus
, “
Study of vortex breakdown by particle tracking velocimetry (PTV), part 3: time-dependent structure and development of breakdown modes
,”
Exp. Fluids
18
,
174
(
1995
).
23.
J. C.
Tromp
and
P. S.
Beran
, “
Temporal evolution of three-dimensional vortex breakdown from steady, axisymmetric solutions
,”
AIAA J.
34
,
632
(
1996
).
24.
J. C.
Tromp
and
P. S.
Bean
, “
The role of nonunique axisymmetric solutions in 3-D vortex breakdown
,”
Phys. Fluids
9
,
992
(
1997
).
25.
R. E.
Spall
, “
Transition from spiral- to bubble-type vortex breakdown
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
1330
(
1996
).
26.
A. W. Cary, D. L. Darmofal, and K. G. Powell, “Onset of the spiral mode of vortex breakdown,” AIAA Pap. 97-0439 (1997).
27.
A.
Szeri
and
P.
Holmes
, “
Nonlinear stability of axisymmetric swirling flows
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
326
,
327
(
1988
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.