A methodology termed the “filtered density function” (FDF) is developed and implemented for large eddy simulation (LES) of chemically reacting turbulent flows. In this methodology, the effects of the unresolved scalar fluctuations are taken into account by considering the probability density function (PDF) of subgrid scale (SGS) scalar quantities. A transport equation is derived for the FDF in which the effect of chemical reactions appears in a closed form. The influences of scalar mixing and convection within the subgrid are modeled. The FDF transport equation is solved numerically via a Lagrangian Monte Carlo scheme in which the solutions of the equivalent stochastic differential equations (SDEs) are obtained. These solutions preserve the Itô-Gikhman nature of the SDEs. The consistency of the FDF approach, the convergence of its Monte Carlo solution and the performance of the closures employed in the FDF transport equation are assessed by comparisons with results obtained by direct numerical simulation (DNS) and by conventional LES procedures in which the first two SGS scalar moments are obtained by a finite difference method (LES-FD). These comparative assessments are conducted by implementations of all three schemes (FDF, DNS and LES-FD) in a temporally developing mixing layer and a spatially developing planar jet under both non-reacting and reacting conditions. In non-reacting flows, the Monte Carlo solution of the FDF yields results similar to those via LES-FD. The advantage of the FDF is demonstrated by its use in reacting flows. In the absence of a closure for the SGS scalar fluctuations, the LES-FD results are significantly different from those based on DNS. The FDF results show a much closer agreement with filtered DNS results.

1.
J.
Smagorinsky
, “
General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment
,”
Mon. Weather Rev.
91
,
99
(
1963
).
2.
D. K. Lilly, “The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments,” in Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium Environmental Sciences, IBM Form No. 320-1951 (1967), pp. 195–210.
3.
J. H. Ferziger, “Higher level simulations of turbulent flows,” Stanford University Report No. TF-16, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1981.
4.
P. R. Voke and M. W. Collins, “Large eddy simulation: Retrospect and prospects,” PhysicoChem. Hydrodynam. 4, 119 (1983).
5.
R. S.
Rogallo
and
P.
Moin
, “
Numerical simulation of turbulent flow
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
16
,
99
(
1984
).
6.
W.-H.
Jou
and
J. J.
Riley
, “
Progress in direct numerical simulations of turbulent reacting flows
,”
AIAA J.
27
,
1543
(
1989
).
7.
P.
Givi
, “
Model free simulations of turbulent reactive flows
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
15
,
1
(
1989
).
8.
Whither Turbulence? Turbulence at the Crossroads, Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by J. L. Lumley (Springer, New York, 1990), Vol. 357.
9.
Numerical Approaches to Combustion Modeling, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, edited by E. S. Oran and J. P. Boris (AIAA, New York, 1991), Vol. 135.
10.
P. A. McMurtry and P. Givi, “Spectral simulations of reacting turbulent flows,” in Ref. 9, Chap. 9, pp. 257–303.
11.
Large Eddy Simulations of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows, edited by B. Galperin and S. A. Orszag (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
12.
P. Givi, “Spectral and Random vortex methods in turbulent reacting flows,” in Ref. 19, Chap. 8, pp. 475–572.
13.
D. K.
Lilly
, “
On the computational stability of numerical solutions of time-dependent non-linear geophysical fluid dynamics problems
,”
Mon. Weather Rev.
93
,
11
(
1965
).
14.
M.
Germano
, “
Turbulence: The filtering appraoch
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
238
,
325
(
1992
).
15.
M.
Germano
,
U.
Piomelli
,
P.
Moin
, and
W. H.
Cabot
, “
A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
1760
(
1991
).
16.
S. B. Pope, “Computations of turbulent combustion: Progress and challenges,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium (International) on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1990), pp. 591–612.
17.
U.
Schumann
, “
Large eddy simulation of turbulent diffusion with chemical reactions in the convective boundary layer
,”
Atmos. Environ.
23
,
1713
(
1989
).
18.
Turbulent Reacting Flows, Topics in Applied Physics, edited by P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams (Springer, Heidelberg, 1980), Vol. 44.
19.
Turbulent Reacting Flows, edited by P. A. Libby and F. A. Williams (Academic, London, 1994).
20.
W. P. Jones, “Turbulence Modelling and Numerical Solution Methods for Variable Density and Combusting Flows,” in Ref. 19, Chap. 6, pp. 309–374.
21.
Turbulence in Mixing Operation, edited by R. S. Brodkey (Academic, New York, 1975).
22.
H. L. Toor, “The non-premixed Reaction: A+B→products, in Ref. 21, pp. 123–166.
23.
J. C.
Hill
, “
Homogeneous turbulent mixing with chemical reaction
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
8
,
135
(
1976
).
24.
R. S.
Brodkey
, “
Fundamental of turbulent motion
,”
Chem. Eng. Commun.
8
,
1
(
1981
).
25.
P. A. McMurtry, S. Menon, and A. R. Kerstein, “A linear eddy sub-grid model for turbulent reacting flows: Application to hydrogen-air combustion,” in Proceedings of the 24th Symposium (International) on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1992), pp. 271–278.
26.
P. A.
McMurtry
,
S.
Menon
, and
A. R.
Kerstein
, “
Linear eddy modeling of turbulent combustion
,”
Energy Fuels
7
,
817
(
1993
).
27.
R. I.
Sykes
,
D. S.
Henn
,
S. F.
Parker
, and
W. S.
Lewellen
, “
Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent reacting plume
,”
Atmos. Environ.
26
,
1713
(
1992
).
28.
T. M.
Liou
,
W. Y.
Lien
, and
P. W.
Hwang
, “
Large-eddy simulations of turbulent reacting flows in chamber with gaseous ethylene injecting through the porous wall
,”
Combust. Flame
99
,
591
(
1994
).
29.
S. Menon, P. A. McMurtry, and A. K. Kerstein, “A linear eddy sugbrid model of turbulent combustion,” in Ref. 11, Chap. 14, pp. 287–314.
30.
J. P. Boris, F. F. Grinstein, E. S. Oran, and R. L. Kolbe, “New insights into large eddy simulations,” NRL Report No. NRL/MR/4400-92-6979, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., 1992.
31.
C. Fureby and C. Lofstrom, “Large-eddy simulations of bluff body stabilized flames,” in Proceedings of the 25th Symposium (International) on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1994), pp. 1257–1264.
32.
C. Fureby, E. Lundgren, and S. I. Moller, “Large-eddy simulation of combustion,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Combustion, edited by S. H. Chen (Taylor-Francis, New York, 1996).
33.
A. W.
Cook
,
J. J.
Riley
, and
G.
Kosály
, “
A laminar flamelet approach to subgrid-scale chemistry in turbulent flows
,”
Combust. Flame
109
,
332
(
1997
).
34.
A. W. Cook, J. J. Riley, and S. M. deBruynKops, “A sub-grid model for nonpremixed turbulent combustion,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows (Grenoble, France, 1997), pp. 16.13–16.18.
35.
F. Mathey and J. P. Chollet, “Large eddy simulation of turbulent reactive flows,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows (Grenoble, France, 1997), pp. 16.19–16.24.
36.
N. Branley and W. P. Jones, “Large eddy simulation of a turbulent non-premixed flame,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows (Grenoble, France, 1997), pp. 21.1–21.6.
37.
H. L.
Toor
, “
Mass transfer in dilute turbulent and nonturbulent systems with rapid irreversible reactions and equal diffusivities
,”
AIChE J.
8
,
70
(
1962
).
38.
S. B. Pope, “The statistical theory of turbulent flames,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 291, 529 (1979).
39.
E. E. O’Brien, “The probability density function (PDF) approach to reacting turbulent flows,” in Ref. 18, Chap. 5, pp. 185–218.
40.
S. B.
Pope
, “
PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
11
,
119
(
1985
).
41.
C. Dopazo, “Recent Developments in PDF Methods,” in Ref. 19, Chap. 7, pp. 375–474.
42.
T. S.
Lundgren
, “
Distribution functions in the statistical theory of turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
10
,
969
(
1967
).
43.
C. K. Madnia and P. Givi, “Direct numerical simulation and large edddy simulation of reacting homogeneous turbulence,” in Ref. 11, Chap. 15, pp. 315–346.
44.
A. W.
Cook
and
J. J.
Riley
, “
A subgrid model for equilibrium chemistry in turbulent flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
2868
(
1994
).
45.
S. H. Frankel, V. Adumitroaie, C. K. Madnia, and P. Givi, “Large eddy simulations of turbulent reacting flows by assumed PDF methods,” edited by S. A. Ragab and U. Piomelli, Engineering Applications of Large Eddy Simulations (ASME, New York, 1993), Vol. 162, pp. 81–101.
46.
F.
Gao
and
E. E.
O’Brien
, “
A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows
,”
Phys. Fluids A
5
,
1282
(
1993
).
47.
A. A. Aldama, “Filtering techniques for turbulent flow simulations,” Lecture Notes in Engineering (Springer, New York, 1990), Vol. 49.
48.
B.
Vreman
,
B.
Geurts
, and
H.
Kuerten
, “
Realizability conditions for the turbulent stress tensor in large-eddy simulation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
278
,
351
(
1994
).
49.
T. A. Zang and U. Piomelli, “Large eddy simulation of transitional flow,” in Ref. 11, Chap. 11, pp. 209–227.
50.
R. M.
Kerr
,
J. A.
Domaradzki
, and
G.
Barbier
, “
Small-scale properties of nonlinear interactions and subgrid-scale energy transfer in isotropic turbulence
,”
Phys. Fluids
8
,
197
(
1996
).
51.
J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds, “Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulations of homogeneous, incompressible, turbulent flows,” Department of Mechanical Engineering Report No. TF-19, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1983.
52.
T. M.
Eidson
, “
Numerical simulation of the turbulent Rayleigh-Benard problem using subgrid modelling
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
158
,
245
(
1985
).
53.
C.
Dopazo
and
E. E.
O’Brien
, “
Statistical treatment of non-isothermal chemical reactions in turbulence
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
13
,
99
(
1976
).
54.
R.
Borghi
, “
Turbulent combustion modeling
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
14
,
245
(
1988
).
55.
S. B.
Pope
, “
A Monte Carlo method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flow
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
25
,
159
(
1981
).
56.
S. B.
Pope
, “
Lagrangian PDF methods for turbulent flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
26
,
23
(
1994
).
57.
A. J. Chorin and J. E. Marsden, A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1979).
58.
A.
Leonard
, “
Vortex methods for flow simulation
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
37
,
289
(
1980
).
59.
A. Majda, “Vortex dynamics: Numerical analysis, scientific computing, and mathematical theory,” in ICIAM ’87, edited by J. McKenna and R. Temam (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 153–182.
60.
T.
Sarpkaya
, “
Computational methods with vortices—The 1988 Freeman Scholar Lecture
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
111
,
5
(
1989
).
61.
A. F. Ghoniem, “Vortex simulation of reacting shear flow,” in Ref. 9, Chap. 10, pp. 305–348.
62.
Vortex Methods and Vortex Motion, edited by K. E. Gustafson and J. A. Sethian (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1991).
63.
H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation, Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer, New York, 1989).
64.
C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods (Springer, New York, 1990).
65.
S. Karlin and H. M. Taylor, A Second Course in Stochastic Processes (Academic, New York, 1981).
66.
P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Applications of Mathematics, Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability (Springer, New York, 1995), Vol. 23.
67.
P. Billingsly, Probability and Measure (Wiley, New York, 1979).
68.
E.
Helfand
, “
Numerical integration of stochastic differential equations
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
58
,
2289
(
1979
).
69.
D. T. Gillespie, Markov Processes, An Introduction for Physical Scientists (Academic, New York, 1992).
70.
K. Itô, On Stochastic Differential Equations, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society (American Math Society, Providence, 1951), Vol. 4.
71.
I. I. Gikhman and A. V. Skorokhod, Stochastic Differential Equations (Springer, New York, 1972).
72.
M. H. Carpenter, “A high-order compact numerical algorithm for supersonic flows,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by K. W. Morton (Springer, New York, 1990), Vol. 371, pp. 254–258.
73.
R. W. MacCormack, The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Catering, AIAA Paper 69-354, 1969.
74.
J. J.
Riley
,
R. W.
Metcalfe
, and
S. A.
Orszag
, “
Direct numerical simulations of chemically reacting mixing layers
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
406
(
1986
).
75.
J. J. Riley and P. A. McMurtry, “The use of direct numerical simulation in the study of turbulent chemically reacting flows,” edited by R. Borghi and S. N. B. Murthy, Turbulent Reactive Flows, Lecture Notes in Engineering (Springer, New York, 1989), pp. 486–514.
76.
P. Givi and J. J. Riley, “Some current issues in the analysis of reacting shear layers: Computational challenges,” edited by M. Y. Hussaini, A. Kumar, and R. G. Voigt, Major Research Topics in Combustion, (Springer, New York, 1992), pp. 588–650.
77.
P. A. McMurtry and P. Givi, “Direct numerical simulations of a reacting, turbulent mixing layer by a pseudospectral-spectral element method,” edited by T. J. Chung, Finite Elements in Fluids (Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1992), Chap. 14, pp. 361–384.
78.
C. J.
Steinberger
,
T. J.
Vidoni
, and
P.
Givi
, “
The compositional structure and the effects of exothermicity in a nonpremixed planar jet flame
,”
Combust. Flame
94
,
217
(
1993
).
79.
R. D.
Moser
and
M. M.
Rogers
, “
Mixing transition and the cascade of small scales in a plane mixing layer
,”
Phys. Fluids A
3
,
1128
(
1991
).
80.
R. S.
Miller
,
C. K.
Madnia
, and
P.
Givi
, “
Structure of a turbulent reacting mixing layer
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
99
,
1
(
1994
).
81.
G.
Erlebacher
,
M. Y.
Hussaini
,
C. G.
Speziale
, and
T. A.
Zang
, “
Toward the large eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
238
,
155
(
1992
).
82.
L. Arnold, Stochastic Differential Equations: Theory and Applications (Krieger, Malbar, 1974).
83.
T. T. Soong, Random Differential Equations in Science and Engineering (Academic, New York, 1973).
84.
A.
Leonard
, “
Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows
,”
Adv. Geophys.
18A
,
237
(
1974
).
85.
M.
Germano
, “
A proposal for a redefinition of the turbulent stresses in the filtered Navier-Stokes equations
,”
Phys. Fluids
29
,
2323
(
1986
).
86.
A. D. Leonard and F. Dai, “Applications of a coupled Monte Carlo PDF/finite volume CFD method for turbulent combustion,” AIAA Paper No. 94-2904, 1994.
87.
S. B.
Pope
, “
On the relation between stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulence and second-moment closures
,”
Phys. Fluids
6
,
973
(
1994
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.