A previous numerical study by Davis and Moore of vortex shedding from rectangles in infinite domains is extended to include the effects of confining walls. The major changes to the numerical modeling are the addition of a direct solver for the pressure equation and the use of an infinite‐to‐finite mapping downstream of the rectangle. The parameters in the problem are now Reynolds number, rectangle aspect ratio, blockage ratio, and upstream velocity profile. As each of these is varied, the effects upon the forces acting on the rectangle and the structure of the wake are discussed. Streakline plots composed of multishaped passive marker particles provide a clear visualization of the vortices. These plots are compared with smoke‐wire photographs taken from a wind tunnel test. Strouhal numbers obtained both computationally and experimentally are compared for two values of the blockage ratio. Moving recirculation zones which appear between the wake and the walls are discussed.

1.
R. W.
Davis
and
E. F.
Moore
,
J. Fluid Mech.
116
,
475
(
1982
).
2.
F. H.
Shair
,
A. S.
Grove
,
E. E.
Petersen
, and
A.
Acrivos
,
J. Fluid Mech.
17
,
546
(
1963
).
3.
H.
Nagata
,
Y.
Kakehi
,
M.
Tsunekawa
, and
T.
Hasegawa
,
Bull. JSME
18
,
992
(
1975
).
4.
T.
Okamoto
and
M.
Takeuchi
,
Bull. JSME
18
,
1011
(
1975
).
5.
A.
Richter
and
E.
Naudascher
,
J. Fluid Mech.
78
,
561
(
1976
).
6.
C.
Farell
,
S.
Carrasquel
,
O.
Güven
, and
V.
Patel
,
J. Fluids Eng.
99
,
470
(
1977
).
7.
G. S.
West
and
C. J.
Apelt
,
J. Fluid Mech.
114
,
361
(
1982
).
8.
A. S.
Ramamurthy
and
P. M.
Lee
,
J. Sound Vib.
31
,
443
(
1973
).
9.
J.
Courchesne
and
A.
Laneville
,
J. Fluids Eng.
101
,
506
(
1979
).
10.
D. T.
Knauss
,
J. E. A.
John
, and
C. H.
Marks
,
J. Hydronaut.
10
,
121
(
1976
).
11.
A.
Okajima
,
J. Fluid Mech.
123
,
379
(
1982
).
12.
B. P.
Leonard
,
Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.
19
,
59
(
1979
).
13.
L. P. Purtell and P. S. Klebanoff, National Bureau of Standards Technical Note No. 989, 1979.
14.
P. J. Roache, Computational Fluid Dynamics (Hermosa, Albuquerque, NM, 1976).
15.
M. A.
Leschziner
,
Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.
23
,
293
(
1980
).
16.
P.
Le Quere
,
J. A. C.
Humphrey
, and
F. S.
Sherman
,
Num. Heat Trans.
4
,
249
(
1981
).
17.
J. P.
Huffenus
and
D.
Khaletzky
,
Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids
1
,
365
(
1981
).
18.
M. A.
Leschziner
and
W.
Rodi
,
J. Fluid Eng.
103
,
352
(
1981
).
19.
T.
Han
,
J. A. C.
Humphrey
, and
B. E.
Launder
,
Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng.
29
,
81
(
1981
).
20.
P. Swarztrauber and R. Sweet, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Technical Note No. IA‐109, 1975.
21.
P. N.
Swarztrauber
,
SIAM J. Num. Anal.
11
,
1136
(
1974
).
22.
B. L.
Buzbee
,
F. W.
Dorr
,
J. A.
George
, and
G. H.
Golub
,
SIAM J. Num. Anal.
8
,
722
(
1971
).
23.
R.
Breidenthal
,
J. Fluid Mech.
109
,
1
(
1981
).
24.
R. W. Davis and E. F. Moore, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow, Venice, Italy, 1981, edited by C. Taylor and B. A. Schrefler (Pineridge, Swansea, Wales, 1981), p. 279.
25.
B.
Cantwell
,
Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.
13
,
457
(
1981
).
26.
H. R.
Baum
,
R. G.
Rehm
,
P. D.
Barnett
, and
D. M.
Corley
,
SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp.
4
,
117
(
1983
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.