In thin film technology, substrate materials happen to be one of the deposition parameters that determine the physical properties of films. Hence, soda-lime glass and quartz continue to be the widely utilized substrate materials because of their high-frequency performance, price, and surface quality. For certain applications, various substrate materials that provide an acceptable compromise for the work at hand are required. Soda-lime glass and quartz have been chosen as the substrates for the tin and chromium thin films that will be produced via thermal evaporation in a vacuum. A comparative study on the electrical properties of chromium films was made in the light of Fuchs–Sondheimer and Mayadas–Shatzkes theories. Numerous physical properties, including resistivity of infinitely thick film, sticking coefficient, conduction electron mean free, etc., may be determined from resistivity-thickness data.

1.
J.
Krzak-Roś
,
J.
Filipiak
,
C.
Pezowicz
,
A.
Baszczuk
,
M.
Miller
,
M.
Kowalski
, and
R.
Będziński
,
Acta Bioeng. Biomech.
11
,
21
(
2009
).
2.
M.
Cao
,
L.
Li
,
B. L.
Zhang
,
J.
Huang
,
K.
Tang
,
H.
Cao
,
Y.
Sun
, and
Y.
Shen
,
J. Alloys Compd.
530
,
81
(
2012
).
3.
A.
Mir
,
M.
Ikram
, and
Ravi
Kumar
, “
Impact of substrate on some physical properties of PrFe0.5Ni0.5O3 thin films
,”
Solid State Sci.
13
,
1994
(
2011
).
4.
L. U.
Shiva
,
N. H.
Ayachit
,
L. A.
Udachan
,
A. V.
Banagar
,
S. S.
Kolkundi
, and
S. S.
Bhairamadagi
, “
Influence of substrates on the electrical properties of thin tin films
,”
Bulg. J. Phys.
45
,
035
(
2018
).
5.
S. L.
Udachan
,
N. H.
Ayachit
, and
L. A.
Udachan
,
Ing. Univ.
23
, 1 (
2019
).
6.
HSn
,
NIST Chemistry WebBook
. (
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
2013
).
7.
W. W.
Coblentz
and
R.
Stair
,
Reflecting power of beryllium, chromium, and several other metals, national institute of standards and technology
(
NIST Publications
,
2018
).
8.
E. A.
Brandes
,
H. T.
Greenaway
, and
H. E. N.
Stone
, “
Ductility in chromium
,”
Nature
178
,
587
(
1956
).
9.
M. A.
Angadi
and
L. A.
Udachan
,
Thin Solid Films
78
,
299
(
1981
).
10.
M. K.
Thakur
,
H. K.
Singh
,
V. N.
Singh
,
Om Pal
Singh
,
Karuna
Thakur
,
Kuldeep Singh
Gaur
,
N.
Muhanthan
,
Sandeep
Singh
,
Dinesh
Singh
, and
N.
Vijayan
,
Adv. Mater. Lett.
7
,
525
(
2016
).
11.
M. Ali
Omer
,
Elementary Solid State Physics
, (
Pearson Education, Inc. and Dorling Kindersley
,
New Delhi, India
,
2012
).
12.
A. F.
Mayadas
and
M.
Shatzkes
,
Phys. Rev. B
1
,
1382
(
1970
).
13.
14.
S. M.
Shivaprasad
,
L. A.
Udachan
, and
M. A.
Angadi
,
Phys. Lett.
78A
,
187
(
1980
).
15.
P. V.
Ashrit
and
M. A.
Angadi
,
J. Less Common Met.
72
,
317
(
1980
).
16.
S. M.
Shivaprasad
,
L. A.
Udachan
, and
M. A.
Angadi
,
Thin Solid Films
71
,
L1
(
1980
).
17.
P. V.
Ashrit
,
S. M.
Shivaprasad
, and
M. A.
Angadi
,
Thin Solid Films
72
,
L5
(
1980
).
18.
P. V.
Ashrit
and
M. A.
Angadi
,
J. Less Common Met.
75
,
147
(
1980
).
19.
M. A.
Angadi
and
L. A.
Udachan
,
Thin Solid Films
79
,
149
(
1981
).
20.
K. L.
Chopra
,
Thin Films Phenomena
(
MG-Hill
,
New York
,
1969
).
21.
Hand Book of Physics and Chemistry
(
Chemical Rubber Company Press
,
Cleveland, Ohio
,
1974
).
22.
M. A.
Angadi
and
L. A.
Udachan
, “
The effect of the deposition rate on the electrical resistivity of thin tin films
,”
Thin Solid Films
78
,
299
(
1980
).
You do not currently have access to this content.