The large penetration of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems at low voltage (LV) networks has started to introduce new challenges to distribution network operators. With the emergence of smart grid technology, the demand response (DR) has been identified as one of the promising approaches for network operators to increase operational flexibility, particularly in the presence of renewable energy resources. Therefore, it is important to investigate how DR applications at a LV consumer level can help to improve network performance. However, so far, only a limited number of works have addressed the implications of DR at LV networks with a PV system. The parametric analysis of the benefits of DR has not been adequately addressed for LV networks with multiple DR-PV interaction scenarios. In this regard, three case studies have been considered in this work, namely, consumers who respond to their own demand profile, consumers who respond to the PV generation profile, and the optimized demand response from consumers. The fractal-based approach has been utilized to model a large number of urban LV networks. Subsequently, the particle swarm optimization technique is utilized to model individual consumers' optimized DR profiles. Comprehensive network case studies are performed considering 100 urban LV network samples under the influence of different DR-PV scenarios. The results suggest that with 100% PV penetration, DR applications at a residential consumer level can achieve 32% peak reduction, reduce network losses by 42%, and achieve 12% load factor increment for the optimized demand response case.

1.
I.
Babić
,
Ž.
Đurišić
, and
M.
Žarković
, “
Analysis of impact of building integrated photovoltaic systems on distribution network losses
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
7
(
4
),
043119
(
2015
).
2.
R.
Tonkoski
,
D.
Turcotte
, and
T. H. M.
El-Fouly
, “
Impact of high PV penetration on voltage profiles in residential neighborhoods
,”
IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy
3
(
3
),
518
527
(
2012
).
3.
L. F.
Ochoa
and
G. P.
Harrison
, “
Minimizing energy losses: Optimal accommodation and smart operation of renewable distributed generation
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
26
(
1
),
198
205
(
2011
).
4.
G.
Strbac
, “
Demand side management: Benefits and challenges
,”
Energy Policy
36
(
12
),
4419
4426
(
2008
).
5.
D. T. C.
Wang
,
L. F.
Ochoa
, and
G. P.
Harrison
, “
DG impact on investment deferral: Network planning and security of supply
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
25
(
2
),
1134
1141
(
2010
).
6.
A.
Zakariazadeh
,
S.
Jadid
, and
P.
Siano
, “
Smart microgrid energy and reserve scheduling with demand response using stochastic optimization
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
63
,
523
533
(
2014
).
7.
Y.
Zhou
,
P.
Mancarella
, and
J.
Mutale
, “
Modelling and assessment of the contribution of demand response and electrical energy storage to adequacy of supply
,”
Sustainable Energy, Grids Networks
3
,
12
23
(
2015
).
8.
O.
Malik
and
P.
Havel
, “
Active demand-side management system to facilitate integration of res in low-voltage distribution networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy
5
(
2
),
673
681
(
2014
).
9.
A.
Safdarian
,
M.
Fotuhi Firuzabad
, and
M.
Lehtonen
, “
Impacts of time-varying electricity rates on forward contract scheduling of DisCos
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
29
(
2
),
733
741
(
2014
).
10.
See http://www.epri.com/abstracts/pages/productabstract.aspx?ProductID=000000000001016987 for “Assessment of Achievable Potential from Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the U.S. (2010–2030), Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).”
11.
B.
Zeng
,
J.
Zhang
,
X.
Yang
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Dong
, and
Y.
Zhang
, “
Integrated planning for transition to low-carbon distribution system with renewable energy generation and demand response
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
29
(
3
),
1153
1165
(
2014
).
12.
A.
Safdarian
,
M.
Fotuhi-Firuzabad
, and
M.
Lehtonen
, “
Benefits of demand response on operation of distribution networks: A case study
,”
IEEE Syst. J.
10
(
1
),
189
197
(
2016
).
13.
J.
Jargstorf
,
C.
De Jonghe
, and
R.
Belmans
, “
Assessing the reflectivity of residential grid tariffs for a user reaction through photovoltaics and battery storage
,”
Sustainable Energy, Grids Networks
1
,
85
98
(
2015
).
14.
D. T.
Nguyen
,
H. T.
Nguyen
,
S.
Member
,
L. B.
Le
, and
S.
Member
, “
Dynamic pricing design for demand response integration in power distribution networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
31
(
5
),
3457
3472
(
2016
).
15.
P.
Palensky
and
D.
Dietrich
, “
Demand side management: Demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf.
7
(
3
),
381
388
(
2011
).
16.
E.
Yao
,
P.
Samadi
,
V. W. S.
Wong
, and
R.
Schober
, “
Residential demand side management under high penetration of rooftop photovoltaic units
,”
IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
7
(
3
),
1597
1608
(
2016
).
17.
J.
Saebi
and
M.
Hossein Javidi
, “
Economic evaluation of demand response in power systems with high wind power penetration
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
6
(
3
),
033141
(
2014
).
18.
J. P.
Green
,
S. A.
Smith
, and
G.
Strbac
, “
Evaluation of electricity distribution system design strategies
,”
IEE Proc. Gener., Transm. Distrib.
146
(
1
),
53
(
1999
).
19.
C. K.
Gan
,
P.
Mancarella
,
D.
Pudjianto
, and
G.
Strbac
, “
Statistical appraisal of economic design strategies of LV distribution networks
,”
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
81
(
7
),
1363
1372
(
2011
).
20.
C. K.
Gan
,
D.
Pudjianto
,
P.
Djapic
, and
G.
Strbac
, “
Strategic assessment of alternative design options for multivoltage-level distribution networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
29
,
1261
1269
(
2014
).
21.
TNB,
Electricity Supply Application Handbook
, 3rd ed. (
Distribution Division
,
TNB
,
2011
).
22.
R. C.
Dugan
and
T. E.
McDermott
, “
An open source platform for collaborating on smart grid research
,” in
IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
(
2011
), pp.
1
7
.
23.
H. L.
Willis
,
Power Distribution Planning Reference Book
(
CRC Press
,
2004
).
24.
I.
Richardson
,
M.
Thomson
,
D.
Infield
, and
C.
Clifford
, “
Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model
,”
Energy Build.
42
(
10
),
1878
1887
(
2010
).
25.
A. H.
Azit
and
K. M.
Nor
, “
Optimal sizing for a gas-fired grid-connected cogeneration system planning
,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.
24
(
4
),
950
958
(
2009
).
26.
P. H.
Tan
,
C. K.
Gan
, and
K. A.
Baharin
, “
Techno-economic analysis of rooftop PV system in UTeM Malaysia
,” in
3rd IET International Conference on Clean Energy and Technology (CEAT)
(IET,
2014
), pp.
1
6
.
27.
K. A.
Baharin
,
H. A.
Rahman
,
M. Y.
Hassan
, and
C. K.
Gan
,
MFS
. “
Quantifying variability for grid-connected photovoltaics in the tropics for microgrid application
,”
in
Applied Energy Symposium and Forum
, REM2016: Renewable Energy Integration with Mini/Microgrid (
2016
).
28.
SEDA, www.seda.gov.my for “Sustainable Energy Development Authority Malaysia,” 2015.
29.
C. K.
Gan
,
M.
Shamshiri
, and
D.
Pudjianto
, “
Integration of PV system into LV distribution networks with demand response application
,” in
IEEE Conference Eindhoven (PowerTech)
(
2015
), pp.
1
6
.
30.
See https://www.tnb.com.my/commercial-industrial/malaysian-grid-code for “Malaysian Grid Code - Tenaga Nasional Berhad.”
31.
M. T.
Au
,
M.
Yusoff
,
A.
Busrah
, and
M.
Mohamad
, “
A simplified approach in estimating technical losses in TNB distribution network based on load profile and feeder characteristics
,” in
8th WSEAS International Conference on Management, Marketing and Finances
(
2010
), pp.
99
105
.
32.
T.
Gonen
,
Electric Power Distribution System Engineering
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1986
), p.
740
.
33.
H. A.
Aalami
,
M. P.
Moghaddam
, and
G. R.
Yousefi
, “
Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets
,”
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
80
(
4
),
426
435
(
2010
).
You do not currently have access to this content.