Renewable energy sources (RES) can be a significant source of profit. However, different RES projects can bring various benefits to their investors, raising the question—Which RES project to select? The objective of this study is to provide answers to two questions: (1) Which factors/criteria should be used in the RES project selection procedure; (2) Which RES project should the investor select out of a group of prospective projects? The study was conducted in a company operating in the energy sector in Serbia. In order to find answers to the above-mentioned questions, the study employed a hybrid methodology integrating the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). First, the Company's management defined the goal and project alternatives. The goal was to select an optimal RES project suitable for the specific circumstances in the Serbian energy sector, and also for the Company's potentials. The alternatives included: a hydro energy project, a solar energy project, a wind energy project (WEP), and a biomass energy project. Then, the decision-making group was formed, consisting of four company's experts (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the decision-makers”), of different professional backgrounds and affiliations. Second, the decision-makers employed SWOT analysis on the RES projects in Serbia to obtain the decision-making criteria. The decision-making procedure has to be based on 20 SWOT factors. However, each criterion is not of equal importance for investors. This shortcoming has been overcome by introducing AHP. Pairwise comparison was performed using the Expert Choice 2000 software. According to the results, the top-ranking project is the WEP.

1.
Aragonés-Beltrán
,
P.
,
Chaparro-González
,
F.
,
Pastor-Ferrando
,
J. P.
, and
Rodríguez-Pozo
,
F.
, “
An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
14
,
249
264
(
2010
).
2.
Aras
,
H.
,
Erdoğmuş
,
Ş.
, and
Koç
,
E.
, “
Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process
,”
Renewable Energy
29
,
1383
1392
(
2004
).
3.
Bas
,
E.
, “
The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: The case of Turkey
,”
Int. J. Electric. Power Energy Syst.
44
(
1
),
897
907
(
2013
).
4.
Cavallaro
,
F.
, “
A comparative assessment of thin-film photovoltaic production processes using the ELECTRE III method
,”
Energy Policy
38
,
463
474
(
2010
).
5.
Charters
,
W. W. S.
, “
Developing markets for renewable energy technologies
,”
Renewable Energy
22
,
217
222
(
2001
).
7.
Dincer
,
I.
, “
Environmental impacts of energy
,”
Energy Policy
27
,
845
854
(
1999
).
8.
Energy Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia by 2025 with Projections Until 2030, Government of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Report No. 101,
2015
.
9.
Eslamipoor
,
R.
and
Sepehriar
,
A.
, “
Firm relocation as a potential solution for environment improvement using a SWOT-AHP hybrid method
,”
Process Saf. Environ. Prot.
92
(
3
),
269
276
(
2014
).
10.
Haralambopoulos
,
D. A.
and
Polatidis
,
H.
, “
Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework
,”
Renewable Energy
28
(
6
),
961
973
(
2003
).
11.
Höfer
,
T. M.
,
Sunak
,
Y.
,
Siddique
,
H.
, and
Madlener
,
R.
, “
Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen
,”
Appl. Energy
163
(
1
),
222
243
(
2016
).
12.
Houben
,
G.
,
Lenie
,
K.
, and
Vanhoof
,
K.
, “
A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises
,”
Decis. Support Syst.
26
(
2
),
125
135
(
1999
).
13.
Jaber
,
J. O.
,
Elkarmi
,
F.
,
Alasis
,
E.
, and
Kostas
,
A.
, “
Employment of renewable energy in Jordan: Current status, SWOT and problem analysis
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
49
,
490
499
(
2015
).
14.
Jovanović
,
B.
,
Filipović
,
J.
, and
Bakić
,
V.
, “
Prioritization of manufacturing sectors in Serbia for energy management improvement-AHP method
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
98
,
225
235
(
2015
).
15.
Kablan
,
M. M.
, “
Decision support for energy conservation promotion: An analytic hierarchy process approach
,”
Energy Policy
32
(
10
),
1151
1158
(
2004
).
16.
Kahraman
,
C.
,
Kaya
,
I.
, and
Cebi
,
S.
, “
A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
,”
Energy
34
(
10
),
1603
1616
(
2009
).
17.
Kajanus
,
M.
,
Kangas
,
J.
, and
Kurttila
,
M.
, “
The use of value focused thinking and the A'WOT hybrid method in tourism management
,”
Tourism Manage.
25
(
4
),
499
506
(
2004
).
18.
Kumar
,
A.
,
Shankar
,
R.
, and
Debnath
,
R. M.
, “
Analyzing customer preference and measuring relative efficiency in telecom sector: A hybrid fuzzy AHP/DEA study
,”
Telematics Inf.
32
(
3
),
447
462
(
2015
).
19.
Kurttila
,
M.
,
Pesonen
,
U. M.
,
Kangas
,
J.
, and
Kajanus
,
M.
, “
Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis—A hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case
,”
For. Policy Econ.
1
(
1
),
41
52
(
2000
).
20.
Lee
,
A. H. I.
,
Chen
,
H. H.
, and
Kang
,
H.
, “
Multi-criteria decision-making on strategic selection of wind farms
,”
Renewable Energy
34
(
1
),
120
126
(
2009
).
21.
Lee
,
S.
and
Walsh
,
P.
, “
SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport
,”
Sport Manage. Rev.
14
(
4
),
361
369
(
2011
).
22.
Masozera
,
M. K.
,
Alavalapati
,
J. R. R.
,
Jacobson
,
S. K.
, and
Shrestha
,
R. K.
, “
Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda
,”
For. Policy Econ.
8
(
2
),
206
216
(
2006
).
23.
Mehmood
,
F.
,
Hassannezhad
,
M.
, and
Abbas
,
T.
, “
Analytical investigation of mobile NFC adaption with SWOT-AHP approach: A case of Italian Telecom
,”
Procedia Technol.
12
,
535
541
(
2014
).
24.
Mosadeghi
,
R.
,
Warnken
,
J.
,
Tomlinson
,
R.
, and
Mirfenderesk
,
H.
, “
Comparison of fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning
,”
Comput., Environ. Urban Syst.
49
,
54
65
(
2015
).
25.
Reinsberger
,
K.
,
Brudermann
,
T.
,
Hatzl
,
S.
,
Fleiss
,
E.
, and
Posch
,
A.
, “
Photovoltaic diffusion from bottom-up: Analytical investigation of critical factors
,”
Appl. Energy
159
,
178
187
(
2015a
).
26.
Reinsberger
,
K.
,
Brudermann
,
T.
, and
Posch
,
A.
, “
The role of photovoltaics in energy transition: An integrated SWOT-AHP approach
,”
GAIA
24
(
1
),
49
55
(
2015b
).
27.
Ren
,
J.
,
Dong
,
L.
,
Sun
,
L.
,
Goodsite
,
M. E.
,
Dong
,
L.
,
Luo
,
X.
, and
Sovacool
,
B. K.
, “
“Supply push” or “demand pull?”: Strategic recommendations for the responsible development of biofuel in China
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
52
,
382
392
(
2015a
).
28.
Ren
,
J.
,
Gao
,
S.
,
Tan
,
S.
, and
Dong
,
L.
, “
Hydrogen economy in China: Strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats analysis and strategies prioritization
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
41
,
1230
1243
(
2015b
).
29.
Ren
,
J.
and
Lützen
,
M.
, “
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for technology selection for emissions reduction from shipping under uncertainties
,”
Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ.
40
,
43
60
(
2015
).
30.
Ren
,
J.
,
Manzardo
,
A.
,
Mazzi
,
A.
,
Zuliani
,
F.
, and
Scipioni
,
A.
, “
Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making
,”
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
20
(
6
),
842
853
(
2015c
).
31.
Ren
,
J.
and
Sovacool
,
B.
, “
Prioritizing low-carbon energy sources to enhance China's energy security
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
92
,
129
136
(
2015
).
32.
REN21
,
Renewables 2014 Global Status Report
(
REN21 Secretariat
,
Paris
,
2014
).
33.
Taha
,
R. A.
and
Daim
,
T.
, in
Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry
, edited by
T.
Daim
,
T.
Oliver
, and
J.
Kim
(
Springer
,
London
,
2013
), pp.
17
30
.
34.
Saaty
,
T. L.
, “
The analytic hierarchy process: A 1993 overview
,”
Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. Econ.
2
(
2
),
119
137
(
1993
).
35.
Saaty
,
T.
, “
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure
,”
J. Math. Psychol.
15
(
3
),
234
281
(
1977
).
36.
Saaty
,
T.
, “
Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
,”
Int. J. Conserv. Sci.
1
,
83
98
(
2008
).
37.
San Cristobal
,
J. R.
, “
Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method
,”
Renewable Energy
36
(
2
),
498
502
(
2011
).
38.
Shahabi
,
R. S.
,
Basiri
M. H.
,
Kahag
,
M. R.
, and
Zonouzi
,
S. A.
, “
An ANP SWOT approach for interdependency analysis and prioritizing the Iran's steels crap industry strategies
,”
Resour. Policy
42
,
18
26
(
2014
).
39.
Sharma
,
M. J.
,
Moon
,
I.
, and
Bae
,
H.
, “
Analytic hierarchy process to assess and optimize distribution network
,”
Appl. Math. Comput.
202
(
1
),
256
265
(
2008
).
40.
Shi
,
X.
, “
The future of ASEAN energy mix: A SWOT analysis
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
53
,
672
680
(
2016
).
41.
Shinno
,
H.
,
Yoshioka
,
H.
,
Marpaung
,
S.
, and
Hachiga
,
S.
, “
Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry
,”
J. Eng. Des.
17
(
3
),
251
258
(
2006
).
42.
Shrestha
,
R. K.
,
Alavalapati
,
J. R. R.
, and
Kalmbacher
,
R. S.
, “
Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: An application of SWOT-AHP method
,”
Agric. Syst.
81
(
3
),
185
199
(
2004
).
43.
Štreimikienė
,
D.
,
Šliogerienė
,
J.
, and
Turskis
,
Z.
, “
Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania
,”
Renewable Energy
85
,
148
156
(
2016
).
44.
Saaty
,
T. L.
,
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
(
McGraw Hill International
,
New York
,
1980
).
45.
Tasri
,
A.
and
Susilawati
,
A.
, “
Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia
,”
Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess.
7
,
34
44
(
2014
).
46.
Tavana
,
M.
,
Pirdashti
,
M.
,
Kennedy
,
D. T.
,
Belaud
,
J.
, and
Behzadian
,
M.
, “
A hybrid Delphi-SWOT paradigm for oil and gas pipeline strategic planning in Caspian Sea basin
,”
Energy Policy
40
,
345
60
(
2012
).
47.
Terrados
,
J.
,
Almonacid
,
G.
, and
Hontoria
,
L.
, “
Regional energy planning through SWOT analysis and strategic planning tools. Impact on renewables development
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
11
,
1275
1287
(
2007
).
48.
The National Action Plan for Renewable Energy of the Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection, Belgrade, Report No. 53,
2013
.
49.
Yavuz
,
F.
and
Baycan
,
T.
, “
Use of SWOT and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management
,”
Procedia Technol.
8
,
134
143
(
2013
).
50.
Zare
,
K.
,
Mehri-Tekmeh
,
J.
, and
Karimi
,
S.
, “
A SWOT framework for analyzing the electricity supply chain using an integrated AHP methodology combined with fuzzy-TOPSIS
,”
Int. Strategic Manage. Rev.
3
(
1–2
),
66
80
(
2015
).
You do not currently have access to this content.