This paper presents a new type of composite bucket foundation (CBF) for offshore wind turbines, which can be adapted to the loading characteristics and development needs of offshore wind farms due to its special structural form. There are seven rooms divided inside the CBF by steel bulkheads, which are arranged in a honeycomb structure. The six peripheral rooms with the skirt have the same proportions while the middle orthohexagonal one is a little larger. With the seven-room structure, the CBF has reasonable motion characteristics and towing reliability during the wet-tow construction process. Through extensive research into the force transfer characteristics of composite structure systems, a composite bucket foundation structure system with a curved transition part has been developed. The large bending moment and horizontal force of the wind turbine tower are transferred to and dispersed into the sea floor soil through a prestressed curved concrete transition section, the top cover of the bucket foundation, the bucket skirts, and the internal steel compartment plates. Particularly, this proposed CBF structure can effectively convert the extremely large bending moment of the turbine tower to limited tensile and compressive stresses within the foundation structure via a transition section.

1.
F. A.
Senders
, “
Suction caissons in sand as tripod foundations for offshore wind turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis (
University of Western Australia
,
2008
).
2.
H.
Yu
,
X. W.
Zeng
, and
J. J.
Lian
, “
Seismic behavior of offshore wind turbine with gravity base
,” in
Geo-Congress Technical Papers
(
2014
), pp.
1206
1214
.
3.
R.
Liu
,
L.
Zhou
,
J. J.
Lian
, and
H. Y.
Ding
, “
Behavior of monopile foundations for offshore wind farms in sand
,”
J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
142
,
04015010
(
2016
).
4.
H.
Yu
,
X. W.
Zeng
,
B.
Li
, and
J. J.
Lian
, “
Centrifuge modeling of offshore wind foundations under earthquake loading
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng.
77
,
402
415
(
2015
).
5.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
C. H.
Le
, “
Model tests on tilt adjustment techniques for a mooring dolphin platform with three suction caisson foundations in clay
,”
Ocean Eng.
73
,
96
105
(
2013
).
6.
H.
Yu
,
X. W.
Zeng
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Seismic centrifuge modelling of offshore wind turbine with tripod foundation
,”
J. Energy Power Eng.
8
(
3
),
470
475
(
2014
).
7.
B.
Zhu
,
B. W.
Byrne
, and
G. T.
Houlsby
, “
Long term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron.
139
(
1
),
73
83
(
2013
).
8.
M.
Achmus
,
C. T.
Akdag
, and
K.
Thieken
, “
Load-bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations in sand
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
43
,
157
165
(
2013
).
9.
G. T.
Houlsby
and
B. W.
Byrne
, “
Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines and anemometer masts
,”
J. Wind Eng.
24
(
4
),
249
255
(
2000
).
10.
L. B.
Ibsen
,
K. A.
Larsen
, and
A.
Barari
, “
Calibration of failure criteria for bucket foundations on drained sand under general loading
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.
140
(
7
),
04014033
(
2014
).
11.
O.
Cotter
, “
The installation of suction caisson foundations for offshore renewable energy structures
,” Ph.D. thesis (
Oxford University
,
2010
).
12.
S.
Madsen
,
L. V.
Andersen
, and
L. B.
Ibsen
, “
Numerical buckling analysis of large suction caissons for wind turbines on deep water
,”
Eng. Struct.
57
,
443
452
(
2013
).
13.
M. N.
Tran
,
M. F.
Randolph
, and
D. W.
Airey
, “
Installation of bucket foundations in sand with silt layers
,”
J. Geotech. Geoenviron.
133
(
10
),
1183
1191
(
2007
).
14.
K.
Thieken
,
M.
Achmus
, and
C.
Schröder
, “
On the behavior of suction buckets in sand under tensile loads
,”
Comput. Geotech.
60
,
88
100
(
2014
).
15.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
C. H.
Le
, “
Installation and removal records of field trials for two mooring dolphin platforms with three suction caissons
,”
J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng.
139
(
6
),
502
517
(
2013
).
16.
B.
Zhu
,
D. Q.
Kong
,
R. P.
Chen
,
L. G.
Kong
, and
Y. M.
Chen
, “
Installation and lateral loading tests of suction caissons in silt
,”
Can. Geotech. J.
48
(
7
),
1070
1084
(
2011
).
17.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
C. H.
Le
, “
Seismic response of large-scale prestressed concrete bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
6
(
1
),
013127
(
2014
).
18.
J. J.
Lian
,
H. Y.
Ding
,
P. Y.
Zhang
, and
R.
Yu
, “
Design of large-scale prestressing bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines
,”
Trans. Tianjin Univ.
18
(
2
),
79
184
(
2012
).
19.
J. J.
Lian
,
L. Q.
Sun
,
J. F.
Zhang
, and
H. J.
Wang
, “
Bearing capacity and technical advantages of composite bucket foundation of offshore wind turbines
,”
Trans. Tianjin Univ.
17
(
2
),
132
137
(
2011
).
20.
H. Y.
Ding
,
J. J.
Lian
,
A. D.
Li
, and
P. Y.
Zhang
, “
One-step-installation of offshore wind turbine on large-scale bucket-top-bearing bucket foundation
,”
Trans. Tianjin Univ.
19
(
3
),
188
194
(
2013
).
21.
R.
Liu
,
G. S.
Chen
,
J. J.
Lian
, and
H. Y.
Ding
, “
Vertical bearing behaviour of the composite bucket shallow foundation of offshore wind turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
7
(
1
),
013123
(
2015
).
22.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
C. H.
Le
, “
Motion analysis on integrated transportation technique for offshore wind turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
5
(
5
),
053117
(
2013
).
23.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
C. H.
Le
, “
Hydrodynamic motion of a large prestressed concrete bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
5
(
6
),
063126
(
2013
).
24.
J. J.
Lian
,
F.
Chen
, and
H. J.
Wang
, “
Laboratory tests on soil–skirt interaction and penetration resistance of suction caissons during installation in sand
,”
Ocean Eng.
84
,
1
13
(
2014
).
25.
P. Y.
Zhang
,
Y. Q.
Han
,
H. Y.
Ding
, and
S. Y.
Zhang
, “
Field experiments on wet tows of an integrated transportation and installation vessel with two bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines
,”
Ocean Eng.
108
,
769
777
(
2015
).
You do not currently have access to this content.