Concerns on climate change and dwindling fossil fuel supply have renewed interest on alternative ways of harnessing renewable energy. Using rotating cylinders to generate lift from a fluid stream, a Magnus rotor can produce up to 10 times more lift compared to an airfoil. However, it is also producing more drag. Recent studies have demonstrated improvement on the aerodynamic efficiency of a Magnus rotor through the application of surface modifications such as grooves, bumps, dimples, and even changing the shape of the cylinder into a frustum. However, it is unknown which is most desirable among those modifications; moreover, if some may be combined for even better performance. This present study seeks to fill the mentioned research gap with the aid of computer simulation tool ANSYS CFX. Simulation results showed that modifying cylinder shape into a frustum generates the most lift force. However, it is also increasing the drag on the cylinder. Interestingly, a helical groove may be employed around the frustum cylinder to mitigate the increase in drag, making the two modifications a promising combination. Multiple response surface analysis using desirability function was used to investigate the sensitivity of the rotor design to the different modifications. Furthermore, a new perspective is introduced wherein the rotor may be able to withstand more drag in exchange for more lift. For lift generation purposes, bumps are not desirable. Finally, the aerodynamic performances of the modified rotors are compared against other published results by means of a drag polar plot.

1.
Abraham
,
J. P.
,
Plourde
,
B. D.
,
Mowry
,
G. S.
,
Sparrow
,
E. M.
, and
Minkowycz
,
W. J.
, “
Numerical simulation of fluid flow around a vertical-axis turbine
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
3
,
033109
(
2011
).
2.
ANSYS®
,
Academic Research, Release 14.5, ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide
(
ANSYS, Inc.
,
2011
).
3.
ANSYS®, Academic Research, Release 14.5.
4.
Badalamenti
,
C.
and
Prince
,
S.
, “
Effects of endplates on a rotating cylinder in crossflow
,” in
Proceedings of the 26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference
,
AIAA, Honolulu, Hawaii
(
2008
).
5.
Butt
,
U.
and
Egbers
,
C.
, “
Aerodynamic characteristics of flow over circular cylinders with patterned surface
,”
Int. J. Mater., Mech., Manuf.
1
(
2
) (
2013
).
6.
Bychkov
,
N. M.
,
Dovgal
,
A. V.
, and
Kozlov
,
V. V.
, “
Magnus wind turbines as an alternative to the blade ones
,”
J. Phys.
75
,
012004
(
2007
), available at http://m.iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012004/meta;jsessionid=81E8745E62DA2E3D4414F2F938B436CB.c1.iopscience.cld.iop.org.
7.
Derringer
,
G.
and
Suich
,
R.
, “
Simultaneous optimization of several response variables
,”
J. Qual. Technol.
12
(
4
),
214
219
(
1980
), available at http://asq.org/qic/display-item/?item=5341.
8.
Enercon, “
Powered by sailing rotors: E-Ship 1 in the testing phase
,” in
Windblatt
(
2010
), No. 2, pp.
06
07
.
9.
Huang
,
S.
, “
Cylinder drag reduction by the use of helical grooves
,” in
Proceedings of the HYDRALAB III Joint User Meeting
(
2010
).
10.
JMP®, Version 11.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007.
11.
Luo
,
D.
,
Huang
,
D.
, and
Wu
,
G.
, “
Analytical solution on Magnus wind turbine power performance based on the blade element momentum theory
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
3
,
033104
(
2011
).
12.
Mara
,
B. K.
,
Mercado
,
B. C.
,
Mercado
,
L. A.
,
Pascual
,
J. M.
, and
Lopez
,
N. S.
, “
Development and validation of a CFD model using ANSYS CFX for aerodynamics simulation of Magnus wind rotor blades
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th IEEE HNICEM Conference
, Manila, Philippines, 12–16 November (
2014a
).
13.
Mara
,
B. K.
,
Mercado
,
B. C.
,
Mercado
,
L. A.
,
Pascual
,
J. M.
, and
Lopez
,
N. S.
, “
Preliminary turbulence model validation for flow across rotating cylinders using ANSYS CFX
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th IEEE HNICEM Conference
,
Manila, Philippines
, 12–16 November (
2014b
).
14.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
Eddy Viscosity Transport Equations and Their Relation to the k-Epsilon Model
(
National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Ames Research Center
,
Moffett Field, CA
,
1994
).
15.
Mowry
,
G. S.
,
Erickson
,
R.
, and
Abraham
,
J. P.
, “
Computational model of a novel, two-cup horizontal wind-turbine system
,”
Open Mech. Eng. J.
3
,
26
34
(
2009
).
16.
Murakami
,
N.
and
Ito
,
J.
, “
Magnus type wind power generator
,” US patent 7504740 B2 (17 March
2009
).
17.
Myers
,
R. H.
and
Montgomery
,
D. C.
,
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
, 2nd ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
2002
).
18.
Plourde
,
B. D.
,
Abraham
,
J. P.
,
Mowry
,
G. S.
, and
Minkowycz
,
W. J.
, “
An experimental investigation of a large, vertical-axis wind turbine: Effects of venting and capping
,”
Wind Eng.
35
,
213
220
(
2011
).
19.
Reid
,
E. R.
, “
Tests of rotating cylinders
,” NACA Technical Memorandum No. TM-209 (1924).
20.
Sedaghat
,
A.
, “
Magnus type wind turbines: Prospects and challenges in design
,”
Renewable Energy
62
,
619
628
(
2014
).
21.
Seifert
,
J.
, “
A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
55
,
17
45
(
2012
).
22.
Sparrow
,
E. M.
,
Abraham
,
J. P.
, and
Chevalier
,
P. W.
, “
A DOS-enhanced numerical simulation of heat transfer and fluid flow through an array of offset fins with conjugate heating in the bounding solid
,”
J. Heat Transfer
127
,
27
33
(
2005
).
23.
Srivastav
,
D.
, “
Flow control over airfoils using different shaped dimples
,” in
International Proceedings of Computer Science & Information Technology
(
2012
), Vol.
33
, p.
92
.
24.
Sun
,
X.
,
Zhuang
,
Y.
,
Cao
,
Y.
,
Huang
,
D.
, and
Wu
,
G.
, “
A three-dimensional numerical study of the Magnus wind turbine with different blade shapes
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
4
,
063139
(
2012
).
24.
Swanson
,
W. M.
, “
The Magnus Effect: A Summary of Investigation to Date
,”
J. Basic Eng.
83
(
3
),
461
470
(
1961
).
25.
Takeda
,
K.
and
Kato
,
M.
, “
Wind tunnel blockage effects on drag coefficient and wind-induced vibration
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
42
,
897
908
(
1992
).
26.
Thom
,
A.
and
Sengupta
,
S. R.
, “
Effect of discs on the air forces on a rotating cylinder
,”
Aeronautical Research Committee
, Reports and Memoranda No. 1623 (
1932
).
27.
Tokomaru
,
P.
and
Dimotakis
,
P.
, “
Rotary oscillation control of a cylinder wake
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
224
,
77
90
(
1991
).
28.
West
,
G. S.
and
Apelt
,
C.
, “
The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105
,”
J Fluid Mech.
114
,
361
377
(
1982
).
29.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
(
DCW Industries, Inc.
,
La Canada, CA
,
1993
).
You do not currently have access to this content.