Several methods to improve the current wind turbine modeling techniques for power system studies are discussed in this paper. Some of the modeling improvements which are discussed are dynamic initialization of models, differences between wind turbine models developed in electromagnetic transient program and bulk power system simulation software, and techniques to avoid numerical instability with minimum errors. Algorithms to provide automatic initial conditions of all variables for any given load flow condition, wind speeds, and wind farm control strategies are developed in this paper. This approach is an improvement to the traditional method of providing constant initial values for given operating conditions. Several physical components such as harmonic filters, cable impedances, and complex control algorithms are either simplified or excluded in the power system models. The fault response of the power system model under extreme conditions leads to a numerically unstable condition. The instability might be a result of simplification discussed above and does not occur in the real turbine. Additional modeling techniques that can be used to achieve numerical stability, dynamic and fault response close to the actual wind turbine are discussed. These techniques are used to compensate for the simplifications made in power system models. Finally, the issue of nuisance tripping faced very frequently by the Independent System Operators, while working on the studies involving wind power plants, is addressed. Various methods to reduce the deviations and prevent nuisance tripping are implemented in the paper.

1.
A.
Perdana
, “
Dynamic models of wind turbines: A contribution towards the establishment of standardized models of wind turbines for power system stability studies
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Energy and Environment,
Chalmers University of Technology
,
Sweden
,
2008
.
2.
V.
Akhmatov
, “
Modelling of variable speed wind turbines with doubly-fed induction generators in short-term stability investigations
,” in
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Farms
, Stockholm, Sweden,
2002
.
3.
L.
Holdsworth
,
X.
Wu
,
J.
Ekanayake
, and
N.
Jenkins
, “
Direct solution method for initializing doubly-fed induction wind turbines in power system dynamic models
,”
IEE Proc. Gener., Transm. Distrib.
150
(
3
),
334
(
2003
).
4.
J.
Slootweg
,
H.
Polinder
, and
W.
Kling
, “
Initialization of wind turbine models in power system dynamics simulations
,” in
Proceedings of the IEEE Porto Power Tech Conference
, Porto, Portugal,
2001
.
5.
M.
Singh
,
S.
Santoso
, and
E.
Muljadi
, “
Dynamic models for wind turbines and wind power plants
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Subcontract Report No. NREL/SR-5500-52780
,
2011
.
6.
A. G.
Abo-Khalil
and
D.-C.
Lee
, “
Dynamic modeling and control of wind turbines for grid-connected wind generation system
,” in
37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '06)
, 18–22 June
2006
, pp.
1
6
.
7.
B.
Novakovic
,
Y.
Duan
,
M.
Solveson
,
A.
Nasiri
, and
D. M.
Ionel
, “
Comprehensive modeling of turbine systems from wind to electric grid
,” in
IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)
, 15–19 September
2013
, pp.
2627
2634
.
8.
V.
Petrovic
and
N.
Peric
, “
Identification of wind turbine mathematical model suitable for advanced controller design
,” in
Proceedings of the 35th International Convention MIPRO
, 21–25 May
2012
, pp.
835
840
.
9.
A.
Ellis
,
E.
Muljadi
,
J.
Sanchez-Gasca
, and
Y.
Kazachkov
, “
Generic models for simulation of wind power plants in bulk system planning studies
,” in
IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
, 24–29 July
2011
, pp.
1
8
.
You do not currently have access to this content.