This paper presents a risk-based decision-making framework for the Distributed Generation (DG)-owning retailer to determine the optimal participation level in the forward and the day-ahead electricity markets, as well as the optimal scheduling of DG units. The energy price in the day-ahead market is very volatile and varies every hour. Also, unpredicted failures of DG units may impose a great financial loss on the retailer. Therefore, the retailer has to evaluate the effects of uncertain parameters to hedge the financial loss. In this paper, the financial risk associated with the uncertain prices is evaluated using the chance constraint optimization method. The normal density function is applied to model the probabilistic realizations of uncertain prices, and scenarios are generated via the scenario tree technique. Moreover, the availability of generation units is modeled by the availability probability. The proposed risk-based framework allows the retailer to determine the optimal strategy at the given risk level. The objective-function of the presented model is based on maximizing the expected profit in a way that ensures the specific profit constraint will be satisfied at the operation period with a defined probability. The performance and efficiency of the presented decision-making framework are analyzed on the sample DG-owning retailer, and the optimal framework is simulated under different risk levels.

1.
S. A.
Gabriel
,
A. J.
Conejo
,
M. A.
Plazas
, and
S.
Balakrishnan
, “
Optimal price and quantity determination for retail electric power contracts
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
21
,
180
187
(
2006
).
2.
D.
Das
and
B.
Wollenberg
, “
Minimizing forced outage risk in generator bidding
,”
Euro. Trans. Electr. Power.
17
,
347
357
(
2007
).
3.
S.
Soleymani
,
A. M.
Ranjbar
, and
A. R.
Shirani
, “
Strategic bidding of generating units in competitive electricity market with considering their reliability
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power
30
,
193
201
(
2008
).
4.
M.
Carrion
,
J. M.
Arroyo
, and
A. J.
Conejo
, “
A bilevel stochastic programming approach for retailer futures market trading
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
24
,
1446
1456
(
2009
).
5.
A.
Hatami
,
H.
Seifi
, and
M. K.
Sheikh-El-Eslami
, “
A stochastic-based decision-making framework for an electricity retailer: Time-of-use pricing and electricity portfolio optimization
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
26
,
1808
1816
(
2011
).
6.
S. A.
Gabriel
,
S.
Kiet
, and
S.
Balakrishnan
, “
A mixed integer stochastic optimization model for settlement risk in retail electric power markets
,”
Networks Spat. Econ.
4
,
323
345
(
2004
).
7.
J. M.
Yusta
,
I. J.
Ramirez-Rosado
,
J. A.
Dominguez-Navarro
, and
J. M.
Perez-Vidal
, “
Optimal electricity price calculation model for retailers in a deregulated market
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power
27
,
437
447
(
2005
).
8.
S. A.
Gabriel
,
M. F.
Gence
, and
S.
Balakrishnan
, “
A simulation approach to balancing annual risk and reward in retail electrical power markets
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
17
,
1050
1057
(
2002
).
9.
S.
Erik
and
E.
Pettersen
, “
Constructing bidding curves for a price-taking retailer in the norwegian electricity market
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
20
,
701
708
(
2005
).
10.
S.
Palamarchuk
, “
Dynamic programming approach to the bilateral contract scheduling
,”
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.
4
,
211
220
(
2010
).
11.
R. G.
Karandikar
,
S. A.
Khaparde
, and
S. V.
Kulkarni
, “
Strategic evaluation of bilateral contract for electricity retailer in restructured power market
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power
32
,
457
463
(
2010
).
12.
R. G.
Karandikar
,
S. A.
Khaparde
, and
S. V.
Kulkarni
, “
Quantifying price risk of electricity retailer based on CAPM and RAROC methodology
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power
29
,
803
809
(
2007
).
13.
U. A.
Ozturk
,
M.
Mazumdar
, and
B. A.
Norman
, “
A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
19
,
1589
1598
(
2004
).
14.
H.
Yu
,
C. Y.
Chung
,
K. P.
Wong
, and
J. H.
Zhang
, “
A chance constrained transmission network expansion planning method with consideration of load and wind farm uncertainty
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
24
,
1568
1576
(
2009
).
15.
Q.
Wang
,
Y.
Guan
, and
J.
Wang
, “
A chance constrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
27
,
206
215
(
2012
).
16.
H.
Zhang
and
P.
Li
, “
Chance constrained programming for optimal power flow under uncertainty
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
26
,
2417
2424
(
2011
).
17.
M.
Carrion
and
J.
Arroyo
, “
A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
21
,
1371
1378
(
2006
).
18.
G.
Guastaroba
,
R.
Mansini
, and
M. Grazia
Speranza
, “
On the effectiveness of scenario generation techniques in single-period portfolio optimization
,”
Eur. J. Operations Res.
192
,
500
511
(
2009
).
19.
N. G.
Kuska
,
H.
Heitsch
, and
W.
Romisch
, “
Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems
,”
IEEE Power Tech Conference proceedings 2003, Bologna, Italy
(
IEEE
,
2003
), Vol. 3.
20.
H. M.
Ghadikolaei
,
E.
Tajik
,
J.
Aghaei
, and
M.
Charwand
, “
Integrated day-ahead and hour-ahead operation model of discos in retail electricity markets considering DGs and CO2 emission penalty cost
,”
Appl. Energy
95
,
174
185
(
2012
).
You do not currently have access to this content.