This study presents a thorough methodology for wind park design and micro-siting. It encompasses all aspects of wind project development and prefeasibility analysis. This approach uses the long-term wind data taken from on site measurements. Collected data are analyzed statistically. Then, wind resources are estimated and a choice of the best fitted wind turbines is performed. An optimal layout for wind turbines is proposed using the Windstation and 3DEM software. The main contribution of this paper is to evaluate the amount of accuracy given by this methodology in terms of predicting the future annual energy production of wind projects. To achieve this objective, the methodology was applied to a specific site which already contains an installed wind park. The test case wind farm is located in the north-east of Tunisia. The evaluation is performed by comparing the estimated energy production with real-time operation database of the wind park. Finally, the paper discusses the prospects of wind farm upgrading in order to make better use of the local wind resource.

1.
Global Wind Energy Council, Global Wind Report: Annual Market Update,
2012
, see http://www.gwec.net.
2.
M.
Abbes
and
J.
Belhadj
, “
Wind resource estimation and wind park design in El-Kef region, Tunisia
,”
Energy
40
,
348
357
(
2012
).
3.
J. F.
Manwell
,
J. G.
McGowan
, and
A. L.
Rogers
,
Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2002
).
4.
A. N.
Celik
,
A.
Makkawi
, and
T.
Muneer
, “
Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
2
,
013102
(
2010
).
5.
Windstation: A Software Tool For the Simulation of Wind Flow Over Complex Topography, see http://www.easycfd.net.
6.
H.
Bailey
and
L.
McDonald
,
Wind Resource Assessment Handbook
(
AWS Scientific, Inc.
,
New York
,
1997
).
7.
S. B.
Haralambos
,
G.
Mihalakakou
,
S.
Rehman
, and
L. M.
Al-Hadhrami
, “
Wind power potential assessment for seven buoys data collection stations in Aegean Sea using Weibull distribution function
,”
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy
4
,
013119
(
2012
).
8.
T. P.
Chang
, “
Estimation of wind energy potential using different probability density functions
,”
Appl. Energy
88
,
1848
1856
(
2011
).
9.
J. V.
Seguro
and
T. W.
Lambert
, “
Modern estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
85
,
75
84
(
2000
).
10.
M. R.
Islam
,
R.
Saidur
, and
N. A.
Rahim
, “
Assessment of wind energy potentiality at Kudat and Labuan, Malaysia using Weibull distribution function
,”
Energy
36
,
985
992
(
2011
).
11.
A. M. G.
Lopes
, “
WindStation—A software for the simulation of atmospheric flows over complex topography
,”
Environ. Modell. Software
18
,
81
96
(
2003
).
12.
M.
Taylor
,
P.
Mackiewicz
,
M. C.
Brower
, and
M.
Markus
, “
An analysis of wind resource uncertainty in energy production estimates
,” in
European Wind Energy Conference, London
(
2004
).
13.
U.
Eminoglu
and
S.
Ayasun
, “
Modeling and design optimization of variable-speed wind turbine systems
,”
Energies
7
,
402
419
(
2014
).
14.
Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, see http://srtm.usgs.gov.
15.
L.
Fingersh
,
M.
Hand
, and
A.
Laxson
, “
Wind turbine design cost and scaling model
,”
Technical Report No. TP-500-40566, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
2006
.
16.
U.S. Department of Energy, 2012 Wind Technologies Market Report, see http://www.energy.gov.
You do not currently have access to this content.