This study conducted well-to-pump and well-to wheel life-cycle assessment of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during ethanol production from tropical Banagrass (Pennisetum purpureum) using green-processing (with the use of fresh feedstocks) and dry or conventional processing (with the use of dried feedstocks) in the state of Hawaii. 10 000 MJ of energy was used as a functional unit with a systematic boundary drawn based on relative mass, energy, and economic value method using a 1% cutoff value, and the results were compared to those of conventional gasoline, and ethanol from corn and other ethanol lignocellulosic feedstocks. Detailed techno-economic model was built using the SuperPro designer. Ethanol yields were estimated at 0.27 l/kg (green processing with fungal co-product), 0.27 l/kg (green processing without co-product), and 0.29 l/kg (dry-processing) of feedstock, respectively. The well-to-pump analysis indicate that ethanol production consume 8200 MJ (green processing with co-product), 7600 MJ (green-processing without co-product) and 7200 MJ (dry-processing without co-product) of fossil energy and emit approximately144 kg CO2-eq., 90.6 kg CO2-eq., and 59.1 kg CO2-eq. per 10 000 MJ of ethanol produced, respectively; well-to-wheel analysis showed that 280 g of gCO2-eq., 260 g CO2-eq., and 250 g CO2-eq. of emissions were produced per kilometer by driving Flex Fuel Vehicle. In summary, ethanol produced using the green-processing technology required greater amount of fossil energy and produced more GHG emissions compared to that of dry processing technology, due to additional energy needed for fungal growth and related processes. Process power, enzyme, and chemical production during ethanol processing were identified as emissions hot-spots for both green and dry processing.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2014
Research Article|
August 19 2014
Life cycle assessment of ethanol production from tropical banagrass (Pennisetum purpureum) using green and dry processing technologies in Hawaii
Junko Mochizuki;
Junko Mochizuki
a)
1Risk, Policy and Vulnerability Program,
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
John F. Yanagida;
John F. Yanagida
2Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management,
University of Hawaii at Manoa
, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Deepak Kumar;
Deepak Kumar
3
Department of Biological and Ecological Engineering
, Oregon State University
, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Devin Takara;
Devin Takara
4
Department of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering
, University of Hawaii at Manoa
, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Ganti S. Murthy
Ganti S. Murthy
3
Department of Biological and Ecological Engineering
, Oregon State University
, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: mochizuk@iiasa.ac.at
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 6, 043128 (2014)
Article history
Received:
December 07 2013
Accepted:
August 07 2014
Citation
Junko Mochizuki, John F. Yanagida, Deepak Kumar, Devin Takara, Ganti S. Murthy; Life cycle assessment of ethanol production from tropical banagrass (Pennisetum purpureum) using green and dry processing technologies in Hawaii. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 1 July 2014; 6 (4): 043128. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4893673
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00