Potential biodiesel production was evaluated by assuming that waste and cutover forestlands and burnt site areas, equivalent to 5.94% of China’s land area, were used to cultivate the most suitable energy crop in each province of China. Jatropha, Xanthoceras, Pistacia, and Swida were the candidate energy crops in that order of priority based on yield and oil content. The crop was assigned by comparing crop climatic requirements and the meteorological statistics of each province and choosing the best match. Potential production for all of China was estimated to be 57.6×106tons/yr on the basis of seed yields and biodiesel conversion factors. A logistics scenario was created for the transportation of crops and biodiesel, and a life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs were evaluated for the cultivation, refinement, and transportation stages using local data on energy sources and costs. The production of biodiesel with and without waste biomass utilization creates emissions of 0.95 and 1.31 tCO2eq/t biodiesel, respectively, as compared to 2.08 tCO2eq/t fossil diesel. Fertilizer use in the cultivation stage accounts for 61% and 44% of GHG emissions with and without waste biomass utilization, respectively. The use of waste biomass and proper use of fertilizers are essential in reducing GHG emissions and enhancing the advantages of using biodiesel.

1.
R.
Edwards
,
J. -F.
Larivé
,
V.
Mahieu
, and
P.
Rouveirolles
, “
Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. Well-to-tank report version 2c, tank-to-wheels report version 2c, and well-to-wheel report version 2c
,” CONCAWE, EuroCar, and IES publication, EUR 22342 EN, Luxembourg, EU,
2007
; available from http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
2.
E.
Menichetti
and
M.
Otto
, “
Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels from a life-cycle perspective (81-109)
,” in
Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use
, edited by
R. W.
Howarth
and
S.
Bringezu
(
SCOPE
,
Ithaca, NY
,
2009
), Chap. 5.
3.
J.
Fargione
,
J.
Hill
,
D.
Tilman
,
S.
Polasky
, and
P.
Hawthorne
,
Science
319
,
1235
(
2008
).
4.
T.
Searchinger
,
R.
Heimlich
,
R. A.
Houghton
,
F.
Dong
,
A.
Elobeid
,
J.
Fabiosa
,
S.
Tokgoz
,
D.
Hayes
, and
T. -H.
Yu
,
Science
319
,
1238
(
2008
).
5.
J.
Hill
,
E.
Nelson
,
D.
Tilman
,
S.
Polasky
, and
D.
Tiffany
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
103
,
11206
(
2006
).
6.
T. A.
Boden
,
G.
Marland
, and
R. J.
Andres
, Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
,
Oak Ridge, TN
,
2009
).
7.
M.
Mohibbe Azam
,
A.
Waris
, and
N. M.
Nahar
,
Biomass Bioenergy
29
,
293
(
2005
).
8.
M.
Mittelbach
,
Bioresour. Technol.
56
,
7
(
1996
).
9.
K.
Krisnangkura
,
J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
63
,
552
(
1986
).
10.
Y.
Luo
and
M.
Liu
,
China Biotechnology
27
,
68
(
2007
) (in Chinese).
11.
Y.
Fu
and
X.
Pan
,
Annual Conference on National Agricultural Meteorology and Ecological Environment 2006
,
Nanchang, Jiangxi
,
2006
(in Chinese).
12.
State Forestry Administration of China
, The Sixth National Forestry Survey 1999–2003 (
2006
).
13.
Y.
Liang
. The technology of planting Swida wilsoniana (Wanger.) Sojak, Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research (March
2007
) (in Chinese).
14.
China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System, http://data.cma.gov.cn/.
15.
State Forestry Administration of China
, The Fifth National Forestry Survey 1994–1998 (
2000
).
16.
J.
Shi
,
Liaoning Communication Science and Technology
08
,
28
(
1995
) (in Chinese).
17.
China Market Report Center
, http://www.chinairn.com/.
18.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
, in
2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme
, edited by
H. S.
Eggleston
,
L.
Buendia
,
K.
Miwa
,
T.
Ngara
, and
K.
Tanabe
(
IGES
,
Kanagawa, Japan
,
2006
).
19.
Energy Science Date Sharing Center
, China, http://energy.amr.gov.cn/eds/.
20.
World Bank
, International Comparison Program, Global Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures–2005, International Comparison Program, http://go.worldbank.org/VMCB80AB40.
21.
Energy Information Administration
, U.S. Sales of Distillate Fuel Oil by End Use (
2009
) http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_821dst_dcu_nus_a.htm.
22.
Center for Transportation Research
, Argonne National Laboratory, The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model, Ver. 1.8 c.0 (
2009
); available at http://www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET/index.html.
23.
W. M. J.
Achten
,
L.
Verchot
,
Y. J.
Franken
,
E.
Mathijs
,
V. P.
Singh
,
R.
Aerts
, and
B.
Muys
,
Biomass Bioenergy
32
,
1063
(
2008
).
24.
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
, GAIN Report No. CH9080 (December 14,
2009
).
25.
National Bureau of Statistics of China
, Chinese Year Book 2006 (
2007
).
26.
Clean development mechanism in China, http://cdm.ccchina.gov.cn/english/index.asp.
27.
National Development and Reform Commission
, China, http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/.
28.
The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC)
, reported by People’s daily online (English version), September 29,
2009
.
29.
Y.
Zhang
,
M. A.
Dube
,
D. D.
McLean
, and
M.
Kates
,
Bioresour. Technol.
89
,
1
(
2003
).
30.
M. J.
Haas
,
A. J.
McAloon
,
W. C.
Yee
, and
T. A.
Foglia
,
Bioresour. Technol.
97
,
671
(
2006
).
31.
X.
Ou
,
X.
Zhang
,
S.
Chang
, and
Q.
Guo
,
Appl. Energy
86
,
S197
(
2009
).
You do not currently have access to this content.