Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-parameter Weibull function might be inadequate in modeling the wind speed probability density distributions or independent of whether the distribution is of unimodal or bimodal nature. For the unimodal distributions, the inadequacy may be due to the intricate behavior of the distribution, which prevents it to be satisfyingly modeled by a two-parameter model. For the bimodal behavior, the two-parameter Weibull function, which produces only a unimodal distribution, is simply inadequate to model it appropriately. Therefore, in recent years, alternative functions have been suggested for both unimodal and bimodal distributions, seeking more involved functions to better model these distributions. This article involves the modeling of observed wind speed probability density distributions using the main body of models found in the literature, namely, Rayleigh, Lognormal, two-parameter Weibull, three-parameter Weibull, and bimodal Weibull probability distribution functions. One of the important steps in the evaluation of different functions is the interpretation of the statistical parameters, namely, slope, , mean bias error, and root mean squared error, as are presently used in this article. A novel statistical tool is developed in the present article using these four statistical parameters. The novel tool can be used to evaluate the relative performance of models when more than one model is involved or to determine the overall accuracy of a particular model for a specific site. The calculations are made based on the long term wind speed data collected at 4-s interval at the experimental site at Edinburgh Napier University.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2010
Research Article|
January 13 2010
Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions
A. N. Celik;
A. N. Celik
a)
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture,
Abant Izzet Baysal University
, Gölköy Campus, 14280 Bolu, Turkey
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Makkawi;
A. Makkawi
2School of Engineering and the Built Environment,
Edinburgh Napier University
, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Scotland, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
T. Muneer
T. Muneer
2School of Engineering and the Built Environment,
Edinburgh Napier University
, 10 Colinton Road, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Scotland, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected].
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2, 013102 (2010)
Article history
Received:
September 07 2009
Accepted:
December 18 2009
Citation
A. N. Celik, A. Makkawi, T. Muneer; Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 1 January 2010; 2 (1): 013102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3294127
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Improving academic–industry collaboration: A case study of UK distribution system operators
Jamie M. Bright, Hilal Ozdemir, et al.
Efficient wind farm layout optimization with the FLOWERS AEP model and analytic gradients
Michael J. LoCascio, Christopher J. Bay, et al.
Weather as a driver of the energy transition – present and emerging perspectives of energy meteorology
Marion Schroedter-Homscheidt, Jan Dobschinski, et al.
Related Content
Validation of three new measure-correlate-predict models for the long-term prospection of the wind resource
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (April 2011)
Multiple un-replicated linear functional relationship model and its application in real estate
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2018)
Short-term annoyance reactions to stationary and time-varying wind turbine and road traffic noise: A laboratory study
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2016)
Agrivoltaics in Austria: A stakeholder perspective on the opportunities and constraints of synergetic land use
AIP Conference Proceedings (June 2021)
Stochastic modeling and performance monitoring of wind farm power production
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (May 2014)