Solar energy is the prime renewable energy source to provide the carbon-free power. However, various irreversibilities are associated with the solar power tower (SPT) system, and they cannot be avoided. Therefore, to enhance the performance of the solar power plant, in this work, four configurations of the combined cycles have been considered for harvesting the solar heat from the SPT system, and the performance of all the considered power systems was compared with the SPT-based conventional helium Brayton cycle (HBC) system. These four proposed combined cycles used HBC as the topping cycle and basic organic Rankine cycle (ORC), recuperative ORC, regenerative ORC, and regenerative-recuperative ORC (RRORC) as bottoming cycles separately. Energy and exergy analyses of the proposed power generation systems were performed based on numerical technique using the computational software engineering equation solver. It was concluded that the SPT-HBC-RRORC system was considered the best-performing power generation system among the other considered power systems. The SPT-HBC-RRORC system achieved energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and net work output, respectively, as 7.69%, 8.09%, and 21.69% higher than that of the conventional system (SPT-HBC). However, the SPT-HBC-RRORC system achieved 5.44%, 5.08%, and 18.51% higher energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and net work output, respectively, than that of the SPT-HBC-basic ORC. Therefore, the SPT-HBC-RRORC system is far better than the conventional SPT-HBC system. The parametric analysis indicates that the parameters related to the solar subsection significantly influence the power generation unit's performance.

1.
Y.
Khan
,
D.
Singh
,
S.
Sharma
,
S.
Gupta
,
S. K.
Joshi
, and
A.
Tevatia
, “
Comprehensive analysis of a high temperature solar powered trigeneration system: An energy, exergy, and exergo-environmental (3E) assessment
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
238
(
16
),
8446
8463
(
2024
).
2.
A. H.
Alami
,
A. G.
Olabi
,
A.
Mdallal
,
A.
Rezk
,
A.
Radwan
,
S. M. A.
Rahman
,
S. K.
Shah
, and
M. A.
Abdelkareem
, “
Concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Status and analysis
,”
Int. J. Thermofluids
18
,
100340
(
2023
).
3.
E.
Ali
, “
Integrated membrane distillation and absorption chiller driven by solar energy: Concept and analysis
,”
J. Renew. Sustain. Energy
16
,
053706
(
2024
).
4.
S. A.
Kalogirou
, “
Solar thermal collectors and applications
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
30
(
3
),
231
295
(
2004
).
5.
J.
Zhou
,
M. A.
Ali
,
F. M.
Zeki
, and
H. A.
Dhahad
, “
Thermoeconomic investigation and multi-objective optimization of a novel efficient solar tower power plant based on supercritical Brayton cycle with inlet cooling
,”
Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog.
39
,
101679
(
2023
).
6.
Y.
Khan
and
R. S.
Mishra
, “
Performance investigation of the solar power tower driven combined cascade supercritical CO2 cycle and organic Rankine cycle using HFO fluids
,”
Aust. J. Mech. Eng.
21
(
5
),
1714
1728
(
2023
).
7.
Y.
Ma
,
T.
Morozyuk
,
M.
Liu
,
J.
Yan
, and
J.
Liu
, “
Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach
,”
Appl. Energy
242
,
1134
1154
(
2019
).
8.
Y.
Khan
,
D.
Apparao
,
S.
Gawande
,
N.
Singh
,
Y. S.
Bisht
, and
P.
Singh
, “
Performance assessment and working fluid selection of the novel combined helium Brayton cycle and organic Rankine cycle based on solar power tower for sustainable generation
,”
Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng.
48
,
1901
1916
(
2024
).
9.
M.
Adnan
,
M.
Zaman
,
A.
Ullah
,
A.
Gungor
,
M.
Rizwan
, and
S. R.
Naqvi
, “
Thermo-economic analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle co-generation system hybridized with concentrated solar power tower
,”
Renew. Energy
198
,
654
666
(
2022
).
10.
Y.
Ahn
,
S. J.
Bae
,
M.
Kim
,
S. K.
Cho
,
S.
Baik
,
J. I.
Lee
, and
J. E.
Cha
, “
Review of supercritical CO2 power cycle technology and current status of research and development
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
47
,
647
661
(
2015
).
11.
Y.
Khan
and
R. S.
Mishra
, “
Performance evaluation of solar-based combined pre-compression supercritical CO2 cycle and organic Rankine cycle
,”
Int. J. Green Energy
18
(
2
),
172
186
(
2021
).
12.
L.
Qin
,
G.
Xie
,
Y.
Ma
, and
S.
Li
, “
Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a waste heat recovery system with a combined supercritical/transcritical CO2 cycle
,”
Energy
265
,
126332
(
2023
).
13.
Y.
Huang
,
P.
Jiang
, and
Y.
Zhu
, “
Analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system by integrating of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and transcritical ejector refrigeration cycle
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
269
,
116081
(
2022
).
14.
A.
Zendehnam
and
F.
Pourfayaz
, “
Advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of the partial heating supercritical CO2 power cycle for waste heat recovery
,”
J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.
149
,
3397
3414
(
2024
).
15.
M.
Pan
,
X.
Chen
, and
X.
Li
, “
Multi-objective analysis and optimization of cascade supercritical CO2 cycle and organic Rankine cycle systems for waste-to-energy power plant
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
214
,
118882
(
2022
).
16.
H.
Zhu
,
G.
Xie
,
H.
Yuan
, and
S.
Nizetic
, “
Thermodynamic assessment of combined supercritical CO2 cycle power systems with organic Rankine cycle or Kalina cycle
,”
Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.
52
,
102166
(
2022
).
17.
J.
Nondy
and
T. K.
Gogoi
, “
Exergoeconomic investigation and multi-objective optimization of different ORC configurations for waste heat recovery: A comparative study
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
245
,
114593
(
2021
).
18.
Z.
Wang
,
H.
Chen
,
R.
Xia
,
F.
Han
,
Y.
Ji
, and
W.
Cai
, “
Energy, exergy and economy (3E) investigation of a SOFC-GT-ORC waste heat recovery system for green power ships
,”
Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog.
32
,
101342
(
2022
).
19.
M.
Mahmoud
,
S.
Naher
, and
M.
Ramadan
, “
Investigation of a ground-cooled organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery
,”
Int. J. Thermofluids
18
,
100348
(
2023
).
20.
Y.
Khan
,
D.
Singh
,
H.
Caliskan
, and
H.
Hong
, “
Exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses of solar power tower based novel combined helium Brayton cycle-transcritical CO2 cycle for carbon free power generation
,”
Global Challenges
7
,
2300191
(
2023
).
21.
Y.
Khan
and
R. S.
Mishra
, “
Performance analysis of a solar based novel trigeneration system using cascaded vapor absorption-compression refrigeration system
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
155
,
207
218
(
2023
).
22.
M. T.
Dunham
and
B. D.
Iverson
, “
High-efficiency thermodynamic power cycles for concentrated solar power systems
,”
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
30
,
758
770
(
2014
).
23.
Y.
Yao
,
Y.
Hu
, and
S.
Gao
, “
Heliostat field layout methodology in central receiver systems based on efficiency-related distribution
,”
Sol. Energy
117
,
114
124
(
2015
).
24.
A.
Bejan
,
G.
Tsatsaronis
, and
M.
Moran
,
Thermal Design and Optimization
(
John Wiley and Sons Inc
,
New York
,
1996
).
25.
V.
Zare
,
S. M. S.
Mahmoudi
, and
M.
Yari
, “
On the exergoeconomic assessment of employing Kalina cycle for GT-MHR waste heat utilization
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
90
,
364
374
(
2015
).
26.
S.
Sahar
and
A.
Fereshteh
, “
Energy and exergy assessments of modified Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)
,”
Energy Rep.
1
,
1
7
(
2015
).
27.
C.
Xu
,
Z.
Wang
,
X.
Li
, and
F.
Sun
, “
Energy and exergy analysis of solar power tower plants
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
31
,
3904
3913
(
2011
).
You do not currently have access to this content.