The motivation for our study stems from the increasing complexity of spillovers between energy markets in the low-carbon energy transition and the important practical implications of ensuring a secure energy supply. In this paper, based on a time-frequency perspective, we use TVP-VAR-SV and network topology analysis to examine the dynamic linkages between China's carbon market, several renewable energy markets, and electricity markets. The results reveal asymmetric risk spillovers between markets over time, with an upward trend. The establishment of the national carbon market did not significantly change the inter-market risk structure, with the hydropower and wind markets being the main sources of risk, and the electricity and carbon markets being the main recipients of risk. Spillovers show delayed and cyclical effects, peaking within one week and lasting up to five weeks. Finally, the paper makes several suggestions for risk prevention in the energy market: strengthening ex-ante risk warning and monitoring in the energy market; formulating specific carbon market policies based on the specific relationship between the carbon market and different energy markets; and giving full play to the guiding role of the carbon price in the allocation of carbon resources.

1.
Benhmad
,
F.
and
Percebois
,
J.
, “
Photovoltaic and wind power feed-in impact on electricity prices: The case of Germany
,”
Energy Policy
119
,
317
326
(
2018
).
2.
Boersen
,
A.
and
Scholtens
,
B.
, “
The relationship between European electricity markets and emission allowance futures prices in phase II of the EU (European Union) emission trading scheme
,”
Energy
74
,
585
594
(
2014
).
3.
Bondia
,
R.
,
Ghosh
,
S.
, and
Kanjilal
,
K.
, “
International crude oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies: Evidence from non-linear cointegration tests with unknown structural breaks
,”
Energy
101
,
558
565
(
2016
).
4.
Bottger
,
D.
and
Hartel
,
P.
, “
On wholesale electricity prices and market values in a carbon-neutral energy system
,”
Energy Econ.
106
,
105709
(
2022
).
5.
Cao
,
G.
and
Xu
,
W.
, “
Nonlinear structure analysis of carbon and energy markets with MFDCCA based on maximum overlap wavelet transform
,”
Physica A
444
,
505
523
(
2016
).
6.
Cotton
,
D.
and
Truck
,
S.
, “
Interaction between Australian carbon prices and energy prices
,”
Australas. J. Environ. Manage.
18
(
4
),
208
222
(
2011
).
7.
Diebold
,
F.
and
Yilmaz
,
K.
, “
Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers
,”
Int. J. Forecast.
28
(
1
),
57
66
(
2012
).
8.
Diebold
,
F.
and
Yilmaz
,
K.
, “
On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms
,”
J. Econometrics
182
(
1
),
119
134
(
2014
).
9.
Du
,
Y.
and
Takeuchi
,
K.
, “
Does a small difference make a difference? Impact of feed-in tariff on renewable power generation in China
,”
Energy Econ.
87
,
104710
(
2020
).
10.
Fang
,
Y.
,
Wei
,
W.
, and
Mei
,
S.
, “
How dynamic renewable portfolio standards impact the diffusion of renewable energy in China? A networked evolutionary game analysis
,”
Renewable Energy
193
,
778
788
(
2022
).
11.
Fasanya
,
I.
,
Adekoya
,
O.
, and
Adetokunbo
,
A.
, “
On the connection between oil and global foreign exchange markets: The role of economic policy uncertainty
,”
Resources Policy
72
,
102110
(
2021
).
12.
Gong
,
X.
,
Shi
,
R.
,
Xu
,
J.
, and
Lin
,
B.
, “
Analyzing spillover effects between carbon and fossil energy markets from a time-varying perspective
,”
Appl. Energy
285
,
116384
(
2021
).
13.
Goodarzi
,
S.
,
Perera
,
H.
, and
Bunn
,
D.
, “
The impact of renewable energy forecast errors on imbalance volumes and electricity spot prices
,”
Energy Policy
134
,
110827
(
2019
).
14.
Hammoudeh
,
S.
,
Lahiani
,
A.
,
Nguyen
,
D.
, and
Sousa
,
R.
, “
An empirical analysis of energy cost pass-through to CO2 emission prices
,”
Energy Econ.
49
,
149
156
(
2015
).
15.
Hanif
,
W.
,
Mensi
,
W.
,
Gubareva
,
M.
, and
Teplova
,
T.
, “
Impacts of COVID-19 on dynamic return and volatility spillovers between rare earth metals and renewable energy stock markets
,”
Resour. Policy
80
,
103196
(
2023
).
16.
Hartner
,
M.
and
Permoser
,
A.
, “
Through the valley: The impact of PV penetration levels on price volatility and resulting revenues for storage plants
,”
Renewable Energy
115
,
1184
1195
(
2018
).
17.
Hossain
,
M. R.
,
Singh
,
S.
,
Sharma
,
G. D.
,
Apostu
,
S.-A.
, and
Bansal
,
P.
, “
Overcoming the shock of energy depletion for energy policy? Tracing the missing link between energy depletion, renewable energy development and decarbonization in the USA
,”
Energy Policy
174
,
113469
(
2023
).
18.
Impram
,
S.
,
Nese
,
S.
, and
Oral
,
B.
, “
Challenges of renewable energy penetration on power system flexibility: A survey
,”
Energy Strategy Rev.
31
,
100539
(
2020
).
19.
Jahanger
,
A.
,
Ozturk
,
I.
,
Chukwuma Onwe
,
J.
,
Joseph
,
T. E.
, and
Razib Hossain
,
M.
, “
Do technology and renewable energy contribute to energy efficiency and carbon neutrality? Evidence from top ten manufacturing countries
,”
Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess.
56
,
103084
(
2023
).
20.
Ji
,
Q.
,
Xia
,
T.
,
Liu
,
F.
, and
Xu
,
J.
, “
The information spillover between carbon price and power sector returns: Evidence from the major European electricity companies
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
208
,
1178
1187
(
2019
).
21.
Ji
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
D.
, and
Geng
,
J.
, “
Information linkage, dynamic spillovers in prices and volatility between the carbon and energy markets
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
198
,
972
978
(
2018
).
22.
Jiang
,
W.
and
Chen
,
Y.
, “
The time-frequency connectedness among carbon, traditional/new energy and material markets of China in pre- and post-COVID-19 outbreak periods
,”
Energy
246
,
123320
(
2022
).
23.
Kang
,
S.
,
McIver
,
R.
, and
Yoon
,
S.
, “
Dynamic spillover effects among crude oil, precious metal, and agricultural commodity futures markets
,”
Energy Econ.
62
,
19
32
(
2017
).
24.
Keppler
,
J.
and
Mansanet-Bataller
,
M.
, “
Causalities between CO2, electricity, and other energy variables during phase I and phase II of the EU ETS
,”
Energy Policy
38
(
7
),
3329
3341
(
2010
).
25.
Kumar
,
S.
,
Managi
,
S.
, and
Matsuda
,
A.
, “
Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: A vector autoregressive analysis
,”
Energy Econ.
34
(
1
),
215
226
(
2012
).
26.
Kyritsis
,
E.
,
Andersson
,
J.
, and
Serletis
,
A.
, “
Electricity prices, large-scale renewable integration, and policy implications
,”
Energy Policy
101
,
550
560
(
2017
).
27.
Li
,
H.
and
An
,
H.
, “
How does the coal stock market, carbon market and coal price co-movement with each other in China: A co-movement matrix transmission network perspective
,”
Energy Procedia
105
,
3479
3484
(
2017
).
28.
Li
,
T.
,
Gao
,
C.
,
Chen
,
T.
,
Jiang
,
Y.
, and
Feng
,
Y.
, “
Medium and long-term electricity market trading strategy considering renewable portfolio standard in the transitional period of electricity market reform in Jiangsu, China
,”
Energy Econ.
107
,
105860
(
2022
).
29.
Liu
,
F.
,
Zhang
,
C. G.
, and
Tang
,
M. Y.
, “
The impacts of oil price shocks and jumps on China's nonferrous metal markets
,”
Resources Policy
73
,
102228
(2021).
30.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
X. Q.
, and
Wang
,
M.
, “
Global transmission of returns among financial, traditional energy, renewable energy and carbon markets: New evidence
,”
Energies
14
(
21
),
7286
(2021).
31.
Liu
,
X.
, “
Research on bidding strategy of virtual power plant considering carbon-electricity integrated market mechanism
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
137
,
107891
(
2022
).
32.
Maryniak
,
P.
,
Truck
,
S.
, and
Weron
,
R.
, “
Carbon pricing and electricity markets—The case of the Australian Clean Energy Bill
,”
Energy Econ.
79
,
45
58
(
2019
).
33.
Mo
,
J.
,
Zhu
,
L.
, and
Fan
,
Y.
, “
The impact of the EU ETS on the corporate value of European electricity corporations
,”
Energy
45
(
1
),
3
11
(
2012
).
34.
Mwampashi
,
M.
,
Nikitopoulos
,
C.
,
Konstandatos
,
O.
, and
Rai
,
A.
, “
Wind generation and the dynamics of electricity prices in Australia
,”
Energy Econ.
103
,
105547
(
2021
).
35.
Naeem
,
M.
,
Peng
,
Z.
,
Suleman
,
M.
,
Nepal
,
R.
, and
Shahzad
,
S.
, “
Time and frequency connectedness among oil shocks, electricity and clean energy markets
,”
Energy Econ.
91
,
104914
(
2020
).
36.
Olmstead
,
D. E. H.
and
Yatchew
,
A.
, “
Carbon pricing and Alberta's energy-only electricity market
,”
Electr. J.
35
(
4
),
107112
(
2022
).
37.
Qiao
,
S.
,
Guo
,
Z.
,
Tao
,
Z.
, and
Ren
,
Z.
, “
Analyzing the network structure of risk transmission among renewable, non-renewable energy and carbon markets
,”
Renewable Energy
209
,
206
217
(
2023
).
38.
Schoniger
,
F.
and
Morawetz
,
U.
, “
What comes down must go up: Why fluctuating renewable energy does not necessarily increase electricity spot price variance in Europe
,”
Energy Econ.
111
,
106069
(
2022
).
39.
Tian
,
Y.
,
Akimov
,
A.
,
Roca
,
E.
, and
Wong
,
V.
, “
Does the carbon market help or hurt the stock price of electricity companies? Further evidence from the European context
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
112
,
1619
1626
(
2016
).
40.
Wen
,
F.
,
Zhao
,
L.
,
He
,
S.
, and
Yang
,
G.
, “
Asymmetric relationship between carbon emission trading market and stock market: Evidences from China
,”
Energy Econ.
91
,
104850
(
2020
).
41.
Wozabal
,
D.
,
Graf
,
C.
, and
Hirschmann
,
D.
, “
The effect of intermittent renewables on the electricity price variance
,”
OR Spectrum
38
(
3
),
687
709
(
2016
).
42.
Wu
,
R.
,
Qin
,
Z.
, and
Liu
,
B.
, “
A systemic analysis of dynamic frequency spillovers among carbon emissions trading (CET), fossil energy and sectoral stock markets: Evidence from China
,”
Energy
254
,
124176
(
2022
).
43.
Yang
,
L.
, “
Idiosyncratic information spillover and connectedness network between the electricity and carbon markets in Europe
,”
J. Commod. Mark.
25
,
100185
(
2022
).
44.
Yang
,
S.
,
Jahanger
,
A.
, and
Hossain
,
M. R.
, “
Does China's low-carbon city pilot intervention limit electricity consumption? An analysis of industrial energy efficiency using time-varying DID model
,”
Energy Econ.
121
,
106636
(
2023
).
45.
Yuan
,
N.
and
Yang
,
L.
, “
Asymmetric risk spillover between financial market uncertainty and the carbon market: A GAS-DCS-copula approach
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
259
,
120750
(
2020
).
46.
Zeng
,
S.
,
Su
,
B.
,
Zhang
,
M.
,
Gao
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
J.
,
Luo
,
S.
, and
Tao
,
Q.
, “
Analysis and forecast of China's energy consumption structure
,”
Energy Policy
159
,
112630
(
2021
).
47.
Zhang
,
H.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Gao
,
W.
, and
Li
,
Y.
, “
Extreme quantile spillovers and drivers among clean energy, electricity and energy metals markets
,”
Int. Rev. Financ. Anal.
86
,
102474
(
2023
).
48.
Zhao
,
X.
,
Han
,
M.
,
Ding
,
L.
, and
Kang
,
W.
, “
Usefulness of economic and energy data at different frequencies for carbon price forecasting in the EU ETS
,”
Appl. Energy
216
,
132
141
(
2018
).
49.
Zhao
,
L. L.
,
Wen
,
F. H.
, and Wang
,
X.
, “
Interaction among China carbon emission trading markets: Nonlinear Granger causality and time-varying effect
,”
Energy Econ.
91
,
104901
(2020).
50.
Zheng
,
B.
,
Zhang
,
Y. W.
,
Qu
,
F.
,
Geng
,
Y.
, and
Yu
,
H.
, “
Do rare earths drive volatility spillover in crude oil, renewable energy, and high-technology markets?—A wavelet-based BEKK-GARCH-X approach
,”
Energy
251
,
123951
(
2022
).
51.
Zhou
,
Y.
,
Zhao
,
X.
,
Jia
,
X.
, and
Wang
,
Z.
, “
Can the renewable portfolio standards improve social welfare in China's electricity market?
,”
Energy Policy
152
,
112242
(
2021
).
52.
Zhu
,
B.
,
Huang
,
L.
,
Yuan
,
L.
,
Ye
,
S.
, and
Wang
,
P.
, “
Exploring the risk spillover effects between carbon market and electricity market: A bidimensional empirical mode decomposition based conditional value at risk approach
,”
Int. Rev. Econ. Finance
67
,
163
175
(
2020
).
You do not currently have access to this content.