Efficient and accurate wake models are required for wind plant performance modeling and the suite of engineering processes that support wind plant layout, control, and monitoring. Although many analytical and engineering wake models with low computational costs have been proposed, their ability to represent the power production of large wind plants in a wide range of atmospheric conditions is not completely understood. The following validation study reviews the underlying theory for analytical wake models, outlines quality control procedures for observational data, and compares model results with observational data from the Lillgrund Wind Plant. Lillgrund makes a valuable case study for wake modeling because of its regular arrangement and the relatively close spacing of constituent wind turbines, which lead to regular and significant wake interactions within the wind plant and the development of deep array flow conditions. Formulations for the velocity deficit, wake-added turbulence, and wake superposition methods are considered in a modular sense, yielding many possible configurations to represent wind turbine wakes, of which seven are examined in detail. Velocity deficit models that account for flow conditions in the near wake are better able to reproduce power production for wind turbines in the transitional region of the wind plant, where wind turbines experience as many as five wakes from upstream turbines. In the deep array, where power production reaches asymptotic values and wake statistics become quasi-periodic, wake superposition schemes become the largest driver in error reduction; using the linear or maximum wake superposition methods can reduce the relative root mean square error by as much as 40% in the deep array.
Skip Nav Destination
CHORUS
Article navigation
September 2020
Research Article|
October 30 2020
Comparison of modular analytical wake models to the Lillgrund wind plant
Special Collection:
Advances in Wind Plant Controls: Strategies, Implementation, and Validation
Nicholas Hamilton
;
Nicholas Hamilton
a)
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, Colorado, 80401 USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher J. Bay;
Christopher J. Bay
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, Colorado, 80401 USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Fleming;
Paul Fleming
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, Colorado, 80401 USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Jennifer King;
Jennifer King
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, Colorado, 80401 USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Luis A. Martínez-Tossas
Luis A. Martínez-Tossas
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, Colorado, 80401 USA
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Note: This paper is part of the special issue on Advances in Wind Plant Controls: Strategies, Implementation, and Validation.
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 12, 053311 (2020)
Article history
Received:
June 17 2020
Accepted:
September 22 2020
Citation
Nicholas Hamilton, Christopher J. Bay, Paul Fleming, Jennifer King, Luis A. Martínez-Tossas; Comparison of modular analytical wake models to the Lillgrund wind plant. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 1 September 2020; 12 (5): 053311. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018695
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Weather as a driver of the energy transition – present and emerging perspectives of energy meteorology
Marion Schroedter-Homscheidt, Jan Dobschinski, et al.
Modification of wind turbine wakes by large-scale, convective atmospheric boundary layer structures
Lawrence Cheung, Gopal Yalla, et al.
Machine learning for modern power distribution systems: Progress and perspectives
Marija Marković, Matthew Bossart, et al.
Related Content
Pseudo-2D RANS: A LiDAR-driven mid-fidelity model for simulations of wind farm flows
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (March 2022)
Wind plant wake losses: Disconnect between turbine actuation and control of plant wakes with engineering wake models
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (July 2024)
Wind plant controls
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (November 2022)
Monte-Carlo simulations based hub height optimization using FLORIS for two interacting onshore wind farms
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (November 2022)
Graph network heterogeneity predicts interplant wake losses
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (November 2024)