Isolated coastal areas and remote islands may be particularly vulnerable to damage from powerful storms, storm surges, and flooding. Because wave energy converters are designed to survive rough seas and can be transported by sea, they could potentially play a role in poststorm operations and contribute to power-grid recovery. To that end, this paper addresses questions such as how many devices would need to be deployed and in what sequence, in order to optimize some performance index that includes, as functions of time, both, the energy needed and the energy converted by the device units. In this work, the wave-by-wave dynamics of the devices are controlled to optimize mean power conversion over 20 min, assuming sea-state stationarity over that period. Sea-state variations between 20 min and 13 h are found to be small (relative to variations between 13 and 60 h) for a candidate deployment site near a Caribbean island. Targeting deployment over 5–7 days, two optimization schemes are considered: (i) maximization of the power conversion capacity over a specified time interval and (ii) minimization of the time taken to deploy the desired conversion capacity. With the wave energy devices controlled for optimal conversion over successive 20-min periods, the optimization is carried out over the number of converter units added as a function of time. The results indicate that optimal deployment sequences can be evaluated for given conversion capacity/recovery-time targets and the type of recovery desired [strategies (i) or (ii) above]. However, depending on the energy richness of the “normal” wave climate at the deployment site, cost-effective recovery may require closer consideration of the trade-offs among device configurations, size, and number of units needed for desired capacity. The potential for wave energy devices to power early recovery operations and to support power-grid black-start could be worth considering further as a means to enhance the resilience of coastal and island energy systems.

1.
USGCRP-I
,
Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment
(
U.S. Global Change Research Program
,
Washington, DC, USA
,
2017
), Vol.
I
.
2.
USGCRP-II
,
Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment
(
U.S. Global Change Research Program
,
Washington, DC, USA
,
2018
), Vol.
II
.
3.
NWS
,
Major Hurricane Maria
(
The National Weather Service
,
2017
).
4.
L.
Lazo
,
Michael Cleanup in Florida Panhandle Hampered by Damaged Roads, Power Outages
(
The Washington Post
,
2018
).
5.
DOE
,
Potential Maritime Markets for Marine and Hydrokinetic Technologies: Draft Report
(
Department of Energy: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
,
Washington, DC, USA
,
2018
).
6.
S. H.
Salter
, “
Wave power
,”
Nature
249
,
720
724
(
1974
).
7.
E.
Lewis
,
Principles of Naval Architecture
(
Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers
,
NJ
,
1988
), Vol.
II
, Chap. 4.
8.
A. F. O.
Falcão
, “
Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
14
,
899
918
(
2010
).
9.
S. H.
Salter
, “
Recent progress on ducks
,” in
IEEE Proceedings of 1st Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization
, Gothenburg, Sweden,
1979
.
10.
S. H.
Salter
, “
Progress on Edinburgh ducks
,” in
Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Hydrodynamics of Wave Energy Utilization
, edited by
D.
Evans
and
A.
de Araujo Falcão
(
Springer Verlag
,
Berlin
,
1985
), pp.
35
50
.
11.
K.
Budal
and
J.
Falnes
, “
Optimum operation of improved wave power converter
,”
Mar. Sci. Commun.
3
,
133
150
(
1977
).
12.
D. V.
Evans
,
D. C.
Jeffrey
,
S. H.
Salter
, and
J. R. M.
Taylor
, “
Submerged cylinder wave energy device: Theory and experiment
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
1
,
3
12
(
1979
).
13.
Y.
Masuda
, “
Experimental full-scale results of wave power machine Kaimei in 1978
,” in
Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization
, Gothenburg, Sweden (
1979
), pp.
349
360
.
14.
R.
Yemm
,
D.
Pizer
,
C.
Retzler
, and
R.
Henderson
, “
Pelamis: Experience from concept to connection
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A
370
,
365
380
(
2012
).
15.
E.
Friis-Madsen
,
H. C.
Sorensen
, and
S.
Parmeggiani
, “
The development of a wave dragon 1.5 MW demonstrator
,” in
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ocean Energy
, Dublin, October,
2012
.
16.
E.
Mehlum
and
J. J.
Stammes
, “
Power production based on focusing ocean swells
,” in
Proceedings of 1st Symposium on Wave Energy Utilization
, Gothenburg, Sweden (
1979
), pp.
29
35
.
17.
B. M.
Count
, “
Wave power: Problem searching for a solution
,” in
Power from Sea Waves
, edited by
B.
Count
(
Academic Press
,
London
,
1980
), pp.
11
27
.
18.
H.
Eidsmoen
, “
On the theory and simulation of heaving-buoy wave-energy converters with control
,” Ph.D. thesis (
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
, Trondheim, Norway,
1995
).
19.
S. H.
Salter
, “
Development of the duck concept
,” in
Proceedings of Wave Energy Conference
, Heathrow, UK,
1978
.
20.
K.
Budal
and
J.
Falnes
, “
Interacting point absorbers with controlled motion
,” in
Power from Sea Waves
, edited by
B. M.
Count
(
Academic Press
,
London
,
1980
), pp.
381
399
.
21.
P.
Nebel
, “
Maximizing the efficiency of wave-energy plants using complex conjugate control
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I
206
,
225
236
(
1992
).
22.
D.
Skyner
,
Solo Duck Linear Analysis
(
University of Edinburgh
,
1987
).
23.
R. H.
Hansen
and
M. M.
Kramer
, “
Modeling and control of the wave star prototype
,” in
Proceedings of 9th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference,
Southampton, UK (
2011
), p. 163.
24.
S.
Naito
and
S.
Nakamura
, “
Wave energy absorption in irregular waves by feedforward control system
,” in
Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Hydrodynamics of Wave Energy Utilization
, edited by
D.
Evans
and
A.
de Araujo Falcão
(Springer Verlag, Berlin,
1985
), pp.
269
280
.
25.
J.
Falnes
, “
On non-causal impulse response functions related to propagating water waves
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
17
,
379
389
(
1995
).
26.
U. A.
Korde
, “
Near-optimal control of a wave energy device using deterministic-model driven incident wave prediction
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
53
,
31
45
(
2015
).
27.
M. S.
Longuet-Higgins
, “
The statistical analysis of a random moving surface
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
249
,
321
387
(
1957
).
28.
J. W.
Feltes
and
C.
Grande-Moran
, “
Black start studies on system restoration
,” in
Proceedings of IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
(
2008
), p.
8
p.
29.
J. R.
Minkel
,
The 2003 Northeast Blackout: Five Years Latter
(
Scientific American
,
2008
).
30.
P.
Danjcek
,
Mass-Power Outage in Disasters: Addressing Inefficiencies in FEMA's Generator Mission
(
Johns Hopkins University
,
Baltimore, MD, USA
,
2014
).
31.
J. A.
Lopes
,
C. L.
Decas
, and
F. O.
Resende
, “
Microgrids black start and islanded operation
,” in
Proceedings of 15th PSCC
, Liege, Belgium,
2005
.
32.
A.
Colthorpe
,
California Battery's Black Start Capability Hailed as Major Accomplishment in the Energy Industry
(
Energy Storage
,
2017
).
33.
IEC
,
Key World Energy Statistics: Microgrids for Disaster Preparedness and Recovery
(
International Electrotechnical Society
,
Sweden
,
2014
).
34.
ORDOE
, in
Distributed Energy Resilience Study
, edited by
R. W.
Beck
(
Oregon Department of Energy
,
2011
).
35.
M.
Bruneau
,
S. E.
Chang
,
R. T.
Eguchi
,
G. C.
Lee
,
T. D.
O'Rourke
,
A. M.
Reinhern
, and
M.
Shinozuka
, “
A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities
,”
Earthquake Spectra
19
,
733
752
(
2003
).
36.
CDIP
,
Wave measurements at CDIP 181
(
Coastal Data Information Program, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California
,
SD
2019
).
37.
U. A.
Korde
and
J. B.
Richon
,
Recent Experimental Testing of a 2-Body Wave Energy Converter Under Wave-by-Wave Impedance Matching Control
(
National Science Foundation
,
U.S
.,
2018
).
38.
D. V.
Evans
, “
Power from water waves
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
13
,
157
187
(
1981
).
39.
J.
Falnes
, “
Wave-energy conversion through relative motion between two single-mode oscillating bodies
,”
J Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
121
,
32
36
(
1999
).
40.
U. A.
Korde
, “
Wave energy conversion under constrained wave-by-wave impedance matching with amplitude and phase-match limits
” (unpublished).
41.
W.
Cummins
, The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions (David Taylor Model Basin DTNSRDC,
1962
).
42.
U. A.
Korde
and
J. V.
Ringwood
,
Hydrodynamic Control of Wave Energy Devices
(
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
,
2016
), Chap. 4.
43.
C.
Lanczos
,
The Variational Principles of Mechanics
(
University of Toronto Press, CA
;
Dover Inc, NY
,
1970
).
44.
R.
Weinstock
,
Calculus of Variations: With Applications to Physics and Engineering
(
Dover
,
McGraw-Hill edition, NY
,
1974
).
45.
EIA
,
How Much Energy does an American Household Use
(
Energy Information Agency
,
Washington, DC, USA
,
2017
).
46.
FEMA
,
National Disaster Recovery Framework
(
Federal Emergency Management Agency
,
Washington, DC, USA
,
2016
).
47.
U. A.
Korde
,
J. J.
Song
,
R. D.
Robinett
, and
O.
Abdelkhalik
, “
Hydrodynamic considerations in near-optimal control of a wave energy converter for ocean measurement applications
,”
Mar. Technol. Soc. J.
51
,
44
57
(
2017
).
You do not currently have access to this content.