In the present work, the exergetic cost, exergy losses, and optimum insulation thicknesses of pipes by the usage of thermoeconomic analysis are found for the selected four cities, each with different climate regions in Turkey. Glasswool, EPS, and XPS are selected as the insulation materials in this work. It is seen that the optimum value of the insulation thickness such as exergetic cost and exergy losses is dependent on degree-days and it increases with the increasing degree-days. With natural gas as a fuel type and XPS as an insulation material, the optimum values of insulation thicknesses are found to be 0.019, 0.030, 0.036, and 0.057 m for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Elazığ, and Kars, respectively. The exergy savings and payback periods increase with the increasing pipe diameters. Additionally, the optimum insulation thickness is dependent on the convective heat transfer coefficient on the outer surface of the pipe, and it increases with the increasing convective heat transfer coefficient. It is seen from the results of sensitivity analysis that the sensitivity degree of increase in the discount and inflation rate is greater than other variations with respect to the optimum insulation thickness.

1.
Abusoglu
,
A.
and
Kanoglu
,
M.
, “
Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
13
,
2295
2230
(
2009
).
2.
Bahadori
,
A.
and
Vuthaluru
,
H. B.
, “
A simple correlation for estimation of economic thickness of thermal insulation for process piping and equipment
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
30
,
254
259
(
2010
).
3.
Başogul
,
Y.
and
Keçebas
,
A.
, “
Economic and environmental impacts of insulation in district heating pipelines
,”
Energy
36
,
6156
6164
(
2011
).
4.
Başoğul
,
Y.
,
Demircan
C.
, and
Keçebaş
,
A.
, “
Determination of optimum insulation thickness for environmental impact reduction of pipe insulation
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
101
,
121
130
(
2016
).
5.
Çengel
,
Y. A.
, “
Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
2004
).
6.
Çengel
,
Y. A.
and
Boles
,
M. A.
, “
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
,” 5th ed. (
McGraw-Hill
,
2006
).
7.
Čož
,
T. D.
,
Kitanovski
,
A.
, and
Poredoš
,
A.
, “
Exergoeconomic optimization of a district cooling network
,”
Energy
135
,
342
351
(
2017
).
8.
Daşdemir
,
A.
,
Ural
T.
,
Ertürk
,
M.
, and
Keçebas
,
A.
, “
Optimal economic thickness of pipe insulation considering different pipe materials for HVAC pipe applications
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
121
,
242
254
(
2017
).
9.
Duffie
,
J. A.
and
Beckman
,
W. A.
, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 2nd ed. (
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York
, 1991).
10.
Karabay
,
H.
, “
The thermo-economic optimization of hot-water piping systems: A parametric study of the effect of the system conditions
,”
Strojniski Vestn.-J. Mech. Eng.
53
,
548
555
(
2007
).
11.
Kaynakli
,
O.
, “
A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
16
,
415
425
(
2012
).
12.
Kaynakli
,
O.
, “
Economic thermal insulation thickness for pipes and ducts: A review study
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
30
,
184
194
(
2014
).
13.
Keçebaş
,
A.
, “
Determination of insulation thickness by means of exergy analysis in pipe insulation
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
58
,
76
83
(
2012
).
14.
Keçebas
,
A.
,
Alkan
,
M. A.
, and
Bayhan
,
M.
, “
Thermo-economic analysis of pipe insulation for district heating piping systems
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
31
,
3929
3937
(
2011
).
15.
Kotas
,
T. J.
, “
The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis
(
Butterworths
,
London
,
1985
).
16.
Li
,
Y. F.
and
Chow
,
W. K.
, “
Optimum insulation-thickness for thermal and freezing protection
,”
Appl. Energy
80
,
23
33
(
2005
).
17.
Öztürk
,
I. T.
,
Karabay
,
H.
, and
Bilgen
,
E.
, “
Thermo-economic optimization of hot water piping systems: A comparison study
,”
Energy
31
,
2094
2107
(
2006
).
18.
Ucar
,
A.
, “
Thermoeconomic analysis method for optimization of insulation thickness for the four different climatic regions of Turkey
,”
Energy
35
,
1854
1864
(
2010
).
19.
Uçar
,
A.
and
Balo
,
F.
, “
Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls
,”
Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy
30
,
113
122
(
2011
).
20.
Yıldız
,
A.
,
Gürlek
,
G.
,
Erkek
,
M.
, and
Özbalta
,
N.
, “
Economical and environmental analyses of thermal insulation thickness in buildings
,”
J. Therm. Sci. Technol.
28
,
25
34
(
2008
).
21.
Zaki
,
G. M.
and
Al-Turki
,
A. M.
, “
Optimization of multilayer thermal insulation for pipelines
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
21
,
63
70
(
2000
).
22.
Zhang
,
L.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Xiaohu
,
Y.
,
Jin
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
Q.
, and
Hu
W.
, “
Thermo-economic analysis for directly-buried pipes insulation of district heating piping systems
,”
Energy Proc.
105
,
3369
3376
(
2017
).
You do not currently have access to this content.