We study the behavior of a quantum particle trapped in a confining potential in one dimension under multiple sudden changes of velocity and/or acceleration. We develop the appropriate formalism to deal with such situation and we use it to calculate the probability of transition for simple problems such as the particle in an infinite box and the simple harmonic oscillator. For the infinite box of length L under two and three sudden changes of velocity, where the initial and final velocity vanish, we find that the system undergoes quantum revivals for Δt=τ04mL2π, regardless of other parameters (Δt is the time elapsed between the first and last change of velocity). For the simple harmonic oscillator we find that the states obtained by suddenly changing (one change) the velocity and/or the acceleration of the potential, for a particle initially in an eigenstate of the static potential, are coherent states. For multiple changes of acceleration or velocity we find that the quantum expectation value of the Hamiltonian is remarkably close (possibly identical) to the corresponding classical expectation values. Finally, the probability of transition for a particle in an accelerating harmonic oscillator (no sudden changes) calculated with our formalism agrees with the formula derived long time ago by Ludwig [Z. Phys. 130(4), 468–475 (1951)], and recently modified by Dodonov [J. Russ. Laser Res. 42(3), 243–249 (2021)], but with a different expression for the dimensionless parameter γ. Our probability agrees with the one of Dodonov for γ ≪ 1 but is not periodic in time (it decays monotonously), contrary to the result derived by Dodonov.

1.
S. W.
Doescher
and
M. H.
Rice
, “
Infinite square-well potential with a moving wall
,”
Am. J. Phys.
37
(
12
),
1246
1249
(
1969
).
2.
A. J.
Makowski
and
S. T.
Dembinski
, “
Exactly solvable models with time-dependent boundary conditions
,”
Phys. Lett. A
154
(
5-6
),
217
220
(
1991
).
3.
E.
Granot
and
A.
Marchewka
,
EPL (Europhys. Lett.)
86
20007
(
2009
).
4.
M.
Ahumada-Centeno
,
P.
Amore
,
F. M.
Fernández
, and
J.
Manzanares-Martinez
, “
Quantum particles in a moving potential
,”
Phys. Scr.
95
(
6
),
065405
(
2020
).
5.
V. V.
Dodonov
, “
Excitation of a moving oscillator
,”
J. Russ. Laser Res.
42
(
3
),
243
249
(
2021
).
6.

The case of the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) is peculiar because under a constant acceleration the potential transforms into a displaced SHO.

7.
A. G.
Butkovskiy
and
Y. I.
Samoilenko
,
Control of Quantum-Mechanical Processes and Systems
(
Nauka
,
Moscow
,
1984
) (in Russian). English translation: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1990).
8.
P.
Rouchon
, “
Control of a quantum particle in a moving potential well
,”
IFAC Proc. Vol.
36
(
2
),
287
290
(
2003
).
9.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Quantum mechanical time-development operator for the uniformly accelerated particle
,”
Am. J. Phys.
64
(
6
),
803
808
(
1996
).
10.
W. H.
Klink
, “
Quantum mechanics in nonintertial reference frames
,”
Ann. Phys.
260
(
1
),
27
49
(
1997
).
11.
G.
Vandegrift
, “
Accelerating wave packet solution to Schrödinger’s equation
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
(
6
),
576
577
(
2000
).
12.
G. F.
Torres del Castillo
and
B. C.
Nájera Salazar
, “
Transformation of a wavefunction under changes of reference frame
,”
Rev. Mex. Fis.
63
(
2
),
185
189
(
2017
).
13.

If one chooses, for example, a particle in an infinite box, under a constant acceleration the potential behaves linearly between the walls and the spectrum as well as the wave functions have to be determined numerically.

14.
D. F.
Styer
, “
Quantum revivals versus classical periodicity in the infinite square well
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
(
1
),
56
62
(
2001
).
15.
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Quantum wave packet revivals
,”
Phys. Rep.
392
(
1-2
),
1
119
(
2004
).
16.
M. A.
Doncheski
and
R. W.
Robinett
, “
Expectation value analysis of wave packet solutions for the quantum bouncer: Short-term classical and long-term revival behaviors
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
(
10
),
1084
1090
(
2001
).
17.
G.
Ludwig
, “
Die erzwungenen schwingungen des harmonischen oszillators nach der quantentheorie
,”
Z. Phys.
130
(
4
),
468
476
(
1951
).
18.
J.
Schwinger
, “
The theory of quantized fields. III
,”
Phys. Rev.
91
(
3
),
728
(
1953
).
19.

Although we have not stated it explicitly, our method requires working with potentials for which the basis of eigenfunctions is explicitly known.

You do not currently have access to this content.