In this paper, we classify in terms of Lie point symmetries the three-dimensional nonrelativistic motion of charged particles in arbitrary time-independent electromagnetic fields. The classification is made on the ground of equivalence transformations, and when the system is nonlinear and particularly for inhomogeneous and curved magnetic fields, it is also complete. Using the homogeneous Maxwell’s equations as auxiliary conditions for consistency, in which case the system amounts to a Lagrangian of three degrees of freedom with velocity-dependent potentials, the equivalence group stays the same. Therefore, instead of the actual fields, the potentials are equally employed and their gauge invariance results in an infinite-dimensional equivalence algebra, which nevertheless projects to finite-dimensional symmetry algebras. Subsequently, optimal systems of equivalence subalgebras are obtained that lead to one-, two-, and three-parameter extended symmetry groups, besides the obvious time translations. Finally, based on symmetries of Noether type, aspects of complete integrability are discussed, as well.

1.
G. W.
Bluman
and
S. C.
Anco
,
Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations
, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 154 (
Springer
,
2002
).
2.
G. W.
Bluman
,
A. F.
Cheviakov
, and
S. C.
Anco
,
Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations
, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 168 (
Springer
,
2010
).
3.
P. E.
Hydon
,
Symmetry Methods for Differential Equations: A Beginner’s Guide
(
Cambridge University Press
,
2000
).
4.
P. J.
Olver
,
Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations
, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics Vol. 107 (
Springer
,
1993
).
5.
H.
Stephani
,
Differential Equations: Their Solution Using Symmetries
(
Cambridge University Press
,
1989
).
6.
L. V.
Ovsiannikov
,
Group Analysis of Differential Equations
(
Academic Press, Inc.
,
1982
).
7.
N. H.
Ibragimov
,
Selected Works Volume II
(
ALGA Publications, Blekinge Institute of Technology
,
Sweden
,
2006
).
8.
I.
Lisle
, “
Equivalence transformations for classes of differential equations
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of British Columbia
,
Canada
,
1992
.
9.
F.
Schwarz
,
Algorithmic Lie Theory for Solving Ordinary Differential Equations
, Pure and Applied Mathematics (
Chapman & Hall/CRC
,
2008
).
10.

In this paper, by “symmetry” we will always mean “Lie point symmetry,” even when not explicitly stated.

11.
F. M.
Mahomed
and
P. G. L.
Leach
, “
Lie algebras associated with scalar second-order ordinary differential equations
,”
J. Math. Phys.
30
,
2770
2777
(
1989
).
12.
T.
Sen
, “
Lie symmetries and integrability
,”
Phys. Lett. A
122
,
327
330
(
1987
).
13.
P. A.
Damianou
and
C.
Sophocleous
, “
Symmetries of Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom
,”
J. Math. Phys.
40
,
210
235
(
1999
).
14.
P. A.
Damianou
and
C.
Sophocleous
, “
Symmetry group classification of three-dimensional Hamiltonian systems
,”
Appl. Math. Lett.
13
,
63
70
(
2000
).
15.
P. A.
Damianou
and
C.
Sophocleous
, “
Classification of Noether symmetries for Lagrangians with three degrees of freedom
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
36
,
3
18
(
2004
).
16.
M.
Tsamparlis
and
A.
Paliathanasis
, “
Two-dimensional dynamical systems which admit Lie and Noether symmetries
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
44
,
175202
(
2011
).
17.
M.
Tsamparlis
,
A.
Paliathanasis
, and
L.
Karpathopoulos
, “
Autonomous three-dimensional Newtonian systems which admit Lie and Noether point symmetries
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
45
,
275201
(
2012
).
18.
S.
Moyo
,
S. V.
Meleshko
, and
G. F.
Oguis
, “
Complete group classification of systems of two linear second-order ordinary differential equations
,”
Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
18
,
2972
2983
(
2013
).
19.
S.
Suksern
,
S.
Moyo
, and
S. V.
Meleshko
, “
Application of group analysis to classification of systems of three second-order ordinary differential equations
,”
Math. Methods Appl. Sci.
38
,
5097
5113
(
2015
).
20.
C.
Wafo Soh
, “
Symmetry breaking of systems of linear second-order ordinary differential equations with constant coefficients
,”
Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
15
,
139
143
(
2010
).
21.
R.
Campoamor-Stursberg
, “
Systems of second-order linear ODE’s with constant coefficients and their symmetries
,”
Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
16
,
3015
3023
(
2011
).
22.
V. M.
Boyko
,
R. O.
Popovych
, and
N. M.
Shapoval
, “
Lie symmetries of systems of second-order linear ordinary dfferential equations with constant coefficients
,”
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
397
,
434
440
(
2013
).
23.
N.
Kallinikos
and
E.
Meletlidou
, “
Symmetries of charged particle motion under time-independent electromagnetic fields
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
46
,
305202
(
2013
).
24.
F.
Haas
and
J.
Goedert
, “
Noether symmetries for two-dimensional charged-particle motion
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
32
,
6837
6852
(
1999
).
25.
F.
Haas
and
J.
Goedert
, “
Lie symmetries for two-dimensional charged-particle motion
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
33
,
4661
4677
(
2000
).
26.
N. H.
Ibragimov
, “
Symmetries, Lagrangian and conservation laws for the Maxwell equations
,”
Acta Appl. Math.
105
,
157
188
(
2008
).
27.
S. V.
Meleshko
, “
Generalization of the equivalence transformations
,”
Nonlinear Math. Phys.
3
,
170
174
(
1996
).
28.

In fact, instead of V, it suffices to take the projection of V to the (x, A, Φ)-space. Since, however, this would slightly simplify just V8 by leaving out tt, in order to spare notation, we continue to consider the whole of V.

You do not currently have access to this content.