Atom waveguides are used to manipulate cold atoms in atom interferometers. The creation of atom interferometers using cold atoms in miniature magnetic waveguides is one of many goals of current atom chip research. To achieve a complete understanding of atom propagation in a complicated device such as a guided atom interferometer, a detailed understanding of the ground state and other nearby states is needed. The Frobenius series solutions for the bounded transverse modes of an atomic waveguide are presented here and arbitrary precision arithmetic is used to evaluate the series solutions without roundoff errors. The waveguide potential considered is an infinitely long quadrupole magnetic potential as used in various atom chip waveguides. The simplest case of a guided spin- 1 2 particle is presented here. However, the basic series techniques can be extended to both higher order multipole potentials and higher spin particles, including atoms with hyperfine splitting. The low-field and the high-field seeking states together form the spectrum of the waveguide Hamiltonian. In the limit where the transverse dimension of the guide tends to infinity, the spectrum of the guide changes from a discrete set of low- and high-field seeking states to a continuum of high-field seeking states embedded with a discrete set of low-field seeking states. Although the low-field seeking states are not truly bound, the system is an approximate example of bound states in a continuum first discussed by von Neumann and Wigner. Depending on boundary conditions, the solutions form either a discrete set or a continuum of orthogonal waveguide modes. These are useful for further analysis of ideal waveguide behavior as well as the detailed perturbation studies necessary for analysis of atomic waveguide interferometers.

1.
Atom Chips
, edited by
J.
Reichel
and
V.
Vuletic
(
Wiley-VCH
,
2011
).
2.
J.
Fortágh
and
C.
Zimmermann
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
79
,
235
(
2007
).
3.
F.
Bloch
and
I. I.
Rabi
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
17
,
237
(
1945
).
4.
C. V.
Sukumar
and
D. M.
Brink
,
Phys. Rev. A
56
,
2451
(
1997
).
5.
E. A.
Hinds
and
C.
Eberlein
,
Phys. Rev. A
61
,
033614
(
2000
).
6.
E. A.
Hinds
and
C.
Eberlein
,
Phys. Rev. A
64
,
039902
(
2001
).
7.
I.
Lesanovsky
and
P.
Schmelcher
,
Phys. Rev. A
70
,
063604
(
2004
).
8.
J.
Bill
,
M.-I.
Trappe
,
I.
Lesanovsky
, and
P.
Schmelcher
,
Phys. Rev. A
73
,
053609
(
2006
).
9.
R. M.
Potvliege
and
V.
Zehnlé
,
Phys. Rev. A
63
,
025601
(
2001
).
10.
E. L.
Ince
,
Ordinary Differential Equations
(
Dover Publications, Inc.
,
1956
).
11.
C. M.
Bender
and
S. A.
Orszag
,
Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers
(
McGraw HillBook Company
,
1978
).
12.
I.
Lesanovsky
and
P.
Schmelcher
,
Phys. Rev. A
71
,
032510
(
2005
).
13.
W.
Golding
,
ARL Technical Report ARL-TR-5335
,
2010
.
14.
W.
Golding
,
ARL Technical Report ARL-TR-5014
,
2009
.
15.
A. R.
Forsyth
,
Differential Equations
(
Cambridge
,
1902-1904
).
16.
J.
Heading
,
An Introduction to Phase-Integral Methods
(
Metheun & Co.
,
1962
).
17.
J.
von Neumann
and
E.
Wigner
,
Phys. Z.
30
,
465
(
1929
).
You do not currently have access to this content.