With the known group relations for the elements (a,b,c,d) of a quantum matrix T as input a general solution of the RTT relations is sought without imposing the Yang–Baxter (YB) constraint for R or the braid equation for R̂=PR. For three biparametric deformatios, GL(p,q)(2),GL(g,h)(2), and GL(q,h)(1/1), the standard, the nonstandard, and the hybrid one, respectively, R or is found to depend, apart from the two parameters defining the deformation in question, on an extra free parameter K, such that (12)(23)(12)−R̂(23)(12)(23)=[(K/K1)−1][(K/K2)−1](R̂(23)−R̂(12)) with (K1,K2)=(1,p/q),(1,1), and (1,1/q), respectively. Only for K=K1 or K=K2 one has the braid equation. Arbitray K corresponds to a class (conserving the group relations independent of K) of the MQYBE or modified quantum YB equations studied by Gerstenhaber, Giaquinto, and Schack. Various properties of the triparametric R̂(K;p,q),R̂(K;g,h), and R̂(K;q,h) are studied. In the larger space of the modified braid equation (MBE) even R̂(K;p,q) can satisfy 2=1 outside the braid equation (BE) subspace. A generalized, K-dependent, Hecke condition is satisfied by each three-parameter R̂. The role of K in noncommutative geometries of the (K;p,q),(K;g,h), and (K;q,h) deformed planes is studied. K is found to introduce a “soft symmetry breaking,” preserving most interesting properties and leading to new interesting ones. Further aspects to be explored are indicated.

1.
B. L.
Aneva
,
D.
Arnaudon
,
A.
Chakrabarti
,
V. K.
Dobrev
, and
S. G.
Mihov
, “
On combined standard-nonstandard or hybrid (q,h)-deformations
,”
J. Math. Phys.
42
,
1236
(
2001
).
2.
M.
Gerstenhaber
and
A.
Giaquinto
, “
Boundary solutions of the quantum Yang–Baxter equation and solutions in three dimensions
,” q-alg/9710033.
3.
M. Gerstenhaber, A. Giaquinto, and S. D. Schack, Construction of quantum groups from Belavin–Drinfeld infinitesimals, Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, Vol. 7, pp. 45–64, 1993.
4.
J. Madore, An Introduction to Noncommutative Differential Geometry and its Physical Applications, Second ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
5.
S.
Cho
,
J.
Madore
, and
K. S.
Park
, “
Noncommutative geometry of the h-deformed quantum plane
,”
J. Phys. A
31
,
2639
(
1998
).
6.
G.
Fiore
and
J.
Madore
, “
The geometry of the quantum Euclidean space
,” math.QA/9904027.
7.
A.
Aghamohammadi
, “
The two-parametric extension of h deformation of GL(2) and the differential calculus on its quantum plane
,”
Mod. Phys. Lett. A
8
,
2607
(
1993
).
8.
J.
Wess
and
B.
Zumino
, “
Covariant differential calculus on the quantum hyperplane
,”
Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.)
18B
,
302
(
1991
).
9.
A. Klimyk and K. Schmüdgen, Quantum Groups and their Representations (Springer, 1997), p. 296
10.
B.
Abdesselam
,
A.
Chakrabarti
, and
R.
Chakrabarti
, “
Towards a general construction of nonstandard Rh-matrices as contraction limits of Rq-matrices: Uh(SL(N) algebra case
,”
Mod. Phys. Lett. A
13
,
779
(
1998
).
11.
A.
Chakrabarti
and
R.
Chakrabarti
, “
The Gervais-Neveu-Felder equation for the Jordanian quasi-Hopf Uh;y(SL(2)) algebra
,”
J. Phys. A
33
,
1
(
2000
).
12.
B.
Abdesselam
,
A.
Chakrabarti
,
R.
Chakrabarti
, and
J.
Segar
, “
Maps and twists relating U(SL(2)) and the nonstandard Uh(SL(2)): unified construction
,”
Mod. Phys. Lett. A
14
,
765
(
1999
).
13.
P. P.
Kulish
, “
Symmetries related to Yang-Baxter equation and reflection equation
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
13
,
2943
(
1999
).
14.
P. P.
Kulish
,
V. D.
Lyakhovsky
, and
A. I.
Mudrov
, “
Extended Jordanian twists for Lie algebras
,” math.QA/9806014.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.