We examine the geometry of the state space of a relativistic quantum field. The mathematical tools used involve complex algebraic geometry and Hilbert space theory. We consider the Kähler geometry of the state space of any quantum field theory based on a linear classical field equation. The state space is viewed as an infinite-dimensional complex projective space. In the case of boson fields, a special role is played by the coherent states, the totality of which constitutes a nonlinear submanifold 𝒞 of the projective Fock space PF. We derive the metric on 𝒞 induced from the ambient Fubini–Study metric on PF. Arguments from differential geometric, algebraic, and Kählerian points of view are presented, leading to the result that the induced metric is flat, and that the intrinsic geometry of 𝒞 is Euclidean. The coordinates for the single-particle Hilbert space of solutions are shown to be complex Euclidean coordinates for 𝒞. A transversal intersection property of complex projective lines in PF with 𝒞 is derived, and it is shown that the intrinsic geodesic distance between any two coherent states is strictly greater than the corresponding geodesic distance in the ambient Fubini–Study geometry. The functional metric norm of a difference field is shown to give the intrinsic geodesic distance between two coherent states, and the metric overlap expression is shown to measure the angle subtended by two coherent states at the vacuum, which acts as a preferred origin in the Euclidean geometry of 𝒞. Using the flatness of 𝒞 we demonstrate the relationship between the manifold complex structure on PF and the quantum complex structure viewed as an active transformation on the single-particle Hilbert space. These properties of 𝒞 hold independently of the specific details of the single-particle Hilbert space. We show how 𝒞 arises as the affine part of its compactification obtained by setting the vacuum part of the state vector to zero. We discuss the relationship between unitary orbits and geodesics on 𝒞 and on PF. We show that for a Fock space in which the expectation of the total number operator is bounded above, the coherent state submanifold is Kähler and has finite conformal curvature.

1.
T. W. B.
Kibble
,
Commun. Math. Phys.
64
,
73
(
1978
).
2.
T. W. B.
Kibble
,
Commun. Math. Phys.
65
,
189
(
1979
).
3.
J.
Anandan
and
Y.
Aharonov
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
65
,
1697
(
1990
).
4.
R.
Cirelli
,
A.
Manin
, and
L.
Pizzocchero
,
J. Math. Phys.
31
,
2891
(
1990
).
5.
G. W.
Gibbons
,
J. Geom. Phys.
8
,
147
(
1992
).
6.
L. P. Hughston, “Geometric aspects of quantum mechanics,” in Twistor Theory, edited by S. A. Huggett (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995), Chap. 6.
7.
L. P.
Hughston
, “
Geometry of stochastic state vector reduction
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
452
,
953
(
1996
).
8.
A. Ashtekar and T. A. Schilling, “Geometrical formulation of quantum mechanics,” in On Einstein’s Path, edited by A. Harvey (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
9.
D. C.
Brody
and
L. P.
Hughston
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
77
,
2851
(
1996
).
10.
D. C. Brody and L. P. Hughston, “Geometric models for quantum statistical inference,” in The Geometric Universe: Science, Geometry, and the Work of Roger Penrose, edited by S. A. Huggett (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), Chap. 18.
11.
T. R. Field, “The quantum complex structure,” D. Phil thesis, Oxford University, 1997.
12.
R. J.
Glauber
, “
Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field
,”
Phys. Rev.
131
,
2767
(
1963
).
13.
R. J.
Glauber
, “
Classical behaviour of systems of quantum oscillators
,”
Phys. Lett.
21
,
650
(
1966
).
14.
J. R. Klauder and B. Skagerstam, Coherent States (World Scientific, New York, 1985), Chap. 1.
15.
E.
Schrödinger
,
Naturwissenschaften
14
,
664
(
1926
).
16.
R. P. Geroch, “Special topics in particle physics,” unpublished lecture notes, University of Texas at Austin, 1971.
17.
R. P. Geroch, Mathematical Physics (Chicago University Press, Chicago and London, 1984).
18.
R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space–Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984), Vol. 1.
19.
R. P.
Geroch
,
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
62
,
582
(
1971
).
20.
R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics (Chicago University Press, City, 1994).
21.
R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman, PCT Spin and Statistics and All That (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1980).
22.
T. Schilling, “Geometry of quantum mechanics,” Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1996.
23.
S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, “Foundations of differential geometry,” Wiley Classics Library, reissue (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vol. 2.
24.
N. M. J. Woodhouse, Geometric Quantization (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992).
25.
A.
Ashtekar
and
A.
Magnon-Ashtekar
, “
A geometrical approach to external potential problems in quantum field theory
,”
Gen. Relativ. Gravit.
12
,
205
(
1980
).
26.
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958).
27.
D. A.
Page
,
Phys. Rev. A
36
,
3479
(
1987
).
28.
J. A. Morrow and K. Kodaira, Complex Manifolds (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971).
29.
T. R. Field, “Coherent states and Fubini–Study geometry,” Twistor Newsletter, Mathematical Institute, Oxford University 1996, Vol. 41, p. 6.
30.
J. H.
Rawnsley
,
Q. J. Math. Oxford, Ser. 2
28
,
403
(
1977
).
31.
P. A. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry (Wiley, New York, 1978).
32.
A. M.
Perelomov
,
Commun. Math. Phys.
26
,
222
(
1972
).
33.
R. Penrose, in General Relativity and Gravitation 13. Part 1: Plenary Lectures, edited by R. J. Gleiser, C. N. Kozameh, and O. M. Moreschi (IOPP, Bristol/Philadelphia, 1993), p. 179.
34.
M.
Ko
,
E. T.
Newman
, and
R.
Penrose
, “
The Kähler structure of asymptotic twistor space
,”
J. Math. Phys.
18
,
58
(
1977
).
35.
I. C.
Percival
,
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
447
,
189
(
1994
).
36.
J. R.
Klauder
, “
Is quantization geometry?
,” IHES preprint, quant-ph/9604032,
1996
.
37.
A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic, New York, 1995).
38.
A.
Peres
, “
How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states
,”
Phys. Lett. A
128
,
19
(
1988
).
39.
I. D.
Ivanovic
, “
How to differentiate between non-orthogonal states, 2
Phys. Lett. A
123
,
257
(
1988
).
40.
M. Reed and B. Simon, “Methods of modern mathematical physics,” Functional Analysis (Academic, New York, 1972), Vol. I, Chap. VIII.
41.
M. Reed and B. Simon, “Methods of modern mathematical physics,” Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic, New York, 1975), Vol. 2, appendix to Sec. X.7.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.