This paper proposes to broaden the canonical formulation of quantum mechanics. Ordinarily, one imposes the condition H=H on the Hamiltonian, where † represents the mathematical operation of complex conjugation and matrix transposition. This conventional Hermiticity condition is sufficient to ensure that the Hamiltonian H has a real spectrum. However, replacing this mathematical condition by the weaker and more physical requirement H=H, where ‡ represents combined parity reflection and time reversal 𝒫𝒯, one obtains new classes of complex Hamiltonians whose spectra are still real and positive. This generalization of Hermiticity is investigated using a complex deformation H=p2+x2(ix)ε of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian, where ε is a real parameter. The system exhibits two phases: When ε⩾0, the energy spectrum of H is real and positive as a consequence of 𝒫𝒯 symmetry. However, when −1<ε<0, the spectrum contains an infinite number of complex eigenvalues and a finite number of real, positive eigenvalues because 𝒫𝒯 symmetry is spontaneously broken. The phase transition that occurs at ε=0 manifests itself in both the quantum-mechanical system and the underlying classical system. Similar qualitative features are exhibited by complex deformations of other standard real Hamiltonians H=p2+x2N(ix)ε with N integer and ε>−N; each of these complex Hamiltonians exhibits a phase transition at ε=0. These 𝒫𝒯-symmetric theories may be viewed as analytic continuations of conventional theories from real to complex phase space.

1.
C. M.
Bender
and
S.
Boettcher
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
80
,
5243
(
1998
). Note that in this reference the notation N represents the quantity 2+ε.
2.
Several years ago, D. Bessis and J. Zinn-Justin conjectured that the spectrum of H in Eq. (1.1) for the special case ε=1 is real (private communication).
A partial proof for the reality of the spectrum in this special case has been given by
M. P.
Blencowe
,
H.
Jones
, and
A. P.
Korte
,
Phys. Rev. D
57
,
5092
(
1998
) using the linear delta expansion and by
E.
Delabaere
and
F.
Pham
,
Ann. Phys.
261
,
180
(
1997
) using WKB methods.
3.
T. J.
Hollowood
,
Nucl. Phys. B
386
,
166
(
1992
).
4.
D. R.
Nelson
and
N. M.
Shnerb
,
Phys. Rev. E
58
,
1383
(
1998
).
5.
N.
Hatano
and
D. R.
Nelson
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
77
,
570
(
1996
);
N.
Hatano
and
D. R.
Nelson
,
Phys. Rev. B
56
,
8651
(
1997
).
6.
C. M.
Bender
and
S.
Boettcher
,
J. Phys. A
31
,
L273
(
1998
).
7.
C. M.
Bender
and
K. A.
Milton
,
Phys. Rev. D
55
,
R3255
(
1997
).
8.
Nontriviality of −gφ4 field theory has been argued using analytic continuation techniques [see
K.
Gawadzki
and
A.
Kupiainen
,
Nucl. Phys. B
257
,
474
(
1985
)] and using Gaussian approximation [see
B.
Rosenstein
and
A.
Kovner
,
Phys. Rev. D
40
,
504
(
1989
)].
9.
C. M.
Bender
and
K. A.
Milton
,
Phys. Rev. D
57
,
3595
(
1998
).
10.
C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, H. F. Jones, and P. N. Meisinger, in preparation.
11.
C. M.
Bender
and
K. A.
Milton
,
J. Phys. A
32
,
L87
(
1999
).
12.
Equation (2.3) is a complex version of the statement that the velocity is the time derivative of the position (v=dx/dt). Here, the time is real but the velocity and position are complex.
13.
C. M.
Bender
and
J. P.
Vinson
,
J. Math. Phys.
37
,
4103
(
1996
).
14.
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1964).
15.
C. M.
Bender
and
A.
Turbiner
,
Phys. Lett. A
173
,
442
(
1993
).
16.
A. Erdelyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1953), Vol. 2.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.