This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up‐to‐a‐factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero‐mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero‐mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two‐particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.

1.
E. P.
Wigner
,
Ann. Math.
40
,
149
(
1939
).
2.
V.
Bargmann
,
Ann. Math.
59
,
1
(
1954
).
3.
E.
Inönu
and
E. P.
Wigner
,
Nuovo Cimento
9
,
705
(
1952
).
4.
M.
Hamermesh
,
Ann. Phys.
9
,
518
(
1960
).
5.
See, for instance, M. Hamermesh, Group Theory (Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1962), Sec. 12‐7.
6.
F. Lurcat and L. Michel (unpublished).
L. Michel, Lectures at the Istanbul Summer School (1962) (to be published).
7.
The concept of equivalence in the case of projective representations is somewhat distinct from the case of true representations. In fact if {Ur} and {Ur} are two projective representations of the group G, they are said to be equivalent if Ur = VUrV−1 holds between operator rays (Ur is the operator ray generated by Ur, i.e. the set of all operators τUr,τ∈,|τ| = 1). For the operators themselves, we have Ur = φ(r)VUrV−1, where φ(r) is some complex function of modulus 1 on the group. We see that Ur is indeed a projective representation of the group with a factor system ω′(r,s) = [φ(r)φ(s)/φ(rs)]ω(r,s) equivalent to the factor system ω(r,s) of {Ur}.
8.
It was Wigner who emphasized (in the relativistic case but the same remark is valid here) that a zero‐mass system possesses two polarization states but only if we consider the space reflections, since otherwise they would not be connected to each other. On the other hand, for the nonzero mass systems, proper rotational invariance is sufficient for deducing the (2s+1) polarization states from any one among them.
9.
E. P.
Wigner
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
29
,
255
(
1957
).
10.
G. C.
Wick
,
A. S.
Wightman
, and
E. P.
Wigner
,
Phys. Rev.
88
,
101
(
1952
).
11.
A. S. Wightman, “Lectures on Relativistic Invariance,” in Les Houches 1960 Summer School Proceedings (Hermann et Cie., Paris, 1960), pp. 159–226.
12.
J. S.
Lomont
and
H. E.
Moses
,
J. Math. Phys.
3
,
405
(
1962
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.