It is known that Riemannian and Lorentzian four-dimensional dynamically homogeneous manifolds are two-point homogeneous spaces. This is not true for signature (−−++) (neutral or Kleinian signature). In order to better understand their rich structure we study the geometry of nonsymmetric dynamically homogeneous spaces (types II and III): they admit autoparallel distributions and they are locally foliated by totally geodesic, flat, isotropic two-dimensional submanifolds. Moreover we characterize them locally in terms of the existence of an appropriate coordinate system (in the sense of A. G. Walker [Q. J. Math. 1, 69–79 (1950)]).
REFERENCES
1.
B. O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity (Academic, New York, 1983).
2.
M. A.
Akivis
and V. V.
Konnov
, “Local aspects in conformal structure theory
,” Russ. Math. Surveys 48, 1–35 (1993) [Usp. Mat. Nauk
48
, 3
–40
(1993
)].3.
N. Blažić, N. Bokan, and Z. Rakić, “Characterization of 4-dimensional Osserman pseudo-Riemannian manifolds,” preprint (1995, 1997).
4.
A. Borowiec, M. Ferraris, M. Francaviglia, and I. Volovich, “Almost complex and almost product Einstein manifolds from a variational principle,” preprint (1996).
5.
I. Ya.
Arefeva
and I. V.
Volovich
, “Kaluza–Klein theories and the signature of space–time
,” Phys. Lett. B
164
, 287
–292
(1985
).6.
I. Bars and C. Kounnas, “Theories with two times,” preprint, Chern-TH/97-36 (1997).
7.
A. D. Popov, “Hyperbolic strings,” preprint (1990).
8.
9.
J.
Barrett
, G. W.
Gibbons
, M. J.
Perry
, C. N.
Pope
, and P.
Ruback
, “Kleinian geometry and superstring
,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
9
, 1457
(1994
).10.
E.
Bergshoeff
and E.
Sezgin
, “Self-dual supergravity theories in dimensions
,” preprint hep-th/9206101.11.
R.
Osserman
, “Curvature in the eighties
,” Am. Math. Monthly
97
, 731
–756
(1990
).12.
Q. S.
Chi
, “A curvature characterization of certain locally rank-one symmetric spaces
,” J. Diff. Geom.
28
, 187
–202
(1988
).13.
P.
Gilkey
, “Manifolds whose curvature operator has constant eigenvalues at the basepoint
,” J. Geom. Anal.
4
, 155
–158
(1994
).14.
P.
Gilkey
, A.
Swann
, and L.
Vanhecke
, “Isoparametric geodesic spheres and a conjecture of Osserman concerning the Jacobi operator
,” Q. J. Math. Oxford.
46
, 299
–320
(1995
).15.
N.
Blažić
, N.
Bokan
, P. B.
Gilkey
, and Z.
Rakić
, “Pseudo-Riemannian Osserman manifolds
,” Balkan J. Geom. Appl.
2
, 1
–12
(1997
).16.
N.
Blažić
, N.
Bokan
, and P.
Gilkey
, “A Note on Osserman Lorentzian manifolds
,” Bull. London Math. Soc.
29
, 227
–230
(1997
).17.
E. Garcia-Rio, M. E. Vázquez-Abal, and R. Vázquez-Lorenzo, “Nonsymmetric Osserman pseudo-Riemannian manifolds,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc. (to be published).
18.
Z.
Rakić
, “Rank 2 symmetric Osserman spaces
,” Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.
56
, 517
–521
(1998
).19.
D. M. Alekseevsky, N. Blažić, N. Bokan, and Z. Rakić, “Self-dual and pointwise Osserman spaces” (unpublished).
20.
M. A.
Akivis
, “On the real theory of four dimensional conformal structures
,” J. Geom. Phys.
21
, 55
–80
(1996
).21.
A. G.
Walker
, “Canonical form for a Riemannian space with a parallel field of null planes
,” Q. J. Math. (Oxford) (2)
1
, 69
–79
(1950
).22.
N. Blaz̆ić, N. Bokan, and Z. Rakić, “Characterization of type II Osserman manifolds in terms of connection forms,” preprint (1997).
23.
N.
Blaz̆ić
, N.
Bokan
, and Z.
Rakić
, “The first order PDE system for type III Osserman manifolds
,” Publ. Inst. Math., Nouv. Ser.
62
, 113
–119
(1997
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1998 American Institute of Physics.
1998
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.