While it is known that manifest Poincaré invariance of equations of motion for an isolated system of N interacting point particles is not a guarantee of conserved quantities, here it is shown that if such equations of motion have a Newtonian-like form (e.g., the formalism of Havas and Plebański), then ten multiple-time constants of the motion can be constructed by direct integration of the equations of motion. That these directly integrated quantities may be regarded as the ten standard relativistic multiple-time conserved quantities is verified by showing that a known subset, the Lagrangian-based multiple-time conserved quantities that are usually derived from symmetries of manifestly Poincaré-invariant variational principles, here can be obtained by substitution of the Lagrangian forces (which are read from the Newtonian-like Lagrangian equations of motion) into the directly integrated multiple-time forms. This method of obtaining relativistic multiple-time conserved quantities shows that, contrary to some previous statements in the literature, a manifestly Poincaré-invariant “Newton’s third law of motion” is not necessary to guarantee the existence of a conserved four-momentum. Furthermore, an analogous calculation in Newtonian mechanics (using a Galilei-invariant integration parameter instead of a Poincaré-invariant one) yields Newtonian multiple-time constants of the motion. The standard one-time forms of Newtonian conserved quantities do follow from these Newtonian multiple-time constants of the motion when all N times are chosen to be equal and the two-body forces follow from a sum of particle-symmetric two-body potential energies depending only on the mutual interparticle separations. A main result of this direct integration method of obtaining classical relativistic conserved quantities (which involve integrals over the whole motion) is that such quantities are far more analogous to the Newtonian multiple-time constants of the motion (which are just integrals of the equations of motion, independent of any symmetries of these equations) than to the standard Newtonian conservation laws (which apply only under restricted conditions).

1.
R. P.
Gaida
,
Sov. J. Part. Nucl.
13
,
179
(
1982
) is a review of quasirelativistic (or approximately relativistic) equations and includes many references to the three approaches.
2.
D. G.
Currie
,
J. Math. Phys.
4
,
1470
(
1963
);
D. G.
Currie
,
T. F.
Jordan
, and
E. C. G.
Sudarshan
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
35
,
350
(
1963
);
D. G. Currie and T. F. Jordan, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics X-A, edited by W. E. Brittin and A. O. Barut (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968), p. 91.
3.
E. H.
Kerner
,
J. Math. Phys.
6
,
1218
(
1965
).
4.
Constraint’s Theory and Relativistic Dynamics, edited by G. Longhi and L. Lusanna (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
5.
A. D.
Fokker
,
Physica
9
,
33
(
1929
);
A. D.
Fokker
,
Z. Phys.
58
,
386
(
1929
).
6.
P. Havas, in Problems in the Foundations of Physics, edited by M. Bunge (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971), p. 31, referred to here as H, gives the ten conserved quantities for interactions not symmetric in particle variables. Several misprints (in H) in Lμν [Eq. (60)] are noted in
H. W.
Woodcock
and
P.
Havas
,
Phys. Rev. D
6
,
3422
(
1972
), Ref. 37.
7.
J. W.
Dettman
and
A.
Schild
,
Phys. Rev.
95
,
1057
(
1954
).
8.
For an approach more in the Noether spirit than Refs. 6 or 7, see
W. N.
Herman
,
J. Math. Phys.
26
,
2769
(
1985
).
9.
P.
Havas
and
J.
Plebański
,
Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.
5
,
433
(
1960
);
P. Havas, in Statistical Mechanics of Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium, edited by J. Meixner (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965), p. 1;
P.
Havas
and
J.
Plebański
,
Celestial Mech.
7
,
321
(
1973
);
P.
Havas
and
J.
Plebański
,
Rev. Mex. Fis.
40
,
665
(
1994
).
10.
H.
Van Dam
and
E.
Wigner
,
Phys. Rev. B
138
,
1576
(
1965
);
H.
Van Dam
and
E.
Wigner
,
142
,
838
(
1966
). In the second paper, conserved quantities are written with integrals similar in part to those used in this paper, but, with a major difference, viz., integrations on functions which are nonzero only for spacelike interactions and forces which are a special case of those defined in Sec. II in this paper.,
Phys. Rev. B
11.
P.
Droz-Vincent
,
Phys. Scr.
2
,
129
(
1970
);
L.
Bel
,
A.
Salas
, and
J. M.
Sanchez
,
Phys. Rev. D
7
,
1099
(
1973
);
L.
Bel
and
J.
Martin
,
Phys. Rev. D
8
,
4347
(
1973
); ,
Phys. Rev. D
L.
Bel
and
J.
Martin
,
9
,
2760
(
1974
).,
Phys. Rev. D
12.
See Ref. 10 and references therein.
13.
P.
Havas
,
Acta Phys. Austr.
38
,
145
(
1973
). This paper is also available in Symmetry in Physics: Selected Reprints, edited by J. Rosen (Am. Asso. Phys. Teachers, New York, 1982), p. 108, where misprints and misstatements have been corrected.
14.
P.
Stephas
,
Am. J. Phys.
46
,
360
(
1978
) has done an integration of the equations of motion of classical electrodynamics using Dirac delta functions to create functionals for conserved quantities, but they are not of the forms used in this paper.
15.
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1959), p. 47.
16.
H. W. Woodcock, Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, 1972 (unpublished), Appendix D.
17.
In fact, even approximately relativistic (to order c−2) multiple-time conserved quantities for interacting point particles with isospin following from MPI Fokker variational principles have been shown to be limits of MPI multiple-time conserved quantities;
see W. N. Herman, Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, 1976 (unpublished), Appendix C.
18.
P.
Havas
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
36
,
938
(
1964
) treats invariant parameters of both the Poincaré and Galilei groups.
19.
J. A.
Wheeler
and
R. P.
Feynmann
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
21
,
425
(
1949
), Eq. (19) and the second of Refs. 10, Eq. (19).
20.
Reference 9 (1973) and Ref. 10.
21.
From an unpublished manuscript by the authors of Ref. 9 (1960).
22.
P. Havas, private communication.
23.
Definitive conditions on the integrands that make these integrals finite have not been established. Thus, this formalism applies only to Fiμ that yield finite integrals.
24.
Interaction angular momentum in electrodynamics [a special case of Eq. (28)] has been studied in both classical and quantum forms by
J. H.
Cooke
,
Phys. Rev.
174
,
1602
(
1968
);
J. H.
Cooke
,
Phys. Rev. D
7
,
2818
(
1973
)
and in the classical case only by
G. M.
Schmieg
,
Nuovo Cimento B
67
,
67
(
1970
).
25.
P. Havas, in Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965), p. 347.
26.
Newton’s third law of motion is sufficient here and follows from the form of the potential energy. That the necessary condition for (A15) is the vanishing of the total force has been known at least as far back as
J. R.
Schütz
,
Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl.
,
110
(
1897
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.