The Poincaré group is represented taking as a complete set of commuting observables {PT,K3,𝒯3}, where K3 is the boost along the third axis and 𝒯3 the third component of the null plane spin. We name it K3‐representation. There appears in it a parameter K, with dimensions of momentum, from which the infinite momentum limit can be implemented in a natural way as the contraction k→∞. K3‐states and wavefunctions are well defined in the infinite momentum limit. They are related to null plane states and wavefunctions by a Mellin transformation. The convergence properties of null plane functions translate into analyticity properties of K3‐functions in the complex λ (eigenvalue of K3)‐plane.
REFERENCES
1.
For a review of IMF techniques, see:
I. B.
Kogut
and L.
Susskind
, Phys. Rep.
8 C
, 75
(1973
).2.
I. D.
Bjorken
, I. B.
Kogut
, and E. E.
Soper
, Phys. Rev. D
3
, 1382
(1971
).3.
4.
5.
6.
J.
León
, M.
Quirós
, and J.
Ramirez Mittelbrunn
, J. Math. Phys.
20
, 1068
(1979
);Nuovo Cimento
54B
, 153
(1979
).7.
An earlier attempt along this direction can be found in
J.
León
, M.
Quirós
, and J.
Ramirez Mittelbrunn
, Nuovo Cimento
41 A
, 141
(1977
);Phys. Lett.
68B
, 247
(1977
).8.
H.
Leutwyler
and I.
Stern
, Ann. Phys.
112
, 94
(1978
) and references contained therein.9.
Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, SLAC Report No. 137, 1971 (unpublished).
10.
Other possibilities have been explored in:
M.
Quiros
and J.
Ramirez Mittelbrunn
, Nuovo Cimento Lett.
26
, 633
(1979
).11.
Bateman Manuscript Project, Table of Integral Transforms, edited by A. Erdélyi (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1953).
12.
I. M. Gel’fand and G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions, Vol. I (Academic, New York, 1964).
13.
N. I. Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations, (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968).
14.
To be precise, this is only true if the functions satisfy a slightly stronger condition than (21a), namely that they should decrease at at least as and vanish at at least as for some For example, a behavior of like is enough for (21a) at ∞ but it is not sufficient to guarantee the existence of the analyticity band (21b).
15.
Similar considerations as in (14) apply also here.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1981 American Institute of Physics.
1981
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.