We show that the intensity of magnetization I (z,x) where z=e−2βH and x=e−2βJ, for the ferromagnetic Ising model in arbitrary dimension, reduces, for rational values of x, to a Diophantine moment problem I (z) =∑0nkzk, where nk=∫Λ0σ (λ) λkdλ, σ (λ) is a positive measure, n0=1/2, and nk is integer for k≠0. The fact that the nk are positive integers puts very stringent constraints on the measure σ (λ). One of the simplest results we obtain is that for Λ<4, σ (λ) is necessarily a finite sum of Dirac δ functions whose support is of the form 4 cos2(pπ/m), p=0,1,2,...,m−1, with m a finite integer. For Λ=4, which correspond to the one‐dimensional Ising model, we have the result that either I (z) is a rational fraction belonging to the previous class Λ<4, or I (z) = (1/2)(1−4z)−1/2 which corresponds precisely to the exact answer for dimension 1. For Λ≳4, which is associated with Ising models in dimension d⩾2 we show that all cases are reducible to Λ=6, by a quadratic transformation which transforms integers into integers and positive measures into positive measures. The fixed point of this type of transformation is analyzed in great detail and is shown to provide a devil’s staircase measure. Various other results are also discussed as well as conjectures.

1.
L.
Onsager
,
Phys. Rev.
65
,
117
(
1944
);
B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, The Two‐Dimension Ising Model (Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass., 1973).
2.
T. D.
Lee
and
C. N.
Yang
,
Phys. Rev.
87
,
410
(
1952
);
D.
Ruelle
,
Commun. Math. Phys.
31
,
265
(
1973
).
3.
F. Hausdorff, Set Theory (Chelsea, New York, 1962).
4.
C. Domb, Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, London, 1974), Vol. 3, p. 357.
5.
J. D.
Bessis
,
J. M.
Drouffe
, and
P.
Moussa
,
J. Phys. A
9
,
2105
(
1976
).
6.
Analogous Stieltjes representation for the intensity of magnetization was introduced in
G. A.
Baker
, Jr.
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
20
,
990
(
1968
).
7.
See Eq. (3.18) in Ref. 5, which contains a misprint and must be read: π‐Θ0⩽(c/2)(π‐ψ), where x = sin(π/2).
8.
See
G. A.
Baker
, Jr.
,
Adv. Theor. Phys.
1
,
1
(
1965
).
9.
D. S.
Gaunt
,
Phys. Rev.
179
,
174
(
1969
);
G. A.
Baker
, Jr.
, and
P.
Moussa
,
J. Appl. Phys.
43
,
1360
(
1978
).
10.
M. E.
Fisher
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
40
,
1610
(
1978
).
11.
P. Dienes, The Taylor series (Dover, New York, 1957), p. 324.
12.
U. Grenander and G. Szegö, Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications (University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1958).
13.
D. and G. Choodnovsky (private communication).
14.
P. Deligne (private communication).
15.
Some of the results in this paragraph have been obtained in collaboration with B. Derrida.
16.
S. Karlin and W. J. Studden, Tchebycheff Systems (Interscience, New York, London, Sydney, 1966).
17.
J. A. Shohat and J. D. Tamarkin, The Problem of Moments (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1950).
18.
G. A.
Baker
, Jr.
,
J. Math. Phys.
10
,
814
(
1969
).
19.
S. Aubry, “The new concept of transitions by breaking of analyticity in a crystallographic model,” communication at the Symposium on Non‐Linear Soliton Structure and the Dynamic of Condensed Matter, Oxford, England, June 1978.
20.
R. J.
Rubin
,
J. Math. Phys.
11
,
1857
(
1970
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.