We investigate the vibrational ultrastrong coupling between molecular vibrations of water molecules and surface lattice resonances (SLRs) sustained by extended arrays of plasmonic microparticles. We design and fabricate an array of gold bowties, which sustain a very high field enhancement, with its SLR resonated with the OH stretching modes of water. We measure a Rabi splitting of 567 cm−1 in the strongly coupled system, whose coupling strength is 8% of the OH vibrational energy, at the onset of the ultrastrong coupling regime (10%). These results introduce metallic microparticle arrays as a platform for the investigation of ultrastrong coupling, which could be used in polaritonic chemistry to modify the dynamics of chemical reactions that require high coupling strengths.

The strong coupling between molecular vibrations and photons is known as vibrational strong coupling (VSC), and it has attracted increasing attention due to its potential applications, particularly in chemistry where vibrations play a crucial role.1–8 The hallmark of this coupling is the formation of vibro-polaritons, which are hybrid states that inherit both the properties of molecular vibrations and light. These dressed states are referred as the lower (LP) and upper (UP) polaritons. The energy difference between the LP and UP, also known as the Rabi splitting (ΩR), indicates the strength of the coupling. A representation of the energy levels of a system under strong coupling is shown in Fig. 1(a), with the following equation defining the magnitude of ΩR in the case of collective strong coupling:9–11,
(1)
where h is Planck’s constant, N is the number of molecules involved in the coupling, and g is the coupling strength of a single molecule. The coupling strength depends on the transition dipole moment (μ) of the molecule and on the electric field (E) in the optical cavity, g=μE. Based on the magnitude of g, and consequently, on ΩR, it is possible to define different regimes of photon–vibration coupling. If the loss and/or decoherence rates of the vibration or the photons exceed their energy exchange rate, the system is in the weak coupling regime. Conversely, the strong coupling regime is achieved if the energy exchange rate exceeds the losses in the system.12 If the Rabi splitting reaches a magnitude comparable with the energy of the molecular vibration ων, the vibration–photon system enters the regime known as ultrastrong coupling (USC). Typically, a system is considered to be in the USC regime when the coupling strength g ≥ 0.1ων.13–16 While strong light–matter coupling mostly affects the excited state of the molecule, under ultrastrong interaction, the ground state of the system is perturbed and dressed by virtual photons.17 The USC regime has been investigated in relation to applications such as polaritonic chemistry,18–24 organic light emitting diodes,25–27 and quantum technologies.28–30 
FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic representation of the energy levels of a strongly coupled system between molecular vibrations (green), V1, and optical states (blue), |ℏωc⟩. (b) Absorbance of the symmetric and antisymmetric stretching modes of the OH bond of water as a function of the wavenumber. The water molecule is shown as an inset.

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic representation of the energy levels of a strongly coupled system between molecular vibrations (green), V1, and optical states (blue), |ℏωc⟩. (b) Absorbance of the symmetric and antisymmetric stretching modes of the OH bond of water as a function of the wavenumber. The water molecule is shown as an inset.

Close modal

Vibro-polaritons under the USC have been investigated exclusively with Fabry–Pérot optical cavities formed by a pair of facing mirrors with the molecules in between.31–35 An alternative platform to achieve USC can be found in periodic arrays of scattering metallic or dielectric particles called metasurfaces. These metasurfaces sustain photonic modes known as surface lattice resonances (SLRs), which arise from the enhanced radiative coupling of the scatterers in the array mediated by the in-plane diffracted orders of the array.36–39 Compared to optically closed Fabry–Pérot cavities, these metasurfaces are open cavities, which are fully accessible for optical characterizations and easier to couple with external radiation. In addition, their tunability and scalability make them relevant for strong and ultrastrong coupling experiments.

In this article, we experimentally demonstrate the VSC between the SLRs of an array of gold microparticles and the OH stretching modes of water molecules; see Fig. 1(b). The symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes of water cause a very broad linewidth of 500 cm−1 and an energy of 3390 cm−1. Several studies have demonstrated the USC of water in the Fabry–Pérot cavity22,24,40–42 and water droplets.43 The gold metasurfaces are designed and optimized using Finite-Differences in Time-Domain (FDTD) to obtain an SLR perfectly resonant with the OH modes. Due to the close frequencies between the two stretching modes of water, the SLRs here couple to both modes, leading to the formation of two species of vibrational polaritons. We investigate three different array configurations: an array with a single gold disk per unit cell, an array with a dimer of disks per unit cell, and an array with a bowtie per unit cell. Among these systems, the bowtie array exhibits the largest Rabi splitting because of its highest field confinement. In addition, the optical response of the fabricated array of gold bowties coupled with the OH bond of water was measured. We recover a Rabi splitting of 564 cm−1, whose coupling strength g is 8% of the vibrational energy of the OH stretching modes. This magnitude of the coupling strength is close to the criterion of USC. The demonstration opens the possibility of using these resonant arrays as a platform to further investigate novel physical and chemical properties under USC.

The light–matter interaction between the OH molecular vibrations and SLRs is performed on uniform periodic arrays of gold microparticles. To investigate what kind of particle’s geometry and configuration leads to the strongest coupling strength, we analyze three different configurations of particles forming the unit cell: a single disk, a dimer of disks, and a bowtie. The geometrical parameters of both the metallic particles and the arrays have been optimized using the FDTD method. In general, the optimal coupling is achieved when the SLR perfectly overlaps with the molecular resonance. For all three array configurations, a three-layer system is considered: a semi-infinite CaF2 substrate with frequency-dependent permittivity,44 the gold particles with a complex refractive index on top of the substrate,45 and 6 μm of dielectric material representing the water layer on top of the array. To simulate the optical response of the bare array without the effect of the molecular vibrations of water, we consider the dielectric material on top of the arrays with the real part of the refractive index of the dielectric material as a constant (n = 1.33) and zero dissipation (k = 0). A hypothetical non-dissipative medium is used for the numerical characterization of the SLR modes in the absence of molecular vibrations [black curves in Figs. 3(a)3(c)]. By having a real component of the refractive index and no absorption, we can tune the SLRs to the same frequency of the molecular vibrations, which are responsible for the coupling. For the array formed by single disks, the optimization is performed by sweeping over several radii of particles (R) and period of the arrays (a), until a good overlap between the spectral position and linewidth of the SLR and the OH resonance is achieved. The height of the metallic particles is set at 50 nm. The optimal system obtained from the simulations is an array with a period a = 1.95 μm and disk’s radius of R = 490 nm.

The increased complexity of the array of disk’s dimers requires the consideration of an additional parameter: the gap distance, d, between the disks in the dimer. After optimization of the geometrical parameters, the ideal system is found to have a period a = 1.9 μm, radii of the disks in the dimer of R = 335 nm, and a gap distance of d = 50 nm. Finally, the array configuration with bowties is optimized with the simulations by sweeping over the period, the angle α at the vertex of the triangles, and the height of the triangles h. The optimization yielded an array with a period a = 1.75 μm and a height of h = 670 nm.

As the coupling strength depends on the electric field of the metasurface, we simulated for all the optimized configurations the electric field enhancement under normal illumination with a plane wave polarized along the x-direction. The results are shown in Fig. 2. Schematic illustrations of the unit cell with the parameters that are optimized with the simulations are shown in Figs. 2(a),2(e), and 2(i). Figures 2(b)2(d) show the field enhancement in a unit cell of the array formed by single disks. The largest field enhancement is located on the edges of the particle with a 20-fold enhancement. In addition, field enhancements above 2, which are associated with the SLR, extend up to 1 μm above the CaF2/water interface.

FIG. 2.

Field enhancement maps in a unit cell of three arrays under investigation. The arrays are simulated with an x-polarized plane wave incident at normal incidence. (a) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a single disk in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a and R are the period of the array and the radius of the particle, respectively. (b) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white circle indicates the position of the particle. (c) XZ and (d) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement. (e) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a dimer of disks in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a, d, and R are the period of the array, the distance between the disks, and the radius of the particle, respectively. (f) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white circles indicate the position of the disks. (g) XZ and (h) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement. (i) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a bowtie in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a, α, and h are the period of the array, the angle at the vertex of the triangle, and the height of the triangle, respectively. (j) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white triangles indicate the position of the disks. (k) XZ and (l) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement.

FIG. 2.

Field enhancement maps in a unit cell of three arrays under investigation. The arrays are simulated with an x-polarized plane wave incident at normal incidence. (a) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a single disk in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a and R are the period of the array and the radius of the particle, respectively. (b) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white circle indicates the position of the particle. (c) XZ and (d) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement. (e) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a dimer of disks in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a, d, and R are the period of the array, the distance between the disks, and the radius of the particle, respectively. (f) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white circles indicate the position of the disks. (g) XZ and (h) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement. (i) Schematic representation of the simulated unit cell for the array with a bowtie in the unit cell. The highlighted parameters a, α, and h are the period of the array, the angle at the vertex of the triangle, and the height of the triangle, respectively. (j) XY cross section of the field enhancement on top of the gold disk at a height of 50 nm from the substrate. The white triangles indicate the position of the disks. (k) XZ and (l) YZ cross sections of the field enhancement.

Close modal

Compared to the array of single particles, the configuration with the disk dimers shows a higher field enhancement of 30 in the gap between the disks, as shown in Figs. 2(f)2(h). The SLR in the array of bowties gives the highest field enhancements with a maximum value of 155 [Figs. 2(j)2(l)]. Notably, at the bases of the triangles, a high-field enhancement is also present with a value of 20, comparable to the highest fields of the previous two configurations.

The coupled systems are simulated by replacing the dielectric material without absorption with the material with the complex refractive index of water.46 Note that the molecular density and the random orientation of water molecules are taken into account by the complex refractive index of bulk water. The simulated extinction spectra E, defined as E = 1 − T (where T is the transmission), of the coupled systems are shown for the investigated arrays in Figs. 3(a)3(c) (red curves) as a function of the wavenumber. The extinction of the SLRs of the bare arrays is shown in the same figures as a black curve. All three configurations clearly show Rabi splitting, indicating the formation of vibro-polaritons. Note that the VSC here fulfills the Savona et al. criterion: 4g > |γcγm|, where γc and γm correspond to the losses of the photonic modes and the molecular resonator.47,48 For the array of the single microdisks, we retrieve the energies of the lower and upper polaritons to be 3130 and 3610 cm−1, respectively. The Rabi splitting is 480 cm−1. In the case of the array of dimers of disks, the lower polariton has an energy of 3150 cm−1 and the upper polariton has an energy of 3603 cm−1, with a Rabi splitting of 453 cm−1. The coupled array of bowties and water shows the polaritons at 3119 cm−1 for the LP and 3645 cm−1 for the UP. For this configuration, the Rabi splitting is 526 cm−1, which is 17% of the energy of the molecular vibration. These results show that the array of bowties gives the highest light–matter coupling strength together with the most intense field enhancement [Fig. 3(d)]. As a result, we choose the array of bowtie as the platform to experimentally achieve vibrational ultrastrong coupling. Interestingly, the comparison between the single-microdisk array and the array of microdisk dimers indicates that high local field enhancements are not directly associated with high coupling strength. This is because the disk dimer causes fewer averaged field enhancements on top of the disks, where the majority of the molecules are located, compared to the single disk (Fig. S2).

FIG. 3.

FDTD simulations of the optical extinction of the arrays coupled with the OH of water. (a) Simulated optical extinction of the array of single particles as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. (b) Simulated optical extinction of the array of dimers of disks as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. (c) Simulated optical extinction of the array of bowties as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. Note that the extinction spectra of the coupled system are normalized by the extinction spectrum of water. (d) Rabi splitting for the three configurations as a function of the field enhancement. Next to the simulated values (black filled circles), the unit cells are represented.

FIG. 3.

FDTD simulations of the optical extinction of the arrays coupled with the OH of water. (a) Simulated optical extinction of the array of single particles as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. (b) Simulated optical extinction of the array of dimers of disks as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. (c) Simulated optical extinction of the array of bowties as a function of the wavenumber (red curve), and simulated SLR of the bare array (black curve). As an inset, a schematic representation of the unit cell is shown. Note that the extinction spectra of the coupled system are normalized by the extinction spectrum of water. (d) Rabi splitting for the three configurations as a function of the field enhancement. Next to the simulated values (black filled circles), the unit cells are represented.

Close modal

The particle array has been fabricated using electron beam lithography (see Sec. S1 of the supplementary material) on a disk-shaped CaF2 substrate with 1-inch diameter and 1 mm thickness. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a portion of the array is shown in Fig. 4. The dimensions of the array are 9 × 9 mm2. After fabrication, the sample is placed in a Harrick Scientific demountable liquid cell with a 6 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) spacer and a 2 mm thick CaF2 window on top. We use a Bruker v70 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) to measure the IR extinction spectra.

FIG. 4.

Array of gold bowties and its SLR. (a) SEM image of the array of bowties. (b) Optical extinction spectra of the bowtie array in air as a function of the polarization angle. (c) Comparison between the simulated (dotted) and measured (solid) extinction spectra of the SLR for TE (red) and TM (black) polarizations.

FIG. 4.

Array of gold bowties and its SLR. (a) SEM image of the array of bowties. (b) Optical extinction spectra of the bowtie array in air as a function of the polarization angle. (c) Comparison between the simulated (dotted) and measured (solid) extinction spectra of the SLR for TE (red) and TM (black) polarizations.

Close modal

The SLR of the bare array is characterized by measuring the zeroth order transmission with linearly polarized incident light at normal incidence. The dependence of the IR extinction on the polarization angle of the incident light is shown in Fig. 4(b). The band of large extinction around 4000 cm−1 corresponds to the SLR. The white vertical dotted lines indicate the angles at which the polarization of the light is parallel (TE) or orthogonal (TM) to the long axis of the bowties, which leads to a blueshift from 3930 cm−1 (parallel to the long axis) to 4066 cm−1 (orthogonal to the long axis). In Fig. 4(c), the simulated and measured SLRs of the bowtie array are shown for both TE (red) and TM (black) polarizations as a function of the wavenumber. For both simulations and measurements, the nearly equal peak positions of TE and TM modes arise from the same lattice periods along the x and y axes (square lattice) together with the nearly equilateral shape of the triangles forming the bowtie.38 In addition, the blueshift of the SLR from the TE to TM polarization is observed, which is mainly due to the reduction of the capacitive coupling between the two triangles of the bowties across the gap that results from the different charge distributions under TE and TM excitation (see details in Sec. S2 of the supplementary material). In Figs. 4(b) and 4(c), the measurements and simulations are performed in air to characterize the SLR modes. The difference between the simulated and measured SLRs shown in Fig. 4(c) could be due to imperfections during fabrication, the focused illumination of the sample instead of the collimated illumination considered in the simulations, or a difference in the refractive index of the evaporated gold compared to the values from the literature used in the simulations.45 The measurements are taken in air as there is no available material that matches the refractive index of water while lacking the OH vibrational mode.

To investigate the VSC, we fill the cell with demineralized water and measure the transmittance for both TE and TM polarizations with normal incidence excitation. Figure 5 shows the extinction spectra of the coupled system. To remove the signal from dark states and uncoupled molecules, the measurements are normalized by the extinction spectrum of water in the same liquid cell without particle array. After this normalization, the polariton peaks are clearly observed. For TE polarization, the polaritons are found at 3167 cm−1 (LP) and 3734 cm−1 (UP). We retrieve a Rabi splitting of ΩR = 567 cm−1. Since the coupling strength is 8% of the OH energy, it is at the onset of USC. In contrast, the spectrum of the extinction for TM excitation shows a larger Rabi splitting. However, this splitting is caused by the detuned SLR from the OH vibration at normal incidence due to the blueshift for this polarization [see Fig. 4(c)], and not to a larger coupling strength. Indeed, the simulated field enhancement for TM polarization is lower for TM polarization (see Sec. S5 of the supplementary material), which should lead to a weaker coupling.

FIG. 5.

Relative extinction spectrum of the coupled system. The extinction (E) is defined as E = 1 − T/Tref, where T and Tref are the transmission spectrum through the sample and the reference transmission spectrum, respectively. “Sample” indicates the particle array in the liquid cell filled with water, and “Reference” represents the water in the cell without the array.

FIG. 5.

Relative extinction spectrum of the coupled system. The extinction (E) is defined as E = 1 − T/Tref, where T and Tref are the transmission spectrum through the sample and the reference transmission spectrum, respectively. “Sample” indicates the particle array in the liquid cell filled with water, and “Reference” represents the water in the cell without the array.

Close modal

We have investigated the coupling between surface lattice resonances in arrays made of metallic particles and the hydroxyl bond of water molecules. We have simulated and optimized three arrays with different unit cell configurations: single disks, dimers of disks, and bowties. Among the three configurations, the arrays of bowties show the largest Rabi splitting and the highest field enhancement, making them the perfect candidate to experimentally demonstrate ultrastrong coupling of molecular vibrations in liquid phase. After fabrication of the array of bowties, we have characterized the bare array, finding good agreement between the measurements and simulations. Finally, we have measured the coupled system retrieved a Rabi splitting of 567 cm−1, whose coupling strength is 8% of the energy of the OH bond stretching of water. These results demonstrate the coupling between the optical modes in metasurfaces and water molecules close to the USC regime. This demonstration in open resonant cavities, in contrast to closed Fabry–Pérot cavities, introduces a novel platform for investigating polaritonic physics and chemistry under ultrastrong coupling.

The supplementary material is available free of charge and includes: the fabrication recipe of the metasurface, the origin of the blueshift of the SLRs for different polarizations of incident light, the angular dispersion of the SLR, the comparison between the field enhancements of the single disk and the dimer along the z direction, and the field enhancement of the bowtie for the TM polarization.

J.G.R. acknowledges the financial support from the Dutch Research Council (NWO) through the talent scheme (Vici Grant No. 680-47-628). Y.-C.W. acknowledges the support from the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) through the postdoctoral research abroad program.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Francesco Verdelli: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yu-Chen Wei: Formal analysis (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Joost M. Scheers: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Mohamed S. Abdelkhalik: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal). Masoumeh Goudarzi: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal). Jaime Gómez Rivas: Conceptualization (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

1.
P.
Törmä
and
W. L.
Barnes
, “
Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: A review
,”
Rep. Prog. Phys.
78
(
1
),
013901
(
2014
).
2.
T. W.
Ebbesen
, “
Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective
,”
Acc. Chem. Res.
49
(
11
),
2403
2412
(
2016
).
3.
T. E.
Li
,
B.
Cui
,
J. E.
Subotnik
, and
A.
Nitzan
, “
Molecular polaritonics: Chemical dynamics under strong light–matter coupling
,”
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
73
,
43
71
(
2022
).
4.
D.
Sidler
,
C.
Schäfer
,
M.
Ruggenthaler
, and
A.
Rubio
, “
Polaritonic chemistry: Collective strong coupling implies strong local modification of chemical properties
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
12
(
1
),
508
516
(
2020
).
5.
K.
Hirai
,
J. A.
Hutchison
, and
H.
Uji-i
, “
Recent progress in vibropolaritonic chemistry
,”
ChemPlusChem
85
(
9
),
1981
1988
(
2020
).
6.
K.
Nagarajan
,
A.
Thomas
, and
T. W.
Ebbesen
, “
Chemistry under vibrational strong coupling
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
143
(
41
),
16877
16889
(
2021
).
7.
J.
Fregoni
and
S.
Corni
, “
Polaritonic chemistry
,” in
Theoretical and Computational Photochemistry
(
Elsevier
,
2023
), pp.
191
211
.
8.
F.
Verdelli
,
Y.-C.
Wei
,
K.
Joseph
,
M. S.
Abdelkhalik
,
M.
Goudarzi
,
S. H. C.
Askes
,
A.
Baldi
,
E. W.
Meijer
, and
J.
Gómez Rivas
, “
Polaritonic chemistry enabled by non-local metasurfaces
,”
Angew. Chem.
(published online
2024
).
9.
H.
Varguet
,
A. A.
Díaz-Valles
,
S.
Guérin
,
H. R.
Jauslin
, and
G.
Colas des Francs
, “
Collective strong coupling in a plasmonic nanocavity
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
154
,
084303
(
8
) (
2021
).
10.
G.
Zengin
,
M.
Wersäll
,
S.
Nilsson
,
T. J.
Antosiewicz
,
M.
Käll
, and
T.
Shegai
, “
Realizing strong light-matter interactions between single-nanoparticle plasmons and molecular excitons at ambient conditions
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
(
15
),
157401
(
2015
).
11.
D. S.
Dovzhenko
,
S. V.
Ryabchuk
,
Y. P.
Rakovich
, and
I. R.
Nabiev
, “
Light–matter interaction in the strong coupling regime: Configurations, conditions, and applications
,”
Nanoscale
10
(
8
),
3589
3605
(
2018
).
12.
R.
Houdré
, “
Early stages of continuous wave experiments on cavity-polaritons
,”
Phys. Status Solidi B
242
(
11
),
2167
2196
(
2005
).
13.
A.
Frisk Kockum
,
A.
Miranowicz
,
S.
De Liberato
,
S.
Savasta
, and
F.
Nori
, “
Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
1
(
1
),
19
40
(
2019
).
14.
P.
Forn-Díaz
,
L.
Lamata
,
E.
Rico
,
J.
Kono
, and
E.
Solano
, “
Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
91
(
2
),
025005
(
2019
).
15.
T. E.
Li
,
J. E.
Subotnik
, and
A.
Nitzan
, “
Cavity molecular dynamics simulations of liquid water under vibrational ultrastrong coupling
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
117
(
31
),
18324
18331
(
2020
).
16.
A.
Kadyan
,
A.
Shaji
, and
J.
George
, “
Boosting self-interaction of molecular vibrations under ultrastrong coupling condition
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
12
(
17
),
4313
4318
(
2021
).
17.
C.
Ciuti
,
G.
Bastard
, and
I.
Carusotto
, “
Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field
,”
Phys. Rev. B
72
(
11
),
115303
(
2005
).
18.
A.
Fontcuberta i Morral
and
F.
Stellacci
, “
Ultrastrong routes to new chemistry
,”
Nat. Mater.
11
(
4
),
272
273
(
2012
).
19.
J.
George
,
T.
Chervy
,
A.
Shalabney
,
E.
Devaux
,
H.
Hiura
,
C.
Genet
, and
T. W.
Ebbesen
, “
Multiple Rabi splittings under ultrastrong vibrational coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
117
(
15
),
153601
(
2016
).
20.
F.
Herrera
and
F. C.
Spano
, “
Cavity-controlled chemistry in molecular ensembles
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
(
23
),
238301
(
2016
).
21.
L. A.
Martínez-Martínez
,
R. F.
Ribeiro
,
J.
Campos-González-Angulo
, and
J.
Yuen-Zhou
, “
Can ultrastrong coupling change ground-state chemical reactions?
,”
ACS Photonics
5
(
1
),
167
176
(
2018
).
22.
R. M. A.
Vergauwe
,
A.
Thomas
,
K.
Nagarajan
,
A.
Shalabney
,
J.
George
,
T.
Chervy
,
M.
Seidel
,
E.
Devaux
,
V.
Torbeev
, and
T. W.
Ebbesen
, “
Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
58
(
43
),
15324
15328
(
2019
).
23.
N. T.
Phuc
,
P. Q.
Trung
, and
A.
Ishizaki
, “
Controlling the nonadiabatic electron-transfer reaction rate through molecular-vibration polaritons in the ultrastrong coupling regime
,”
Sci. Rep.
10
(
1
),
7318
(
2020
).
24.
K.
Hirai
,
H.
Ishikawa
,
T.
Chervy
,
J. A.
Hutchison
, and
H.
Uji-i
, “
Selective crystallization via vibrational strong coupling
,”
Chem. Sci.
12
(
36
),
11986
11994
(
2021
).
25.
C. R.
Gubbin
,
S. A.
Maier
, and
S.
Kéna-Cohen
, “
Low-voltage polariton electroluminescence from an ultrastrongly coupled organic light-emitting diode
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
(
23
),
233302
(
2014
).
26.
M.
Mazzeo
,
A.
Genco
,
S.
Gambino
,
D.
Ballarini
,
F.
Mangione
,
O.
Di Stefano
,
S.
Patanè
,
S.
Savasta
,
D.
Sanvitto
, and
G.
Gigli
, “
Ultrastrong light-matter coupling in electrically doped microcavity organic light emitting diodes
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
(
23
),
233303
(
2014
).
27.
E.
Eizner
,
J.
Brodeur
,
F.
Barachati
,
A.
Sridharan
, and
S.
Kéna-Cohen
, “
Organic photodiodes with an extended responsivity using ultrastrong light–matter coupling
,”
ACS Photonics
5
(
7
),
2921
2927
(
2018
).
28.
T.
Niemczyk
,
F.
Deppe
,
H.
Huebl
,
E. P.
Menzel
,
F.
Hocke
,
M. J.
Schwarz
,
J. J.
Garcia-Ripoll
,
D.
Zueco
,
T.
Hümmer
,
E.
Solano
et al, “
Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime
,”
Nat. Phys.
6
(
10
),
772
776
(
2010
).
29.
A.
Ridolfo
,
M.
Leib
,
S.
Savasta
, and
M. J.
Hartmann
, “
Photon blockade in the ultrastrong coupling regime
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
109
(
19
),
193602
(
2012
).
30.
L.
Giannelli
,
E.
Paladino
,
M.
Grajcar
,
G. S.
Paraoanu
, and
G.
Falci
, “
Detecting virtual photons in ultrastrongly coupled superconducting quantum circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
6
(
1
),
013008
(
2024
).
31.
T.
Schwartz
,
J. A.
Hutchison
,
C.
Genet
, and
T. W.
Ebbesen
, “
Reversible switching of ultrastrong light-molecule coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
106
(
19
),
196405
(
2011
).
32.
S.
Kéna-Cohen
,
S. A.
Maier
, and
D. D. C.
Bradley
, “
Ultrastrongly coupled exciton–polaritons in metal-clad organic semiconductor microcavities
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
1
(
11
),
827
833
(
2013
).
33.
S.
Gambino
,
M.
Mazzeo
,
A.
Genco
,
O.
Di Stefano
,
S.
Savasta
,
S.
Patanè
,
D.
Ballarini
,
F.
Mangione
,
G.
Lerario
,
D.
Sanvitto
, and
G.
Gigli
, “
Exploring light–matter interaction phenomena under ultrastrong coupling regime
,”
ACS Photonics
1
(
10
),
1042
1048
(
2014
).
34.
A.
Genco
,
A.
Ridolfo
,
S.
Savasta
,
S.
Patanè
,
G.
Gigli
, and
M.
Mazzeo
, “
Bright polariton coumarin-based OLEDs operating in the ultrastrong coupling regime
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
6
(
17
),
1800364
(
2018
).
35.
T.
Fukushima
,
S.
Yoshimitsu
, and
K.
Murakoshi
, “
Vibrational coupling of water from weak to ultrastrong coupling regime via cavity mode tuning
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
125
(
46
),
25832
25840
(
2021
).
36.
S. R. K.
Rodriguez
,
A.
Abass
,
B.
Maes
,
O. T. A.
Janssen
,
G.
Vecchi
, and
J.
Gómez Rivas
, “
Coupling bright and dark plasmonic lattice resonances
,”
Phys. Rev. X
1
(
2
),
021019
(
2011
).
37.
W.
Wang
,
M.
Ramezani
,
A. I.
Väkeväinen
,
P.
Törmä
,
J.
Gómez Rivas
, and
T. W.
Odom
, “
The rich photonic world of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays
,”
Mater. Today
21
(
3
),
303
314
(
2018
).
38.
V. G.
Kravets
,
A. V.
Kabashin
,
W. L.
Barnes
, and
A. N.
Grigorenko
, “
Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: A review of properties and applications
,”
Chem. Rev.
118
(
12
),
5912
5951
(
2018
).
39.
F.
Verdelli
,
J. J. P. M.
Schulpen
,
A.
Baldi
, and
J.
Gómez Rivas
, “
Chasing vibro-polariton fingerprints in infrared and Raman spectra using surface lattice resonances on extended metasurfaces
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
126
(
16
),
7143
7151
(
2022
).
40.
J.
Lather
and
J.
George
, “
Improving enzyme catalytic efficiency by co-operative vibrational strong coupling of water
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
12
(
1
),
379
384
(
2020
).
41.
T.
Fukushima
,
S.
Yoshimitsu
, and
K.
Murakoshi
, “
Inherent promotion of ionic conductivity via collective vibrational strong coupling of water with the vacuum electromagnetic field
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
144
(
27
),
12177
12183
(
2022
).
42.
M. V.
Imperatore
,
J. B.
Asbury
, and
N. C.
Giebink
, “
Reproducibility of cavity-enhanced chemical reaction rates in the vibrational strong coupling regime
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
154
(
19
),
191103
(
2021
).
43.
A.
Canales
,
O. V.
Kotov
,
B.
Küçüköz
, and
T. O.
Shegai
, “
Self-hybridized vibrational-Mie polaritons in water droplets
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
(
19
),
193804
(
2024
).
44.
H. H.
Li
, “
Refractive index of alkaline earth halides and its wavelength and temperature derivatives
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
9
(
1
),
161
290
(
1980
).
45.
E. D.
Palik
,
Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids
(
Academic Press
,
1998
), Vol.
3
.
46.
G. M.
Hale
and
M. R.
Querry
, “
Optical constants of water in the 200-nm to 200-μm wavelength region
,”
Appl. Opt.
12
(
3
),
555
563
(
1973
).
47.
V.
Savona
,
L. C.
Andreani
,
P.
Schwendimann
, and
A.
Quattropani
, “
Quantum well excitons in semiconductor microcavities: Unified treatment of weak and strong coupling regimes
,”
Solid State Commun.
93
(
9
),
733
739
(
1995
).
48.
P. A.
Thomas
,
W. J.
Tan
,
H. A.
Fernandez
, and
W. L.
Barnes
, “
A new signature for strong light–matter coupling using spectroscopic ellipsometry
,”
Nano Lett.
20
(
9
),
6412
6419
(
2020
).