The millimeter-wave rotational spectrum of ketene (H2C=C=O) has been collected and analyzed from 130 to 750 GHz, providing highly precise spectroscopic constants from a sextic, S-reduced Hamiltonian in the Ir representation. The chemical synthesis of deuteriated samples allowed spectroscopic measurements of five previously unstudied ketene isotopologues. Combined with previous work, these data provide a new, highly precise, and accurate semi-experimental (reSE) structure for ketene from 32 independent moments of inertia. This reSE structure was determined with the experimental rotational constants of each available isotopologue, together with computed vibration–rotation interaction and electron-mass distribution corrections from coupled-cluster calculations with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ]. The 2σ uncertainties of the reSE parameters are ≤0.0007 Å and 0.014° for the bond distances and angle, respectively. Only S-reduced spectroscopic constants were used in the structure determination due to a breakdown in the A-reduction of the Hamiltonian for the highly prolate ketene species. All four reSE structural parameters agree with the “best theoretical estimate” (BTE) values, which are derived from a high-level computed re structure [CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z] with corrections for the use of a finite basis set, the incomplete treatment of electron correlation, relativistic effects, and the diagonal Born–Oppenheimer breakdown. In each case, the computed value of the geometric parameter lies within the statistical experimental uncertainty (2σ) of the corresponding semi-experimental coordinate. The discrepancies between the BTE structure and the reSE structure are 0.0003, 0.0000, and 0.0004 Å for rC–C, rC–H, and rC–O, respectively, and 0.009° for θC–C–H.

Ketenes (R2C=C=O) represent an important functional group in organic chemistry.1,2 The reactivity of ketenes, albeit modulated by the nature of the substituents, is generally very high with respect to cycloaddition reactions and the addition of nucleophiles. As such, ketenes are precursors to the family of carboxylic acid derivatives, including anhydrides, carboxylic acids, esters, and amides (Scheme ). It is the central relationship to these and other functional groups that places ketenes as important intermediates in diverse areas of science, including synthetic organic chemistry,1–3 petroleum refining,4 photolithography,5 atmospheric chemistry,6 combustion,7 and astrochemistry.8 The parent molecule of the family, ketene (H2C=C=O), is a paradigm in terms of structure, bonding, and reactivity. It is a cornerstone of structural organic chemistry and has attracted substantial interest from both experimental and theoretical communities. In the current study, we describe the determination of a highly precise, gas-phase molecular structure for ketene using state-of-the-art methods for both experiment and theory.

SCHEME 1.

Reactions of ketene with various nucleophiles.

SCHEME 1.

Reactions of ketene with various nucleophiles.

Close modal

Ketene (H2C=C=O, C2v, ethenone) has been identified as an interstellar molecule, with its initial detection in Sgr B2 in 1977.9 Its detection in that source was later confirmed,10 and various subsequent studies detected ketene in other galactic11–15 and extra-galactic16 sources. Ketene has been generated from the photolysis of interstellar ice analogs comprising a variety of chemical compositions (O2 + C2H2, CO2 + C2H4, CO + CH4).8 The central, electrophilic carbon atom of ketene reacts with common interstellar molecules H2O, NH3, CH3OH, and HCN to form acetic acid, acetamide, methyl acetate, and pyruvonitrile, respectively.17–19 Some of these reaction products have potential prebiotic importance in the interstellar medium. Ketene can also be generated from the decomposition of two known interstellar molecules: acetic acid20 and acetone.21 The acylium cation (H3C–C≡O+, C3v),22 which has recently been detected in the ISM,23 is a protonated form of ketene. Due to its prevalence and possible role in the chemical reactions of extraterrestrial environments, the observation of rotational transitions of ketene in its ground and vibrationally excited states is important to radioastronomers. Previously, the rotational spectra of various ketene isotopologues have been observed and assigned up to a frequency of 350 GHz. In this work, we extended the frequency range to 750 GHz for 15 ketene isotopologues, including all singly substituted heavy-atom isotopologues of ketene, ketene-d1, and ketene-d2. The doubling of the spectral range for ketene isotopologues, along with new isotopologue analyses, expands the capabilities for radioastronomers to search for ketene spectral lines in different extra-terrestrial environments.

The pure rotational spectra of ketene and its isotopologues have been extensively studied for over seventy years. The rotational spectrum of ketene and its two deuteriated isotopologues, [2-2H]-ketene (HDC=C=O) and [2,2-2H]-ketene (D2C=C=O), were measured in the early 1950s.24,25 Subsequently, heavy-atom substituted isotopologues [2-13C]-ketene and [18O]-ketene were measured in 1959 and 1963,26,27 but the final single-substitution isotopologue, [1-13C]-ketene, was not reported until 1990.28 In 1966, the proton spin–rotation and deuterium nuclear quadrupole constants were determined for ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene.29 In 1976, the frequency range was extended into the millimeter-wave region (up to 220 GHz) for [2-2H]-ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene, permitting analysis of their centrifugal distortion.30 More recent studies expanded the measured frequency range to 350 GHz for various isotopologues, refined the least-squares fits, and measured the spectra of new isotopologues [17O]-ketene,31 [1,2-13C]-ketene,32 [2,2-2H, 1-13C]-ketene,32 [2,2-2H, 2-13C]-ketene,32 and [2,2-2H, 18O]-ketene.32 For ketene, itself, Nemes et al. reported the measurement of 82 a-type, ΔKa = 0 transitions up to 800 GHz.33  Figure 1 shows the 11 isotopologues for which rotational spectra have previously been reported (black) and the five isotopologues newly measured in this work (blue).

FIG. 1.

Ketene isotopologues previously measured (black) and newly measured in this work (blue). Ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene were measured by Bak et al.24 [2-13C]-ketene and [18O]-ketene were measured by Cox et al.26 [1-13C]-ketene was measured by Brown et al.28 [17O]-ketene was measured by Guarnieri and Huckauf31 [1,2-13C]-ketene, [2,2-2H, 1-13C]-ketene, [2,2-2H, 2-13C]-ketene, and [2,2-2H, 18O]-ketene were measured by Guarnieri.32 The date listed indicates the first literature report of that isotopologue.

FIG. 1.

Ketene isotopologues previously measured (black) and newly measured in this work (blue). Ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene were measured by Bak et al.24 [2-13C]-ketene and [18O]-ketene were measured by Cox et al.26 [1-13C]-ketene was measured by Brown et al.28 [17O]-ketene was measured by Guarnieri and Huckauf31 [1,2-13C]-ketene, [2,2-2H, 1-13C]-ketene, [2,2-2H, 2-13C]-ketene, and [2,2-2H, 18O]-ketene were measured by Guarnieri.32 The date listed indicates the first literature report of that isotopologue.

Close modal

The gas-phase infrared spectrum of ketene was recorded nearly 85 years ago.34 The rotational structure in the infrared spectrum was first analyzed by Halverson and Williams,35 followed by Harp and Rasmussen,36 Drayton and Thompson,37 Bak and Andersen,38 and Butler et al.39 The infrared spectra of [2-2H]-ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene were reported in 1951,40 and the first vibration-rotation bands of ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene were observed by Arendale and Fletcher in 1956.41,42 The first complete analysis of the rotationally resolved infrared spectra of the nine fundamental states present in ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene was performed by Cox and Esbitt in 1963.43 Nemes explored the Coriolis coupling present in ν5, ν6, ν8, and ν9 of ketene in two separate studies in 1974 and 1978.44,45 A similar study was done on [2,2-2H]-ketene by Winther et al., where ν5, ν6, ν8, and ν9 were examined.46 A high-resolution infrared analysis of the four A1 vibrational states for ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene was performed by Duncan et al.,47 followed by the high-resolution infrared study of ν5, ν6, ν7, and ν8 fundamental states and two overtone states for ketene by Duncan and Ferguson.48 The ν9, ν6, and ν5 bands in [2,2-2H]-ketene were analyzed with high-resolution infrared spectroscopy by Hegelund et al.49 Escribano et al.50 examined the ν1 band of ketene in 1994, which is coupled to other vibrational modes. The fundamental states, ν5 and ν6, were re-examined by Campiña et al.51 in 1998 along with the observation of ν6 + ν9 in 1999 by Gruebele et al.52 Johns et al.53 were able to update the ground-state spectroscopic constants derived from millimeter-wave data along with the infrared data provided by Campiña et al.51 and Escribano et al.50 Nemes et al.54 revisited the non-linear least-squares fitting of ν5, ν6, and ν9 and were able to remove most of the Coriolis perturbation contributions to the Aν rotational constants and derive new experimental Coriolis ζ constants. The vibrational energy manifold up to 3400 cm−1 is shown in Fig. 2, using the experimental frequencies where available and supplementing with computed values where experimental values are not available.

FIG. 2.

Vibrational energy levels of ketene below 3400 cm−1. Experimentally observed vibrational energy levels (black, purple, and maroon) are each taken from the most recent literature report and labeled.44–54 Unobserved vibrational energy levels (gray) are depicted using the computed fundamental frequencies [CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ]. Overtone and combination states are provided up to five quanta.

FIG. 2.

Vibrational energy levels of ketene below 3400 cm−1. Experimentally observed vibrational energy levels (black, purple, and maroon) are each taken from the most recent literature report and labeled.44–54 Unobserved vibrational energy levels (gray) are depicted using the computed fundamental frequencies [CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ]. Overtone and combination states are provided up to five quanta.

Close modal

The observation and assignment of various ketene isotopologues have been used for several structural determinations presented in Table I.28,55–58 The first zero-point average structure (rz), accounting for harmonic vibrational corrections, centrifugal distortion, and electronic corrections, was determined in 1976.55 A second rz structure was calculated in 1987,56 after several studies examining the vibrational spectra of ketene isotopologues facilitated a more physically realistic general harmonic force field to be applied to the structure calculation.47,48,59 The additional measurement of [1-13C]-ketene by Brown et al.28 enabled the first complete substitution structure (rs) determination, where every atom was isotopically substituted at least once in the structure determination. The first semi-experimental equilibrium structure (reSE), using vibration–rotation interaction corrections calculated from an anharmonic force field, was calculated in 1995 with the rotational constants of the six isotopologues available at that time.57 The six isotopologues in this reSE structure provide 12 independent moments of inertia, which is more than sufficient to determine the four structural parameters of ketene. Guarnieri et al.31,32,60 measured and assigned rotational transitions for five new isotopologues and determined an updated reSE from the rotational constants of 11 isotopologues (22 independent moments of inertia) using vibration–rotation corrections calculated at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level in 2010.58 The two reSE structures are generally in good agreement but disagree somewhat with respect to the rC–H value.

TABLE I.

Select previously reported structures of ketene.

Mallinson and Nemes55 Duncan and Munro56 Brown et al.28 East et al.57 Guarnieri et al.58 
rz 1976rz 1987rs 1990reSE 1995reSE 2010
rC–C 1.3171 (20)a 1.316 5 (15)b 1.314 (72)c 1.312 12 (60)d 1.3122 (12)d 
rC–H 1.0797 (10)a 1.080 02 (33)b 1.0825 (15)c 1.075 76 (14)d 1.0763 (2)d 
rC–O 1.1608 (20)a 1.161 4 (14)b 1.162 (72)c 1.160 30 (58)d 1.1607 (12)d 
θC–C–H 119.02 (10)a 119.011 (31)b 118.72 (5)c 119.110 (12)d 119.115 (22)d 
Nisoe 11 
Mallinson and Nemes55 Duncan and Munro56 Brown et al.28 East et al.57 Guarnieri et al.58 
rz 1976rz 1987rs 1990reSE 1995reSE 2010
rC–C 1.3171 (20)a 1.316 5 (15)b 1.314 (72)c 1.312 12 (60)d 1.3122 (12)d 
rC–H 1.0797 (10)a 1.080 02 (33)b 1.0825 (15)c 1.075 76 (14)d 1.0763 (2)d 
rC–O 1.1608 (20)a 1.161 4 (14)b 1.162 (72)c 1.160 30 (58)d 1.1607 (12)d 
θC–C–H 119.02 (10)a 119.011 (31)b 118.72 (5)c 119.110 (12)d 119.115 (22)d 
Nisoe 11 
a

Uncertainties as stated in Mallinson and Nemes.55 

b

3σ values.

c

Uncertainties estimated as recommended by Costain61 and Harmony et al.62 

d

All statistical uncertainties adjusted from previous reports to be 2σ values.

e

Number of isotopologues used in the structure determination.

The foundation for semi-experimental equilibrium (reSE) structure determination was pioneered by Pulay, Meyer, and Boggs,63 and the accuracy of the structures obtained using this approach has been exemplified in various studies.64–67 The accuracy of semi-experimental structures using different computational methods was investigated in the 1990s and 2000s68–74 and was comprehensively reviewed by Puzzarini75 and Puzzarini and Stanton.76 The coupled-cluster method for both geometry optimizations and anharmonic force-field calculations, along with sufficiently large basis sets for the molecule of interest, was shown to provide the most accurate structural parameters.73,77 For larger molecules, where coupled-cluster methods are not feasible, structural parameters derived from density functional methods, e.g., B3LYP/SNSD, display reasonable accuracy.78 A number of our recent studies have shown remarkable agreement of CCSD(T)/cc-pCV5Z or CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z re structures with reSE structures determined using CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ vibration–rotation corrections.79–86 The small number of atoms in ketene allows the coupled-cluster approach to be utilized in this work, affording an reSE structure of similar precision and accuracy to those recent studies.

The rotational spectra of synthesized samples of ketene and deuteriated ketene, described later, were continuously collected in the segments 130–230, 235–360, 350–500, and 500–750 GHz. The instrument covering the 130–360 GHz range has previously been described.87–89 The 350–500 and 500–750 GHz segments were obtained with a newly acquired amplification and multiplication chain. VDI Mini SGX (SGX-M) signal generator, with external multipliers WR4.3X2 and WR2.2X2, generates 350-500 GHz and, with external multipliers WR4.3X2 and WR1.5X3, generates 500-750 GHz. These spectral segments were detected by using VDI zero-bias detectors WR2.2ZBD and WR1.5ZBD, respectively. The complete spectrum from 130 to 750 GHz was obtained using automated data collection software over ∼12 days with these experimental parameters: 0.6 MHz/s sweep rate, 10 ms time constant, and 50 kHz AM and 500 kHz FM modulation in a tone-burst design.90 The frequency spectra were combined into a single spectral file using Assignment and Analysis of Broadband Spectra (AABS) software.91,92 Pickett’s SPFIT/SPCAT programs93 were used for least-squares fits and spectral predictions, along with Kisiel’s PIFORM, PLANM, and AC programs for analysis.94,95 Additional short-frequency ranges of the spectrum were collected with an increased number of scans for low-abundance isotopologues. In our least-squares fits, we assume a uniform 50 kHz frequency measurement uncertainty for our measured transitions, 50 kHz for literature values that did not specify an uncertainty, and 25 kHz for transitions reported by Guarnieri et al.31,32,60 Least-squares fitting output files are provided in the supplementary material.

In this study, we measured and assigned the rotational spectrum from 130 to 750 GHz for the primary (Fig. 3) and deuterium-substituted ketene isotopologues, including their heavy-atom isotopologues, 13C and 18O. All 17O-substituted isotopologues, including the new detection of [2-2H, 17O]-ketene and [2,2-2H, 17O]-ketene, were measured from 230 to 500 GHz. The reduced frequency coverage is due to lower signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) for the hardware configurations outside that range. Transitions of [1,2-13C]-ketene could not be measured or assigned due to the proximity of its transitions to those of [2-13C]-ketene and the inherently lower S/N for an isotopologue ∼0.0121% the intensity of the main isotopologue. Thus, we were unable to improve upon the spectroscopic constants presented by Guarnieri.32 Due to the planarity condition, each isotopologue provides two independent moments of inertia. With 16 isotopologues used for the new structure determination, an reSE structure for ketene was obtained by using 32 independent moments of inertia.

FIG. 3.

Ketene structure with principal inertial axes and carbon atom numbering.

FIG. 3.

Ketene structure with principal inertial axes and carbon atom numbering.

Close modal

Calculations were carried out using a development version of CFOUR.96 The ketene structure was first optimized at the CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ level of theory. The optimized geometry and the same level of theory were subsequently used for an anharmonic, second-order vibrational perturbation theory (VPT2) calculation, wherein cubic force constants are evaluated using analytical second derivatives at displaced points.97–99 Magnetic property calculations were performed for each isotopologue to obtain the electron-mass corrections to the corresponding rotational constants. The “best theoretical estimate” (BTE), as described previously, is based on a CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z optimized structure with four additional corrections79–86 that address the following:

  1. Residual basis set effects beyond cc-pCV6Z.

  2. Residual electron correlation effects beyond the CCSD(T) treatment.

  3. Effects of scalar (mass–velocity and Darwin) relativistic effects.

  4. The fixed-nucleus approximation via the diagonal Born–Oppenheimer correction.

The equations used to calculate these corrections and the values of each of these corrections for ketene are provided in the supplementary material (S7–S13 and Table S-V). One of the most important factors of the algorithm used to determine the BTE is the estimation of residual basis set effects, specifically estimated as the difference between the (directly computed) cc-pCV6Z geometry at the CCSD(T) level of theory and the estimate of the CCSD(T) geometry at the basis set limit. Following others,100 the latter is estimated by assuming an exponential convergence pattern with respect to the highest angular momentum basis functions present in the basis. A complete explanation of the BTE calculation is provided in the supplementary material.

The xrefit module of CFOUR calculates the moments of inertia and the semi-experimental equilibrium structure using the experimental, S-reduced rotational constants and computational electron-mass distribution and vibration–rotation corrections. The xrefiteration program was used to reveal insight into the contributions of additional isotopologues in refining the structure.82 The routine begins by determining a structure using a single isotopic substitution at each position and then sequentially adding the most uncertainty-minimizing isotopologue to the structural least-squares fit until all available isotopologues are incorporated. The routine is also useful in assessing the quality of the fit for each isotopologue, since a problematic fit may be readily apparent as a deviation in the xrefiteration plot.

Computational output files are provided in the supplementary material.

Ketene was synthesized by pyrolysis of acetone (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich) at atmospheric pressure using a lamp described by Williams and Hurd101 and collected in a −130 °C cold trap [Scheme ]. After collection, the cold trap was isolated from the pyrolysis apparatus and placed under vacuum to remove volatile impurities; ketene was then transferred to a stainless-steel cold trap for spectroscopic investigation. A mixed deuterio-/protio-solution of acetone-dx was produced by a procedure modified from Paulsen and Cooke,102 using acetone, D2O, and lithium deuteroxide (LiOD). The reaction mixture was distilled, yielding ∼50% deuterium-enriched acetone. Pyrolysis and purification of this mixture produced ketene, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene [Scheme ]. An independent sample of [2,2-2H]-ketene [Scheme ] with high deuterium incorporation was generated by pyrolysis of acetone-d6 (99.5%, Oakwood Chemical).

SCHEME 2.

Ketene isotopologue synthesis: (a) ketene-h2 by pyrolysis of acetone-h6, (b) mixture of ketene isotopologues by pyrolysis of 50% deuterium-enriched acetone, and (c) ketene-d2 by pyrolysis of acetone-d6.

SCHEME 2.

Ketene isotopologue synthesis: (a) ketene-h2 by pyrolysis of acetone-h6, (b) mixture of ketene isotopologues by pyrolysis of 50% deuterium-enriched acetone, and (c) ketene-d2 by pyrolysis of acetone-d6.

Close modal
The rotational spectrum of ketene is dominated by aR0,1 transitions, but a select few low-intensity aQ0,−1 transitions were observable in the lower frequency range. Ketene has an a-axis dipole, μa = 1.414 (10) D,25 and is extremely close to a prolate top [κ = −0.997 for the main isotopologue, Eq. (1)], which can result in a breakdown of the A-reduction least-squares fit (Ir representation) of the Hamiltonian,
(1)
The A-reduction breakdown for molecules that approach a spherical top, a prolate top (in the Ir/l representation), or an oblate top (in the IIIr/l representation) has been discussed previously.84,103–108 (The output files of least-squares fitting for each isotopologue to sextic, A- and S-reduction Hamiltonians in the Ir representation are provided in the supplementary material.) For ketene, the experimental and computed A-reduction spectroscopic constants do not appear to display the unreasonably large K-dependent centrifugal distortion constants that have been noted in other cases where the A-reduction breaks down. There is, however, a significant difference between the A- and S-reduction determinable constants (Eqs. S1–S6 in the supplementary material) from the least-squares fits in the A- and S-reductions. The κ values for the ketene isotopologues vary from −0.9915 ([2,2-2H]-ketene) to −0.9975 ([18O]-ketene). The greatest discrepancies in the determinable constants occur for the A0 constant of the isotopologues with the greatest κ values, [18O]-ketene and [17O]-ketene. Figure 4 shows the differences in the determinable constants (nominal B″ values) in the A- and S-reductions as a function of κ. While the trend does not show a clearly defined behavior, the variability in A0″ increases as κ approaches the prolate-top limit (−1.000). Additionally, in each case, the A-reduction fits have a larger statistical uncertainty than the S-reduction fits. Doose et al.109 observed similar issues with [2,2-2H]-ketene (κ = −0.9915), including high uncertainties and high correlations for some parameters when only pure rotational transitions were used in the least-squares fit. For these reasons, only the S-reduction spectroscopic constants are presented in the main text of this work and used in the reSE structure determination. The S-reduction spectroscopic constants for all ketene isotopologues are presented in Table II.
FIG. 4.

Difference between the determinable constants (A0″, B0″, and C0″) derived using the A- and the S-reduced Hamiltonians for ketene isotopologues as a function of κ. The symbols for the b- and c-axis differences are so close to zero that they are overlapped and difficult to distinguish on the plot. Note the increase in scatter and the deviation from zero for the a-axis differences as κ approaches the prolate limit of −1.000.

FIG. 4.

Difference between the determinable constants (A0″, B0″, and C0″) derived using the A- and the S-reduced Hamiltonians for ketene isotopologues as a function of κ. The symbols for the b- and c-axis differences are so close to zero that they are overlapped and difficult to distinguish on the plot. Note the increase in scatter and the deviation from zero for the a-axis differences as κ approaches the prolate limit of −1.000.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Spectroscopic constants for ketene isotopologues, ground vibrational state (S-reduced Hamiltonian, Ir representation).

Normal isotopologue
Guarnieri et al. 2003aCCSD(T)bCurrent work[1-13C][2-13C][18O]
A0 (MHz) 282 032 (22) 281 680 282 121.6 (18) 282 104.2 (25) 282 108.1 (26) 282 142.0 (40) 
B0 (MHz) 10 293.319 63 (81) 10 234 10 293.318 94 (24) 10 293.629 59 (44) 9 960.977 88 (37) 9 761.237 01 (38) 
C0 (MHz) 9 915.903 93 (80) 9861 9 915.903 04 (24) 9 916.210 87 (44) 9 607.139 42 (35) 9 421.124 72 (37) 
DJ (kHz) 3.280 4 (18) 3.15 3.281 23 (30) 3.279 63 (49) 3.090 08 (35) 2.949 28 (14) 
DJK (kHz) 478.27 (11) 477 477.384 (31) 476.701 (43) 451.182 (36) 434.455 (47) 
DK (kHz) [22 840]c 20 700 [20 700]d [20 700]d [20 700]d [20 700]d 
d1 (kHz) −0.147 57 (84) −0.125 −0.147 726 (11) −0.147 875 (96) −0.132 961 (89) −0.125 48 (11) 
d2 (kHz) −0.056 21 (51) −0.043 3 −0.055 755 (57) −0.055 96 (11) −0.049 28 (11) −0.045 47 (17) 
HJ (Hz) [−0.002 04]c −0.000 466 −0.001 25 (13) −0.001 11 (21) −0.001 10 (14) [−0.000 319 4] 
HJK (Hz) 2.27 (21) 2.80 2.914 2 (89) 2.976 (13) 2.587 6 (91) 2.495 (13) 
HKJ (Hz) −526.2 (45) −711 −647.7 (11) −673.7 (15) −603.0 (13) −614.2 (17) 
HK (Hz) [5230]c 5890 [5890]d [5930]d [5850]d [5850]d 
h1 (Hz)  0.000 026 4 [0.000 026 4]d [0.000 025 9]d [0.000 023 7]d [0.000 025]d 
h2 (Hz)  0.000 442 [0.000 442]d [0.000 444]d [0.000 369]d [0.000 339]d 
h3 (Hz)  0.000 072 4 [0.000 0724]d [0.000 073]d [0.000 059 5]d [0.000 054 4]d 
LJK (mHz) −21.3 (46)      
LJKK (mHz) 3475 (59)      
Nlinese 156  307f 209 230 189 
σ (MHz) 0.040  0.037 0.048 0.041 0.041 
[17O][1,2-13C][2-2H][2-2H, 1-13C][2-2H, 2-13C][2-2H,18O]
A0 (MHz) 282 175 (13) 282 031 (22) 194 292.2 (13) 194 256.1 (23) 193 984.2 (26) 194 243.2 (31) 
B0 (MHz) 10 013.472 2 (14) 9 960.865 0 (25) 9 647.065 33 (21) 9 646.687 07 (65) 9 373.431 43 (63) 9 145.129 30 (76) 
C0 (MHz) 9 655.909 6 (13) 9 607.055 0 (27) 9 174.643 51 (20) 9 174.260 89 (64) 8 926.177 92 (60) 8 719.333 31 (72) 
DJ (kHz) 3.099 97 (63) 3.088 1 (21) 3.004 61 (37) 3.005 29 (64) 2.827 55 (61) 2.699 45 (58) 
DJK (kHz) 454.371 (92) 451.12 (11) 328.426 (25) 327.242 (41) 315.948 (35) 297.756 (44) 
DK (kHz) [20 700]d [22 840]c 17 400 (674) 15 380 (1098) 17 090 (1276) 16 760 (1576) 
d1 (kHz) −0.134 67 (76) −0.133 1 (27) −0.226 195 (49) −0.226 86 (15) −0.203 28 (16) −0.191 48 (17) 
d2 (kHz) −0.048 45 (60) −0.050 9 (11) −0.084 10 (15) −0.083 75 (26) −0.075 65 (27) −0.068 77 (30) 
HJ (Hz) [−0.003 84]d [−0.002 04]c −0.001 380 (80) −0.001 04 (15) −0.001 03 (12) [−0.000 111 7]d 
HJK (Hz) 2.561 (89) 2.07 (23) 2.284 3 (67) 2.316 (11) 2.065 5 (83) 1.948 (11) 
HKJ (Hz) −635.8 (33) −506.9 (42) −254.39 (89) −264.6 (15) −240.3 (13) −238.6 (15) 
HK (Hz) [5870]d [5230]c [4070]d [3970]d [4060]d [4040]d 
h1 (Hz) [0.000 025 8]d  [0.000 194]d [0.000 195]d [0.000 161]d [0.000 165]d 
h2 (Hz) [0.000 385]d  0.000 782 (35) [0.000 767]d [0.000 653]d [0.000 586]d 
h3 (Hz) [0.000 062 4]d  [0.000 139]d [0.000 140]d [0.000 118]d [0.000 105]d 
LJK (mHz)  18.7 (47)     
LJKK (mHz)  −3545 (53)     
Nlinese 94 86 344 204 240 171 
σ (MHz) 0.046 0.030 0.034 0.043 0.042 0.047 
A0 (MHz) 194 260.6 (27) 141 490.38 (28) 141 484.52 (67) 141 483.16 (65) 141 489.40 (85) 141 490.0(10) 
B0 (MHz) 9 383.171 5 (13) 9 120.830 67 (17) 9 119.426 58 (65) 8 890.473 51 (67) 8 641.838 91 (56) 8 869.062 1(17) 
C0 (MHz) 8 935.543 1 (13) 8 552.699 81 (16) 8 551.484 44 (71) 8 349.841 31 (61) 8 130.053 11 (54) 8 330.881 9(13) 
       
DJ (kHz) 2.845 76 (51) 2.484 04 (19) 2.484 96 (48) 2.358 60 (38) 2.234 74 (43) 2.355 69(55) 
DJK (kHz) 312.295 (66) 322.962 (21) 321.967 (38) 310.142 (37) 294.046 (43) 307.799(76) 
DK (kHz) 15 140 (840) 5645 (100) 5327 (225) 5373 (209) 5470 (359) [5000]d 
d1 (kHz) −0.209 21 (58) −0.220 132 (37) −0.220 25 (14) −0.201 00 (12) −0.186 76 (15) −0.204 48(71) 
d2 (kHz) −0.075 96 (29) −0.114 212 (87) −0.114 15 (31) −0.103 09 (28) −0.093 66 (32) −0.103 11(28) 
HJ (Hz) [0.000 021 1]d −0.001 690 (47) −0.001 63 (12) −0.001 558 (95) −0.001 436 (96) [−0.000 862]d 
HJK (Hz) 2.162 (37) 2.077 5 (46) 2.079 8 (93) 1.895 4 (93) 1.690 (12) 2.001(43) 
HKJ (Hz) −243.1 (22) −127.50 (80) −138.4 (14) −124.0 (14) −129.4 (15) −129.1(27) 
HK (Hz) [4050]d [787]d [793]d [781]d [781]d [784]d 
h1 (Hz) [0.000 178]d [−0.000 014 4]d [−0.000 014 6]d [−0.000 014 2]d [−0.000 002]d [−0.000 007 30]d 
h2 (Hz) [0.000 568]d 0.001 030 (30) 0.001 19 (12) 0.000 66 (11) 0.000 700 (97) [0.000 752]d 
h3 (Hz) [0.000 120]d [0.000 208]d [0.000 208]d [0.000 180]d [0.000 156]d [0.000 179]d 
Nlinese 107 403 221 218 166 88 
σ (MHz) 0.040 0.032 0.046 0.045 0.042 0.046 
Normal isotopologue
Guarnieri et al. 2003aCCSD(T)bCurrent work[1-13C][2-13C][18O]
A0 (MHz) 282 032 (22) 281 680 282 121.6 (18) 282 104.2 (25) 282 108.1 (26) 282 142.0 (40) 
B0 (MHz) 10 293.319 63 (81) 10 234 10 293.318 94 (24) 10 293.629 59 (44) 9 960.977 88 (37) 9 761.237 01 (38) 
C0 (MHz) 9 915.903 93 (80) 9861 9 915.903 04 (24) 9 916.210 87 (44) 9 607.139 42 (35) 9 421.124 72 (37) 
DJ (kHz) 3.280 4 (18) 3.15 3.281 23 (30) 3.279 63 (49) 3.090 08 (35) 2.949 28 (14) 
DJK (kHz) 478.27 (11) 477 477.384 (31) 476.701 (43) 451.182 (36) 434.455 (47) 
DK (kHz) [22 840]c 20 700 [20 700]d [20 700]d [20 700]d [20 700]d 
d1 (kHz) −0.147 57 (84) −0.125 −0.147 726 (11) −0.147 875 (96) −0.132 961 (89) −0.125 48 (11) 
d2 (kHz) −0.056 21 (51) −0.043 3 −0.055 755 (57) −0.055 96 (11) −0.049 28 (11) −0.045 47 (17) 
HJ (Hz) [−0.002 04]c −0.000 466 −0.001 25 (13) −0.001 11 (21) −0.001 10 (14) [−0.000 319 4] 
HJK (Hz) 2.27 (21) 2.80 2.914 2 (89) 2.976 (13) 2.587 6 (91) 2.495 (13) 
HKJ (Hz) −526.2 (45) −711 −647.7 (11) −673.7 (15) −603.0 (13) −614.2 (17) 
HK (Hz) [5230]c 5890 [5890]d [5930]d [5850]d [5850]d 
h1 (Hz)  0.000 026 4 [0.000 026 4]d [0.000 025 9]d [0.000 023 7]d [0.000 025]d 
h2 (Hz)  0.000 442 [0.000 442]d [0.000 444]d [0.000 369]d [0.000 339]d 
h3 (Hz)  0.000 072 4 [0.000 0724]d [0.000 073]d [0.000 059 5]d [0.000 054 4]d 
LJK (mHz) −21.3 (46)      
LJKK (mHz) 3475 (59)      
Nlinese 156  307f 209 230 189 
σ (MHz) 0.040  0.037 0.048 0.041 0.041 
[17O][1,2-13C][2-2H][2-2H, 1-13C][2-2H, 2-13C][2-2H,18O]
A0 (MHz) 282 175 (13) 282 031 (22) 194 292.2 (13) 194 256.1 (23) 193 984.2 (26) 194 243.2 (31) 
B0 (MHz) 10 013.472 2 (14) 9 960.865 0 (25) 9 647.065 33 (21) 9 646.687 07 (65) 9 373.431 43 (63) 9 145.129 30 (76) 
C0 (MHz) 9 655.909 6 (13) 9 607.055 0 (27) 9 174.643 51 (20) 9 174.260 89 (64) 8 926.177 92 (60) 8 719.333 31 (72) 
DJ (kHz) 3.099 97 (63) 3.088 1 (21) 3.004 61 (37) 3.005 29 (64) 2.827 55 (61) 2.699 45 (58) 
DJK (kHz) 454.371 (92) 451.12 (11) 328.426 (25) 327.242 (41) 315.948 (35) 297.756 (44) 
DK (kHz) [20 700]d [22 840]c 17 400 (674) 15 380 (1098) 17 090 (1276) 16 760 (1576) 
d1 (kHz) −0.134 67 (76) −0.133 1 (27) −0.226 195 (49) −0.226 86 (15) −0.203 28 (16) −0.191 48 (17) 
d2 (kHz) −0.048 45 (60) −0.050 9 (11) −0.084 10 (15) −0.083 75 (26) −0.075 65 (27) −0.068 77 (30) 
HJ (Hz) [−0.003 84]d [−0.002 04]c −0.001 380 (80) −0.001 04 (15) −0.001 03 (12) [−0.000 111 7]d 
HJK (Hz) 2.561 (89) 2.07 (23) 2.284 3 (67) 2.316 (11) 2.065 5 (83) 1.948 (11) 
HKJ (Hz) −635.8 (33) −506.9 (42) −254.39 (89) −264.6 (15) −240.3 (13) −238.6 (15) 
HK (Hz) [5870]d [5230]c [4070]d [3970]d [4060]d [4040]d 
h1 (Hz) [0.000 025 8]d  [0.000 194]d [0.000 195]d [0.000 161]d [0.000 165]d 
h2 (Hz) [0.000 385]d  0.000 782 (35) [0.000 767]d [0.000 653]d [0.000 586]d 
h3 (Hz) [0.000 062 4]d  [0.000 139]d [0.000 140]d [0.000 118]d [0.000 105]d 
LJK (mHz)  18.7 (47)     
LJKK (mHz)  −3545 (53)     
Nlinese 94 86 344 204 240 171 
σ (MHz) 0.046 0.030 0.034 0.043 0.042 0.047 
A0 (MHz) 194 260.6 (27) 141 490.38 (28) 141 484.52 (67) 141 483.16 (65) 141 489.40 (85) 141 490.0(10) 
B0 (MHz) 9 383.171 5 (13) 9 120.830 67 (17) 9 119.426 58 (65) 8 890.473 51 (67) 8 641.838 91 (56) 8 869.062 1(17) 
C0 (MHz) 8 935.543 1 (13) 8 552.699 81 (16) 8 551.484 44 (71) 8 349.841 31 (61) 8 130.053 11 (54) 8 330.881 9(13) 
       
DJ (kHz) 2.845 76 (51) 2.484 04 (19) 2.484 96 (48) 2.358 60 (38) 2.234 74 (43) 2.355 69(55) 
DJK (kHz) 312.295 (66) 322.962 (21) 321.967 (38) 310.142 (37) 294.046 (43) 307.799(76) 
DK (kHz) 15 140 (840) 5645 (100) 5327 (225) 5373 (209) 5470 (359) [5000]d 
d1 (kHz) −0.209 21 (58) −0.220 132 (37) −0.220 25 (14) −0.201 00 (12) −0.186 76 (15) −0.204 48(71) 
d2 (kHz) −0.075 96 (29) −0.114 212 (87) −0.114 15 (31) −0.103 09 (28) −0.093 66 (32) −0.103 11(28) 
HJ (Hz) [0.000 021 1]d −0.001 690 (47) −0.001 63 (12) −0.001 558 (95) −0.001 436 (96) [−0.000 862]d 
HJK (Hz) 2.162 (37) 2.077 5 (46) 2.079 8 (93) 1.895 4 (93) 1.690 (12) 2.001(43) 
HKJ (Hz) −243.1 (22) −127.50 (80) −138.4 (14) −124.0 (14) −129.4 (15) −129.1(27) 
HK (Hz) [4050]d [787]d [793]d [781]d [781]d [784]d 
h1 (Hz) [0.000 178]d [−0.000 014 4]d [−0.000 014 6]d [−0.000 014 2]d [−0.000 002]d [−0.000 007 30]d 
h2 (Hz) [0.000 568]d 0.001 030 (30) 0.001 19 (12) 0.000 66 (11) 0.000 700 (97) [0.000 752]d 
h3 (Hz) [0.000 120]d [0.000 208]d [0.000 208]d [0.000 180]d [0.000 156]d [0.000 179]d 
Nlinese 107 403 221 218 166 88 
σ (MHz) 0.040 0.032 0.046 0.045 0.042 0.046 
a

Constants as reported in Ref. 60.

b

B0 values obtained from Eq. (2) using the computed values for Be, vibration–rotation interaction, and electron-mass distribution [each evaluated using CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ]. Distortion constants computed using CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ.

c

Constant held fixed to value in Ref. 53 as stated by Ref. 60.

d

Constant held fixed at the CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ value.

e

Number of independent transitions.

f

Transitions reported by Brown et al.,28 Johnson and Strandberg,25 and Guarnieri and Huckauf60 are included in the least-squares fit. See the supplementary material for transitions used from previous studies for non-standard isotopologues.

Table II provides the experimental spectroscopic constants in the S-reduction and Ir representation for all 16 ketene isotopologues used in the semi-experimental equilibrium structure determination. The [1,2-13C]-ketene spectroscopic constants provided in Table II are those reported by Guarnieri et al.32 due to the inability to measure this isotopologue in this work. Table II includes, for the normal isotopologue, the previously determined spectroscopic constants by Guarnieri and Huckauf60 and the computed constants [CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z] for comparison to the experimental values determined in this work. The CCSD(T) values for all other isotopologues can be found in the supplementary material. Experimental rotational constants B0 and C0 determined by Guarnieri and Huckauf60 are in exceptional agreement with this work, but A0 is not in such good agreement. The computed rotational constants are in good agreement with the experimentally determined ones previously reported, with the largest discrepancy being in B0 (0.58%). Centrifugal distortion constants determined by Guarnieri and Huckauf60 are also in excellent agreement with those determined here, with the largest difference in d2 (0.81%). Neither work was able to determine DK, but Guarnieri et al. used the previously determined value from Johns et al.,53 while the present work used the CCSD(T) value. The CCSD(T) value was utilized to maintain a consistent treatment with the sextic centrifugal distortion constants, which were also held fixed at the CCSD(T) values since experimental values are not available. The CCSD(T) values for the centrifugal distortion constants display the expected level of agreement with the experimental values, with the largest discrepancy in d2 (22%). There are only two sextic distortion constants that were determined both in this work and by Guarnieri and Huckauf,60  HJK and HKJ, and both are in reasonable agreement (28%). HJ was determined in this work, while it was held fixed in Guarnieri and Huckauf,60 similar to DK. HK is held fixed at two different values in the two works for the same reason as DK. This work held the off-diagonal sextic centrifugal distortion constants, h1, h2, and h3, fixed at their respective CCSD(T) values, while they were held at zero in the previous studies. This difference seemed to negate the need for the two octic centrifugal distortion constants utilized in the previous studies for the frequency range and Ka range measured in this work. The largest relative discrepancy in the CCSD(T) sextic centrifugal distortion constants that were determined is in HJ (63%), which is not unexpected due to it being orders of magnitude smaller than the other constants.

The band structure for all ketene isotopologues is typical for a highly prolate molecule, with each band corresponding to a singular J+1 value with different Ka values. The transitions of the band structure lose Ka degeneracy for Ka = 3 for all isotopologues, with the protio-isotopologues losing degeneracy in bands at higher frequencies. The current work expanded the range of quantum numbers of the transitions assigned for ketene to include J+1 = 7 to 41 and Ka = 0 to 5. The breadth of the transitions assigned in this work is shown in Fig. 5, where all transitions newly measured are in black and previously measured transitions are in various colors indicating their source. All ketene isotopologue least-squares fits were limited to transitions with Ka ≤ 5, even though transitions with higher Ka were observed. This is because a single-state, distorted-rotor Hamiltonian was unable to provide a least-squares fit below the assumed measurement uncertainty of 50 kHz when incorporating transitions above Ka = 5. This failure of the single-state least-squares fit to model all of the observable transitions is due to coupling between the vibrational ground and excited states that has been extensively studied in the infrared spectra of ketene and summarized in the Introduction.44–49,51,52,54 An analysis of the vibrational coupling is beyond the scope of the current work. The cutoff of Ka ≤ 5 was implemented for all isotopologues to maintain a consistent amount of spectroscopic information. A similar procedure was applied to previous studies with HN3, which also has a ground state coupled to low-energy fundamental states,110 and was shown to provide an reSE structure with complete consistency with the BTE.83,87

FIG. 5.

Data distribution plot for the least-squares fit of spectroscopic data for the vibrational ground state of ketene. The size of the outlined circle is proportional to the value of |(fobs.fcalc.)/δf|, where δf is the frequency measurement uncertainty. The transitions are color coordinated as follows: Current work (black), Brown et al.28 (purple), Johnson and Strandberg25 (blue), and Guarnieri and Huckauf60(green). Transitions from previous studies that overlapped with current measurements were omitted from the dataset.

FIG. 5.

Data distribution plot for the least-squares fit of spectroscopic data for the vibrational ground state of ketene. The size of the outlined circle is proportional to the value of |(fobs.fcalc.)/δf|, where δf is the frequency measurement uncertainty. The transitions are color coordinated as follows: Current work (black), Brown et al.28 (purple), Johnson and Strandberg25 (blue), and Guarnieri and Huckauf60(green). Transitions from previous studies that overlapped with current measurements were omitted from the dataset.

Close modal

The heavy-atom isotopologues of ketene were observed at natural abundance from the synthesized protio-sample of ketene, and only aR0,1 transitions could be observed and measured. The [2-2H]-ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene isotopologues were the only other isotopologues where aQ0,−1 transitions could be measured. The [2-2H]-ketene isotopologue has a small predicted b-dipole moment, μb = 0.048 D, but no b-type transitions were sufficiently intense to be observed in our spectrum. All of the heavy-atom isotopologues for [2-2H]-ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene were observable at natural abundance in their deuterium-enriched samples. For the previously observed isotopologues, the published spectroscopic constants were used as predictions for the spectral region measured in this work. Once rotational constants were obtained for several known isotopologues, a preliminary semi-experimental equilibrium structure was obtained, which provided very accurate equilibrium rotational constants for new isotopologues. Along with CCSD(T) vibrational and electronic corrections and centrifugal distortion constants, the predicted rotational constants were used to assign transitions for the previously unidentified isotopologues: [2-2H, 1-13C]-ketene, [2-2H, 2-13C]-ketene, [2-2H, 18O]-ketene, [2-2H, 17O]-ketene, and [2,2-2H, 17O]-ketene. This technique greatly expedited the search for these transitions, as the CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ rotational constants predictions were not accurate enough to easily identify and assign the transitions. All heavy-atom isotopologue transitions measured from 500 to 750 GHz and all three 17O-isotopologues measured from 230 to 500 GHz required averaging 20 scans due to low S/N. These low S/N transitions were collected by acquiring 10 MHz windows around each predicted transition. Despite the various isotopologue substitutions, the spectral pattern (Fig. 6) of ketene was relatively consistent due to the highly prolate nature of the molecule.

FIG. 6.

(a) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 420.0 to 434.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. (b) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 420.0 to 434.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the [2-2H]-ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. (c) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 411.0 to 425.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the [2,2-2H]-ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. Transitions belonging to vibrationally excited states are also discernible.

FIG. 6.

(a) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 420.0 to 434.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. (b) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 420.0 to 434.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the [2-2H]-ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. (c) Stick spectra predicted from experimental spectroscopic constants from 411.0 to 425.0 GHz (top) and experimental spectrum (bottom) of the [2,2-2H]-ketene and heavy-atom isotopologues. Transitions belonging to vibrationally excited states are also discernible.

Close modal

The rotational spectra of three separate ketene samples are shown in Fig. 6, where (a) corresponds to the protio-isotopologue from 420 to 434 GHz, (b) corresponds to the [2-2H]-ketene isotopologue from 420 to 434 GHz, and (c) corresponds to the [2,2-2H]-ketene isotopologue from 411 to 425 GHz along with their respective heavy-atom isotopologues. The rotational spectrum of ketene is sparse with the bands of R-branch transitions with constant J values, separated by ∼16 GHz or ∼2C, allowing for the assignment of multiple isotopologues within one sample spectrum. Thus, there was little issue with transitions overlapping, which would cause a poor determination of the transition frequencies. Each spectrum contains unassigned transitions belonging to excited vibrational states of ketene isotopologues, as shown in Fig. 6. Data distribution plots for the isotopologues, showing the breadth of quantum numbers observed, are provided in the supplementary material.

In contrast to several of our recent reSE structure determinations,79–86 the spectroscopic constants determined in the S-reduction (B0β(S)) were converted to equilibrium constants (Beβ) and used directly in the least-squares fitting of the semi-experimental equilibrium structure without conversion to the determinable constants. In those previous studies, with the exception of [1,3-2H]-1H-1,2,4-triazole, the A-reduction and S-reduction rotational constants for each isotopologue were converted to the determinable constants from which the centrifugal distortion has been removed. These determinable constants are then averaged before converting to the equilibrium constants (Beβ) for reSE structure determination. As noted previously, ketene is an extreme prolate top (κ = −0.997) with only a-type transitions; thus, the A-reduction spectroscopic constants cannot be determined as accurately as the S-reduction constants. As a result, the S-reduction specific vibration–rotation interaction corrections determined in the CFOUR anharmonic frequency calculation were used to obtain the equilibrium rotational constants. Thus, the centrifugal distortion corrections used to determine the equilibrium rotational constants are the computed ones rather than the experimental ones. Ideally, the spectroscopic constants would be determined in both the A- and S-reductions, and each rotational constant would be converted to a determinable constant. If the determinable constants were similar, it would give confidence that the rotational and quartic centrifugal distortion constants were determined with sufficient accuracy to be included in the structure determination, regardless of the size of the transition dataset. A similar problem might have arisen in the HN3 semi-experimental equilibrium structure determinations,83,87 but the HN3 dataset included b-type transitions, along with a-type transitions, which gave enough spectroscopic information to successfully determine the A-reduction spectroscopic constants.

In the current case, the S-reduction rotational constants were input to xrefit, along with vibration–rotation interaction and electron-mass distribution corrections predicted at the CCSD(T)/cc-pCVTZ level of theory. The xrefit module uses the values to calculate the equilibrium rotational constants (Be) using Eq. (2), where the second term contains the vibration–rotation interaction correction, meMp is the electron–proton mass ratio, B0β(S) is the S-reduction rotational constant, and gββ is the corresponding magnetic g-tensor component,
(2)
These calculated equilibrium rotational constants are then used to calculate the inertial defect (Δi), which is precisely zero for a rigid, planar molecule. For ketene, without either computational correction, the observed inertial defect Δi0 is ∼0.09 μÅ2 (Table III). Including the vibration–rotation interaction correction decreases the inertial defect to ∼0.004 μÅ2, while the inclusion of the electron-mass correction brings the inertial defect to slightly larger than 0.004 μÅ2 (Table III) in a similar manner to HN3.83 These two molecules stand in contrast to the trend observed for heterocyclic molecules,79–82,111 where the vibration–rotation interaction correction results in a small negative value of Δie and subsequent application of the electron-mass correction brings the magnitude of Δie close to zero.79–82,111 The similar inertial defect trend to HN3 is likely due to the nature of the C–C–O backbone, where the electron mass is more-or-less cylindrically distributed in the combined in-plane and out-of-plane π orbitals.
TABLE III.

Inertial defects (Δi) and second moments (Pbb) of ketene isotopologues.

IsotopologueΔi0 (μÅ2)aΔie (μÅ2)a,bΔie (μÅ2)a,cPbb (μÅ2)c,dPbb/mH2)c,d,e
H2CCO 0.0774 0.0035 0.0041 1.782 76 1.768 92 
[1-13C]-H2CCO 0.0772 0.0035 0.0040 1.782 77 1.768 93 
[2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0772 0.0035 0.0041 1.782 75 1.768 91 
[18O]-H2CCO 0.0779 0.0036 0.0042 1.782 70 1.768 86 
[17O]-H2CCO 0.0779 0.0038 0.0044 1.782 59 1.768 75 
[1,2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0766 0.0031 0.0037 1.782 95 1.769 11 
[2,2-2H]-H2CCO 0.1089 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 73 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H, 2-13C]-H2CCO 0.1086 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 74 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H, 1-13C]-H2CCO 0.1086 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 74 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H,18O]-H2CCO 0.1095 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 75 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H,17O]-H2CCO 0.1093 0.0037 0.0043 3.561 77 1.768 42 
[2-2H]-H2CCO 0.0964 0.0037 0.0043 2.594 89  
[2-2H, 2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0963 0.0037 0.0043 2.598 82  
[2-2H, 1-13C]-H2CCO 0.0961 0.0036 0.0042 2.595 32  
[2-2H,18O]-H2CCO 0.0969 0.0037 0.0043 2.595 58  
[2-2H,17O]-H2CCO 0.0966 0.0036 0.0042 2.595 31  
Average (x̄0.0918 0.0036 0.0042   
Std dev (s) 0.0132 0.0001 0.0001   
IsotopologueΔi0 (μÅ2)aΔie (μÅ2)a,bΔie (μÅ2)a,cPbb (μÅ2)c,dPbb/mH2)c,d,e
H2CCO 0.0774 0.0035 0.0041 1.782 76 1.768 92 
[1-13C]-H2CCO 0.0772 0.0035 0.0040 1.782 77 1.768 93 
[2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0772 0.0035 0.0041 1.782 75 1.768 91 
[18O]-H2CCO 0.0779 0.0036 0.0042 1.782 70 1.768 86 
[17O]-H2CCO 0.0779 0.0038 0.0044 1.782 59 1.768 75 
[1,2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0766 0.0031 0.0037 1.782 95 1.769 11 
[2,2-2H]-H2CCO 0.1089 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 73 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H, 2-13C]-H2CCO 0.1086 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 74 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H, 1-13C]-H2CCO 0.1086 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 74 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H,18O]-H2CCO 0.1095 0.0036 0.0042 3.561 75 1.768 40 
[2,2-2H,17O]-H2CCO 0.1093 0.0037 0.0043 3.561 77 1.768 42 
[2-2H]-H2CCO 0.0964 0.0037 0.0043 2.594 89  
[2-2H, 2-13C]-H2CCO 0.0963 0.0037 0.0043 2.598 82  
[2-2H, 1-13C]-H2CCO 0.0961 0.0036 0.0042 2.595 32  
[2-2H,18O]-H2CCO 0.0969 0.0037 0.0043 2.595 58  
[2-2H,17O]-H2CCO 0.0966 0.0036 0.0042 2.595 31  
Average (x̄0.0918 0.0036 0.0042   
Std dev (s) 0.0132 0.0001 0.0001   
a

Δi = IcIaIb = −2Pcc.

b

Vibration–rotation interaction corrections only.

c

Vibration–rotation interaction and electron-mass corrections.

d

Pbb = (IbIaIc)/−2.

e

mH = 1.007 825 035 for 1H or 2.014 101 779 for 2H.

The semi-experimental equilibrium structure parameters of ketene obtained from 16 isotopologues are shown in Fig. 7 and enumerated in Table IV. The 2σ statistical uncertainties of the bond distances are all <0.0007 Å, and the corresponding uncertainty in the bond angle is 0.014°. Overall, the precision and accuracy of the structural parameters are similar to those of HN383 when comparing the reSE calculated at the same level of theory. The 2σ statistical uncertainties of heavy-atom bond lengths are nearly identical for HN3 and ketene (0.000 74 for N1–N2; 0.000 75 for N2–N3; and 0.000 69 for C1-C2; 0.000 66 for C1-O). The 2σ statistical uncertainty for the respective X–H bond is also quite similar (0.0003 for HN3 and 0.0002 for ketene). More generally, the bond length accuracy of the reSE of ketene is similar to our other works, including heterocyclic molecules,79–82,111 and is of the same order of magnitude for the accuracy in the angles, with that in ketene being more accurately determined. This improvement in accuracy is largely due to having 8× more independent moments of inertia than structural parameters (three bond lengths and one angle) for ketene. Table IV presents the reSE structural parameters determined in the complete analysis, as well as the recommended reSE structural parameters, which take into account the limits of precision in their determination. The distinction between these sets of values is discussed in greater detail in the next section.

FIG. 7.

Semi-experimental equilibrium structure (reSE) of ketene with 2σ statistical uncertainties from least-squares fitting of the moments of inertia from 16 isotopologues. Distances are in angstroms, and the angle is in degrees.

FIG. 7.

Semi-experimental equilibrium structure (reSE) of ketene with 2σ statistical uncertainties from least-squares fitting of the moments of inertia from 16 isotopologues. Distances are in angstroms, and the angle is in degrees.

Close modal
TABLE IV.

Equilibrium structural parameters of ketene. Boldface indicates recommended values.

reSEa,b East et al.57 reSEa,c Guarnieri et al.58 reSE this workreSE recommendedCCSD(T) BTECCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z
rC–C (Å) 1.312 12 (60) 1.3122 (12) 1.312 18 (69) 1.3122 (7) 1.312 58 1.312 00 
rC–H (Å) 1.075 76 (14) 1.0763 (2) 1.075 93 (16) 1.0759 (2) 1.075 89 1.075 65 
rC–O (Å) 1.160 30 (58) 1.1607 (12) 1.160 64 (66) 1.1606 (7) 1.160 97 1.160 07 
θC–C–H (deg) 119.110 (12) 119.115 (22) 119.086 (14) 119.086 (14) 119.077 119.067 
Nisod 11 16 16   
reSEa,b East et al.57 reSEa,c Guarnieri et al.58 reSE this workreSE recommendedCCSD(T) BTECCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z
rC–C (Å) 1.312 12 (60) 1.3122 (12) 1.312 18 (69) 1.3122 (7) 1.312 58 1.312 00 
rC–H (Å) 1.075 76 (14) 1.0763 (2) 1.075 93 (16) 1.0759 (2) 1.075 89 1.075 65 
rC–O (Å) 1.160 30 (58) 1.1607 (12) 1.160 64 (66) 1.1606 (7) 1.160 97 1.160 07 
θC–C–H (deg) 119.110 (12) 119.115 (22) 119.086 (14) 119.086 (14) 119.077 119.067 
Nisod 11 16 16   
a

2σ uncertainties calculated based on the uncertainty presented in each work.

b

Vibration–rotation corrections calculated at a mixed MP2 and CCSD(T) level.

c

Vibration–rotation and electron-mass corrections calculated at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level.

d

Number of isotopologues used in the structure determination.

In accordance with previous structure determinations,80–85 the effect of including the available isotopologues in the reSE structure is examined using xrefiteration.82, Figure 8 shows a plot of parameter uncertainty as a function of the number of incorporated isotopologues and reveals that the total uncertainty and the uncertainty of both the bond distances and bond angle have converged with the inclusion of the 11th isotopologue. Coincidentally, this is the same number of isotopologues used in the reSE determination published by Guarnieri et al.58 The composition of the set of 11 isotopologues, however, is different in each case. Guarnieri et al.58 determined the reSE with mainly protio- and [2,2-2H]-ketene isotopologues, while the first 11 isotopologues utilized by xrefiteration in the current work include a mix of protio-, [2-2H]-ketene, and [2,2-2H]-ketene isotopologues. The addition of the five other isotopologues beyond the 11th neither decreases nor increases the total uncertainty, which is similar to the situation observed with HN383 but unlike the cases of thiophene80 and 1H- and 2H-1,2,3-triazole,85 where the statistical uncertainty increases with the inclusion of the final isotopologues. Figure 9 shows the structural parameter values and their uncertainties as a function of the number of ketene isotopologues, added in the same order as in Fig. 8. It is evident that the structural parameters are well-determined with the core set of isotopologues because they agree with the respective BTE values. The addition of further isotopologues, however, decreases the 2σ uncertainties for all parameters until the addition of the 11th isotopologue, similar to Fig. 8. The rC–C and rC–O bond lengths of the current reSE are both smaller than the respective BTE values (by 0.0003 and 0.0004 Å, respectively), while there is quite close agreement between the rC–H bond lengths (reC–HreSEC–H = 0.000 04 Å). The value of the bond angle, θC–C–H, is slightly larger (0.009°) than the BTE value. Both heavy-atom bond distances of the re BTE structure are too large (Fig. 9) relative to their reSE parameters, and the observed residuals are very similar to those we observed in HN3,83 0.000 35 Å for the central rN1–N2 bond and 0.000 41 Å for the terminal RN2-N3 bond. In the structural least-squares fitting from rotational constants, the most difficult atom to locate is the heavy atom nearest to the center of mass, but an error in its location would tend to make one heavy-atom distance too long and one too short, contrary to the observations in ketene and HN3. This may suggest that these residual discrepancies, which are not present in the distances involving H atoms, are due to some systematic shift in the BTE distances related to the heavy atom backbone of these molecules.

FIG. 8.

Plot of reSE uncertainty (δreSE) as a function of the number of isotopologues (Niso) incorporated into the structure determination dataset for ketene. The total relative statistical uncertainty (δreSE, blue squares), the relative statistical uncertainty in the bond distances (green triangles), and the relative statistical uncertainty in the angle (purple circles) are presented.

FIG. 8.

Plot of reSE uncertainty (δreSE) as a function of the number of isotopologues (Niso) incorporated into the structure determination dataset for ketene. The total relative statistical uncertainty (δreSE, blue squares), the relative statistical uncertainty in the bond distances (green triangles), and the relative statistical uncertainty in the angle (purple circles) are presented.

Close modal
FIG. 9.

Plots of the structural parameters of ketene as a function of the number of isotopologues (Niso) and their 2σ uncertainties. Plots of bond distance use consistent scales. The colored dashed lines indicate the BTE value. The table in Fig. 8 indicates the xth isotopologue added to the reSE.

FIG. 9.

Plots of the structural parameters of ketene as a function of the number of isotopologues (Niso) and their 2σ uncertainties. Plots of bond distance use consistent scales. The colored dashed lines indicate the BTE value. The table in Fig. 8 indicates the xth isotopologue added to the reSE.

Close modal

A graphical representation of all the structural parameters for the current reSE, the reSE by East et al.,57 the reSE by Guarnieri et al.,58 the BTE, and various coupled-cluster calculations with different basis sets is shown in Fig. 10. Upon cursory inspection, it seems there is excellent agreement among all of the structural parameters of the three reSE structures (Table IV and Fig. 10), and all are quoted to similar precision. Because separate sets of discrepancies are involved with respect to the two previous reSE structure determinations, we will discuss them separately. The heavy-atom distances from Guarnieri et al.58 are essentially the same as our own, although with slightly larger 2σ uncertainties due to the smaller dataset compared to the present work, and BTE results for both parameters easily fall within the quoted 2σ limit. The agreement for the two parameters involving the hydrogen-atom position is not quite as good. The rC-H bond distance from Guarnieri et al.58 is in disagreement with our value by slightly more than the combined 2σ error estimates, and the BTE value falls well outside their 2σ error range. The angle, θC-C-H, is, indeed, in agreement with our value within the combined estimated 2σ error limits, but the BTE value of this parameter falls significantly outside their 2σ error range. We believe that the reason for these discrepancies is the impact of untreated coupling between vibrational states impacting the rotational constants. It is known that the ground state of ketene at high Ka values is affected by perturbations from low-lying vibrational states. We have chosen to employ only measurements for Ka = 0–5, which removed this problem. Guarnieri et al.,58 however, used higher Ka transitions in their least-squares fits, which required the inclusion of higher-order centrifugal distortion terms, LJK and LJKK. These effective parameters distort the determined values of A0 from the regression analysis, which may affect the structural parameters. We tested our conjecture by using our rotational constants for the set of isotopologues used by Guarnieri et al.58 and found the resultant structure in essentially complete agreement with our own reSE structure (Table IV), which is consistent with the analysis of the structure shown in Fig. 9. This indicates that the five additional isotopologues that we measured and included were not required to achieve this improved accuracy.

FIG. 10.

Graphical comparison of the ketene structural parameters with bond distances in angstroms (Å) and angles in degrees (°). Plots of bond distance use the same scale. Expansions are provided for each parameter in gray boxes. The statistical uncertainties for all reSE parameters are 2σ.

FIG. 10.

Graphical comparison of the ketene structural parameters with bond distances in angstroms (Å) and angles in degrees (°). Plots of bond distance use the same scale. Expansions are provided for each parameter in gray boxes. The statistical uncertainties for all reSE parameters are 2σ.

Close modal

The situation with respect to the reSE structure from East et al.57 is more straightforward. The bond distances and angles reported by East et al.57 are in complete agreement with the current reSE values. This is somewhat surprising, given that the rotational constants are substantially less precise than the values determined in the present work and that the A0 constant of [18O]-ketene used by East et al.57 and determined experimentally by Brown et al.,28 287 350 (910) MHz, is clearly too large by about 5 GHz. The values of A0 for all heavy-atom isotopologues should be nearly the same because they depend only on the distance of the hydrogen atoms from the a-axis. This is confirmed by the data in Table II. The remaining rotational constants used by East et al.57 are all similar to those in the present work. We obtained an reSE structure using the rotational constants and vibration–rotation interaction corrections presented in Table XIV of the East et al.57 work and obtained a structure very closely resembling the one presented in that work for all parameters. This is also an interesting outcome, as the vibration–rotation interaction corrections used in that work are clearly inadequate, as evidenced by the residual inertial defects presented in their Table XIV57 that vary in sign and order of magnitude across the six isotopologues. Despite the inadequacy of the vibration–rotation interaction corrections, the reSE structure of East et al.57 is in excellent agreement with the new reSE but not quite in agreement with the θC–C–H value from the re BTE structure. These analyses are provided in the supplementary material and summarized in Tables S-V and S-VI.

The reSE structure presented in this work, like the previously reported structures,57,58 suffers from the impact of untreated Coriolis coupling between its ground state and its vibrationally excited states. Despite this limitation, the 2σ statistical uncertainties for the bond distances and bond angles are quite small (0.0002 to 0.0007 Å for the bond distances and 0.014° for the bond angle). For the bond distances, this statistical uncertainty is approaching the limit of the reSE structure determination, which requires the assumption that there is one mass-independent equilibrium geometry. The mass independence of equilibrium structures is a tacitly accepted assumption of molecular structure determination by rotational spectroscopy that is no longer valid as the limits of accuracy and precision are extended, especially for parameters involving hydrogen atoms. As a simple test of this assumption, optimized geometries were obtained for ketene and [2,2-2H]-ketene with and without the diagonal Born–Oppenheimer correction (DBOC; SCF with the aug-cc-pCVTZ basis set). Of course, the re structure obtained from the normal optimization without the DBOC resulted in the same equilibrium geometry for both isotopologues. With the DBOC, however, the equilibrium C–D distance decreased relative to the C–H distance by 0.000 06 Å. This value, which is similar to that obtained for benzene,86 suggests that the limit and trustworthiness of the reSE structure for ketene and other C–H containing reSE structures is on the order of 0.0001 Å, which is half of the 2σ statistical uncertainty of the reSE C–H distance in this work. As a consequence of these relationships, our recommended values for the structural parameters of ketene are rC–C = 1.3122 (7) Å, rC–H = 1.0759 (2) Å, rC–O = 1.1606 (7) Å, and θC–C–H = 119.086 (14)°, as shown in Fig. 7 and Table IV.

The C2v symmetry of ketene-h2 and ketene-d2 allows for two independent confirmations of the quality of the spectroscopic analysis and computational corrections, Pbb and Δie. Δie for a planar molecule is zero, as no nuclear mass exists off of the molecular plane. Any residual inertial defect after correction of the rotational constants for the vibration–rotation interaction and the electronic mass distribution potentially reveals room for improvements in the rotational constants or computational corrections. While all of the residual Δie values are quite small (Table III), their non-zero values demonstrate that further corrections may be possible. Their scatter reveals an interesting mass dependence. The ketene-d1 and ketene-d2 isotopologues have nearly identical inertial defects to four decimal places (0.0042 or 0.0043 μÅ2), while the ketene-h2 isotopologues have an average value of (0.0042 μÅ2) and a range from 0.0037 to 0.0044 μÅ2. To probe this mass dependence, we determined the Pbb (second moments) value112 for each isotopologue (Table III), after computational corrections were applied to the rotational constants. To the extent that there is a single, mass-independent equilibrium geometry of ketene, the Pbb value, corrected for the mass of the hydrogen or deuterium atom in the C2v isotopologues (ketene-h2 and ketene-d2), should be the same for all isotopologues because it is only dependent on the location of the H atoms with respect to the perpendicular mirror plane. Also shown in Table III are the Pbb/mH values, which are practically identical for all of the ketene-d2 isotopologues (1.7684 Å2). The Pbb/mH values for the protio-ketene isotopologues show an increased scatter ranging from 1.7687 to 1.7691 Å2 but have a higher average value as well (1.7689 Å2). While these differences are small, their clear mass dependence leads us to conclude that we have not completely removed the impact of untreated Coriolis coupling from the rotational constants. The larger mass of 2H compared to 1H reduces the A0 rotational constant by roughly a factor of two for the deuterium-containing isotopologues. The a-axis Coriolis ζ is unchanged between isotopologues, but the a-axis Coriolis coupling constants scale with the magnitude of the A0 rotational constant. It is expected, therefore, that the protio-ketenes would be subject to a slightly greater impact of untreated Coriolis coupling, which is consistent with this observation. The great constancy of the Pbb/mD values across all the [2,2-2H]-ketene isotopologues (vide supra) leads us to believe that the corresponding b-coordinate of the 2H-atom [0.940 32 Å, determined by Eq. (3)] is one of the most reliably determined structural parameters of ketene,
(3)
This assertion is supported by a comparison to its corresponding values calculated from the internal coordinates in Table IV: reSE = 0.940 25 Å, re 6Z = 0.940 17 Å, and re BTE = 0.940 29 Å. The very small difference from the BTE value (0.000 03 Å) is particularly notable and satisfying. The corresponding value for the b-coordinate of the 1H-atom in ketene is 0.940 45 Å, which is slightly larger due to some combination of the true isotopic difference in the rC–H and rC–D equilibrium bond distances and the increased untreated Coriolis coupling in the protio-ketene isotopologues.

A new, highly precise, and accurate semi-experimental equilibrium (reSE) structure for ketene (H2C=C=O) has been determined from the rotational spectra of 16 isotopologues. The 2σ values for the reSE structure of ketene, and also the discrepancies between the best theoretical estimate (BTE) and the reSE structural parameters, are strikingly similar to those for the previous reSE structure of hydrazoic acid (HNNN).83 This outcome is noteworthy, although perhaps not surprising, given (i) the structural similarity between the two species and (ii) the highly over-determined datasets, which are a consequence of the large number of isotopologues relative to the number of structural parameters. In both cases, we found that extrapolation to the complete basis set limit provided slightly better agreement with the reSE structure when the highest level calculation included in the extrapolation was CCSD(T)/cc-pCV6Z, as opposed to CCSD(T)/cc-pCV5Z. It is somewhat surprising that the high accuracy of the ketene structure did not require the full dataset from 16 isotopologues. The uncertainties in the structural parameters did not improve with the inclusion of the “last” five isotopologues in the xrefiteration analysis. This case stands in contrast to other molecules that we have studied, in which quite large numbers of isotopologues are required for convergence of the reSE parameters.82,84,85 Previous studies were steering us toward a generalization that “more is better” with respect to the number of isotopologues used in a structure determination, but the current case provides a counterexample. In the current case, the extra isotopologues do not degrade the quality of the structure, but they do not improve it. The current state of understanding of reSE structure determination does not enable a prediction of the number of isotopologues that will be required for the statistical uncertainties of the structural parameters to converge.

The present work confirms the great utility of the BTE structure as a benchmark for the semi-experimental structures. Although both of the published reSE structures for ketene, to which we have compared our own results, are generally in excellent agreement with the present work, the comparison to the BTE structure clearly establishes that the present approach of limiting the dataset to low Ka values (0–5) improved the results for a molecule in which perturbations of the ground state exist. There need to be further investigations of why the BTE structure predicts heavy-atom bond distances that are longer than the reSE structure when all of the other structural parameters agree so well. The BTE values for the heavy-atom distances do not fall outside the 2σ statistical uncertainty of the reSE values, but the small differences between BTE and reSE values have now been observed in both ketene and HN3. The general applicability to similar molecules and the origin of the effect merit additional study.

The current studies enhance the capability for radioastronomers to search for ketene in different extraterrestrial environments by extending the measured frequency range of ketene to 750 GHz as well as providing data for newly measured isotopologues, [2-2H, 1-13C]-ketene, [2-2H, 2-13C]-ketene, [2-2H, 18O]-ketene, [2-2H, 17O]-ketene, and [2,2-2H, 17O]-ketene. These new data will also be valuable for identifying these species in laboratory experiments, e.g., electric discharge, pyrolysis, and photolysis. Finally, these spectra contain a great many transitions from vibrationally excited states, which should prove valuable in analyzing and quantifying the numerous perturbations that exist between these low-lying vibrational states. We hope to pursue this topic in the future.

Computational output files, least-squares fitting for all isotopologues, data distribution plots for all non-standard isotopologues, xrefiteration outputs, equations used for calculating determinable constants and BTE corrections, and tables of S-reduction, A-reduction, and determinable constants, structural parameters, inertial defects, BTE corrections, and synthetic details are provided in the supplementary material.

We gratefully acknowledge the funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation for the support of this project (Grant No. CHE-1954270 to R.J.M and Grant No. CHE-1664325 to J.F.S.). We thank Maria Zdanovskaia for her assistance with generating figures. We thank Maria Zdanovskaia and Andrew Owen for their thoughtful commentary and review of the manuscript. We thank Tracy Drier for the construction of the ketene lamp used in this work.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Houston H. Smith: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Brian J. Esselman: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Samuel A. Wood: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). John F. Stanton: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Software (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). R. Claude Woods: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Robert J. McMahon: Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
T. T.
Tidwell
,
Ketenes
,
2nd ed.
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2006
).
2.
R. L.
Danheiser
,
Science of Synthesis: Three Carbon-Heteroatom Bonds: Ketenes and Derivatives
(
Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
,
2006
), Vol. 23.
3.
A. D.
Allen
and
T. T.
Tidwell
, “
New directions in ketene chemistry: The land of opportunity
,”
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2012
,
1081
1096
.
4.
Y.
Zhang
,
P.
Gao
,
F.
Jiao
,
Y.
Chen
,
Y.
Ding
,
G.
Hou
,
X.
Pan
, and
X.
Bao
, “
Chemistry of ketene transformation to gasoline catalyzed by H-SAPO-11
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
144
18251
18258
(
2022
).
5.
F. A.
Leibfarth
and
C. J.
Hawker
, “
The emerging utility of ketenes in polymer chemistry
,”
J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
51
,
3769
3782
(
2013
).
6.
M. J.
Newland
,
G. J.
Rea
,
L. P.
Thüner
,
A. P.
Henderson
,
B. T.
Golding
,
A. R.
Rickard
,
I.
Barnes
, and
J.
Wenger
, “
Photochemistry of 2-butenedial and 4-oxo-2-pentenal under atmospheric boundary layer conditions
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
21
,
1160
(
2019
).
7.
W.
Sun
,
J.
Wang
,
C.
Huang
,
N.
Hansen
, and
B.
Yang
, “
Providing effective constraints for developing ketene combustion mechanisms: A detailed kinetic investigation of diacetyl flames
,”
Combust. Flame
205
,
11
21
(
2019
).
8.
R. L.
Hudson
and
M. J.
Loeffler
, “
Ketene formation in interstellar ices: A laboratory study
,”
Astrophys. J.
773
,
109
(
2013
).
9.
B. E.
Turner
, “
Microwave detection of interstellar ketene
,”
Astrophys. J.
213
,
L75
L79
(
1977
).
10.
H. E.
Matthews
and
T. J.
Sears
, “
Interstellar molecular line searches at 1.5 centimeters
,”
Astrophys. J.
300
,
766
772
(
1986
).
11.
L. E. B.
Johansson
,
C.
Andersson
,
J.
Ellder
,
P.
Friberg
,
A.
Hjalmarson
,
B.
Hoglund
,
W. M.
Irvine
,
H.
Olofsson
, and
G.
Rydbeck
, “
Spectral scan of Orion A and IRC+10216 from 72 to 91 GHz
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
130
,
227
256
(
1984
).
12.
W. M.
Irvine
,
P.
Friberg
,
N.
Kaifu
,
K.
Kawaguchi
,
Y.
Kitamura
,
H. E.
Matthews
,
Y.
Minh
,
S.
Saito
,
N.
Ukita
, and
S.
Yamamoto
, “
Observations of some oxygen-containing and sulfur-containing organic molecules in cold dark clouds
,”
Astrophys. J.
342
,
871
875
(
1989
).
13.
B. E.
Turner
,
R.
Terzieva
, and
E.
Herbst
, “
The physics and chemistry of small translucent molecular clouds. XII. More complex species explainable by gas-phase processes
,”
Astrophys. J.
518
,
699
732
(
1999
).
14.
A.
Bacmann
,
V.
Taquet
,
A.
Faure
,
C.
Kahane
, and
C.
Ceccarelli
, “
Detection of complex organic molecules in a prestellar core: A new challenge for astrochemical models
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
541
,
L12
(
2012
).
15.
J. K.
Jørgensen
,
H. S. P.
Müller
,
H.
Calcutt
,
A.
Coutens
,
M. N.
Drozdovskaya
,
K. I.
Öberg
,
M. V.
Persson
,
V.
Taquet
,
E. F.
van Dishoeck
, and
S. F.
Wampfler
, “
The ALMA-PILS survey: Isotopic composition of oxygen-containing complex organic molecules toward IRAS 16293–2422B
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
620
,
A170
(
2018
).
16.
S.
Muller
,
A.
Beelen
,
M.
Guélin
,
S.
Aalto
,
J. H.
Black
,
F.
Combes
,
S. J.
Curran
,
P.
Theule
, and
S. N.
Longmore
, “
Molecules at z = 0.89. A 4-mm-rest-frame absorption-line survey toward PKS 1830-211
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
535
,
A103
(
2011
).
17.
H.
Staudinger
,
Die Ketene
(
Enke Verlag
,
Stuttgart
,
1912
).
18.
S. C.
Wang
and
F. W.
Schueler
, “
A simple ketene generator
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
26
,
323
(
1949
).
19.
G.
Quadbeck
, “
Neuere Methoden der präparativen organischen Chemie II. Keten in der präparativen organischen Chemie
,”
Angew. Chem.
68
,
361
370
(
1956
).
20.
E. M. S.
Maçôas
,
L.
Khriachtchev
,
R.
Fausto
, and
M.
Räsänen
, “
Photochemistry and vibrational spectroscopy of the trans and cis conformers of acetic acid in solid Ar
,”
J. Phys. Chem. A
108
,
3380
3389
(
2004
).
21.
X. K.
Zhang
,
J. M.
Parnis
,
E. G.
Lewars
, and
R. E.
March
, “
FTIR spectroscopic investigation of matrix-isolated isomerization and decomposition products of ionized acetone: Generation and characterization of 1-propen-2-ol
,”
Can. J. Chem.
75
,
276
284
(
1997
).
22.
B. J.
Esselman
and
N. J.
Hill
, “
Proper resonance depiction of Acylium cation: A high-level and student computational investigation
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
92
,
660
663
(
2015
).
23.
J.
Cernicharo
,
C.
Cabezas
,
S.
Bailleux
,
L.
Margulès
,
R.
Motiyenko
,
L.
Zou
,
Y.
Endo
,
C.
Bermúdez
,
M.
Agúndez
,
N.
Marcelino
,
B.
Lefloch
,
B.
Tercero
, and
P.
de Vicente
, “
Discovery of the acetyl cation, CH3CO+, in space and in the laboratory
,”
Astron. Astrophys.
646
,
L7
(
2021
).
24.
B.
Bak
,
E. S.
Knudsen
,
E.
Madsen
, and
J.
Rastrup-Andersen
, “
Preliminary analysis of the microwave spectrum of ketene
,”
Phys. Rev.
79
,
190
(
1950
).
25.
H. R.
Johnson
and
M. W. P.
Strandberg
, “
The microwave spectrum of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
20
,
687
695
(
1952
).
26.
A. P.
Cox
,
L. F.
Thomas
, and
J.
Sheridan
, “
Internuclear distances in keten from spectroscopic measurements
,”
Spectrochim. Acta
15
,
542
543
(
1959
).
27.
R. A.
Beaudet
, “
Problems in molecular structure and internal rotation
,” Ph.D. dissertation (
Harvard University
,
1962
).
28.
R. D.
Brown
,
P. D.
Godfrey
,
D.
McNaughton
,
A. P.
Pierlot
, and
W. H.
Taylor
, “
Microwave spectrum of ketene
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
140
,
340
352
(
1990
).
29.
V. W.
Weiss
and
W. H.
Flygare
, “
Hydrogen spin−spin, spin−rotation, and deuterium nuclear quadrupole interactions in ketene, ketene‐d1, and ketene‐d2
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
45
,
3475
3476
(
1966
).
30.
L.
Nemes
and
M.
Winnewisser
, “
Centrifugal distortion analysis of the microwave and millimeter wave spectra of deuterated ketenes
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A
31
,
272
282
(
1976
).
31.
A.
Guarnieri
and
A.
Huckauf
, “
The rotational spectrum of (17O) ketene
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci.
56
,
440
446
(
2001
).
32.
A.
Guarnieri
, “
The millimeterwave spectrum of four rare ketene isotopomers
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci.
60
,
619
628
(
2005
).
33.
L.
Nemes
,
J.
Demaison
, and
G.
Wlodarczak
, “
New measurements of sub-millimetre-wave rotational transitions for the ketene (H2CCO) Molecule
,”
Acta Phys. Hung.
61
,
135
138
(
1987
).
34.
H.
Gershinowitz
and
E. B.
Wilson
, “
Infrared absorption spectrum of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
5
,
500
(
1937
).
35.
F.
Halverson
and
V. Z.
Williams
, “
The infra‐red spectrum of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
15
,
552
559
(
1947
).
36.
W. R.
Harp
and
R. S.
Rasmussen
, “
The infra‐red absorption spectrum and vibrational frequency assignment of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
15
,
778
785
(
1947
).
37.
L. G.
Drayton
and
H. W.
Thompson
, “
The infra-red spectrum of keten
,”
J. Chem. Soc.
1948
,
1416
1419
.
38.
B.
Bak
and
F. A.
Andersen
, “
The infrared spectrum of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
22
,
1050
1053
(
1954
).
39.
P. E. B.
Butler
,
D. R.
Eatcw
, and
H. W.
Thompson
, “
Vibration-rotation bands of keten
,”
Spectrochim. Acta
13
,
223
235
(
1958
).
40.
W. H.
Fletcher
and
W. F.
Arendale
, “
Infrared spectra of CD2CO and CHDCO
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
19
,
1431
1432
(
1951
).
41.
W. F.
Arendale
and
W. H.
Fletcher
, “
Some vibration‐rotation bands of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
24
,
581
587
(
1956
).
42.
W. F.
Arendale
and
W. H.
Fletcher
, “
Infrared spectra of ketene and deuteroketenes
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
26
,
793
797
(
1957
).
43.
A. P.
Cox
and
A. S.
Esbitt
, “
Fundamental vibrational frequencies in ketene and the deuteroketenes
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
38
,
1636
1643
(
1963
).
44.
L.
Nemes
, “
Multiple Coriolis perturbations in the vibrational-rotational spectra of ketene and dideuteroketene
,”
Tezisy Dokl. - Simp. Mol. Spektrosk. Vys. Sverkhvys. Razresheniya, 2nd; Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sib. Otd., Inst. Opt. Atmos.
2
(
1974
).
45.
L.
Nemes
, “
Rotation-vibration analysis of the Coriolis-coupled ν5, ν6, ν8, and ν9 bands of H2CCO
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
72
,
102
123
(
1978
).
46.
F.
Winther
,
F.
Hegelund
, and
L.
Nemes
, “
The infrared spectrum of dideuteroketene below 620 cm−1
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
117
,
388
402
(
1986
).
47.
J. L.
Duncan
,
A. M.
Ferguson
,
J.
Harper
,
K. H.
Tonge
, and
F.
Hegelund
, “
High-resolution infrared rovibrational studies of the A1 species fundamentals of isotopic ketenes
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
122
,
72
93
(
1987
).
48.
J. L.
Duncan
and
A. M.
Ferguson
, “
High resolution infrared analyses of fundamentals and overtones in isotopic ketenes
,”
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
43
,
1081
1086
(
1987
).
49.
F.
Hegelund
,
J.
Kauppinen
, and
F.
Winther
, “
The high resolution infrared spectrum of the ν9, ν6 and ν5 bands in ketene-d2
,”
Mol. Phys.
61
,
261
273
(
1987
).
50.
R.
Escribano
,
J. L.
Doménech
,
P.
Cancio
,
J.
Ortigoso
,
J.
Santos
, and
D.
Bermejo
, “
The ν1 band of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
101
,
937
949
(
1994
).
51.
M. C.
Campiña
,
E.
Domingo
,
M. P.
Fernández-Liencres
,
R.
Escribano
, and
L.
Nemes
, “
Analysis of the high resolution spectra of the ν5 and ν6 bands of ketene
,”
An. Quim., Int. Ed.
94
,
23
26
(
1998
)..
52.
M.
Gruebele
,
J. W. C.
Johns
, and
L.
Nemes
, “
Observation of the ν6 + ν9 band of ketene via resonant Coriolis interaction with ν8
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
198
,
376
380
(
1999
).
53.
J. W. C.
Johns
,
L.
Nemes
,
K. M. T.
Yamada
,
T. Y.
Wang
,
J.
Doménech
,
J.
Santos
,
P.
Cancio
,
D.
Bermejo
,
J.
Ortigoso
, and
R.
Escribano
, “
The ground state constants of ketene
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
156
,
501
503
(
1992
).
54.
L.
Nemes
,
D.
Luckhaus
,
M.
Quack
, and
J. W. C.
Johns
, “
Deperturbation of the low-frequency infrared modes of ketene (CH2CO)
,”
J. Mol. Struct.
517-518
,
217
226
(
2000
).
55.
P. D.
Mallinson
and
L.
Nemes
, “
The force field and rz structure of ketene
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
59
,
470
481
(
1976
).
56.
J. L.
Duncan
and
B.
Munro
, “
The ground state average structure of ketene
,”
J. Mol. Struct.
161
,
311
319
(
1987
).
57.
A. L. L.
East
,
W. D.
Allen
, and
S. J.
Klippenstein
, “
The anharmonic force field and equilibrium molecular structure of ketene
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
102
,
8506
8532
(
1995
).
58.
A.
Guarnieri
,
J.
Demaison
, and
H. D.
Rudolph
, “
Structure of ketene—Revisited re (equilibrium) and rm (mass-dependent) structures
,”
J. Mol. Struct.
969
,
1
8
(
2010
).
59.
J. L.
Duncan
,
A. M.
Ferguson
,
J.
Harper
, and
K. H.
Tonge
, “
A combined empirical-ab initio determination of the general harmonic force field of ketene
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
125
,
196
213
(
1987
).
60.
A.
Guarnieri
and
A.
Huckauf
, “
The rotational spectrum of ketene isotopomers with 18O and 13C revisited
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci.
58
,
275
279
(
2003
).
61.
C. C.
Costain
, “
Determination of molecular structures from ground state rotational constants
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
29
,
864
874
(
1958
).
62.
M. D.
Harmony
,
V. W.
Laurie
,
R. L.
Kuczkowski
,
R. H.
Schwendeman
,
D. A.
Ramsay
,
F. J.
Lovas
,
W. J.
Lafferty
, and
A. G.
Maki
, “
Molecular structures of gas‐phase polyatomic molecules determined by spectroscopic methods
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
8
,
619
722
(
1979
).
63.
P.
Pulay
,
W.
Meyer
, and
J. E.
Boggs
, “
Cubic force constants and equilibrium geometry of methane from Hartree–Fock and correlated wavefunctions
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
68
,
5077
5085
(
1978
).
64.
J.
Demaison
, “
Experimental, semi-experimental and ab initio equilibrium structures
,”
Mol. Phys.
105
,
3109
3138
(
2007
).
65.
J.
Vázquez
and
J. F.
Stanton
, in
Equilibrium Molecular Structures: From Spectroscopy to Quantum Chemistry
, edited by
J.
Demaison
,
J. E.
Boggs
, and
A. G.
Császár
(
Taylor & Francis Group; CRC Press
,
2010
), pp
53
87
.
66.
M.
Mendolicchio
,
E.
Penocchio
,
D.
Licari
,
N.
Tasinato
, and
V.
Barone
, “
Development and implementation of advanced fitting methods for the calculation of accurate molecular structures
,”
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
,
3060
3075
(
2017
).
67.
C.
Puzzarini
and
V.
Barone
, “
Diving for accurate structures in the ocean of molecular systems with the help of spectroscopy and quantum chemistry
,”
Acc. Chem. Res.
51
,
548
556
(
2018
).
68.
K.
Raghavachari
,
G. W.
Trucks
,
J. A.
Pople
, and
M.
Head-Gordon
, “
A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
157
,
479
483
(
1989
).
69.
J. M. L.
Martin
and
P. R.
Taylor
, “
The geometry, vibrational frequencies, and total atomization energy of ethylene. A calibration study
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
248
,
336
344
(
1996
).
70.
T.
Helgaker
,
J.
Gauss
,
P.
Jørgensen
, and
J.
Olsen
, “
The prediction of molecular equilibrium structures by the standard electronic wave functions
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
106
,
6430
6440
(
1997
).
71.
K. A.
Peterson
and
T. H.
Dunning
, Jr.
, “
Benchmark calculations with correlated molecular wave functions. VIII. Bond energies and equilibrium geometries of the CHn and C2Hn (n=1–4) series
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
106
,
4119
4140
(
1997
).
72.
T.
Helgaker
,
P.
Jørgensen
, and
J.
Olsen
,
Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2000
).
73.
K. L.
Bak
,
J.
Gauss
,
P.
Jørgensen
,
J.
Olsen
,
T.
Helgaker
, and
J. F.
Stanton
, “
The accurate determination of molecular equilibrium structures
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
114
,
6548
6556
(
2001
).
74.
S.
Coriani
,
D.
Marchesan
,
J.
Gauss
,
C.
Hättig
,
T.
Helgaker
, and
P.
Jørgensen
, “
The accuracy of ab initio molecular geometries for systems containing second-row atoms
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
123
,
184107
(
2005
).
75.
C.
Puzzarini
, “
Accurate molecular structures of small- and medium-sized molecules
,”
Int. J. Quantum Chem.
116
,
1513
1519
(
2016
).
76.
C.
Puzzarini
and
J. F.
Stanton
, “
Connections between the accuracy of rotational constants and equilibrium molecular structures
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
25
,
1421
1429
(
2023
).
77.
J.
Gauss
and
J. F.
Stanton
, “
Equilibrium structure of LiCCH
,”
Int. J. Quantum Chem.
77
,
305
310
(
2000
).
78.
M.
Piccardo
,
E.
Penocchio
,
C.
Puzzarini
,
M.
Biczysko
, and
V.
Barone
, “
Semi-experimental equilibrium structure determinations by employing B3LYP/SNSD anharmonic force fields: Validation and application to semirigid organic molecules
,”
J. Phys. Chem. A
119
,
2058
2082
(
2015
).
79.
Z. N.
Heim
,
B. K.
Amberger
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Molecular structure determination: Equilibrium structure of pyrimidine (m-C4H4N2) from rotational spectroscopy (reSE) and high-level ab initio calculation (re) agree within the uncertainty of experimental measurement
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
,
104303
(
2020
).
80.
V. L.
Orr
,
Y.
Ichikawa
,
A. R.
Patel
,
S. M.
Kougias
,
K.
Kobayashi
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Precise equilibrium structure determination of thiophene (c-C4H4S) by rotational spectroscopy—Structure of a five-membered heterocycle containing a third-row atom
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
154
,
244310
(
2021
).
81.
B. J.
Esselman
,
M. A.
Zdanovskaia
,
A. N.
Owen
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Precise equilibrium structure of thiazole (c-C3H3NS) from twenty-four isotopologues
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
155
,
054302
(
2021
).
82.
A. N.
Owen
,
M. A.
Zdanovskaia
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Semi-experimental equilibrium (reSE) and theoretical structures of pyridazine (o-C4H4N2)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. A
125
,
7976
7987
(
2021
).
83.
A. N.
Owen
,
N. P.
Sahoo
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Semi-experimental equilibrium (reSE) and theoretical structures of hydrazoic acid (HN3)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
157
,
034303
(
2022
).
84.
H. A.
Bunn
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
P. R.
Franke
,
S. M.
Kougias
,
R. J.
McMahon
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
S. L.
Widicus Weaver
, and
R. C.
Woods
, “
Millimeter/Submillimeter-wave spectroscopy and the semi-experimental equilibrium (reSE) structure of 1H-1,2,4-Triazole (c-C2H3N3)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. A
126
,
8196
8210
(
2022
).
85.
M. A.
Zdanovskaia
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
S. M.
Kougias
,
B. K.
Amberger
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Precise equilibrium structures of 1H- and 2H-1,2,3-triazoles (C2H3N3) by millimeter-wave spectroscopy
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
157
,
084305
(
2022
).
86.
B. J.
Esselman
,
M. A.
Zdanovskaia
,
A. N.
Owen
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Precise equilibrium structure of benzene
” (unpublished) (
2023
).
87.
B. K.
Amberger
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Precise equilibrium structure determination of hydrazoic acid (HN3) by millimeter-wave Spectroscopy
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
143
,
104310
(
2015
).
88.
B. J.
Esselman
,
B. K.
Amberger
,
J. D.
Shutter
,
M. A.
Daane
,
J. F.
Stanton
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
Rotational spectroscopy of pyridazine and its isotopologs from 235–360 GHz: Equilibrium structure and vibrational satellites
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
139
,
224304
(
2013
).
89.
M. A.
Zdanovskaia
,
B. J.
Esselman
,
R. C.
Woods
, and
R. J.
McMahon
, “
The 130–370 GHz rotational spectrum of phenyl isocyanide (C6H5NC)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
,
024301
(
2019
).
90.
H. M.
Pickett
, “
Determination of collisional linewidths and shifts by a convolution method
,”
Appl. Opt.
19
,
2745
2749
(
1980
).
91.
Z.
Kisiel
,
L.
Pszczółkowski
,
B. J.
Drouin
,
C. S.
Brauer
,
S.
Yu
,
J. C.
Pearson
,
I. R.
Medvedev
,
S.
Fortman
, and
C.
Neese
, “
Broadband rotational spectroscopy of acrylonitrile: Vibrational energies from perturbations
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
280
,
134
144
(
2012
).
92.
Z.
Kisiel
,
L.
Pszczółkowski
,
I. R.
Medvedev
,
M.
Winnewisser
,
F. C.
De Lucia
, and
E.
Herbst
, “
Rotational spectrum of trans–trans diethyl ether in the ground and three excited vibrational states
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
233
,
231
243
(
2005
).
93.
H. M.
Pickett
, “
The fitting and prediction of vibration-rotation spectra with spin interactions
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
148
,
371
377
(
1991
).
94.
Z.
Kisiel
, “
Assignment and analysis of complex rotational spectra
,” in
Spectroscopy from Space
, edited by
J.
Demaison
,
K.
Sarka
, and
E. A.
Cohen
,
1st ed.
(
Springer Netherlands
,
Dordrecht
,
2001
), pp
91
106
.
95.
See http://info.ifpan.edu.pl/∼kisiel/prospe.htm for PROSPE—Programs for ROtational SPEctroscopy.
96.
J. F.
Stanton
,
J.
Gauss
,
M. E.
Harding
, and
P. G.
Szalay
, with contributions from
A. A.
Auer
,
R. J.
Bartlett
,
U.
Benedikt
,
C.
Berger
,
D. E.
Bernholdt
,
Y. J.
Bomble
,
L.
Cheng
,
O.
Christiansen
,
M.
Heckert
,
O.
Heun
,
C.
Huber
,
T.-C.
Jagau
,
D.
Jonsson
,
J.
Jusélius
,
K.
Klein
,
W. J.
Lauderdale
,
D. A.
Matthews
,
T.
Metzroth
,
L. A.
Mück
,
D. P.
O'Neill
,
D. R.
Price
,
E.
Prochnow
,
C.
Puzzarini
,
K.
Ruud
,
F.
Schiffmann
,
W.
Schwalbach
,
S.
Stopkowicz
,
A.
Tajti
,
J.
Vázquez
,
F.
Wang
,
J. D.
Watts
, and the integral packages MOLECULE (
J.
Almlöf
and
P. R.
Taylor
), PROPS (
P. R.
Taylor
), ABACUS (
T.
Helgaker
,
H. J. Aa.
Jensen
,
P.
Jørgensen
, and
J.
Olsen
), and ECP routines by
A. V.
Mitin
and
C.
van Wüllen
, CFOUR, Coupled-Cluster techniques for Computational Chemistry, a quantum-chemical program package. For the current version, see http://www.cfour.de.
97.
J. F.
Stanton
,
C. L.
Lopreore
, and
J.
Gauss
, “
The equilibrium structure and fundamental vibrational frequencies of dioxirane
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
108
,
7190
7196
(
1998
).
98.
W.
Schneider
and
W.
Thiel
, “
Anharmonic force fields from analytic second derivatives: Method and application to methyl bromide
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
157
,
367
373
(
1989
).
99.
I. M.
Mills
, “
Vibration-rotation structure in asymmetric- and symmetric-top molecules
,” in
Molecular Spectroscopy: Modern Research
, edited by
K. N.
Rao
and
C. W.
Mathews
(
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1972
), Vol. 1, pp
115
140
.
100.
C.
Puzzarini
,
J.
Bloino
,
N.
Tasinato
, and
V.
Barone
, “
Accuracy and interpretability: The devil and the holy grail. New routes across old boundaries in computational spectroscopy
,”
Chem. Rev.
119
,
8131
8191
(
2019
).
101.
J. W.
Williams
and
C. D.
Hurd
, “
An improved apparatus for the laboratory preparation of ketene and butadiene
,”
J. Org. Chem.
5
,
122
125
(
1940
).
102.
P. J.
Paulsen
and
W. D.
Cooke
, “
Preparation of deuterated solvents for nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry
,”
Anal. Chem.
35
,
1560
(
1963
).
103.
J. K. G.
Watson
, “
Determination of centrifugal distortion coefficients of asymmetric‐top molecules
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
46
,
1935
1949
(
1967
).
104.
G.
Winnewisser
, “
Millimeter wave rotational spectrum of HSSH and DSSD. II. Anomalous K doubling caused by centrifugal distortion in DSSD
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
56
,
2944
2954
(
1972
).
105.
B. P.
van Eijck
, “
Reformulation of quartic centrifugal distortion Hamiltonian
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
53
,
246
249
(
1974
).
106.
V.
Typke
, “
Centrifugal distortion analysis including P6-terms
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
63
,
170
179
(
1976
).
107.
L.
Margulès
,
A.
Perrin
,
J.
Demaison
,
I.
Merke
,
H.
Willner
,
M.
Rotger
, and
V.
Boudon
, “
Breakdown of the reduction of the rovibrational Hamiltonian: The case of S18O2F2
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
256
,
232
237
(
2009
).
108.
R. A.
Motiyenko
,
L.
Margulès
,
E. A.
Alekseev
,
J.-C.
Guillemin
, and
J.
Demaison
, “
Centrifugal distortion analysis of the rotational spectrum of aziridine: Comparison of different Hamiltonians
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
264
,
94
99
(
2010
).
109.
J.
Doose
,
A.
Guarnieri
,
W.
Neustock
,
R.
Schwarz
,
F.
Winther
, and
F.
Hegelund
, “
Application of a PC-controlled MW-spectrometer for the analysis of ketene-D2. Simultaneous analysis of vibrational excited states using microwave and infrared spectra
,”
Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci.
44
,
538
550
(
1989
).
110.
K.
Vávra
,
P.
Kania
,
J.
Koucký
,
Z.
Kisiel
, and
Š.
Urban
, “
Rotational spectra of hydrazoic acid
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
337
,
27
31
(
2017
).
111.
A. G.
Császár
,
J.
Demaison
, and
H. D.
Rudolph
, “
Equilibrium structures of three-, four-, five-, six-, and seven-membered unsaturated N-containing heterocycles
,”
J. Phys. Chem. A
119
,
1731
1746
(
2015
).
112.
R. K.
Bohn
,
J. A.
Montgomery
, Jr.
,
H. H.
Michels
, and
J. A.
Fournier
, “
Second moments and rotational spectroscopy
,”
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
325
,
42
49
(
2016
).

Supplementary Material