Surface-bound reactions are commonly employed to develop nanoarchitectures through bottom-up assembly. Precursor molecules are carefully designed, and surfaces are chosen with the intention to fabricate low-dimensional extended networks, which can include one-dimensional and two-dimensional structures. The inclusion of functional groups can offer the opportunity to utilize unique chemistry to further tune the bottom-up method or form novel nanostructures. Specifically, carbonyl groups open up new avenues for on-surface coordination chemistry. Here, the self-assembly and formation of an organometallic species via the thermally induced reaction of 3,6-dibromo-9,10-phenanthrenequinone (DBPQ) molecules were studied on Ag(100) and Ag(110). Low-temperature ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy revealed the room temperature formation of self-assemblies defined by hydrogen and halogen bonds on Ag(100). Following a thermal anneal to 300 °C, DBPQ on Ag(100) was found to form metal–organic coordination networks composed of a combination of organometallic species characteristics of Ullmann-like coupling reactions and carbonyl complexes. On Ag(110), the C–Br bonds were found to readily dissociate at room temperature, resulting in the formation of disordered organometallic species.

Bottom-up assembly has become a viable means for the atomically precise fabrication of nanostructures.1 Intermolecular forces can be carefully tuned to build larger superstructures. Nanostructures can be stabilized via van der Waals forces, coordination bonds,2–4 hydrogen bonds,5 and covalent bonds;6 and more recently halogen–halogen bonds7–11 have been used to form supramolecular structures and assemblies on surfaces. The substrate nature, base monomer structure,12 and fabrication method determine the ability to form desirable products with useful functions.13,14 Subsequently, the design of nanocarbon materials for energy storage, conversion, and catalysis requires a fundamental understanding of the forces, bonds, and reactions that drive their formation.

Low-dimensional nanocarbon materials with defined chemical structures containing catalytically active ketonic groups have been explored as models to examine the catalytic process at the molecular scale.15–17 To date, the synthesis of these conjugated polymers primarily relies upon established methods to couple aromatic molecules in solution or post-fabrication functionalization. On-surface reactions of precursors with functional groups can similarly be used to develop two-dimensional nanoarchitectures, and surface-sensitive analyses provide a means to study the products with techniques that provide atomic-scale spatial resolution. Additionally, although the reaction becomes constrained to two-dimensions, the surface adds a critical parameter to control the mechanism of the reaction and provides a means to form coordinated organometallic nanostructures18 and one- or even two-dimensional covalent polymers.19–25 In this manner, selecting a surface requires careful consideration and an understanding of the role of the surface in catalyzing the coupling reaction.

Although there exist many options for on-surface homo-coupling reactions,13 the Ullmann-like coupling reaction has become one of the most popular reactions in on-surface synthesis due to its robustness and tunability. The initial Ullmann coupling reaction performed in solution uses a copper catalyst to covalently couple aryl halides via a mechanism that relies on a dehalogenation process, which is speculated and commonly considered, to proceed through a mechanism that involves the formation of an intermediate copper coordinated compound.26,27 Recent research in on-surface synthesis has found that Ullmann-like reactions can be used to build up carbon-based scaffolds on a variety of single metal crystals with atomic precision.1,28 These substrates include low-index facets, specifically (111),29–31 (100),21 and less commonly (110),32,33 of coinage metals, such as Ag,34,35 Au,36–38 and Cu.20,39–42 Significantly, even in cases where the precursor molecules are identical, different metal surfaces can result in vastly different on-surface structures.33,43 Metal atoms from the surface can become incorporated into stable coordinated organometallic structures or covalent networks predominant depending on conditions.34,44 Furthermore, when confined to a surface, the halogen atoms that serve as leaving groups can remain adsorbed on the surface. In some cases, these halogen atoms on the surface can stabilize larger organometallic structures or radical intermediates that enable the formation of otherwise unstable or inaccessible products.21,45

Efforts to optimize the Ullmann-like coupling reaction for the fabrication of unique low-dimensional materials primarily rely upon manipulating the precursor molecule. Changes in the carbon skeleton or the positions of the halogen leaving groups enable the ability to direct the growth process.46–48 More recently, in an effort to expand the toolset, the inclusion of functional groups in the organic precursor molecule has become another method to control the reaction process and reliably fabricate unique low-dimensional structures that contain functional groups.20,37,48–51 On its own, the addition of carbonyl groups to a molecular precursor presents the opportunity for the formation of metal–organic coordination networks on a surface via coordination chemistry.52,53 When the base molecule includes both carbonyl groups and aryl halides, it becomes possible for two types of coordination bonds to occur in a competing or synergistic process during the course of the on-surface reaction.54 Metal adatoms can be captured either by the dehalogenation process, through coordination with the carbonyl groups, or through a combination of the two. The competition between two interactions, such as these, can result in mixed-valence two-dimensional coordination networks,55 which can show significantly improved catalytic efficiencies when compared to metal–organic networks with only one coordination environment.56 Ultimately, a study of the complex on-surface interactions and reactions requires a spatially sensitive technique in order to characterize the nanostructure and develop an understanding of the underlying chemistry that drives its formation.

Ullmann-like coupling reactions have previously been found to depend on the identity of the substrate. Although the titular Ullmann coupling reaction involves a copper catalyst in solution, on-surface synthetic methods have found that various metal surfaces can be used to grow nanostructures through dehalogenation reactions with a focus on gold, silver, and copper.42,57,58 The different metal surfaces have been found to result in different pathways and reaction products, where covalent or coordination bonded nanostructures become accessible.20,57,58 In this work, the self-assembly and reaction products of 3,6-dibromo-9,10-phenanthrenequinone (DBPQ) were studied on Ag(100) and Ag(110). It was found that the relatively simple planar molecular structure (C2V symmetry), shown in Fig. 1(a), that results from the phenanthrene skeleton with a diketone and two peripheral bromines, self-assemble on Ag(100) and can form complex organometallic structures on the silver surfaces following the dissociation of the C–Br bonds.

FIG. 1.

(a) Chemical structure of DBPQ. (b) STM image showing the long-range order of a self-assembled island of DBPQ following deposition onto a room temperature Ag(100) substrate (U = +1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Model depicting the possible intermediates or products of the Ullmann-like coupling reaction of DBPQ on a silver surface.

FIG. 1.

(a) Chemical structure of DBPQ. (b) STM image showing the long-range order of a self-assembled island of DBPQ following deposition onto a room temperature Ag(100) substrate (U = +1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Model depicting the possible intermediates or products of the Ullmann-like coupling reaction of DBPQ on a silver surface.

Close modal

Experiments took place in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) variable temperature scanning tunneling microscope (STM) system (Unisoku Co., Ltd.) at a base pressure of 6.0 × 10−11 Torr previously described in more detail elsewhere.59 The silver single crystals, Ag(100) and Ag(110), were prepared in a preparation chamber with a base pressure of 1.0 × 10−10 Torr and then transferred through a gate valve into the STM chamber for observation. The substrates were cleaned by standard cycles of argon ion sputtering followed by indirect thermal annealing to 800 K. The DBPQ molecules were deposited onto the silver substrates, which were held at room temperature via a K-cell style molecular evaporator. The molecular evaporator was heated to 135 °C during deposition in order to obtain sub-monolayer surface coverage. In the case of experiments requiring a thermal anneal, the anneal was carried out by indirect heating through a tungsten filament located behind the sample. STM experiments took place at liquid nitrogen temperatures (78 K). Electrochemically etched Ag tips were used for STM imaging. The tip fabrication method and methods to further process tips within the UHV chamber are explained elsewhere.60 Biases were applied to the sample with respect to the grounded Ag tip with the STM scanning in the constant current mode. Gwyddion was used to process the STM images.61 

As shown in Fig. 1(b), DBPQ forms self-assembled molecular islands on Ag(100) with clear long-range ordering of the molecules with a row-like motif. This behavior becomes more apparent in zoomed-in STM images, such as Fig. 2(a), where the high resolution enables the ability to identify individual molecules within the self-assembly and develop an understanding of the driving intermolecular interactions. The positions and orientations of the functional groups within a DBPQ molecule provide a means to identify the chemical species observed with STM and also guide an interpretation of the intermolecular interactions that drive the self-assembly of molecular islands. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the diketone occupies the 9 and 10 positions of the phenanthrene skeleton, with bromine atoms bonded to the carbons at the 3 and 6 positions. The inclusion of halogen atoms into the molecular structure enables the clear identification of the position and orientation of individual molecules within the self-assembly, as can be seen later in Figs. 2(a) and 3(a), since molecular halogen atoms have been previously found to appear brighter than molecular carbon atoms in STM images.8,62,63 This unique feature of aryl halides combined with the identification of pristine bare Ag(100), with no adsorbed Br atoms, confirms that the C–Br bonds within DBPQ molecules remain intact following deposition onto the room temperature substrate.

FIG. 2.

(a) STM image of DBPQ on Ag(100) with the two types of self-assembled molecular rows apparent. Molecular models are overlaid. A simple dimer defined by hydrogen bond interactions is outlined in blue. The arrows denote the location and direction of the STM line profiles for the adjacent plots, and the colors of the arrows correspond to the color of the plots. (b) Molecular models of the self-assembly are shown, where the hydrogen bonds are represented by green dashed lines. The bright bromines and adjacent hydrogen atoms that do not participate in hydrogen bonds are highlighted with yellow. [(c) and (d)] Line profiles across noodle-like rows and circle rows illustrating the difference in apparent height between brighter and dimmer bromines within the molecules (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA).

FIG. 2.

(a) STM image of DBPQ on Ag(100) with the two types of self-assembled molecular rows apparent. Molecular models are overlaid. A simple dimer defined by hydrogen bond interactions is outlined in blue. The arrows denote the location and direction of the STM line profiles for the adjacent plots, and the colors of the arrows correspond to the color of the plots. (b) Molecular models of the self-assembly are shown, where the hydrogen bonds are represented by green dashed lines. The bright bromines and adjacent hydrogen atoms that do not participate in hydrogen bonds are highlighted with yellow. [(c) and (d)] Line profiles across noodle-like rows and circle rows illustrating the difference in apparent height between brighter and dimmer bromines within the molecules (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA).

Close modal
FIG. 3.

(a) Zoomed-in STM image showing the self-assembly of DBPQ on Ag(100). Molecular models are overlaid. The simple dimer that can be used to define the self-assembly is highlighted in blue. Transformations of this pair can be used to define the entire self-assembly (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (b) A simplified model showing the intermolecular interactions that define the self-assembly. The hydrogen bonds are shown as green dashed lines, while the halogen bonds that result in the observed chirality are shown as red dashed lines. (c) The reflection across the vertical axis followed by 90° rotation counterclockwise (CCW) can transform a C1 pair to C2. (d) The reflection across the axis represented by the blue dashed line transforms an N1 noodle-like row to N2.

FIG. 3.

(a) Zoomed-in STM image showing the self-assembly of DBPQ on Ag(100). Molecular models are overlaid. The simple dimer that can be used to define the self-assembly is highlighted in blue. Transformations of this pair can be used to define the entire self-assembly (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (b) A simplified model showing the intermolecular interactions that define the self-assembly. The hydrogen bonds are shown as green dashed lines, while the halogen bonds that result in the observed chirality are shown as red dashed lines. (c) The reflection across the vertical axis followed by 90° rotation counterclockwise (CCW) can transform a C1 pair to C2. (d) The reflection across the axis represented by the blue dashed line transforms an N1 noodle-like row to N2.

Close modal

On-surface coupling reactions require two molecules to come into close contact with each other in order to interact and form a new bond that links them. Figure 1(c) shows the possible intermediates or products of the Ullmann-like reaction of DBPQ on a Ag surface. This process depends upon the diffusion of the molecules across the surface. Through studying the self-assembly of the precursor molecules, it is possible to generate an understanding of the intermolecular forces and interactions that can play a role in the movement and stabilization of molecules on a surface. In fact, self-assembly strategies can be used to efficiently steer reaction pathways and dynamics.64 Within this context, it is important to consider the nature of the long-range order of the self-assembled molecules observed on the Ag(100) substrate with finer details.

As a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, the addition of two carbonyl groups to the molecular structure, as shown in Fig. 1(a), presents the opportunity for hydrogen bonding between molecules. Indeed, 9,10-phenanthrenequinone was previously investigated on a Au(111) surface and the C–H⋯O bonding between molecules was found to primarily result in well-ordered self-assemblies characterized by a row-like bonding motif.65 As shown in Fig. 2(a), this row-like behavior is still observed on Ag(100), even with the addition of C–Br functional groups to the 9,10-phenanthrenequinone moiety.

Based upon STM imaging, the self-assembly of DBPQ on Ag(100) can be defined with two types of molecular rows that can be understood to be the result of hydrogen bond interactions between rows. Noodle-like rows and rows composed of dimer circles or rings, which will be referred to as circle rows, form an alternating pattern across the surface, Fig. 2(a). Due to the alternating pattern of these molecular rows, the two types were observed to occur in a 1:1 ratio. In the short range, from one circle row across a noodle-like row to the next circle row, the self-assembly can be represented by a simple pair of molecules interacting through hydrogen bonds between the diketonic oxygens of one molecule and the aromatic hydrogens of an adjacent molecule. The apparent distance (<3 Å) between molecules of different rows aligns with the expected distance for an on-surface C–H⋯O hydrogen bond, as visualized with STM.66,67 Molecular models are overlaid on the zoomed-in STM image in Fig. 2(a), where a simple hydrogen bonded pair is outlined in blue.

As shown with line profiles extracted from the STM image [Fig. 2(a)], each DBPQ molecule has a brighter and a dimmer Br atom [Figs. 2(c) and 2(d)]. The bromine atoms closer to the edge of molecular rows and adjacent to hydrogen bond interactions show decreased heights, while those located more within the interior of a molecular row appear brighter. Figure 2(b) illustrates a model of the self-assembly of a few DBPQ molecules, where the hydrogen bond interactions are represented by green dashed lines. The brighter bromine atoms and aromatic hydrogen atoms that are not involved in hydrogen bonds are highlighted in yellow. This analysis reveals that the dimmer bromine atoms are proximal to the hydrogen bond interactions. This difference in contrast confirms a change in the relative electronic densities of the bromine atoms due to hydrogen bond interactions between molecules of adjacent rows. Significantly, this interaction breaks the electronic symmetry of a DBPQ molecule since only aromatic hydrogens at the edges of the molecular rows can form hydrogen bonds with the diketonic oxygens of a molecule in an adjacent row. Hydrogen bonding explains the short-range alternating assembly of noodle-like and circle rows and the row-like motif that was previously observed for 9,10-phenanthrenequinone.65 However, in contrast to the previous work, where simple linear rows were observed, the inclusion of bromine atoms into the molecule’s structure results in chiral noodle-like rows and circle rows, necessitating further explanation.

The Ullmann-like coupling reaction requires the inclusion of halogen atoms to serve as leaving groups and allow coupling between molecules; however, prior to reaction, they can play an important role in mediating self-assembly. In the case of DBPQ, the C–Br bonds at the 3 and 6 positions introduce the possibility for halogen bonding, which can compete or cooperate with hydrogen bonding.68 Due to their similar relative strengths, hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds have been found to compete in the self-assembly of crystals, both experimentally and theoretically.69–71 The halogen bonds arise from interactions between the anisotropic distributions of electron density in the adjacent halogen atoms. An electron-depleted σ-hole at the pole of a C–X (X = Cl, Br, I) bond orients toward the electron-rich equatorial region of another X atom.7,72–74 This interaction can result in chiral self-assemblies due to the ability for halogen bonds to exhibit a clockwise or counterclockwise (CCW) nature.8–10,75 This chirality is apparent within the molecular rows of DBPQ. As illustrated in Fig. 3(b), the pairs that compose a circle row can be understood to be stabilized by halogen bonding within the molecular pair, where the halogen bond is shown with a red dashed line. Significantly, each of the noodle-like and circle rows has two enantiomer forms, i.e., circle rows consist of C1 or C2 enantiomers and noodle-like rows consist of N1 or N2 enantiomers. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) show the series of transformations necessary to convert between the enantiomer subunits and describe the various molecular rows. In both cases, the reflection across an in-plane axis is necessary due to the enantiomer rows that result from the halogen bonds between molecules. These axes of reflection are denoted with blue dashed lines in Fig. 3. Ultimately, the combination of carbonyl groups and halogen atoms in the structure of DBPQ results in a complex self-assembly characterized by a molecular row motif that is defined by both hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds.

Figure 4(a) shows the results of thermally annealing DBPQ on Ag(100) to 300 °C. The ordered substructures evident on the surface appear reminiscent of the row motif previously observed for the self-assembly of DBPQ following a room temperature deposition. This suggests that the self-assembly of precursor molecules on the surface prior to the reaction plays a significant role in the formation of the structure that results from thermal annealing.76 By varying the applied bias, it is possible to characterize the network and species that are adsorbed on the surface. As shown in Fig. 4(b) and its inset, STM imaging performed with a certain applied bias enables the identification of silver adatoms due to their increased brightness compared to the surrounding bromine atoms or organic molecules. As a result, it becomes possible to define a semi-ordered metal–organic coordination network composed of ladder-like substructures. Significantly, this bias-dependent imaging also provides a means to identify the bromine atoms that remain adsorbed on the surface following the dissociation of C–Br bonds, which now appear dimmer compared to the organic molecules and metal adatoms. Ag adatoms link two DBPQ molecules to form organometallic dimers, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(b) and more clearly with models in Fig. 4(c). On silver surfaces, the Ullmann-like coupling reaction can proceed through an organometallic intermediate before terminating in covalently coupled products.34,44,77 With certain reaction conditions, the growth process can terminate with the formation of the organometallic species as it becomes stable.77 In both STM images, the bromine atoms are visible, adsorbed on the surface as well as surrounding the metal–organic network, suggesting a stabilizing interaction. The bromine adsorbates have previously been found to stabilize metal–organic hybrid chains on a silver surface.78 

FIG. 4.

STM images and model showing the metal–organic coordination network of DBPQ that forms on Ag(100) following a thermal anneal to 300 °C. The bromine atoms are observed, adsorbed on the surface and surrounding the coordinated organometallic network. [(a) and (b)] Scanning at different applied biases results in contrast differences for the Ag adatoms involved in the coordination bonded structure. (a) At a positive bias (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (b) With a negative bias, the Ag adatoms appear significantly brighter. The inset highlights a recurring ladder-like substructure with molecular models overlaid (U = −1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (c) Model of the ladder-like substructure observed in the metal–organic coordination network highlighting the coordination bonds with blue dashed lines.

FIG. 4.

STM images and model showing the metal–organic coordination network of DBPQ that forms on Ag(100) following a thermal anneal to 300 °C. The bromine atoms are observed, adsorbed on the surface and surrounding the coordinated organometallic network. [(a) and (b)] Scanning at different applied biases results in contrast differences for the Ag adatoms involved in the coordination bonded structure. (a) At a positive bias (U = +1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (b) With a negative bias, the Ag adatoms appear significantly brighter. The inset highlights a recurring ladder-like substructure with molecular models overlaid (U = −1.0 V, I = 100 pA). (c) Model of the ladder-like substructure observed in the metal–organic coordination network highlighting the coordination bonds with blue dashed lines.

Close modal

However, as shown in Fig. 4, rather than forming long organometallic polymeric chains, this process for DBPQ appears to be capped at dimers in many instances, resulting in ladder-like substructures. This early termination can be explained by interactions of a diketone with the terminal Ag adatoms of the dimer. The carbonyl functional groups coordinate to the otherwise reactive Ag adatom preventing further Ullmann-like coupling reactions in favor of the formation of a metal–organic coordination network in an orientation perpendicular to the potential chain growth. This competing process between two types of coordination bonds, C⋯Ag and C=O⋯Ag, results in the ladder-like substructure shown in Fig. 4(c), where the coordination bonds are shown with blue dashed lines. These coordinated Ag adatoms exhibit a threefold symmetry despite the fourfold symmetry of the underlying Ag(100) lattice. Coordination bonds between organic ligands and surface metal adatoms have previously been found to exhibit an unusual threefold symmetry on various substrates,79 and silver atoms are known to be capable of coordination with three ligands.80 The structure observed in this case is likely a result of the complicated nature of the interactions between the diketone and the Ag adatom that becomes incorporated into the organometallic species formed by the Ullmann-like coupling reaction. Additionally, based on the structure apparent in STM images, the Ag adatoms incorporated into the ladder-like substructure are expected to have different coordination numbers, suggesting the formation of a mixed-valence two-dimensional coordination network. Through the simultaneous combination of two methods of bottom-up assembly, the Ullmann-like coupling reaction and metal carbonyl coordination chemistry, new and unique materials become accessible.

In order to identify facet effects on the self-assembly or Ullmann-like coupling reaction of DBPQ on silver surfaces, DBPQ was deposited onto Ag(110) at room temperature. Although both of the substrates are silver, the STM images of DBPQ on Ag(110) present significant differences compared to the long-range ordered assemblies observed on Ag(100). Figure 5(a) shows the presence of disordered structures. Additionally, the step edges of the Ag(110) surface show significant etching, suggesting the abstraction of silver atoms by the DBPQ molecules. The zoomed-in STM images provide a means to develop an understanding of the observed disordered networks [Figs. 5(b) and 5(c)]. Through using the same method of bias-dependent imaging, as was used to identify Ag adatoms within the metal–organic coordination structure on Ag(100), it is possible to identify the presence of Ag adatoms and dissociated Br atoms in Fig. 5(c). With a negative applied bias, the Ag adatoms appear significantly brighter compared to organic substituents, while slightly dimmer atoms correspond to Br atoms, which appear surrounding and interspersed within the structure. Although the location of DBPQ molecules cannot be precisely defined due to the disorder, the organic components of the metal–organic coordination network appear to adopt a preferred orientation that aligns with the corrugation of the Ag(110) surface. Overall, the Ag(110) surface was found to exhibit substantially increased reactivity toward inducing the dissociation of C–Br bonds.

FIG. 5.

STM images showing the result of vapor deposition of DBPQ onto a room temperature Ag(110) substrate. (a) Large scale image (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (b) A few networks of different sizes are shown here (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Zooming in to the edge of one network allows the identification of atomic corrugation of the Ag(110) surface and reveals the complicated structure (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA).

FIG. 5.

STM images showing the result of vapor deposition of DBPQ onto a room temperature Ag(110) substrate. (a) Large scale image (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (b) A few networks of different sizes are shown here (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA). (c) Zooming in to the edge of one network allows the identification of atomic corrugation of the Ag(110) surface and reveals the complicated structure (U = −1.0 V, I = 150 pA).

Close modal

Although both of the substrates used are silver, the marked difference in the behavior of DBPQ on these surfaces suggests distinct surface coordination chemistry. The room temperature dissociation of the C–Br bonds on Ag(110) suggests a strong molecule–substrate interaction on Ag(110) compared to that on Ag(100) where the self-assembly of unreacted molecules is mediated by intermolecular interactions. The surface silver atoms that compose the Ag(110) substrate are less coordinated than the silver atoms of the Ag(100) surface, resulting in the increased reactivity of this surface.81 Previous literature has found that the Ag(110) surface can catalyze the dissociation of C–Br bonds at room temperature.33,34,82 However, the corrugation of the (110) surface can suppress thermally activated surface diffusion or result in the anisotropic movement of molecules on the surface, subsequently preventing the formation of an ordered two-dimensional structure.33 The strong molecule–substrate interactions and anisotropic molecular diffusion result in the formation of the disordered metal–organic structures, composed of organic molecules with preferred orientations, observed on the surface.

Figure 6 serves to summarize the interplay of intermolecular and molecule–substrate interactions that result in the self-assemblies and metal–organic coordination networks formed by DBPQ molecules on the Ag(100) and Ag(110) substrates. The observed self-assembly of DBPQ on Ag(100), mediated by hydrogen and halogen bonds, results in the subsequent formation of a semi-ordered metal–organic coordination network following thermal annealing. However, the increased reactivity and corrugation of Ag(110) result in the immediate formation of a disordered metal–organic coordination network at room temperature.

FIG. 6.

Reaction scheme for DBPQ on silver single crystal surfaces. On Ag(100), DBPQ self-assembles via hydrogen and halogen bonds. With thermal annealing, a metal–organic coordination network forms on the surface. Disordered metal–organic structures immediately form at room temperature on a Ag(110) substrate.

FIG. 6.

Reaction scheme for DBPQ on silver single crystal surfaces. On Ag(100), DBPQ self-assembles via hydrogen and halogen bonds. With thermal annealing, a metal–organic coordination network forms on the surface. Disordered metal–organic structures immediately form at room temperature on a Ag(110) substrate.

Close modal

In conclusion, the self-assembly and reaction products of DBPQ on Ag(100) and Ag(110) have been characterized with STM in order to understand the competition between intermolecular and molecule–substrate interactions and reactions relevant to bottom-up assembly. STM imaging shows that DBPQ self-assembles on Ag(100) following room temperature deposition. This self-assembly consists of chiral molecular rows that can be understood by the cooperation and competition of hydrogen bonding across rows and halogen bonding within rows. In comparison, the more reactive Ag(110) surface catalyzes the dissociation of the C–Br bonds in DBPQ molecules but also constrains on-surface diffusion, resulting in the formation of disordered metal–organic species on the surface. On Ag(100), the molecular row motif visible in the self-assembly of precursor molecules was found to carry over through the thermally induced reaction process to result in ladder-like substructures within the larger metal–organic coordination network. The ladder-like substructures were found to be the result of two different types of coordination bonds, C⋯Ag⋯C and C=O⋯Ag. Through the inclusion of multiple functional groups within a precursor molecule, it becomes possible to introduce competing interaction or reaction mechanisms, as shown in Fig. 6. Although this method complicates bottom-up assembly, necessitating a characterization technique with atomic-scale spatial resolution to develop a fundamental understanding, it provides a means to fabricate new low-dimensional materials with highly unique chemical, physical, and electronic properties.

See the supplementary material for STM images showing the reproducible functionalization of the STM tip with a Br atom and the change in image resolution and contrast that results.

J.F.S. and N.J. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE-1944796). B.Y. acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21872145) and the Foundation of Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (Grant No. DICP I201943).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J.
Cai
,
P.
Ruffieux
,
R.
Jaafar
,
M.
Bieri
,
T.
Braun
,
S.
Blankenburg
,
M.
Muoth
,
A. P.
Seitsonen
,
M.
Saleh
,
X.
Feng
,
K.
Müllen
, and
R.
Fasel
, “
Atomically precise bottom–up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons
,”
Nature
466
,
470
(
2010
).
2.
Q.
Li
,
L.
Yan
,
Z.
Wang
,
Y.
Lu
,
S.
Wei
,
X.
Liu
, and
L.
Wang
, “
Surface-mediated construction of diverse coordination-dominated nanostructures with 4-azidobenzoic acid molecule
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
,
044704
(
2020
).
3.
H.-H.
Yang
,
H.-H.
Tsai
,
C.-F.
Ying
,
T.-H.
Yang
,
C.-C.
Kaun
,
C.-H.
Chen
, and
M.-T.
Lin
, “
Tuning molecule-substrate coupling via deposition of metal adatoms
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
143
,
184704
(
2015
).
4.
T.
Lin
,
Q.
Wu
,
J.
Liu
,
Z.
Shi
,
P. N.
Liu
, and
N.
Lin
, “
Thermodynamic versus kinetic control in self-assembly of zero-, one-, quasi-two-, and two-dimensional metal–organic coordination structures
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
142
,
101909
(
2015
).
5.
M.
Luft
,
B.
Groß
,
M.
Schulz
,
A.
Lützen
,
M.
Schiek
, and
N.
Nilius
, “
Adsorption of squaraine molecules to Au(111) and Ag(001) surfaces
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
148
,
074702
(
2018
).
6.
L.
Grill
,
M.
Dyer
,
L.
Lafferentz
,
M.
Persson
,
M. V.
Peters
, and
S.
Hecht
, “
Nano-architectures by covalent assembly of molecular building blocks
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
2
,
687
(
2007
).
7.
T. T. T.
Bui
,
S.
Dahaoui
,
C.
Lecomte
,
G. R.
Desiraju
, and
E.
Espinosa
, “
The nature of halogen–halogen interactions: A model derived from experimental charge-density analysis
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
48
,
3838
(
2009
).
8.
J.
Shang
,
Y.
Wang
,
M.
Chen
,
J.
Dai
,
X.
Zhou
,
J.
Kuttner
,
G.
Hilt
,
X.
Shao
,
J. M.
Gottfried
, and
K.
Wu
, “
Assembling molecular Sierpiński triangle fractals
,”
Nat. Chem.
7
,
389
(
2015
).
9.
D.
Peyrot
,
M. G.
Silly
, and
F.
Silly
, “
X3 synthon geometries in two-dimensional halogen-bonded 1,3,5-tris(3,5-dibromophenyl)benzene self-assembled nanoarchitectures on Au(111)-
(22 × 3),”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
20
,
3918
(
2018
).
10.
Z.
Han
,
G.
Czap
,
C.-L.
Chiang
,
C.
Xu
,
P. J.
Wagner
,
X.
Wei
,
Y.
Zhang
,
R.
Wu
, and
W.
Ho
, “
Imaging the halogen bond in self-assembled halogenbenzenes on silver
,”
Science
358
,
206
(
2017
).
11.
S.
Mahapatra
,
J. F.
Schultz
,
Y.
Ning
,
J.-L.
Zhang
, and
N.
Jiang
, “
Probing surface mediated configurations of nonplanar regioisomeric adsorbates using ultrahigh vacuum tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
,”
Nanoscale
11
,
19877
(
2019
).
12.
Y.
Jiang
,
Q.
Huan
,
L.
Fabris
,
G. C.
Bazan
, and
W.
Ho
, “
Submolecular control, spectroscopy and imaging of bond-selective chemistry in single functionalized molecules
,”
Nat. Chem.
5
,
36
(
2012
).
13.
Q.
Shen
,
H.-Y.
Gao
, and
H.
Fuchs
, “
Frontiers of on-surface synthesis: From principles to applications
,”
Nano Today
13
,
77
(
2017
).
14.
S. L.
Tait
, “
Function follows form: Exploring two-dimensional supramolecular assembly at surfaces
,”
ACS Nano
2
,
617
(
2008
).
15.
X.
Guo
,
W.
Qi
,
W.
Liu
,
C.
Liang
,
A.
Zheng
,
X.
Yi
, and
D.
Su
, “
Conjugated polymers with defined chemical structure as model carbon catalysts for nitro reduction
,”
RSC Adv.
6
,
99570
(
2016
).
16.
X.
Guo
,
W.
Qi
,
W.
Liu
,
P.
Yan
,
F.
Li
,
C.
Liang
, and
D.
Su
, “
Oxidative dehydrogenation on nanocarbon: Revealing the catalytic mechanism using model catalysts
,”
ACS Catal.
7
,
1424
(
2017
).
17.
W.
Qi
and
D.
Su
, “
Metal-free carbon catalysts for oxidative dehydrogenation reactions
,”
ACS Catal.
4
,
3212
(
2014
).
18.
W.
Wang
,
X.
Shi
,
S.
Wang
,
M. A.
Van Hove
, and
N.
Lin
, “
Single-molecule resolution of an organometallic intermediate in a surface-supported Ullmann coupling reaction
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
133
,
13264
(
2011
).
19.
Q.-T.
Fan
and
J.-F.
Zhu
, “
Controlling the topology of low-dimensional organic nanostructures with surface templates
,”
Acta Phys. - Chim. Sin.
33
,
1288
(
2017
).
20.
S.
Clair
and
D. G.
de Oteyza
, “
Controlling a chemical coupling reaction on a surface: Tools and strategies for on-surface synthesis
,”
Chem. Rev.
119
,
4717
(
2019
).
21.
J. F.
Schultz
,
B.
Yang
, and
N.
Jiang
, “
Direct observation of the geometric isomer selectivity of a reaction controlled via adsorbed bromine
,”
Nanoscale
12
,
2726
(
2020
).
22.
C.
Zhang
,
Q.
Sun
,
H.
Chen
,
Q.
Tan
, and
W.
Xu
, “
Formation of polyphenyl chains through hierarchical reactions: Ullmann coupling followed by cross-dehydrogenative coupling
,”
Chem. Commun.
51
,
495
(
2015
).
23.
J.
Dai
,
W.
Zhao
,
L.
Xing
,
J.
Shang
,
H.
Ju
,
X.
Zhou
,
J.
Liu
,
Q.
Chen
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Zhu
, and
K.
Wu
, “
Dechlorinated Ullmann coupling reaction of aryl chlorides on Ag(111): A combined STM and XPS study
,”
ChemPhysChem
20
,
2367
(
2019
).
24.
Q.
Fan
,
T.
Wang
,
J.
Dai
,
J.
Kuttner
,
G.
Hilt
,
J. M.
Gottfried
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
On-surface pseudo-high-dilution synthesis of macrocycles: Principle and mechanism
,”
ACS Nano
11
,
5070
(
2017
).
25.
Q.
Fan
,
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Han
,
J.
Zhu
,
W.
Hieringer
,
J.
Kuttner
,
G.
Hilt
, and
J. M.
Gottfried
, “
Surface-assisted organic synthesis of hyperbenzene nanotroughs
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
52
,
4668
(
2013
).
26.
F.
Ullmann
and
J.
Bielecki
, “
Ueber synthesen in der biphenylreihe
,”
Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.
34
,
2174
(
1901
).
27.
J.
Hassan
,
M.
Sévignon
,
C.
Gozzi
,
E.
Schulz
, and
M.
Lemaire
, “
Aryl−aryl bond formation one century after the discovery of the Ullmann reaction
,”
Chem. Rev.
102
,
1359
(
2002
).
28.
G. D.
Nguyen
,
H.-Z.
Tsai
,
A. A.
Omrani
,
T.
Marangoni
,
M.
Wu
,
D. J.
Rizzo
,
G. F.
Rodgers
,
R. R.
Cloke
,
R. A.
Durr
,
Y.
Sakai
,
F.
Liou
,
A. S.
Aikawa
,
J. R.
Chelikowsky
,
S. G.
Louie
,
F. R.
Fischer
, and
M. F.
Crommie
, “
Atomically precise graphene nanoribbon heterojunctions from a single molecular precursor
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
12
,
1077
(
2017
).
29.
A.
Rastgoo Lahrood
,
J.
Björk
,
W. M.
Heckl
, and
M.
Lackinger
, “
1,3-diiodobenzene on Cu(111)—Aan exceptional case of on-surface Ullmann coupling
,”
Chem. Commun.
51
,
13301
(
2015
).
30.
Q.
Fan
and
J. M.
Gottfried
, “
Topology-selective Ullmann coupling on metal surfaces by precursor design and adsorbate-substrate interaction: Towards the control over polymer versus macrocycle formation
,”
ChemPhysChem
20
,
2311
(
2019
).
31.
T. A.
Pham
,
F.
Song
,
M.-T.
Nguyen
,
Z.
Li
,
F.
Studener
, and
M.
Stöhr
, “
Comparing Ullmann coupling on noble metal surfaces: On-surface polymerization of 1,3,6,8-tetrabromopyrene on Cu(111) and Au(111)
,”
Chem.: Eur. J.
22
,
5937
(
2016
).
32.
J. A.
Lipton-Duffin
,
O.
Ivasenko
,
D. F.
Perepichka
, and
F.
Rosei
, “
Synthesis of polyphenylene molecular wires by surface-confined polymerization
,”
Small
5
,
592
(
2009
).
33.
H.
Walch
,
R.
Gutzler
,
T.
Sirtl
,
G.
Eder
, and
M.
Lackinger
, “
Material- and orientation-dependent reactivity for heterogeneously catalyzed carbon−bromine bond homolysis
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
114
,
12604
(
2010
).
34.
C. J.
Judd
,
S. L.
Haddow
,
N. R.
Champness
, and
A.
Saywell
, “
Ullmann coupling reactions on Ag(111) and Ag(110); Substrate influence on the formation of covalently coupled products and intermediate metal–organic structures
,”
Sci. Rep.
7
,
14541
(
2017
).
35.
J. P.
Beggan
,
N. M.
Boyle
,
M. T.
Pryce
, and
A. A.
Cafolla
, “
Surface-confined Ullmann coupling of thiophene substituted porphyrins
,”
Nanotechnology
26
,
365602
(
2015
).
36.
C.
Bronner
,
T.
Marangoni
,
D. J.
Rizzo
,
R. A.
Durr
,
J. H.
Jørgensen
,
F. R.
Fischer
, and
M. F.
Crommie
, “
Iodine versus bromine functionalization for bottom–up graphene nanoribbon growth: Role of diffusion
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
121
,
18490
(
2017
).
37.
D. J.
Rizzo
,
G.
Veber
,
J.
Jiang
,
R.
McCurdy
,
T.
Cao
,
C.
Bronner
,
T.
Chen
,
S. G.
Louie
,
F. R.
Fischer
, and
M. F.
Crommie
, “
Inducing metallicity in graphene nanoribbons via zero-mode superlattices
,”
Science
369
,
1597
(
2020
).
38.
D.
Peyrot
,
M. G.
Silly
, and
F.
Silly
, “
Temperature-triggered sequential on-surface synthesis of one and two covalently bonded porous organic nanoarchitectures on Au(111)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
121
,
26815
(
2017
).
39.
M.
Abyazisani
,
J. M.
MacLeod
, and
J.
Lipton-Duffin
, “
Cleaning up after the party: Removing the byproducts of on-surface Ullmann coupling
,”
ACS Nano
13
,
9270
(
2019
).
40.
G.
Galeotti
,
M.
Di Giovannantonio
,
A.
Cupo
,
S.
Xing
,
J.
Lipton-Duffin
,
M.
Ebrahimi
,
G.
Vasseur
,
B.
Kierren
,
Y.
Fagot-Revurat
,
D.
Tristant
,
V.
Meunier
,
D. F.
Perepichka
,
F.
Rosei
, and
G.
Contini
, “
An unexpected organometallic intermediate in surface-confined Ullmann coupling
,”
Nanoscale
11
,
7682
(
2019
).
41.
M.
Di Giovannantonio
,
M.
Tomellini
,
J.
Lipton-Duffin
,
G.
Galeotti
,
M.
Ebrahimi
,
A.
Cossaro
,
A.
Verdini
,
N.
Kharche
,
V.
Meunier
,
G.
Vasseur
,
Y.
Fagot-Revurat
,
D. F.
Perepichka
,
F.
Rosei
, and
G.
Contini
, “
Mechanistic picture and kinetic analysis of surface-confined Ullmann polymerization
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
138
,
16696
(
2016
).
42.
M.
Lackinger
, “
Surface-assisted Ullmann coupling
,”
Chem. Commun.
53
,
7872
(
2017
).
43.
Q.
Fan
,
T.
Wang
,
L.
Liu
,
J.
Zhao
,
J.
Zhu
, and
J. M.
Gottfried
, “
Tribromobenzene on Cu(111): Temperature-dependent formation of halogen-bonded, organometallic, and covalent nanostructures
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
142
,
101906
(
2015
).
44.
Q.
Fan
,
L.
Liu
,
J.
Dai
,
T.
Wang
,
H.
Ju
,
J.
Zhao
,
J.
Kuttner
,
G.
Hilt
,
J. M.
Gottfried
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Surface adatom mediated structural transformation in bromoarene monolayers: Precursor phases in surface Ullmann reaction
,”
ACS Nano
12
,
2267
(
2018
).
45.
Q.
Fan
,
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Han
,
J.
Zhu
,
J.
Kuttner
,
G.
Hilt
, and
J. M.
Gottfried
, “
Surface-assisted formation, assembly, and dynamics of planar organometallic macrocycles and zigzag shaped polymer chains with C–Cu–C bonds
,”
ACS Nano
8
,
709
(
2014
).
46.
M.
Ammon
,
T.
Sander
, and
S.
Maier
, “
On-surface synthesis of porous carbon nanoribbons from polymer chains
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
139
,
12976
(
2017
).
47.
J.
Hieulle
,
E.
Carbonell-Sanromà
,
M.
Vilas-Varela
,
A.
Garcia-Lekue
,
E.
Guitián
,
D.
Peña
, and
J. I.
Pascual
, “
On-surface route for producing planar nanographenes with azulene moieties
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
418
(
2018
).
48.
M.
Shekhirev
,
P.
Zahl
, and
A.
Sinitskii
, “
Phenyl functionalization of atomically precise graphene nanoribbons for engineering inter-ribbon interactions and graphene nanopores
,”
ACS Nano
12
,
8662
(
2018
).
49.
C.
Moreno
,
M.
Panighel
,
M.
Vilas-Varela
,
G.
Sauthier
,
M.
Tenorio
,
G.
Ceballos
,
D.
Peña
, and
A.
Mugarza
, “
Critical role of phenyl substitution and catalytic substrate in the surface-assisted polymerization of dibromobianthracene derivatives
,”
Chem. Mater.
31
,
331
(
2019
).
50.
M.
Lischka
,
G. S.
Michelitsch
,
N.
Martsinovich
,
J.
Eichhorn
,
A.
Rastgoo-Lahrood
,
T.
Strunskus
,
R.
Breuer
,
K.
Reuter
,
M.
Schmittel
, and
M.
Lackinger
, “
Remote functionalization in surface-assisted dehalogenation by conformational mechanics: Organometallic self-assembly of 3,3′,5,5′-tetrabromo-2,2′,4,4′,6,6′-hexafluorobiphenyl on Ag(111)
,”
Nanoscale
10
,
12035
(
2018
).
51.
J.
Liu
,
B.
Xia
,
H.
Xu
, and
N.
Lin
, “
Controlling the reaction steps of bifunctional molecules 1,5-dibromo-2,6-dimethylnaphthalene on different substrates
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
13001
(
2018
).
52.
A.
Dmitriev
,
H.
Spillmann
,
N.
Lin
,
J. V.
Barth
, and
K.
Kern
, “
Modular assembly of two-dimensional metal–organic coordination networks at a metal surface
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
42
,
2670
(
2003
).
53.
M. N.
Faraggi
,
N.
Jiang
,
N.
Gonzalez-Lakunza
,
A.
Langner
,
S.
Stepanow
,
K.
Kern
, and
A.
Arnau
, “
Bonding and charge transfer in metal–organic coordination networks on Au(111) with strong acceptor molecules
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
116
,
24558
(
2012
).
54.
X.
Liu
,
Y.
Du
,
A.
Timmer
,
H.
Mönig
,
X.
Wan
,
X.
Huang
,
Q.
Ji
,
E.
Kan
,
K.
Ariga
,
J. P.
Hill
,
H.
Fuchs
, and
H.
Kong
, “
Quinone-facilitated coordinated bipyrene and polypyrene on Au(111) by capture of gold adatoms
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
123
,
16281
(
2019
).
55.
Y.
Li
,
J.
Xiao
,
T. E.
Shubina
,
M.
Chen
,
Z.
Shi
,
M.
Schmid
,
H.-P.
Steinrück
,
J. M.
Gottfried
, and
N.
Lin
, “
Coordination and metalation bifunctionality of Cu with 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-pyridyl)porphyrin: Toward a mixed-valence two-dimensional coordination network
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
134
,
6401
(
2012
).
56.
B.
Wurster
,
D.
Grumelli
,
D.
Hötger
,
R.
Gutzler
, and
K.
Kern
, “
Driving the oxygen evolution reaction by nonlinear cooperativity in bimetallic coordination catalysts
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
138
,
3623
(
2016
).
57.
L.
Dong
,
P. N.
Liu
, and
N.
Lin
, “
Surface-activated coupling reactions confined on a surface
,”
Acc. Chem. Res.
48
,
2765
(
2015
).
58.
Q.
Fan
,
J. M.
Gottfried
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Surface-catalyzed C–C covalent coupling strategies toward the synthesis of low-dimensional carbon-based nanostructures
,”
Acc. Chem. Res.
48
,
2484
(
2015
).
59.
P. J.
Whiteman
,
J. F.
Schultz
,
Z. D.
Porach
,
H.
Chen
, and
N.
Jiang
, “
Dual binding configurations of subphthalocyanine on Ag(100) substrate characterized by scanning tunneling microscopy, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and density functional theory
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
5489
(
2018
).
60.
S.
Mahapatra
,
L.
Li
,
J. F.
Schultz
, and
N.
Jiang
, “
Methods to fabricate and recycle plasmonic probes for ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy-based tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
,”
J. Raman Spectrosc.
(published online,
2020
).
61.
D.
Nečas
and
P.
Klapetek
, “
Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis
,”
Cent. Eur. J. Phys.
10
,
181
(
2012
).
62.
D.
Peyrot
and
F.
Silly
, “
On-surface synthesis of two-dimensional covalent organic structures versus halogen-bonded self-assembly: Competing formation of organic nanoarchitectures
,”
ACS Nano
10
,
5490
(
2016
).
63.
F.
Silly
,
C.
Viala
, and
J.
Bonvoisin
, “
Two-dimensional halogen-bonded porous self-assembled nanoarchitectures of copper β-diketonato complexes
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
17143
(
2018
).
64.
X.
Zhou
,
F.
Bebensee
,
M.
Yang
,
R.
Bebensee
,
F.
Cheng
,
Y.
He
,
Q.
Shen
,
J.
Shang
,
Z.
Liu
,
F.
Besenbacher
,
T. R.
Linderoth
, and
K.
Wu
, “
Steering surface reaction at specific sites with self-assembly strategy
,”
ACS Nano
11
,
9397
(
2017
).
65.
R. D.
Brown
,
R. C.
Quardokus
,
N. A.
Wasio
,
J. P.
Petersen
,
A. M.
Silski
,
S. A.
Corcelli
, and
S. A.
Kandel
, “
Non-intuitive clustering of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone on Au(111)
,”
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.
8
,
1801
(
2017
).
66.
J.
Zhang
,
P.
Chen
,
B.
Yuan
,
W.
Ji
,
Z.
Cheng
, and
X.
Qiu
, “
Real-space identification of intermolecular bonding with atomic force microscopy
,”
Science
342
,
611
(
2013
).
67.
A. M.
Sweetman
,
S. P.
Jarvis
,
H.
Sang
,
I.
Lekkas
,
P.
Rahe
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
N. R.
Champness
,
L.
Kantorovich
, and
P.
Moriarty
, “
Mapping the force field of a hydrogen-bonded assembly
,”
Nat. Commun.
5
,
3931
(
2014
).
68.
B.
Zha
,
J.
Li
,
J.
Wu
,
X.
Miao
, and
M.
Zhang
, “
Cooperation and competition of hydrogen and halogen bonds in 2D self-assembled nanostructures based on bromine substituted coumarins
,”
New J. Chem.
43
,
17182
(
2019
).
69.
E.
Corradi
,
S. V.
Meille
,
M. T.
Messina
,
P.
Metrangolo
, and
G.
Resnati
, “
Halogen bonding versus hydrogen bonding in driving self-assembly processes
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
39
,
1782
(
2000
).
70.
A.
Zabardasti
,
A.
Sharifi-Rad
, and
A.
Kakanejadifard
, “
Interplay between H⋯O, H⋯X, X⋯O and X⋯X interactions in the complex pairing of formyl halides with hypohalous acids
,”
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
151
,
746
(
2015
).
71.
C. C.
Robertson
,
J. S.
Wright
,
E. J.
Carrington
,
R. N.
Perutz
,
C. A.
Hunter
, and
L.
Brammer
, “
Hydrogen bonding vs halogen bonding: The solvent decides
,”
Chem. Sci.
8
,
5392
(
2017
).
72.
T.
Clark
,
M.
Hennemann
,
J. S.
Murray
, and
P.
Politzer
, “
Halogen bonding: The σ-hole
,”
J. Mol. Model.
13
,
291
(
2007
).
73.
P.
Politzer
,
P.
Lane
,
M. C.
Concha
,
Y.
Ma
, and
J. S.
Murray
, “
An overview of halogen bonding
,”
J. Mol. Model.
13
,
305
(
2007
).
74.
F.
Silly
, “
Selecting two-dimensional halogen–halogen bonded self-assembled 1,3,5-tris(4-iodophenyl)benzene porous nanoarchitectures at the solid–liquid interface
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
117
,
20244
(
2013
).
75.
X.
Zhang
,
N.
Li
,
L.
Liu
,
G.
Gu
,
C.
Li
,
H.
Tang
,
L.
Peng
,
S.
Hou
, and
Y.
Wang
, “
Robust Sierpinski triangle fractals on symmetry-mismatched Ag(100)
,”
Chem. Commun.
52
,
10578
(
2016
).
76.
N.
Merino-Díez
,
M. S. G.
Mohammed
,
J.
Castro-Esteban
,
L.
Colazzo
,
A.
Berdonces-Layunta
,
J.
Lawrence
,
J. I.
Pascual
,
D. G.
de Oteyza
, and
D.
Peña
, “
Transferring axial molecular chirality through a sequence of on-surface reactions
,”
Chem. Sci.
11
,
5441
(
2020
).
77.
M.
Lischka
,
M.
Fritton
,
J.
Eichhorn
,
V. S.
Vyas
,
T.
Strunskus
,
B. V.
Lotsch
,
J.
Björk
,
W. M.
Heckl
, and
M.
Lackinger
, “
On-surface polymerization of 1,6-dibromo-3,8-diiodpyrene—A comparative study on Au(111) versus Ag(111) by STM, XPS, and NEXAFS
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
5967
(
2018
).
78.
J.
Park
,
K. Y.
Kim
,
K.-H.
Chung
,
J. K.
Yoon
,
H.
Kim
,
S.
Han
, and
S.-J.
Kahng
, “
Interchain interactions mediated by Br adsorbates in arrays of metal–organic hybrid chains on Ag(111)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
115
,
14834
(
2011
).
79.
S.
Stepanow
,
N.
Lin
,
D.
Payer
,
U.
Schlickum
,
F.
Klappenberger
,
G.
Zoppellaro
,
M.
Ruben
,
H.
Brune
,
J. V.
Barth
, and
K.
Kern
, “
Surface-assisted assembly of 2D metal–organic networks that exhibit unusual threefold coordination symmetry
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
46
,
710
(
2007
).
80.
A. G.
Young
and
L. R.
Hanton
, “
Square planar silver(I) complexes: A rare but increasingly observed stereochemistry for silver(I)
,”
Coord. Chem. Rev.
252
,
1346
(
2008
).
81.
I.
Píš
,
L.
Ferrighi
,
T. H.
Nguyen
,
S.
Nappini
,
L.
Vaghi
,
A.
Basagni
,
E.
Magnano
,
A.
Papagni
,
F.
Sedona
,
C.
Di Valentin
,
S.
Agnoli
, and
F.
Bondino
, “
Surface-confined polymerization of halogenated polyacenes: The case of dibromotetracene on Ag(110)
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
120
,
4909
(
2016
).
82.
X.
Leng
,
W.
Li
,
X.
Liu
, and
L.
Wang
, “
Direct observation of copper-induced role on Ullmann reaction by scanning tunneling microscopy
,”
Chem. Phys.
522
,
65
(
2019
).

Supplementary Material