Metal oxides are among the most earth abundant resources on the planet. For example, by mass, Fe is the most earth abundant element, Ni is the sixth most abundant, and Al is the eighth most abundant. Like Fe, Ni, and Al, most metals with only a very few exceptions exist as oxides under ambient conditions. Even for the simplest binary metal oxides, a large number of phases and oxidation states can exist depending on the oxygen chemical potential, and this phase space rapidly expands when considering ternary and higher order oxides, doped materials, and metal/metal oxide interfaces. Questions of electronic and crystal structures become even more complicated at a surface or interface compared to the bulk material. This is, in part, because defects and impurities often segregate to surfaces. Surfaces are also accessible for molecular adsorption and interfacial bonding, which require challenging interface-specific spectroscopies to accurately characterize. Additionally, surfaces lack the periodicity of bulk crystals, making them challenging to treat theoretically.

Metal oxides are also inherently reactive and can serve as catalysts for numerous reactions. Additionally, high surface area mesoporous oxides often act as supports for metal nanoparticles or other co-catalysts. In such cases, the oxide framework can modulate the activity of the supported catalyst through strong metal support interactions. In many cases, metal oxides are semiconducting and exhibit strong absorption coefficients for visible light, making these materials attractive for applications in photocatalysis, solar energy conversion, and storage. The highly polar bonds in many metal oxides result in strong electron–phonon coupling, making it difficult to decouple the electronic and nuclear contributions to the wavefunction. This strong coupling gives rise to unique electrical and optical properties, which often dominate electron transport and significantly complicate excited state modeling. All these effects point to the need for chemical physics to provide a fundamental framework required to support the many promising applications of oxide chemistry and catalysis.

To call attention to this need and to highlight the rapid advances taking place in this field, we believe that a special issue focused on oxide chemistry and catalysis is especially timely. This resulting special issue includes 18 theoretical papers, 31 experimental papers, and 11 papers combining both experiment and theory. This array of works demonstrates the range of complex questions requiring collaborative approaches involving both theory and experiment to be adequately addressed. These questions are also driving new methodological developments. For example, the findings in this special issue rely on a multitude of cutting-edge experimental techniques, including ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),1–5 ambient pressure scanning tunneling microscopy,6in situ x-ray diffraction (XRD),1in situ vibrational spectroscopy,7–9 photoemission electron microscopy,10 solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR),11,12 Mössbauer spectroscopy,13 and cluster anion photoelectron spectroscopy.14 From the theoretical side, these works employ a range of semilocal, semilocal with Hubbard correction (DFT+U), and hybrid density functionals,15–25 in addition to multi-configurational methods,26 first-principles and multiscale molecular dynamics,27,28 machine learning, and neural networks.29 

Applications of these methods cover such important topics as surface chemical kinetics, photo and electrochemical energy conversion, support effects in heterogeneous catalysis and electrochemistry, electronic and structural effects of complex defect chemistry, and advance functional materials such as multiferroics and interfacial pH buffers. These timely applications showcase the importance of chemical physics to address many of the pressing challenges facing modern science. Below we briefly summarize the topics included in this special issue.

A number of papers in this special issue highlight work focused on solar and electrochemical energy conversion by metal oxides. Wu et al. investigate the role of O vacancy and Ti interstitial defect states on the adsorption, desorption, and photochemical reactivity of small molecules on a TiO2 surface.30 Pelli Cresi et al. demonstrate the ability to tune the optical absorption properties of CeO2 by embedding Ag nanoparticles.31 In the original work, Bertram et al. use in situ vibrational spectroscopy to investigate energy storage using norbornadiene photoswitches covalently grafted onto oxide surfaces.8 

Electrochemical studies include investigation of NiCo2O4 particles as supercapacitors for energy storage.32 Considering the catalytic potential of metal oxides for electrochemical O2 evolution, Gono and Pasquarello demonstrate that bifunctional catalysis by mixed oxides can overcome kinetic limitations imposed by linear scaling relations,18 and Hajiyani and Pentcheva utilize first-principles calculations to understand the effects of doping on O2 evolution activity on a hematite anode.22 Mason et al. investigate H2 evolution on Mo–Mn ternary oxide clusters using anion photoelectron spectroscopy.14 Vonrüti and Aschauer use DFT+U to investigate the effects of ferroelectric switching on the water splitting activity of LaTiO2N and BaTiO3 catalysts.24 Considering applications of metal oxides as ion conductors, Lackner et al. investigate the effect of Yt doping to stabilize ion conducting phases of ZrO2.33 Exploring an impressive array of phase space, Guan et al. employ machine learning via neural networks to identify structure–function relationships responsible for the trade-off between ion conductivity and thermal stability in Yt-doped ZrO2.29 

Applications of metal oxides in heterogeneous catalysis are abundantly addressed. These studies discuss catalytic reactions including CO oxidation,7,34–37 CO2 hydrogenation,38 partial methane oxidation,39,40 oxidation of volatile organics,3 dehydrogenation,41,42 selective acetylene hydrogenation,23 chemical looping,19 and olefin epoxidation.9 

A number of papers in this special issue focus on resolving the atomic-scale structure of metal oxides and metal nanoparticles dispersed on an oxide surface. This includes growth and structural characterization of ternary Co–Fe oxides10 and Ca–Mo oxides,43 as well as structural characterization of the stepped surfaces on a curved ZnO single crystal.44 Merte et al. report a novel two-dimensional structure of ultrathin Fe3O4 grown on Ag.45 Si et al. employ the SCAN functional to investigate the surface termination of hematite.15 Freindl et al. explore the reversible interconversion between hematite and magnetite.13 Similarly, Jiang et al. employ ambient pressure XPS to investigate the reversible oxidation and reduction of Fe oxide on Pt.6 Lodesani et al. investigate the growth of Fe oxide on a Ni surface and show that Fe oxide dispersion is strongly affected by the presence of a graphene layer on the Ni substrate.46 Bagus et al. present a detailed analysis of the Fe 2p XPS spectrum in hematite, providing new insights on the Fe–O bond covalency and the role of multibody effects.26 Madej et al. characterize the deposition of Au nanoparticles on TiO2 and show that a sub-monolayer of pre-adsorbed Fe can greatly increase Au dispersion.47 Similarly, Rani et al. characterize the deposition of Pt nanoparticles on SiO2.48 Using DFT, Zhou et al. investigate the formation of small FeOx nanoparticles from Fe–Pt bimetallic alloys under oxidizing conditions and consider the resulting effects on catalytic activity.25 Xue et al. use liquid phase atomic force microscopy to determine the atomic-scale topography of TiO2 surfaces in aqueous solution.49 

Closely related to structural studies, a significant number of papers deal with complex defect chemistry in metal oxides. Arrigoni and Madsen compare the performances of different DFT+U methods and hybrid density functionals in predicting defect properties in TiO2.16 Nagatsuka et al. investigate the creation of midgap states in TiO2 by H ion irradiation.50 Kim et al. utilize ambient pressure XPS and in situ XRD to study O vacancy formation and associated phase transitions in SrRuO3 films.1 Cao et al. show that formaldehyde serves as an effective probe molecule to discern O vacancies in ZnO.51 Daelman et al. present a perspective highlighting the need of an accurate theoretical description of defect states in reducible oxides.17 

Water adsorption on oxide surfaces is important for understanding a number of chemical and environmental phenomena, including geological mineralization, aerosol chemistry, and electrochemistry. From a fundamental perspective, the question of water adsorption on oxide surfaces is extensively addressed in this special issue. Multiple studies deal with the adsorption of water on CeO2 surfaces.21,52 Ambient pressure XPS is used by Goodacre et al. to study water adsorption on VO2 surfaces2 and by Jhang et al. to study water adsorption on SiO2 and Al2O3 surfaces.5 Liu et al. use multiscale simulations to understand the water structure at the aqueous Fe3O4 interface.27 Wen et al. use first-principles molecular dynamics to predict important differences between water structure on reduced and oxidized titania surfaces.28 

In addition to water, the adsorption and reactivity of a number of other molecules on oxide surfaces are reported, including N2, CO, CO2, methanol, formic acid, and cysteine.4,20,53–58 Interesting applications of facet-dependent adsorption are demonstrated by Sellschopp et al. who report the shape directing effects of molecular adsorption during TiO2 nanoparticle growth.59 Using solid state NMR, Hubbard et al. differentiate multiple modes for mobility of triphenylphosphine oxide on an Al2O3 surface.11 

Questions of interfacial pH, which differs significantly from bulk solution, are also investigated. Singappuli-Arachchige and Slowing study surface pH in mesoporous SiO2, and it is found that surface functionalization allows tunable buffering of interfacial pH.60 Maleki and Pacchioni show that 17O NMR can serve as a sensitive probe of surface basicity in the family of alkaline earth oxides.12 

Together, the contributions contained in this special issue provide a snapshot of the rapidly evolving field of oxide chemistry and catalysis. They highlight the challenges and complexities associated with a rigorous understanding of oxide chemistry at surfaces and demonstrate the necessary role of chemical physics to provide a fundamental framework for understanding and utilizing this chemically rich class of materials.

We would like to thank the authors, whose creative work and novel ideas form the basis for this special issue. We also express appreciation to the many reviewers, whose insightful comments and helpful suggestions have significantly strengthened the work included here. Finally, we acknowledge the tireless efforts of The Journal of Chemical Physics editors, Patricia Thiel and Angelos Michaelides, journal staff, Erinn Brigham and Judith Thomas, and editor-in-chief, Tim Lian, for their assistance and strong support during this process.

1.
D.
Kim
,
H.
Lim
,
S. S.
Ha
,
O.
Seo
,
S. S.
Lee
,
J.
Kim
,
K.-J.
Kim
,
L.
Perez Ramirez
,
J.-J.
Gallet
,
F.
Bournel
,
J. Y.
Jo
,
S.
Nemsak
,
D. Y.
Noh
, and
B. S.
Mun
, “
Correlation between structural phase transition and surface chemical properties of thin film SrRuO3/SrTiO3 (001)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
3
),
034704
(
2020
).
2.
D.
Goodacre
,
M.
Blum
,
C.
Buechner
,
H.
Hoek
,
S. M.
Gericke
,
V.
Jovic
,
J. B.
Franklin
,
S.
Kittiwatanakul
,
T.
Söhnel
,
H.
Bluhm
, and
K. E.
Smith
, “
Water adsorption on vanadium oxide thin films in ambient relative humidity
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044715
(
2020
).
3.
J. T.
Diulus
,
R.
Elzein
,
R.
Addou
, and
G. S.
Herman
, “
Surface chemistry of 2-propanol and O2 mixtures on SnO2(110) studied with ambient-pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054713
(
2020
).
4.
G. D.
Degaga
,
M.
Trought
,
S.
Nemsak
,
E. J.
Crumlin
,
M.
Seel
,
R.
Pandey
, and
K. A.
Perrine
, “
Investigation of N2 adsorption on Fe3O4(001) using ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional theory
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054717
(
2020
).
5.
J.-H.
Jhang
,
J. A.
Boscoboinik
, and
E. I.
Altman
, “
Ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of water formation and adsorption under two-dimensional silica and aluminosilicate layers on Pd(111)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
8
),
084705
(
2020
).
6.
Y.
Jiang
,
Y.
Zhu
,
D.
Zhou
,
Z.
Jiang
,
N.
Si
,
D.
Stacchiola
, and
T.
Niu
, “
Reversible oxidation and reduction of gold-supported iron oxide islands at room temperature
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074710
(
2020
).
7.
S.
Oh
,
H.
Ha
,
H.
Choi
,
C.
Jo
,
J.
Cho
,
H.
Choi
,
R.
Ryoo
,
H. Y.
Kim
, and
J. Y.
Park
, “
Oxygen activation on the interface between Pt nanoparticles and mesoporous defective TiO2 during CO oxidation
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
23
),
234716
(
2019
).
8.
M.
Bertram
,
F.
Waidhas
,
M.
Jevric
,
L.
Fromm
,
C.
Schuschke
,
M.
Kastenmeier
,
A.
Görling
,
K.
Moth-Poulsen
,
O.
Brummel
, and
J.
Libuda
, “
Norbornadiene photoswitches anchored to well-defined oxide surfaces: From ultrahigh vacuum into the liquid and the electrochemical environment
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044708
(
2020
).
9.
S. M.
Bashir
and
H.
Idriss
, “
The reaction of propylene to propylene-oxide on CeO2: An FTIR spectroscopy and temperature programmed desorption study
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044712
(
2020
).
10.
S.
Ruiz-Gómez
,
A.
Mandziak
,
J. E.
Prieto
,
M.
Aristu
,
E. M.
Trapero
,
G. D.
Soria
,
A.
Quesada
,
M.
Foerster
,
L.
Aballe
, and
J.
de la Figuera
, “
A real-time XAS PEEM study of the growth of cobalt iron oxide on Ru(0001)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074704
(
2020
).
11.
P. J.
Hubbard
,
J. W.
Benzie
,
V. I.
Bakhmutov
, and
J.
Blümel
, “
Disentangling different modes of mobility for triphenylphosphine oxide adsorbed on alumina
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054718
(
2020
).
12.
F.
Maleki
and
G.
Pacchioni
, “
17O NMR as a measure of basicity of alkaline-earth oxide surfaces: A theoretical study
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
22
),
224705
(
2019
).
13.
K.
Freindl
,
J.
Wojas
,
N.
Kwiatek
,
J.
Korecki
, and
N.
Spiridis
, “
Reversible oxidation–reduction of epitaxial iron oxide films on Pt(111): Magnetite–hematite interconversion
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054701
(
2020
).
14.
J. L.
Mason
,
A. K.
Gupta
,
A. J.
McMahon
,
C. N.
Folluo
,
K.
Raghavachari
, and
C. C.
Jarrold
, “
The striking influence of oxophilicity differences in heterometallic Mo–Mn oxide cluster reactions with water
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054301
(
2020
).
15.
Y.
Si
,
M.
Li
,
Z.
Zhou
,
M.
Liu
, and
O.
Prezhdo
, “
Improved description of hematite surfaces by the SCAN functional
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
2
),
024706
(
2020
).
16.
M.
Arrigoni
and
G. K. H.
Madsen
, “
A comparative first-principles investigation on the defect chemistry of TiO2 anatase
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044110
(
2020
).
17.
N.
Daelman
,
F. S.
Hegner
,
M.
Rellán-Piñeiro
,
M.
Capdevila-Cortada
,
R.
García-Muelas
, and
N.
López
, “
Quasi-degenerate states and their dynamics in oxygen deficient reducible metal oxides
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
050901
(
2020
).
18.
P.
Gono
and
A.
Pasquarello
, “
Oxygen evolution reaction: Bifunctional mechanism breaking the linear scaling relationship
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
10
),
104712
(
2020
).
19.
L.
Li
,
H.
Wang
,
J.
Han
,
X.
Zhu
, and
Q.
Ge
, “
A density functional theory study on reduction-induced structural transformation of copper-oxide-based oxygen carrier
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054709
(
2020
).
20.
X.
Li
and
J.
Paier
, “
Vibrational properties of CO2 adsorbed on the Fe3O4 (111) surface: Insights gained from DFT
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
10
),
104702
(
2020
).
21.
A.
Röckert
,
J.
Kullgren
,
P.
Broqvist
,
S.
Alwan
, and
K.
Hermansson
, “
The water/ceria(111) interface: Computational overview and new structures
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
10
),
104709
(
2020
).
22.
H.
Hajiyani
and
R.
Pentcheva
, “
Influence of 3d, 4d, and 5d dopants on the oxygen evolution reaction at α-Fe2O3(0001) under dark and illumination conditions
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
12
),
124709
(
2020
).
23.
S. F.
Yuk
,
G.
Collinge
,
M.-T.
Nguyen
,
M.-S.
Lee
,
V.-A.
Glezakou
, and
R.
Rousseau
, “
Selective acetylene hydrogenation over single metal atoms supported on Fe3O4(001): A first-principle study
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
15
),
154703
(
2020
).
24.
N.
Vonrüti
and
U.
Aschauer
, “
Catalysis on oxidized ferroelectric surfaces—Epitaxially strained LaTiO2N and BaTiO3 for photocatalytic water splitting
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
2
),
024701
(
2020
).
25.
Z.
Zhou
,
P.
Liu
,
F.
Yang
, and
X.
Bao
, “
Interface-confined triangular FeOx nanoclusters on Pt(111)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
21
),
214704
(
2019
).
26.
P. S.
Bagus
,
C. J.
Nelin
,
C. R.
Brundle
,
N.
Lahiri
,
E. S.
Ilton
, and
K. M.
Rosso
, “
Analysis of the Fe 2p XPS for hematite α Fe2O3: Consequences of covalent bonding and orbital splittings on multiplet splittings
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
1
),
014704
(
2020
).
27.
H.
Liu
,
E.
Bianchetti
,
P.
Siani
, and
C.
Di Valentin
, “
Insight into the interface between Fe3O4 (001) surface and water overlayers through multiscale molecular dynamics simulations
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
12
),
124711
(
2020
).
28.
B.
Wen
,
L.-M.
Liu
, and
A.
Selloni
, “
Structure and reactivity of highly reduced titanium oxide surface layers on TiO2: A first-principles study
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
18
),
184701
(
2019
).
29.
S.-H.
Guan
,
K.-X.
Zhang
,
C.
Shang
, and
Z.-P.
Liu
, “
Stability and anion diffusion kinetics of yttria-stabilized zirconia resolved from machine learning global potential energy surface exploration
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
9
),
094703
(
2020
).
30.
L.
Wu
,
Z.
Wang
,
F.
Xiong
,
G.
Sun
,
P.
Chai
,
Z.
Zhang
,
H.
Xu
,
C.
Fu
, and
W.
Huang
, “
Surface chemistry and photochemistry of small molecules on rutile TiO2(001) and TiO2(011)-(2 × 1) surfaces: The crucial roles of defects
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044702
(
2020
).
31.
J. S.
Pelli Cresi
,
E.
Silvagni
,
G.
Bertoni
,
M. C.
Spadaro
,
S.
Benedetti
,
S.
Valeri
,
S.
D’Addato
, and
P.
Luches
, “
Optical and electronic properties of silver nanoparticles embedded in cerium oxide
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
11
),
114704
(
2020
).
32.
M.
Pathak
,
J. R.
Jose
,
B.
Chakraborty
, and
C. S.
Rout
, “
High performance supercapacitor electrodes based on spinel NiCo2O4@MWCNT composite with insights from density functional theory simulations
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
6
),
064706
(
2020
).
33.
P.
Lackner
,
A. J.
Brandt
,
U.
Diebold
, and
M.
Schmid
, “
Few-monolayer yttria-doped zirconia films: Segregation and phase stabilization
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
6
),
064709
(
2020
).
34.
I.
Lee
and
F.
Zaera
, “
Use of Au@Void@TiO2 yolk-shell nanostructures to probe the influence of oxide crystallinity on catalytic activity for low-temperature oxidations
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
23
),
234706
(
2019
).
35.
P.
Sapkota
,
A.
Aprahamian
,
K. Y.
Chan
,
B.
Frentz
,
K. T.
Macon
,
S.
Ptasinska
,
D.
Robertson
, and
K.
Manukyan
, “
Irradiation-induced reactions at the CeO2/SiO2/Si interface
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
10
),
104704
(
2020
).
36.
J.
Ning
,
C.
Dong
,
M.
Li
,
Y.
Zhou
, and
W.
Shen
, “
Dispersion of copper oxide species on nanostructured ceria
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
9
),
094708
(
2020
).
37.
D. A.
Svintsitskiy
,
M. K.
Lazarev
,
T. Y.
Kardash
,
E. A.
Fedorova
,
E. M.
Slavinskaya
, and
A. I.
Boronin
, “
Mixed silver-nickel oxide AgNiO2: Probing by CO during XPS study
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044707
(
2020
).
38.
J.
Kang
,
M.
Mahapatra
,
N.
Rui
,
I.
Orozco
,
R.
Shi
,
S. D.
Senanayake
, and
J. A.
Rodriguez
, “
Growth and structural studies of In/Au(111) alloys and InOx/Au(111) inverse oxide/metal model catalysts
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054702
(
2020
).
39.
S.-H.
Kye
,
H. S.
Park
,
R.
Zhang
,
H. J.
Yang
,
K. H.
Lee
,
H.
Suh
,
J.-G.
Kim
,
M. G.
Kim
,
G. S.
Hwang
, and
N. H.
Hur
, “
Partial oxidation of methane to methanol by isolated Pt catalyst supported on a CeO2 nanoparticle
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054715
(
2020
).
40.
M.
Niedermaier
,
T.
Schwab
,
P.
Kube
,
G. A.
Zickler
,
A.
Trunschke
, and
O.
Diwald
, “
Catalytic activity, water formation, and sintering: Methane activation over Co- and Fe-doped MgO nanocrystals
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074713
(
2020
).
41.
K. R.
Goodman
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Ma
,
X.
Tong
,
D. J.
Stacchiola
, and
M. G.
White
, “
Morphology and reactivity of size-selected titanium oxide nanoclusters on Au(111)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054714
(
2020
).
42.
P.
Novotný
,
S.
Yusuf
,
F.
Li
, and
H. H.
Lamb
, “
MoO3/Al2O3 catalysts for chemical-looping oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
4
),
044713
(
2020
).
43.
M.
Lockhorn
,
P. E.
Kasten
,
S.
Tosoni
,
G.
Pacchioni
, and
N.
Nilius
, “
Growth and characterization of Ca—Mo mixed oxide films on Mo(001)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
151
(
23
),
234708
(
2019
).
44.
E.
Grånäs
,
B.
Arndt
,
C.
Seitz
,
M.
Wagstaffe
, and
A.
Stierle
, “
Atomic scale step structure and orientation of a curved surface ZnO single crystal
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074705
(
2020
).
45.
L. R.
Merte
,
P. A. T.
Olsson
,
M.
Shipilin
,
J.
Gustafson
,
F.
Bertram
,
C.
Zhang
,
H.
Grönbeck
, and
E.
Lundgren
, “
Structure of two-dimensional Fe3O4
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
11
),
114705
(
2020
).
46.
A.
Lodesani
,
A.
Picone
,
A.
Brambilla
,
M.
Finazzi
,
L.
Duò
, and
F.
Ciccacci
, “
3-dimensional nucleation of Fe oxide induced by a graphene buffer layer
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054706
(
2020
).
47.
E.
Madej
,
J.
Korecki
, and
N.
Spiridis
, “
Au nanoparticles on Fe-modified rutile TiO2(110): Dispersion, thermal stability, and CO adsorption
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054712
(
2020
).
48.
S.
Rani
,
C.
Byron
, and
A. V.
Teplyakov
, “
Formation of silica-supported platinum nanoparticles as a function of preparation conditions and boron impregnation
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
13
),
134701
(
2020
).
49.
S.
Xue
,
A.
Sasahara
, and
H.
Onishi
, “
Atomic-scale topography of rutile TiO2(110) in aqueous solutions: A study involving frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
054703
(
2020
).
50.
N.
Nagatsuka
,
M.
Wilde
, and
K.
Fukutani
, “
Hydrogenation and hydrogen diffusion at the anatase TiO2(101) surface
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074708
(
2020
).
51.
Y.
Cao
,
J.
Luo
,
W.
Huang
,
Y.
Ling
,
J.
Zhu
,
W.-X.
Li
,
F.
Yang
, and
X.
Bao
, “
Probing surface defects of ZnO using formaldehyde
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074714
(
2020
).
52.
K.
Murakami
,
S.
Ogo
,
A.
Ishikawa
,
Y.
Takeno
,
T.
Higo
,
H.
Tsuneki
,
H.
Nakai
, and
Y.
Sekine
, “
Heteroatom doping effects on interaction of H2O and CeO2 (111) surfaces studied using density functional theory: Key roles of ionic radius and dispersion
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
1
),
014707
(
2020
).
53.
M. D.
Marcinkowski
,
K. C.
Adamsen
,
N.
Doudin
,
M. A.
Sharp
,
R. S.
Smith
,
Y.
Wang
,
S.
Wendt
,
J. V.
Lauritsen
,
G. S.
Parkinson
,
B. D.
Kay
, and
Z.
Dohnálek
, “
Adsorption and reaction of methanol on Fe3O4(001)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
6
),
064703
(
2020
).
54.
J.-M.
Abdou
,
P.
Seidel
, and
M.
Sterrer
, “
Bonding and thermal stability of cysteine on single-crystalline iron oxide surfaces and Pt(111)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
6
),
064701
(
2020
).
55.
R.
Martin
,
M.
Kim
,
C. J.
Lee
,
M. S.
Shariff
,
F.
Feng
,
R. J.
Meyer
,
A.
Asthagiri
, and
J. F.
Weaver
, “
Molecular chemisorption of N2 on IrO2(110)
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
7
),
074712
(
2020
).
56.
B.
Hu
,
D.-Y.
Kuo
,
H.
Paik
,
D. G.
Schlom
, and
J.
Suntivich
, “
Enthalpy and entropy of oxygen electroadsorption on RuO2(110) in alkaline media
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
9
),
094704
(
2020
).
57.
G.
Li
,
W.
Guo
,
X.
Zhou
,
X.
Yu
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Formic acid adsorption and decomposition on clean and atomic oxygen pre-covered Cu(100) surfaces
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
11
),
114703
(
2020
).
58.
P. T. P.
Ryan
,
M.
Meier
,
Z.
Jakub
,
J.
Balajka
,
J.
Hulva
,
D. J.
Payne
,
T.-L.
Lee
,
C.
Franchini
,
F.
Allegretti
,
G. S.
Parkinson
, and
D. A.
Duncan
, “
Probing structural changes upon carbon monoxide coordination to single metal adatoms
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
5
),
051102
(
2020
).
59.
K.
Sellschopp
,
W.
Heckel
,
J.
Gäding
,
C. J.
Schröter
,
A.
Hensel
,
T.
Vossmeyer
,
H.
Weller
,
S.
Müller
, and
G. B.
Vonbun-Feldbauer
, “
Shape-controlling effects of hydrohalic and carboxylic acids in TiO2 nanoparticle synthesis
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
6
),
064702
(
2020
).
60.
D.
Singappuli-Arachchige
and
I. I.
Slowing
, “
Control of interfacial pH in mesoporous silica nanoparticles via surface functionalization
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
152
(
3
),
034703
(
2020
).