We report a photoelectron imaging and photodetachment study of cryogenically cooled 3-hydroxyphenoxide (3HOP) anions, m-HO(C6H4)O. In a previous preliminary study, two conformations of the cold 3HOP anions with different dipole bound states were observed [D. L. Huang et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2153 (2015)]. Five near-threshold vibrational resonances were revealed in the photodetachment spectrum from the dipole-bound excited states of the two conformations. Here, we report a more extensive investigation of the two conformers with observation of thirty above-threshold vibrational resonances in a wide spectral range between 18 850 and 19 920 cm−1 (∼1000 cm−1 above the detachment thresholds). By tuning the detachment laser to the vibrational resonances in the photodetachment spectrum, high-resolution conformation-selective resonant photoelectron images are obtained. Using information of the autodetachment channels and theoretical vibrational frequencies, we are able to assign the resonant peaks in the photodetachment spectrum: seventeen are assigned to vibrational levels of anti-3HOP, eight to syn-3HOP, and five to overlapping vibrational levels of both conformers. From the photodetachment spectrum and the conformation-selective resonant photoelectron spectra, we have obtained fourteen fundamental vibrational frequencies for the neutral syn- and anti-m-HO(C6H4)O radicals. The possibility to produce conformation-selected neutral beams using resonant photodetachment via dipole-bound excited states of anions is discussed.

The semiquinone radicals, HO(C6H4)O, are important electron transfer intermediates in biological processes such as photosynthesis and respiration.1–3 Different from the o- and p-HO(C6H4)O isomers, the 3-hydroxyphenoxy radical [m-HO(C6H4)O] is particularly interesting, because it can exist as two close-lying conformers, anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O. The two conformations differ by the orientations of the hydrogen atom on the hydroxyl group,4,5 as shown in Fig. 1, along with their respective precursor anions. The two conformers of the 3-hydroxyphenoxy radical have different dipole moments and can support dipole-bound states (DBS) with different binding energies (BEs).6–9 In a previous preliminary study,10 we observed the two conformations in high-resolution photoelectron imaging (PEI) of cryogenically cooled 3-hydroxyphenoxide (3HOP) anions, m-HO(C6H4)O. The electron binding energies of the two 3HOP conformations or the electron affinities of the anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O radicals were found to differ by 67 cm−1 with the anti-conformer being slightly higher. More interestingly, the two conformers of the anion were found to possess excited DBS with different binding energies relative to the respective detachment thresholds, 490 cm−1 and 104 cm−1 for the anti- and syn-3HOP, respectively. Five near-threshold vibrational resonances were observed and conformation-selective PEI was realized via the vibrational levels of the DBS. In the current article, we report a more comprehensive investigation of the 3HOP anion in a wider spectral range, yielding extensive vibrational information for the two conformers of the m-HO(C6H4)O radicals.

FIG. 1.

The structures of the anti- and syn-conformation of m-HO(C6H4)O and the corresponding neutral m-HO(C6H4)O radicals along with their dipole moments.

FIG. 1.

The structures of the anti- and syn-conformation of m-HO(C6H4)O and the corresponding neutral m-HO(C6H4)O radicals along with their dipole moments.

Close modal

Molecular conformations are important in chemistry and biochemistry.11–14 Several experimental techniques have been used to characterize conformational structures and dynamics, such as microwave spectroscopy,15 infrared (IR) spectroscopy,13–16 and conformer-specific photodissociation dynamics and spectroscopy.17–19 Conformers of neutral molecules with sufficiently different dipole moments can be selected using the Stark effects to probe conformation-dependent chemical reactivity.20,21 High-resolution resonant photoelectron imaging via dipole-bound excited states of cold anions yields conformation-selective photoelectron spectra and can be considered as a new method to obtain conformation-selective spectroscopic information for dipolar molecular radicals.10 

This method is based on mode-specific vibrational autodetachment from vibrational levels of DBS, first observed in cryogenically cooled phenoxide anions.22,23 Due to the Δν=−1 propensity rule,24,25 highly non-Franck-Condon resonant PE spectra were obtained to yield much more vibrational information, particularly for low-frequency and Franck-Condon-inactive vibrational modes.26–32 Beyond the preliminary observation of five vibrational resonances due to the excited DBS of anti- and syn-3HOP,10 here we report photodetachment spectroscopy with photon energies up to ∼1000 cm−1 above the detachment thresholds. A total of thirty vibrational resonances are observed, seventeen from the anti-3HOP conformer, eight from the syn-3HOP conformer, and five from overlapping vibrational levels of the DBS of both conformers. Conformation-selective resonant PE images have been obtained by tuning the detachment laser to the vibrational resonances. The photodetachment spectrum is assigned using the resonant PE spectra in conjunction with computed vibrational frequencies. Based on the photodetachment spectrum and resonant PE images, we are able to obtain fourteen fundamental vibrational frequencies for each of the m-HO(C6H4)O– conformations.

The experiment was done using our third-generation electrospray-photoelectron spectroscopy apparatus,23 equipped with a cryogenically cooled Paul trap33 and a high-resolution PE imaging system.34 The 3HOP anions were produced by deprotonation of m-HO(C6H4)OH via electrospray of a 1 mM solution in a mixed solvent of CH3OH/H2O (9/1 in volume) at pH ∼ 10. Anions generated in the electrospray ionization source were guided into a cryogenically cooled Paul trap operated at 4.5 K. After being accumulated for 0.1 s and thermally cooled via collisions with 1 mTorr He/H2 (4/1 in volume) background gas,23,33 the anions were pulsed out at a 10 Hz repetition rate into the extraction zone of a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The 3HOP anions were selected by a mass gate and photodetached in the interaction zone of the imaging lens by a dye laser. Photoelectrons were projected onto a pair of 75-mm diameter micro-channel plates coupled to a phosphor screen and captured by a charge-coupled device camera. The PE images were inverse-Abel transformed and reconstructed using the pBasex and BASEX programs.35,36 The PE spectra were calibrated with the known spectra of Au at different photon energies. The kinetic energy (KE) resolution achieved was 3.8 cm−1 for electrons with 55 cm−1 KE and about 1.5% (ΔKE/KE) for KE above 1 eV in the current experiment.

Fig. 2 shows the non-resonant PE images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at two photon energies. At 517.45 nm, three peaks, labeled as S000, A000, and A, are resolved. The superscripts “S” and “A” in the labels and throughout the text are used to designate the syn and anti conformations. As discussed in Ref. 10, peaks S000 and A000 at binding energies of 18 850 cm−1 and 18 917 cm−1 represent the vibrational origins of the syn- and anti-m-HO(C6H4)O radical conformations or their electron affinities, respectively. It should be noted that vibrational hot bands are completely eliminated due to the effective vibrational cooling in the cryogenic ion trap.22,23,37–39 Peak A corresponds to the fundamental vibrational excitation of mode Sν23 of syn-m-HO(C6H4)O. The relative high intensity of peak A is due to the near-threshold enhancement.10 At 501.01 nm, the normal Franck-Condon profiles are displayed for vibrational peaks far from threshold (the two near-threshold peaks L and M are enhanced). Peaks A–M correspond to transitions from the ground states of the anti- and syn-m-3HOP anions to different excited vibrational levels of the anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O neutral radicals. The electron binding energies of all the observed vibrational peaks, their shifts from the respective vibrational origins, and assignments are summarized in Table I, where the more accurate values are from the resonant PE spectra to be presented below.

FIG. 2.

Non-resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at (a) 517.45 nm and (b) 501.01 nm. The double arrow below the images indicates the direction of the laser polarization.

FIG. 2.

Non-resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at (a) 517.45 nm and (b) 501.01 nm. The double arrow below the images indicates the direction of the laser polarization.

Close modal
TABLE I.

The observed vibrational peaks and their binding energies (BEs) from the photoelectron spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O. The energy shifts from the vibrational origins of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O are given. Peaks A–M correspond to those in the non-resonant photoelectron spectra in Fig. 2, while peaks a–h are from the resonant photoelectron spectra in Figs. 5 and 6. The binding energies of peaks S000, A000, and A–J are measured more accurately from the resonant photoelectron spectra in Figs. 46.

PeaksBE (cm−1)aShift to S000 (cm−1)Shift to A000 (cm−1)Assignmentb
S000 18 850(5)  Neutral ground state (S) 
A000 18 917(5)  Neutral ground state (A) 
19 207(5) 357  S231 
19 365(5) 515  S211 
19 435(5)  518 A211 
19 498(5)  581 A291 
19 560(5) 710 643 A281/S232 
19 613(5) 763  S271 
19 680(5)  763 A271 
19 725(5) 875  S251/S211231 
19 775(5)  858 A251 
19 828(5)  911 A181 
19 849(10) 999  S171 
19 929(10) 1079  S233 
19 955(10)  1038 A212 
19 034(5) 184  S331 
19 092(5)  175 A331 
19 120(5)  203 A321 
19 268(5) 418  S301 
19 336(5) 486  S221 
19 402(5)  485 A221 
19 880(5)  963 A241 
19 750(5)  833 A261 
PeaksBE (cm−1)aShift to S000 (cm−1)Shift to A000 (cm−1)Assignmentb
S000 18 850(5)  Neutral ground state (S) 
A000 18 917(5)  Neutral ground state (A) 
19 207(5) 357  S231 
19 365(5) 515  S211 
19 435(5)  518 A211 
19 498(5)  581 A291 
19 560(5) 710 643 A281/S232 
19 613(5) 763  S271 
19 680(5)  763 A271 
19 725(5) 875  S251/S211231 
19 775(5)  858 A251 
19 828(5)  911 A181 
19 849(10) 999  S171 
19 929(10) 1079  S233 
19 955(10)  1038 A212 
19 034(5) 184  S331 
19 092(5)  175 A331 
19 120(5)  203 A321 
19 268(5) 418  S301 
19 336(5) 486  S221 
19 402(5)  485 A221 
19 880(5)  963 A241 
19 750(5)  833 A261 
a

Numbers in parentheses in BE indicate the experimental uncertainties.

b

The A and S labels refer to final states for the anti- and syn-conformers, respectively.

Fig. 3 shows the photodetachment spectrum of 3HOP with photon energy ∼1000 cm−1 above the detachment thresholds, labeled as SEA and AEA for the syn- and anti-3HOP conformers, respectively. This spectrum was obtained by monitoring the total electron yield while scanning the dye laser wavelength near and above the detachment thresholds of 3HOP.37 The overall baseline above thresholds represents the cross section of direct non-resonant photodetachment of 3HOP. Thirty above-threshold resonances are observed and labeled as A1–A17 (blue), S1–S8 (red), and AS1–AS5 (pink). These peaks indicate autodetachment from vibrational levels of the excited DBS of anti-3HOP, syn-3HOP, and overlapping levels of both conformers, respectively. The first five peaks (A1–A4 and S1) were reported in the previous preliminary study10 as well as the below-threshold vibrational origins of the DBS of the two conformers shown in the inset (A0′ and S0′. Note a ′ sign is used to designate vibrational levels of the DBS). The two below-threshold origin peaks were very weak, because they were due to two-photon detachment. The A0′ and S0′ peaks defined the DBS binding energies of 490 and 104 cm−1 for the anti- and syn-3HOP conformers, relative to their respective detachment thresholds (AEA and SEA).10 The larger DBS binding energy of the anti-conformer is consistent with the larger dipole moment of the neutral radical (Fig. 1). The photon energies, shifts from the respective ground DBS vibrational levels, and assignments of the observed resonances are given in Table II. The assignments of all the vibrational peaks are based on the autodetachment in the resonant PE spectra shown in Figs. 46 and the calculated vibrational frequencies given in Table III.

FIG. 3.

The photodetachment spectrum of m-HO(C6H4)O by measuring the total electron yield as a function of photon energy near and above the detachment thresholds. The two arrows (AEA and SEA) indicate the detachment thresholds for anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, respectively. The peaks labeled as A1–A17 (blue) are due to autodetachment from DBS vibrational levels of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, while peaks S1–S8 (red) are from syn-m-HO(C6H4)O and peaks AS1–AS5 (pink) are from both anion conformers. The inset shows the photodetachment spectrum below the detachment threshold and the two peaks, labeled as A0′ and S0′, represent the ground DBS of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, respectively.10 

FIG. 3.

The photodetachment spectrum of m-HO(C6H4)O by measuring the total electron yield as a function of photon energy near and above the detachment thresholds. The two arrows (AEA and SEA) indicate the detachment thresholds for anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, respectively. The peaks labeled as A1–A17 (blue) are due to autodetachment from DBS vibrational levels of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, while peaks S1–S8 (red) are from syn-m-HO(C6H4)O and peaks AS1–AS5 (pink) are from both anion conformers. The inset shows the photodetachment spectrum below the detachment threshold and the two peaks, labeled as A0′ and S0′, represent the ground DBS of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, respectively.10 

Close modal
TABLE II.

The observed peaks, photon energies (hν), shifts from the ground DBS of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, and assignments for the photodetachment spectrum in Fig. 3.

Peakahν (cm−1)bShift (cm−1)Assignment
A0′ 18 427(5)  Ground DBS of anti 
A18 949(5) (A)522 A21′1 
A19 006(5) (A)579 A29′1 
A19 073(5) (A)646 A28′1 
A19 188(5) (A)761 A27′1 
A19 259(5) (A)832 A26′1 
A19 342(5) (A)915 A18′1 
A19 386(5) (A)959 A24′1 
A19 431(5) (A)1004 A21′122′1 
A19 470(5) (A)1043 A21′2 
A10 19 486(5) (A)1059 A22′129′1 
A11 19 525(5) (A)1098 A21′129′1 
A12 19 594(5) (A)1167 A14′1/A21′128′1 
A13 19 708(5) (A)1281 A21′127′1 
A14 19 784(5) (A)1357 A11′1/A21′126′1 
A15 19 814(5) (A)1387 A21′125′1 
A16 19 862(5) (A)1435 A18′121′1 
A17 19 908(5) (A)1481 A21′124′1 
S0′ 18 746(5)  Ground DBS of syn 
S19 168(5) (S)422 S30′1 
S19 318(5) (S)572 S29′1/S31′133′1 
S19 396(5) (S)650 S28′1 
S19 508(5) (S)762 S23′130′1 
S19 648(5) (S)902 S22′130′1 
S19 658(5) (S)912 S23′131′133′1 
S19 679(5) (S)933 S18′1/S21′130′1/S27′133′1 
S19 917(5) (S)1171 S21′128′1/S27′130′1 
Overlapping levels of anti- and syn-conformersc 
AS19 224(5) (A)797/(S)478 A30′132′133′1/S22′1 
AS19 293(5) (A)866/(S)547 A25′1/A21′133′2/S23′133′1 
AS19 578(5) (A)1151/(S)832 A29′2/S26′1 
AS19 667(5) (A)1240/(S)921 A22′127′1/S21′132′2 
AS19 746(5) (A)1319/(S)1000 S17′1/S29′130′1/A27′129′1 
Peakahν (cm−1)bShift (cm−1)Assignment
A0′ 18 427(5)  Ground DBS of anti 
A18 949(5) (A)522 A21′1 
A19 006(5) (A)579 A29′1 
A19 073(5) (A)646 A28′1 
A19 188(5) (A)761 A27′1 
A19 259(5) (A)832 A26′1 
A19 342(5) (A)915 A18′1 
A19 386(5) (A)959 A24′1 
A19 431(5) (A)1004 A21′122′1 
A19 470(5) (A)1043 A21′2 
A10 19 486(5) (A)1059 A22′129′1 
A11 19 525(5) (A)1098 A21′129′1 
A12 19 594(5) (A)1167 A14′1/A21′128′1 
A13 19 708(5) (A)1281 A21′127′1 
A14 19 784(5) (A)1357 A11′1/A21′126′1 
A15 19 814(5) (A)1387 A21′125′1 
A16 19 862(5) (A)1435 A18′121′1 
A17 19 908(5) (A)1481 A21′124′1 
S0′ 18 746(5)  Ground DBS of syn 
S19 168(5) (S)422 S30′1 
S19 318(5) (S)572 S29′1/S31′133′1 
S19 396(5) (S)650 S28′1 
S19 508(5) (S)762 S23′130′1 
S19 648(5) (S)902 S22′130′1 
S19 658(5) (S)912 S23′131′133′1 
S19 679(5) (S)933 S18′1/S21′130′1/S27′133′1 
S19 917(5) (S)1171 S21′128′1/S27′130′1 
Overlapping levels of anti- and syn-conformersc 
AS19 224(5) (A)797/(S)478 A30′132′133′1/S22′1 
AS19 293(5) (A)866/(S)547 A25′1/A21′133′2/S23′133′1 
AS19 578(5) (A)1151/(S)832 A29′2/S26′1 
AS19 667(5) (A)1240/(S)921 A22′127′1/S21′132′2 
AS19 746(5) (A)1319/(S)1000 S17′1/S29′130′1/A27′129′1 
a

The superscripts in the peak labels indicate the conformers: A for anti, S for syn, and AS for overlapping levels of the anti- and syn-conformers.

b

Numbers in parentheses indicate the experimental uncertainties.

c

Shifts for the anti-conformer are referenced to A0′ and those for the syn-conformer are referenced to S0′.

FIG. 4.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, corresponding to autodetachment involving single vibrational modes. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrow below the images represents the direction of the laser polarization.

FIG. 4.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, corresponding to autodetachment involving single vibrational modes. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrow below the images represents the direction of the laser polarization.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, representing autodetachment involving combinational DBS vibrational levels. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrows below the images represent the direction of the laser polarization.

FIG. 5.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, representing autodetachment involving combinational DBS vibrational levels. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrows below the images represent the direction of the laser polarization.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, representing autodetachment involving overlapping DBS vibrational levels. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrows below the images represent the direction of the laser polarization.

FIG. 6.

Resonant photoelectron images and spectra of m-HO(C6H4)O at ten different detachment wavelengths, representing autodetachment involving overlapping DBS vibrational levels. The peak number (in parentheses) corresponds to that in Fig. 3 and the assigned DBS vibrational levels are given. The labels in bold face indicate the autodetachment-enhanced final neutral vibrational levels. And the double arrows below the images represent the direction of the laser polarization.

Close modal
TABLE III.

Experimental vibrational frequencies (in cm−1) of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, in comparison to theoretical harmonic frequencies calculated at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) level.

anti-m-HO(C6H4)Osyn-m-HO(C6H4)O
Theo.Expt.Peak(s)aTheo.Expt.Peak(s)a
ν1 (A′) 3836   3827   
ν2 (A′) 3209   3205   
ν3 (A′) 3205   3199   
ν4 (A′) 3180   3176   
ν5 (A′) 3157   3175   
ν6 (A′) 1601   1594   
ν7 (A′) 1552   1552   
ν8 (A′) 1474   1490   
ν9 (A′) 1435   1444   
ν10 (A′) 1381   1399   
ν11 (A′) 1336 1357 A14 1337   
ν12 (A′) 1284   1287   
ν13 (A′) 1227   1226   
ν14 (A′) 1172 1167 A12 1179   
ν15 (A′) 1159   1154   
ν16 (A′) 1095   1091   
ν17 (A′) 992   989 1000/999 AS5/K 
ν18 (A′) 929 915/911 A6/J 932 933 S
ν19 (A′) 737   741   
ν20 (A′) 533   533   
ν21 (A′) 511 522/518 A1/C 509 515 
ν22 (A′) 491 485 491 478/486 AS1/e 
ν23 (A′) 344   346 357 
ν24 (A″) 954 959/963 A7/g 970   
ν25 (A″) 877 866/858 AS2/I 877 875 
ν26 (A″) 824 832 A5/h 824 832 AS
ν27 (A″) 753 761/763 A4/G 771 763 
ν28 (A″) 654 646/643 A3/E 656 650/656 S3/S
ν29 (A″) 563 579/581 A2/D 582 572 S
ν30 (A″) 416 419 AS418 422/418 S1/d 
ν31 (A″) 270   374 371/385 S6/a 
ν32 (A″) 209 203 211 215/203 S2/AS
ν33 (A″) 183 175 183 184/190 a/AS
anti-m-HO(C6H4)Osyn-m-HO(C6H4)O
Theo.Expt.Peak(s)aTheo.Expt.Peak(s)a
ν1 (A′) 3836   3827   
ν2 (A′) 3209   3205   
ν3 (A′) 3205   3199   
ν4 (A′) 3180   3176   
ν5 (A′) 3157   3175   
ν6 (A′) 1601   1594   
ν7 (A′) 1552   1552   
ν8 (A′) 1474   1490   
ν9 (A′) 1435   1444   
ν10 (A′) 1381   1399   
ν11 (A′) 1336 1357 A14 1337   
ν12 (A′) 1284   1287   
ν13 (A′) 1227   1226   
ν14 (A′) 1172 1167 A12 1179   
ν15 (A′) 1159   1154   
ν16 (A′) 1095   1091   
ν17 (A′) 992   989 1000/999 AS5/K 
ν18 (A′) 929 915/911 A6/J 932 933 S
ν19 (A′) 737   741   
ν20 (A′) 533   533   
ν21 (A′) 511 522/518 A1/C 509 515 
ν22 (A′) 491 485 491 478/486 AS1/e 
ν23 (A′) 344   346 357 
ν24 (A″) 954 959/963 A7/g 970   
ν25 (A″) 877 866/858 AS2/I 877 875 
ν26 (A″) 824 832 A5/h 824 832 AS
ν27 (A″) 753 761/763 A4/G 771 763 
ν28 (A″) 654 646/643 A3/E 656 650/656 S3/S
ν29 (A″) 563 579/581 A2/D 582 572 S
ν30 (A″) 416 419 AS418 422/418 S1/d 
ν31 (A″) 270   374 371/385 S6/a 
ν32 (A″) 209 203 211 215/203 S2/AS
ν33 (A″) 183 175 183 184/190 a/AS
a

The peaks, A1–A14, S1–S7, and AS1–AS5, refer to the labels used in Fig. 3 and Table II. The peaks labeled with letters refer to those used in the PE spectra (Figs. 2 and 46) and Table I.

By tuning the detachment laser to the above-threshold resonances in Fig. 3, we obtained thirty high-resolution resonantly enhanced PE images and spectra, as shown in Figs. 46. The detachment laser wavelength, the DBS vibrational level, and the corresponding peak label (in parentheses) used in the photodetachment spectrum of Fig. 3 are given in each resonant PE spectrum in Figs. 46. The resonant excitations involve different vibrational levels of the DBS of the two conformers of 3HOP, followed by autodetachment. The ten spectra in Fig. 4 contain autodetachment involving a single vibrational mode of the DBS, where the five spectra on the left, reported previously,10 are shown here for completeness and for comparison. The ten spectra in Fig. 5 represent excitations to combinational vibrational levels of the DBS, whereas the ten spectra in Fig. 6 correspond to excitations to overlapping vibrational levels of DBS of the two conformers. These resonant PE spectra involve two detachment channels:22 (1) non-resonant direct photodetachment represented by the baseline in Fig. 3 and (2) resonant autodetachment via the DBS represented by the resonances in Fig. 3. Due to mode-selectivity and the Δν = −1 propensity rule in the autodetachment process, highly non-Franck-Condon spectra are obtained, with certain vibrational levels significantly enhanced.26–32 The enhanced vibrational levels in each spectrum are labeled in bold face. In addition, several vibrational peaks not observed in the non-resonant PE spectra in Fig. 2 appear in the resonant PE spectra in Figs. 5 and 6. They are labeled as a–h; their binding energies and assignments are also given in Table I.

To assist the assignment of the vibrational peaks in the PE spectra, we calculated the vibrational frequencies of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level, as shown in Table III. The vibrational modes and frequencies of the two conformers are very similar as expected, except the ν31 mode, which corresponds to the out-of-plane rocking mode of the OH group (Fig. 7). Since both the anions and the neutral radicals of the two conformers are planar with Cs symmetry, only in-plane modes (A′) or even quanta of out-of-plane modes (A″) are allowed in principle in the PE spectra. The energy shifts of peaks A–M relative to the respective vibrational origins of the two conformers and their assignments are given in Table I. These peaks are due to vibrational excitations of either isomer or overlapping levels of both isomers. The assignments are accomplished by a careful comparison of the experimental shifts with the theoretical frequencies. For example, peak A has a shift of 357 cm−1 relative to S000 and 290 cm−1 relative to A000. The 290 cm−1 shift does not agree with any frequencies of the vibrational modes of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, while the 357 cm−1 shift matches well the computed frequency for the in-plane Sν23 (A′) mode (346 cm−1 in Table III) of syn-m-HO(C6H4)O. Thus, peak A is assigned to the in-plane scissoring vibrational mode Sν23 of syn-m-HO(C6H4)O. The energy shifts of peak B from S000 and A000 are 515 cm−1 and 448 cm−1, respectively. However, the 448 cm−1 shift does not match any calculated frequency for anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, while the 515 cm−1 shift can be readily assigned to the in-plane stretching mode Sν21 (A′) (with a computed frequency of 509 cm−1 in Table III) of syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, which is also confirmed by the autodetachment enhancement in the resonant PE spectra to be discussed below. Peak C, shifted from A000 by 518 cm−1, is assigned to the in-plane stretching mode Aν21 (A′) (computed frequency of 511 cm−1 in Table III) of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O. At higher binding energies, overlapping of vibrational levels from both conformers becomes possible, which makes the assignments difficult in some cases. Based on the autodetachment enhancement in the resonant PE spectra in Figs. 46, peaks D to J are assigned to A291 (A″), A281 (A″), S271 (A″), A271 (A″), S251 (A″), A251 (A″), and A181 (A′), respectively. Interestingly, except for the in-plane mode Aν18 (A′), the other six modes are all out-of-plane modes (Aȃ), suggesting that the radical conformers may not be truly planar. In addition, peaks E and H can also be assigned to S232 (A′) and S211231, respectively, indicating overlapping levels. Peaks K to M are assigned to S171 (A′), S233 (A′), and A212 (A′), respectively.

FIG. 7.

The fundamental ν31 vibrational mode of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O and their calculated frequencies (Table III).

FIG. 7.

The fundamental ν31 vibrational mode of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O and their calculated frequencies (Table III).

Close modal

The dipole moments of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O were calculated to be 5.3 D and 3.1 D, respectively (Fig. 1),10 which are larger than the 2.5 D practical critical dipole moment to support DBS.6 As reported in the previous preliminary study,10 the binding energies of the DBS are 490 cm−1 and 104 cm−1 for the anti- and syn-3HOP conformers relative to their respective detachment thresholds, as shown by the below-threshold detachment peaks A0′ and S0′ in the inset of Fig. 3. The thirty above-threshold peaks in Fig. 3 represent optical transitions to the excited vibrational levels of the DBS of anti- and syn-3HOP, followed by autodetachment.37 The seventeen peaks, labeled as A1–A17 (blue), are from vibrational levels of the DBS of the anti-3HOP conformer; the eight peaks, S1–S8 (red), are from vibrational levels of syn-3HOP; and the five peaks, AS1–AS5 (pink), are from overlapping vibrational levels of the DBS of both conformers. These assignments are done on the basis of the resonant PE spectra to be discussed below and by comparing the measured vibrational frequencies with those computed for the anti- and syn-conformers of the neutral radicals (Table III). The first five detachment peaks (A1–A4 and S1) were reported in the previous preliminary study.10 All the assignments given in Table II for these five peaks are the same, except the A1 peak, which is reassigned to the Aν21′ mode, instead of the Aν20′ mode assigned previously. This reassignment is done by considering the same mode in the more extensive resonant PE spectra to be discussed below. As shown previously,27–32 the vibrational frequencies in the DBS of anions are the same as the corresponding neutral radicals within our experimental uncertainty, because the weakly bound excess electron in the DBS has negligible influence on the structures of the neutral cores. Since the peak width in Fig. 3 is mainly limited by rotational broadening,37 the measured frequencies in the photodetachment spectrum are in general more accurate than those obtained from the PE spectra. The near-threshold PES features have comparable accuracy as in the photodetachment spectrum. The vibrational labels for the DBS are indicated by ′ in Table II. Most of the vibrational peaks observed in the PE spectra (Fig. 2 and Table I) are also observed in the photodetachment spectrum (Fig. 3 and Table II) with the same frequencies within the experimental accuracy.

It is interesting to note that the vibrational levels observed for the two conformers in the PE spectra in Fig. 2, as well as the photodetachment spectrum in Fig. 3, are not exactly the same, reflecting the slight different structures of the two conformers. In addition, more vibrational levels for the DBS of the anti-3HOP conformer are observed in the photodetachment spectrum, because of the broader excitation energy range as a result of the higher DBS binding energy of the anti-conformer, i.e., the lower excitation energy of the anti-conformer as defined by its 0–0 transition (A0′ in Fig. 3).

Fig. 4 shows the resonant PE images and spectra of 3HOP that correspond to autodetachment from vibrational levels of single modes of the DBS for a given conformer. As shown previously,28–32 autodetachment from vibrational levels of DBS generally follows the Δν=−1 propensity rule due to the similarity of the molecular structures in the DBS and the neutral,24,25 that is, the nth vibrational level of a given mode (ν′xn) of the DBS is favored to autodetach to the (n − 1)th level of the corresponding neutral mode (νxn−1).22 The vibrationally induced autodetachment involves a strong vibronic coupling, during which one vibrational quantum of mode ν′x is transferred to the DBS electron. Hence, only modes with sufficiently high frequencies can couple with the DBS electron for the vibrationally induced autodetachment. In comparison to the relative intensities of peaks S000 and A000 in the non-resonant spectra in Fig. 2, the A000 peak in Figs. 4(a)4(c) and 4(e)4(h) is highly enhanced while the S000 peak is almost negligible, indicating autodetachment from fundamental vibrational levels (Aν′x1) of the DBS of the anti-m-HO(C6H4)O conformer. The assignments of Figs. 4(a)4(e) have been discussed in the recent preliminary study,10 except one reassignment about the resonant peak (A1) in Fig. 4(a), as mentioned above. The A1 peak in the photodetachment spectrum (Fig. 3) was assigned to the A20′1 DBS level previously. However, on the basis of the PE spectra and the overtone excitation level in Fig. 4(j) (see below), the A1 peak excited in Fig. 4(a) should be due to the A21′1 DBS level of the anti-3HOP conformer (Table II).

In Fig. 4(h), the detachment laser wavelength (515.83 nm) corresponds to the A7 resonant peak in the photodetachment spectrum (Fig. 3). The shift of the A7 peak relative to the A0′ DBS ground vibrational level of the anti-conformer is measured to be 959 cm−1 (Table II), which is in good agreement with the computed frequency of the ν24 (A′) mode of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O (954 cm−1, Table III). Thus, Fig. 4(h) corresponds to resonant excitation to the A24′1 DBS vibrational level of the anti-3HOP conformer, followed by autodetachment to the A000 ground state of the neutral anti-m-HO(C6H4)O conformer according to the Δν = −1 propensity rule. Similarly, the PE spectra in Figs. 4(f) and 4(g) are due to autodetachment from the A26′1 and A18′1 DBS vibrational levels of the anti-3HOP conformer, respectively. The strong A peak in Fig. 4(f) is due to the near-threshold enhancement, similar to that observed in Fig. 2(a). The enhanced S000 peak in Fig. 4(i) is due to autodetachment from the S28′1 DBS vibrational level of the syn-3HOP conformer. In Fig. 4(j), the A211 vibrational level of the anti-m-HO(C6H4)O conformer (peak C) is greatly enhanced. According to the Δν = −1 propensity rule, the enhanced peak C should be from autodetachment of the A21′2 DBS vibrational level of the anti-3HOP conformer. Indeed, the photon energy used (513.61 nm) is shifted from the A0′ DBS ground state of the anti-3HOP conformer by 1043 cm−1, which is exactly twice the frequency measured for the A21′ mode (Table II). Even though both the anti- and syn-3HOP conformers are present in the ion beam, the resonant excitation to specific vibrational levels via the DBS allows conformer-specific and autodetachment-enhanced resonant PE spectra to be obtained.

Autodetachment from combinational vibrational levels of DBS is more complicated because of multiple autodetachment channels. For example, excitation to a two-mode, above-threshold combinational DBS vibrational level (νxmνyn) can autodetach to a final neutral level of either νxm−1νyn or νxmνyn−1, following the Δν = −1 propensity rule and mode-selectivity. In Fig. 5(a), a single dominating peak f is observed at an electron binding energy of 19402 cm−1 (Table I), which is not observed in the non-resonant PE spectrum in Fig. 2(b). Peak f has an energy shift of 485 cm−1 from the A000 origin peak of the anti-conformer, which is in good agreement with the computed frequency of the ν22 (A′) mode of anti-m-HO(C6H4)O (Table III). The photon energy used in Fig. 5(a) has a shift of 1004 cm−1 to A0′, i.e., 485 cm−1 + 519 cm−1, corresponding to a combinational DBS vibrational level A21′122′1 of the anti-3HOP conformer. The 519 cm−1 vibrational frequency for the Aν21′ mode deduced from the A8 resonant peak agrees well with that from the A1 resonant peak (522 cm−1 in Table II). The frequency for the Aν21′ DBS mode is the same as that of the Aν21 mode measured in the PE spectra for the neutral radical (518 cm−1 in Table I). In Fig. 5(a), only peak f (A221) is enhanced because only one quantum of mode Aν21′ (519 cm−1) has enough energy to detach the DBS electron with a binding energy of 490 cm−1. This is also the case in Fig. 5(b), where a combinational DBS vibrational level of A22′129′1 is excited and only autodetachment to the final neutral level of A221 is energetically possible.

Figs. 5(d), 5(g), and 5(i) display cases involving excitation to two-mode combinational DBS levels of the anti-3HOP conformer, in which each mode can couple to the DBS electron to induce autodetachment. Hence, two enhanced peaks are observed in each spectrum. However, in Figs. 5(h) and 5(j), only one peak (IA251 in Fig. 5(h) and gA241 in Fig. 5(j)) is enhanced, even though both modes of the excited DBS level (A21′125′1 in Fig. 5(h) and A21′124′1 in Fig. 5(j)) are energetically possible to induce autodetachment. This observation suggests that the coupling of the Aν21′ mode with the DBS electron is much stronger than the Aν24′ or Aν25′ mode. Such mode-dependent vibronic coupling has been observed previously.28–32 Figs. 5(c) and 5(e) show two more examples of mode-dependent vibrationally induced autodetachment. These two spectra involve resonant excitations to two-mode combinational DBS levels (S23′130′1 and S22′130′1, respectively) of the syn-3HOP conformer. In both cases, only one vibrational peak is observed to be enhanced (AS231 in Fig. 5(c) and eS221 in Fig. 5(e)), even though the frequencies of both DBS modes in each case are energetically possible to induce autodetachment. In these cases, the mode that couples with the DBS electron is the Sν30′ mode.

Fig. 5(f) shows a case of the breakdown of the Δν = −1 propensity rule. The S6 resonant peak (Fig. 3) corresponds to a three-mode combinational DBS vibrational level of the syn-3HOP conformer (S23′131′133′1 in Table II). However, only peak A (S231) is enhanced in the resonant PE spectrum, suggesting the coupling of one quantum of ν31′ and one quantum of ν33′ simultaneously to the DBS electron during autodetachment. Such breakdown of the Δν = −1 propensity rule has been observed previously,28–32 often involving low frequency DBS modes.

It is also worthwhile to point out that the resonantly enhanced peaks e, f, g in Fig. 5 due to autodetachment from combinational DBS vibrational levels represent new vibrational features that are not observed in the non-resonant PE spectra in Fig. 2, as shown in Table I. The weak peak c observed in Fig. 5(d) is also a new vibrational feature corresponding to the excitation of a low frequency bending mode (Aν32) of the anti-m-HO(C6H4)O conformer.

For resonant excitations to overlapping DBS vibrational levels, the resonantly enhanced PE spectra can be even more complicated as a result of different autodetachment channels. Fig. 6 displays resonant PE spectra from overlapping DBS vibrational levels of three types: (1) those from the anti-3HOP conformer (Figs. 6(e) and 6(i)), (2) those from the syn-3HOP conformer (Figs. 6(c), 6(g), and 6(j)), and (3) those from both conformers (Figs. 6(a), 6(b), 6(d), 6(f), and 6(h)). The intensity ratio of the anti- and syn-conformers is defined by the S000 and A000 peaks in the non-resonant PE spectra shown in Fig. 2. Significant changes of the relative intensities of these two peaks in the resonant PE spectra indicate fundamental excitations of a specific DBS vibrational mode of a given conformer. In these cases, the fundamental vibrational frequency of a given DBS mode is degenerate with that of another mode or combinational modes. This happened in eight out of the ten spectra in Fig. 6. In Figs. 6(b), 6(e), and 6(i), the A000 peak is enhanced relative to the S000 peak, due to resonant excitations to the A25′1, A14′1, and A11′1 DBS levels of the anti-3HOP conformer, respectively. The frequencies for the three modes are given in Tables II and III. In Figs. 6(a), 6(c), 6(d), 6(g), and 6(h), the S000 peak is enhanced relative to the A000 peak, due to excitations to the S22′1, S29′1, S26′1, S18′1, and S17′1 of the syn-conformer, respectively, as shown in Tables II and III.

The overlapping combinational modes in Figs. 6(e) and 6(i) are also from the anti-conformer. In Fig. 6(e), both the CA211 and EA281 peaks are enhanced and the overlapping combinational mode can be straightforwardly assigned to the A21′128′1 DBS level. In Fig. 6(i), the enhanced CA211 and hA261 peaks suggest excitation to the A21′126′1 DBS level. Note that the hA261 peak was not resolved from the dominating H peak in the non-resonant PE spectrum (Fig. 2(b) and Table I). It should also be pointed out that the H peak is significantly enhanced in Fig. 6(i). However, there are no DBS levels that can autodetach to this level of the neutral syn-conformer. We attribute the enhanced H peak to the threshold effects, which are observed for the A peak (S231) in a number of detachment wavelengths (for example, in Figs. 2(a) and 4(f)).

The overlapping combination modes in Figs. 6(c) and 6(g) are all from the syn-conformer. In Fig. 6(c), a new peak aS331 is observed, suggesting excitation to the S31′133′1 combinational DBS level with only strong vibronic coupling by the Sν31′ mode in the autodetachment. In Fig. 6(g), two peaks BS211 and FS271 are enhanced, suggesting two overlapping combinational DBS levels, S21′130′1 and S27′133′1, respectively, where again only one mode in each case is strongly coupled with the DBS electron for autodetachment. Fig. 6(j) also shows the same two enhanced peaks, BS211 and FS271, suggesting two overlapping combinational DBS levels, S21′128′1 and S27′130′1, respectively, also with only one mode in each case strongly coupled with the DBS electron.

The more complicated cases are those involving resonant excitations to overlapping DBS vibrational levels of both 3HOP conformers, as shown in Figs. 6(a), 6(b), 6(d), 6(f), and 6(h), corresponding to the resonant peaks AS1–AS5 in Fig. 3. In Fig. 6(a), in addition to the enhanced S000 peak due to the excitation to the S22′1 DBS level of the syn-conformer, the cA321 peak is observed, suggesting an overlapping combinational DBS level of A30′132′133′1 in violation of the Δν=−1 propensity rule, because vibrational quanta (A30′133′1) are coupled to the DBS electron for the autodetachment to the A321 final vibrational state. The strong peak A (S231) is a result of threshold enhancement, as mentioned above. In Fig. 6(b), the enhanced peaks bA331 and AS231 imply excitation to an overlapping DBS level involving the two conformers, i.e., A21′133′2/S23′133′1. The enhanced DA291 peak in Fig. 6(d) suggests that the overlapping DBS level is A29′2. In Fig. 6(f), the enhanced fA221 and BS211 peaks suggest overlapping combinational DBS levels of A22′127′1/S21′132′2. Finally, in Fig. 6(h), the enhanced levels dS301 and GA271 imply two overlapping combinational DBS levels of S29′130′1/A27′129′1, in addition to the overlapping S17′1 DBS level. The strong H peak in Fig. 6(h) is attributed to threshold enhancement, similar to that in Fig. 6(i).

All the assignments for the observed DBS vibrational resonances in Fig. 3 are summarized in Table II. An energy level diagram is displayed in Fig. 8, showing the resonant excitations to the DBS vibrational levels of the two 3HOP conformers and the observed autodetachment channels. The electron detachment thresholds and the DBS binding energies for each conformer are also shown. Fig. 8 reveals the complexity of the 3HOP system due to the presence of the two conformers, as well as the wealth of spectroscopic information that can be obtained using resonant PES via the vibrational levels of the DBS. The experimental vibrational frequencies obtained for the two conformers of the m-HO(C6H4)O radical are compared with the computed frequencies in Table III. In many cases, the same frequencies are measured from both the photodetachment spectrum of the DBS and the PE spectra (both resonant and non-resonant) for the neutral radicals. They are generally in agreement within the experimental uncertainties.

FIG. 8.

A schematic energy level diagram for autodetachment from the DBS vibrational levels of the two conformers of 3HOP to the neutral final states of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)OThe detachment thresholds and the DBS binding energies of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O are given. Autodetachment processes from DBS vibrational levels of different conformers are indicated by the arrows with different colors: blue for anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, red for syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, and pink for overlapping DBS levels of the two conformers. The DBS peak labels and the peak labels from the PE spectra are given. The assignments of the final neutral states and the DBS levels are given in Tables I and II, respectively.

FIG. 8.

A schematic energy level diagram for autodetachment from the DBS vibrational levels of the two conformers of 3HOP to the neutral final states of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)OThe detachment thresholds and the DBS binding energies of anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O are given. Autodetachment processes from DBS vibrational levels of different conformers are indicated by the arrows with different colors: blue for anti-m-HO(C6H4)O, red for syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, and pink for overlapping DBS levels of the two conformers. The DBS peak labels and the peak labels from the PE spectra are given. The assignments of the final neutral states and the DBS levels are given in Tables I and II, respectively.

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 1, the different orientation of the hydrogen atom on the hydroxyl group results in the two conformers of 3HOP. The intensity ratio of the 0–0 detachment transitions (S000 vs. A000) in Fig. 2 suggests that the syn-conformer is more stable, consistent with a previous B3LYP calculation, which suggested that anti-3HOP is 0.855 kcal/mol higher in energy.5 Upon electron detachment, the corresponding neutral radicals, anti- and syn-m-HO(C6H4)O, are obtained and their electron affinities are different by 67 cm−1 with the anti-conformer being slightly higher. Table III reveals that the vibrational frequencies of the neutral radicals of the two conformers are very similar, except mode ν31. As shown in Fig. 7, this mode is the out-of-plane rocking mode of the –OH group and is related to the conversion of the two conformations. It is interesting to note that the frequency of this mode in the syn-conformer is much higher. At room temperature, these modes would be significantly populated, leading to equilibrium or free conversion of the two conformers. At lower temperatures, the two conformers are frozen out, but would not be separable. However, using resonant excitations to certain vibrational levels of the DBS, pure or nearly pure conformers of the neutral radicals can be produced. It was shown previously that resonant excitation to an intermediate electronic state of an anion allows different final neutral states to be accessed.40 Fundamental excitations to single DBS vibrational modes of a given conformer can produce almost pure conformers of the corresponding neutral radical in its vibrational ground state according to the Δν = −1 autodetachment propensity rule. For example, using photodetachment wavelengths corresponding to those used in Figs. 4(a)–4(c), 4(e), and 4(g), one can produce almost pure neutral anti-m-HO(C6H4)O radicals, whereas using the wavelength corresponding to that used for Fig. 4(d), one can produce almost pure neutral syn-m-HO(C6H4)O radicals. A neutral conformer with specific vibrational energy can also be produced such as that in Fig. 4(j) or Fig. 5(a). Hence, resonant photodetachment may be a good technique to produce conformer-selected beams of neutral dipolar species for further investigations of conformation-dependent chemical and physical properties.

In conclusion, we report an extensive investigation of the photodetachment spectroscopy of cryogenically cooled m-HO(C6H4)O anions and resonant photoelectron imaging via vibrational levels of the dipole-bound excited states. Two conformers are observed for this anion and each possesses an excited dipole-bound state just below the detachment threshold. Thirty DBS vibrational resonances are observed for the two conformers with some of the resonances consisting of overlapping vibrational levels. Thirty resonant photoelectron spectra are obtained by tuning the detachment laser to each of the vibrational resonances. Extensive spectroscopic information is obtained for each of the conformers. The vibrational structures are assigned using computed frequencies of the two conformers and by using the resonant PE spectra on the basis of the propensity rule of vibrationally induced autodetachment from DBS. Resonant photoelectron spectroscopy of cold anions is shown to be an effective method to probe the spectroscopy of conformers of dipolar molecular species with sufficient dipole moments to support dipole-bound states.

We would like to thank Dr. Hong-Tao Liu and Dr. Chuan-Gang Ning for experimental assistance and valuable discussions. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation.

1.
P.
Seta
,
E.
Bienvenue
,
A. L.
Moore
,
P.
Mathis
,
R. V.
Bensasson
,
P.
Liddell
,
P. J.
Pessiki
,
A.
Joy
,
T. A.
Moore
, and
D.
Gust
,
Nature
316
,
653
(
1985
).
2.
M. S.
Graige
,
M. L.
Paddock
,
J. M.
Bruce
,
G.
Feher
, and
M. Y.
Okamura
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
118
,
9005
(
1996
).
3.
M. H. V.
Huynh
and
T. J.
Meyer
,
Chem. Rev.
107
,
5004
(
2007
).
4.
M.
Altarawneh
,
B. Z.
Dlugogorski
,
E. M.
Kennedy
, and
J. C.
Mackie
,
J. Phys. Chem. A
114
,
1098
(
2010
).
5.
X. B.
Wang
,
Q.
Fu
, and
J.
Yang
,
J. Phys. Chem. A
114
,
9083
(
2010
).
6.
C.
Desfrancois
,
H.
Abdoul-Carmine
, and
J. P.
Schermann
, “
Ground-state dipole-bound anions
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
10
,
1339
(
1996
).
7.
N. I.
Hammer
,
R. J.
Hinde
,
R. N.
Compton
,
K.
Diri
,
K. D.
Jordan
,
D.
Radisic
,
S. T.
Stokes
, and
K. H.
Bowen
,
J. Chem. Phys.
120
,
685
(
2004
).
8.
R. L.
Jackson
,
P. C.
Hiberty
, and
J. I.
Brauman
,
J. Chem. Phys.
74
,
3705
(
1981
).
9.
K.
Yokoyama
,
G. W.
Leach
,
J. B.
Kim
,
W. C.
Lineberger
,
A. I.
Boldyrev
, and
M.
Gutowski
,
J. Chem. Phys.
105
,
10706
(
1996
).
10.
D. L.
Huang
,
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
6
,
2153
(
2015
).
11.
J. I.
Seeman
,
Chem. Rev.
83
,
83
(
1983
).
12.
A.
Gutteridge
and
J.
Thornton
,
FEBS Lett.
567
,
67
(
2004
).
13.
J. P.
Simons
,
R. A.
Jockusch
,
P.
CarCabal
,
I.
Hunig
,
R. T.
Kroemer
,
N. A.
Macleod
, and
L. C.
Snoek
,
Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.
24
,
489
(
2005
).
14.
A.
Mardyukov
,
H.
Quanz
, and
P. R.
Schreiner
,
Nat. Chem.
9
,
71
(
2017
).
15.
B. C.
Dian
,
G. G.
Brown
,
K. O.
Douglass
, and
B. H.
Pate
,
Science
320
,
924
(
2008
).
16.
B. C.
Dian
,
J. R.
Clarkson
, and
T. S.
Zwier
,
Science
303
,
1169
(
2004
).
17.
S. T.
Park
,
S. K.
Kim
, and
M. S.
Kim
,
Nature
415
,
306
(
2002
).
18.
M. H.
Kim
,
L.
Shen
,
H.
Tao
,
T. J.
Martinez
, and
A. G.
Suits
,
Science
315
,
1561
(
2007
).
19.
T. R.
Rizzo
,
J. A.
Stearns
, and
O. V.
Boyarkin
,
Int. Rev. Phys. Chem.
28
,
481
(
2009
).
20.
F.
Filsinger
,
U.
Erlekam
,
G.
von Helden
,
J.
Kupper
, and
G.
Meijer
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
,
133003
(
2008
).
21.
Y. P.
Chang
,
K.
Dlugolecki
,
J.
Kupper
,
D.
Rosch
,
D.
Wild
, and
S.
Willitsch
,
Science
342
,
98
(
2003
).
22.
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
,
D. L.
Huang
,
P. D.
Dau
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
52
,
8976
(
2013
).
23.
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
143
,
040901
(
2015
).
24.
R. S.
Berry
,
J. Chem. Phys.
45
,
1228
(
1966
).
25.
J.
Simons
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
103
,
3971
(
1981
).
26.
I.
Leon
,
Z.
Yang
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
139
,
194306
(
2013
).
27.
I.
Leon
,
Z.
Yang
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
138
,
184304
(
2013
).
28.
D. L.
Huang
,
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
142
,
124309
(
2015
).
29.
D. L.
Huang
,
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
,
G. Z.
Zhu
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Chem. Sci.
6
,
3129
(
2015
).
30.
D. L.
Huang
,
G. Z.
Zhu
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
142
,
091103
(
2015
).
31.
D. L.
Huang
,
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
,
P. D.
Dau
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Chem. Phys.
482
,
374
(
2017
).
32.
D. L.
Huang
,
G. Z.
Zhu
,
Y.
Liu
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
332
,
86
(
2017
).
33.
X. B.
Wang
and
L. S.
Wang
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
79
,
073108
(
2008
).
34.
I.
León
,
Z.
Yang
,
H. T.
Liu
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
85
,
083196
(
2014
).
35.
G. A.
Garcia
,
L.
Nahon
, and
I.
Powis
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
75
,
4989
(
2004
).
36.
V.
Dribinski
,
A.
Ossadtchi
,
V. A.
Mandelshtam
, and
H.
Reisler
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
73
,
2634
(
2002
).
37.
H. T.
Liu
,
C. G.
Ning
,
D. L.
Huang
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
,
2464
(
2014
).
38.
D. L.
Huang
,
P. D.
Dau
,
H. T.
Liu
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
140
,
224315
(
2014
).
39.
G. Z.
Zhu
and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Chem. Phys.
143
,
221102
(
2015
).
40.
H. T.
Liu
,
D. L.
Huang
,
Y.
Liu
,
L. F.
Cheung
,
P. D.
Dau
,
C. G.
Ning
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
6
,
637
(
2015
).