The photoionization and pulsed-field-ionization zero-kinetic-energy photoelectron spectra of the propargyl radical have been recorded in the vicinity of the origin of the

$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+\; ^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}\; ^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12 photoionizing transition. An internally cold sample of propargyl with a rotational temperature of ∼45 K was produced in a supersonic expansion of 1,3-butadiene in helium. Propargyl was generated by excimer laser (ArF, 193 nm) photolysis of 1,3-butadiene in a quartz capillary mounted at the exit of a pulsed valve. The rotational structure of the origin band of the photoelectron spectrum was partially resolved and an improved value of the adiabatic ionization energy of propargyl (EI/hc = 70174.5(20) cm−1) was determined.

The propargyl radical, HC≡C–

$\dot{\mathrm{C}}\mathrm{H}_2$
ĊH2 (C3H3) is one of the simplest organic radicals with a conjugated π-electron system. It is encountered in combustion plasmas and is an important intermediate in chemical reaction systems that lead to the formation of benzene, other aromatic molecules, and, under appropriate conditions, even soot.1–3 

For these reasons considerable efforts have been invested to produce and detect this radical in the gas phase, to study its electronic structure, to establish reliable procedures, to measure its concentration, and to determine basic thermochemical quantities, such as its adiabatic ionization energy, needed to model chemical processes in flames.1 Four independent measurements of the adiabatic ionization energy of propargyl have been reported since 2006, two with an uncertainty of 160  cm−14,5 and two with much smaller uncertainties of 8  cm−16 and 4  cm−1,7 but differing by almost 200  cm−1 (see Table III). Ref. 7 makes it clear that the latter result, i.e., 70156(4) cm−1, obtained by velocity-map-imaging threshold photoelectron spectroscopy is the more reliable one. The two most recent high-level ab initio calculations of the adiabatic ionization energy8,9 yielded values differing by more than 50 cm−1, but both in favor of the value determined by Gao et al.7 

Table III.

Comparison of the present value of the adiabatic ionization energy of the propargyl radical with previous results. (VMI-TPES: velocity-map-imaging–threshold photoelectron spectroscopy, VUV-PIS: vacuum-ultraviolet photoionization spectroscopy, MT-RPMS: multiplexed time-resolved photoionization mass spectrometry, TPES: threshold photoelectron spectroscopy, PES: photoelectron spectroscopy).

EI/[(hc) cm−1]Ref.Method
70156(4) 7  VUV-VMI-TPES 
69961(8) 6  VUV-PIS 
70170(160) 5  MT-RPMS 
70251(160) 4  TPES 
69928(160) 20  PES 
70162, 70210 8  ab initio 
70219 9  ab initio 
70174.5(20) This work PFI-ZEKE PES 
EI/[(hc) cm−1]Ref.Method
70156(4) 7  VUV-VMI-TPES 
69961(8) 6  VUV-PIS 
70170(160) 5  MT-RPMS 
70251(160) 4  TPES 
69928(160) 20  PES 
70162, 70210 8  ab initio 
70219 9  ab initio 
70174.5(20) This work PFI-ZEKE PES 

We report here on a new determination of the adiabatic ionization energy of propargyl based on high-resolution measurements of the photoionization and the pulsed-field-ionization zero-kinetic-energy photoelectron spectra of propargyl and discuss possible reasons for the discrepancy between our new result and the results reported in Refs. 6 and 7.

The experiments were performed using a broadly tunable narrow-bandwidth vacuum-ultraviolet laser coupled to a pulsed-field-ionization zero-kinetic-energy photoelectron spectrometer described in Refs. 10 and 11.

The propargyl radicals were produced by 193 nm laser photolysis of 1,3-butadiene in a 1:10 mixture in He using an ArF excimer laser, following the method described in Ref. 12. The photolysis was carried out in a quartz capillary located at the exit of a pulsed valve. The supersonic beam formed by adiabatic expansion at the end of the capillary was skimmed prior to entering the photoelectron spectrometer, where it was crossed at right angles by the VUV laser beam on the axis of a set of resistively coupled cylindrical ion/electron extraction plates. The rotational temperature of the radicals in the supersonic beam was found to be about 45 K from the analysis of the rotational structure of the photoelectron spectra.

The VUV laser radiation was generated by resonance-enhanced difference-frequency mixing in a gas cell filled with Kr at a pressure of 65 mbar, as described in Ref. 10. The calibration of the VUV wave number was performed at an accuracy of 0.02  cm−1.

The photoionizationspectrum was recorded by monitoring the ions produced by photoionization as a function of the VUV wave number. The ions were extracted toward a microchannel-plate (MCP) detector by a pulsed electric field of 166 V/cm applied 800 ns after photoionization.

PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectra were measured by using a two-pulse electric-field sequence consisting of a discrimination pulse of 33 mV/cm followed by a field ionization pulse of −830 mV/cm which also extracted the electrons toward the MCP detector. The narrowest lines observed experimentally had a full width at half maximum of 1.5 cm−1, limited by spectral congestion. The field-induced shift of the ionization threshold was compensated as described in Ref. 11.

The gas pulses, the laser pulses, the electric-field pulses and the detection electronics were triggered at a repetition rate of 25 Hz and were synchronized using delay generators.

Neutral propargyl and its cation are both near-prolate asymmetric-top molecules. Their structure is represented schematically in Fig. 1 which also defines the molecule-fixed axis system used in this work and which corresponds to the convention Ir,13 with the a and b axes in the plane of the molecule. The molecular symmetry appropriate to label the rovibronic energy levels of the neutral molecule and the cation at the resolution of our experiments is C2v(M).14 The rotational constants of the vibronic ground state of propargyl have been determined experimentally by Tanaka et al.15 and those of the cation have been calculated by Huang et al.16 Their values are listed in Table I with the corresponding asymmetry parameter κ (=(2BAC)/(AC)).

FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of the propargyl radical and definition of the principal-axis system (convention Ir).

FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of the propargyl radical and definition of the principal-axis system (convention Ir).

Close modal
Table I.

Rotational constants of the vibronic ground state of the neutral propargyl radical and the propargyl cation from Refs. 15 and 16, respectively.

 
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime }$
X̃
2B1
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+$
X̃+
1A1
A0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
9.60848(5) 9.45158 
B0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
0.3176757(2) 0.32312 
C0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
0.3071085(2) 0.31201 
κ −0.998 −0.998 
 
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime }$
X̃
2B1
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+$
X̃+
1A1
A0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
9.60848(5) 9.45158 
B0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
0.3176757(2) 0.32312 
C0 (
$\textrm {cm}^{-1}$
cm 1
0.3071085(2) 0.31201 
κ −0.998 −0.998 

The ground electronic state of propargyl has 2B1 symmetry and the singly occupied molecular orbital is a conjugated π-type orbital of b1 symmetry with a nodal plane in the molecular plane. Removal of the unpaired electron leads to the formation of the electronic ground state of the cation which has 1A1 electronic symmetry.

Because we could not resolve the spin-rotational splittings of the rotational levels of the neutral ground state we used the |NKM⟩ symmetric-top basis to compute the rotational level structure of both neutral and cation, where N is the rotational quantum number and K and M are the quantum numbers associated with the projection of

$\vec{N}$
N onto the a axis and onto the Z axis of the space-fixed coordinate system, respectively. To distinguish the quantum numbers of the neutral and ionized molecule we use the superscripts and +, respectively. At the low rotational temperature of the radicals in the supersonic beam (≈45 K), a rigid-rotor Hamiltonian represented an adequate description of the observed structures.

The rotational levels were classified according to the even (e) or odd (o) nature of Ka and Kc, as summarized in Table II. Ka and Kc represent the asymmetric-top quantum numbers associated with the projection of

$\vec{N}$
N onto the a and c axes of the molecule, respectively.

Table II.

Rovibronic symmetries of the

$N^{\prime \prime }_{K^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{a} K^{\prime \prime }_\mathrm{c}}$
NKaKc and
$N^+_{K^+_\mathrm{a} K^+_\mathrm{c}}$
NKa+Kc++
rotational levels of the propargyl radical and its cation in the C2v(M) point group and nuclear-spin-statistical weights of the neutral rovibronic levels.

KaKcΓrve(C3H3)Spin-statistical weightΓrve(
${\rm C}_3{\rm H}_{3}^+$
C3H3+
)
ee B1 A1 
eo B2 A2 
oe A2 B2 
oo A1 B1 
KaKcΓrve(C3H3)Spin-statistical weightΓrve(
${\rm C}_3{\rm H}_{3}^+$
C3H3+
)
ee B1 A1 
eo B2 A2 
oe A2 B2 
oo A1 B1 

From the general rovibronic photoionization selection rules17 

\begin{equation}\Gamma _\mathrm{rve}(\mathrm{neutral}) \otimes \Gamma _\mathrm{rve} (\mathrm{ion}) \supset \Gamma ^{*} \textrm { for } \ell \textrm { even}\end{equation}
Γ rve ( neutral )Γ rve ( ion )Γ* for even
(1)

and

\begin{equation}\Gamma _\mathrm{rve}(\mathrm{neutral}) \otimes \Gamma _\mathrm{rve} (\mathrm{ion}) \supset \Gamma ^{(\mathrm{s})} \textrm { for } \ell \textrm { odd,}\end{equation}
Γ rve ( neutral )Γ rve ( ion )Γ(s) for odd ,
(2)

where Γ* and Γ(s) are the dipole-moment representation (A2) and the totally symmetric representation (A1), respectively, one obtains the following restrictions on the changes of Ka and Kc resulting from photoionization

\begin{equation}\left. \begin{split} \Delta K_a = K^+_a - K_a^{\prime \prime } = \textrm {odd}\\\Delta K_c = K^+_c - K_c^{\prime \prime } = \textrm {even} \end{split} \right\rbrace \textrm {for \textit {l} even}\end{equation}
ΔKa=Ka+Ka= odd ΔKc=Kc+Kc= even for l even
(3)

and

\begin{equation}\left. \begin{split} \Delta K_a = \textrm {odd}\\\Delta K_c = \textrm {odd} \end{split} \right\rbrace \textrm {for \textit {l} odd.}\end{equation}
ΔKa= odd ΔKc= odd for l odd .
(4)

Assuming that the b1 orbital from which the electron is ejected has a dominant p character, angular momentum conservation rules18 indicate that the dominant transitions should conform to

\begin{equation}\Delta N= N^+ - N^{\prime \prime }=0, \pm 1, \pm 2.\end{equation}
ΔN=N+N=0,±1,±2.
(5)

Moreover, the removal of an electron from an orbital with a nodal plane containing the a axis implies the selection rule ΔKa = ±1.

The transitions originating from levels of even (odd)

$K_a^{\prime \prime }$
Ka values were weighted by a factor of 3 (1) corresponding to the spin-statistical weights of the rotational levels.

The PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of the origin band of the

$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+ \; ^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}\;^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12 photoionizing transition is depicted in Fig. 2(a), where it is compared with a calculated spectrum assuming a rotational temperature of 45 K and using weighting factors of 1, 2, and 0.7 for the branches with ΔN = 0, ±1, and ±2, respectively. These assumptions led to the stick spectrum depicted in Fig. 2(b).

The spectrum displayed as thick red line in Fig. 2(a) was obtained by convolution of this stick spectrum with a Gaussian line-shape function with a full width at half maximum of 1.5 cm−1. The dominant pattern of the PFI-ZEKE spectrum is the series of five regularly spaced narrow lines which correspond to ΔN = 0 branches associated with all possible |ΔKa| = 1 transitions accessible from the

$K_a^{\prime \prime } = 0$
Ka=0–2 levels populated in the ground state. The strongest of these lines is that originating from
$K^{\prime \prime }_a =0$
Ka=0
levels which are the most populated levels at 45 K.

The PFI-ZEKE photoelectron signal was found to be extremely weak and, consequently, several spectra recorded under identical conditions had to be added to obtain a signal-to-noise ratio high enough to unambiguously identify the five expected ΔN = 0 branches corresponding to the five |ΔKa| = 1 transitions. In their study of the vacuum-ultraviolet–velocity-map-imaging threshold photoelectron (VUV-VMI-TPE) spectrum of propargyl, Gao et al. also noted the weakness of the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron signal which prevented them from recording the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of propargyl.7 Because the photoionization signal of propargyl is strong, we suspect that the high-Rydberg states of propargyl that are detected in the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectroscopic experiments are partially depleted by predissociation before the field-ionization pulse is applied.

The resolution of the spectrum and the low signal-to-noise ratio prevented the observation of individual rotational lines. Fortunately, the sharpness of the ΔN = 0 branches enabled the precise determination of the adiabatic ionization threshold EI/hc = 70174.5(20) cm−1 and of the

$A_0^+$
A0+ rotational constant (
$A_0^+ = 9.37(5)$
A0+=9.37(5)
cm−1) which lies close to the value calculated ab initio (see Table I).16 

The ΔN = 1 branch located on the high wave-number side of the central

$K^{\prime \prime }_a =0 \rightarrow K_a^+=1$
Ka=0Ka+=1 line is broader than the ΔN = −1 branch located on its low wave-number side, which suggests that the B0 and C0 constants are larger in the cation than in the neutral molecule, which is also in accord with the values presented in Table I. The values of
$B_0^+$
B0+
and
$C_0^+$
C0+
used to calculate the spectrum displayed in Fig. 2(a) were 0.32 cm−1 and 0.31 cm−1, respectively, but could not be fitted because of the low signal-to-noise ratio of our spectrum.

In Table III, the value of the adiabatic ionization energy of propargyl determined from the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum is compared with the most recent values of this quantity reported in the literature. Our new value lies within the error bars of 160 cm−1 of the previous measurements by threshold photoelectron spectroscopy (TPES)4 and photoionization mass spectrometry (MT-RPMS).5 It is a factor of 2 and 4 more precise than the two most precise earlier experimental values, obtained by velocity-map imaging threshold photoelectron spectroscopy7 and photoionization spectroscopy,6 respectively, and lies significantly above both.

The value of 69961(8) cm−1 reported in Ref. 6 was obtained from the position of a weak step in the photoionization spectrum of propargyl recorded with synchrotron radiation and an effusive source of C3H3 radicals produced by 193 nm ArF excimer laser photolysis of propargyl chloride. The discrepancy between this value and the present one may be related to the elevated temperature of the propargyl sample used in Ref. 6, an argument that was already used in Ref. 7 to explain the difference between the results reported in Refs. 7 and 6. The value of 70156(4) cm−1 reported in Ref. 7 was derived from a VUV-VMI-TPE spectrum after having calibrated the shift of the ionization thresholds under the appropriate experimental conditions from an independent set of measurements of the adiabatic ionization energy of C6H5Cl. The discrepancy with the present result may have its origin in a systematic error in the adiabatic ionization energy of C6H5Cl used as reference or in a systematic error associated with the determination of the origin of the photoelectron band from the structured rotational envelope of this band (see Fig. 3 of Ref. 7).

In their analysis, Gao et al.7  used the same rovibronic photoionization selection rules as we did. The main differences between the two analyses are that the intensities of the rotational branches with ΔN = −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, and 3 were weighted by the factors 2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 3, and 2, respectively, in Ref. 7 and by 0, 0.7, 2, 1, 2, 0.7, and 0 in the present work, and that we weighted the transitions originating from levels with odd and even values of Ka by nuclear-spin–statistical weights of 1 and 3, respectively, while the opposite weights were used in Ref. 7. It is conceivable that the different spin-statistical weights used in the two analyses are responsible for the difference in the ionization energies. With the spin-statistical weights used in the present work, the most intense transitions are those originating from

$K_a^{\prime \prime }=0$
Ka=0 levels, whereas those originating from
$K_a^{\prime \prime }=1$
Ka=1
levels are the most intense if the opposite weights are used.19 The fact that we can resolve the five ΔN = 0 branches in our PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum leaves little doubt concerning the correctness of the present analysis and of our new value of the ionization energy of propargyl.

To further test the validity of the present result, we also recorded the photoionization spectrum of propargyl. The spectrum displayed in Fig. 3 was obtained using a pulsed electric field of 166 V/cm delayed by 800 ns with respect to the photoexcitation laser pulse. The normalized

${\rm C}_3{\rm H}_3^+$
C3H3+ signal rises from the background level of 0.1 to 1 over the spectral range where a measurable PFI-ZEKE photoelectron signal could be detected (see Fig. 2). The photoionization spectrum turned out to be independent of the value of the pulsed electric field used to extract the
${\rm C}_3{\rm H}_3^+$
C3H3+
ions. We attribute this observation to the rapid predissociation of the Rydberg states of propargyl already noted above. The adiabatic ionization energy determined from the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum is marked by the vertical line in Fig. 3 and crosses the photoionization curve at mid-rise, as expected.

FIG. 2.

(a) Comparison of the experimental (black) and calculated (red) PFI-ZEKE PE spectrum of the

$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+ \;^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime } \;^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12 transition of the propargyl radical. (b) Calculated stick spectrum of the
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+ \;^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime } \;^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12
transition of the propargyl radical. The red curve in panel (a) corresponds to the convolution of the stick spectrum in panel (b) with a Gaussian line-shape function (FWHM = 1.5 cm−1).

FIG. 2.

(a) Comparison of the experimental (black) and calculated (red) PFI-ZEKE PE spectrum of the

$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+ \;^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime } \;^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12 transition of the propargyl radical. (b) Calculated stick spectrum of the
$\tilde{\mathrm{X}}^+ \;^1\mathrm{A}_1 \leftarrow \tilde{\mathrm{X}}^{\prime \prime } \;^2\mathrm{B}_1$
X̃+A11X̃B12
transition of the propargyl radical. The red curve in panel (a) corresponds to the convolution of the stick spectrum in panel (b) with a Gaussian line-shape function (FWHM = 1.5 cm−1).

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Photoionization spectrum of the propargyl radical. The vertical line represents the adiabatic ionization threshold determined from the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum (see text).

FIG. 3.

Photoionization spectrum of the propargyl radical. The vertical line represents the adiabatic ionization threshold determined from the PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum (see text).

Close modal

The high-resolution PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum of propargyl has been recorded following single-photon excitation from a cold sample of the radical in a supersonic expansion. The PFI-ZEKE photoelectron spectrum was found to be extremely weak, which suggests that the Rydberg states of propargyl are predissociative in the region of the first ionization threshold.

The observation of sharp lines corresponding to the ΔKa = ±1 and ΔN = 0 rotational branches enabled the determination of an improved value of the adiabatic ionization energy of propargyl (EI/hc = 70174.5(20) cm−1). Possible origins of the discrepancies with previous results were discussed.

We thank Professor P. Chen and Dr. A. Bach (both ETH Zürich) for useful discussions and their encouragements and Professor C. Y. Ng (University of California, Davis) for communicating the revised simulation of the photoelectron spectrum published in Ref. 7 after we had sent him a preprint of the present work. This work was supported financially by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Project No. 200020-135342.

1.
J. A.
Miller
and
C. F.
Melius
,
Combust. Flame
91
,
21
(
1992
).
2.
G. R.
Gladstone
,
M.
Allen
, and
Y. L.
Yung
,
Icarus
119
,
1
(
1996
).
3.
J. M.
Vrtilek
,
C. A.
Gottlieb
,
E. W.
Gottlieb
,
T. C.
Killian
, and
P.
Thaddeus
,
Astrophys. J.
364
,
L53
(
1990
).
4.
P.
Hemberger
,
M.
Lang
,
B.
Noller
,
I.
Fischer
,
C.
Alcaraz
,
B. K.
Cunha de Miranda
,
G. A.
Garcia
, and
H.
Soldi-Lose
,
J. Phys. Chem. A
115
,
2225
(
2011
).
5.
J. D.
Savee
,
S.
Soorkia
,
O.
Welz
,
T. M.
Selby
,
C. A.
Taatjes
, and
D. L.
Osborn
,
J. Chem. Phys.
136
,
134307
(
2012
).
6.
T.
Zhang
,
X. N.
Tang
,
K.-C.
Lau
,
C. Y.
Ng
,
C.
Nicolas
,
D. S.
Peterka
,
M.
Ahmed
,
M. L.
Morton
,
B.
Ruscic
,
R.
Yang
,
L. X.
Wei
,
C. Q.
Huang
,
B.
Yang
,
J.
Wang
,
L. S.
Sheng
,
Y. W.
Zhang
, and
F.
Qi
,
J. Chem. Phys.
124
,
074302
(
2006
).
7.
H.
Gao
,
Y.
Xu
,
L.
Yang
,
C.-S.
Lam
,
H.
Wang
,
J.
Zhou
, and
C. Y.
Ng
,
J. Chem. Phys.
135
,
224304
(
2011
).
8.
P.
Botschwina
and
R.
Oswald
,
Chem. Phys.
378
,
4
(
2010
).
9.
K.-C.
Lau
and
C. Y.
Ng
,
J. Chem. Phys.
135
,
246101
(
2011
)
10.
U.
Hollenstein
,
H.
Palm
, and
F.
Merkt
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
71
,
4023
(
2000
).
11.
U.
Hollenstein
,
R.
Seiler
,
H.
Schmutz
,
M.
Andrist
, and
F.
Merkt
,
J. Chem. Phys.
115
,
5461
(
2001
).
12.
S.
Willitsch
,
J. M.
Dyke
, and
F.
Merkt
,
Helv. Chim. Acta
86
,
1152
(
2003
).
13.
R. N.
Zare
,
Angular Momentum
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
1988
).
14.
P. R.
Bunker
and
P.
Jensen
,
Molecular Symmetry and Spectroscopy
, 2nd ed. (
NRC Research Press
,
Otawa, Ontario, Canada
,
1998
).
15.
K.
Tanaka
,
Y.
Sumiyoshi
,
Y.
Ohshima
,
Y.
Endo
, and
K.
Kawaguchi
,
J. Chem. Phys.
107
,
2728
(
1997
).
16.
X.
Huang
,
P. R.
Taylor
, and
T. J.
Lee
,
J. Phys. Chem. A
115
,
5005
(
2011
).
17.
R.
Signorell
and
F.
Merkt
,
Mol. Phys.
92
,
793
(
1997
).
18.
J.
Xie
and
R. N.
Zare
,
J. Chem. Phys.
97
,
2891
(
1992
).
19.
C.-Y.
Ng
, private communication (
2013
), A simulation of the spectrum published in Ref. 7 carried out with the reversed spin-statistical factors leads to an ionization energy in good agreement with our new result.
20.
D. W.
Minsek
and
P.
Chen
,
J. Phys. Chem.
94
,
8399
(
1990
).