In an effort to develop a source of H3+ that is almost entirely in a single quantum state (J=K=1), we have successfully generated a plasma that is enriched to 83% in para-H3+ at a rotational temperature of 80 K. This enrichment is a result of the nuclear spin selection rules at work in hydrogenic plasmas, which dictate that only para-H3+ will form from para-H2, and that para-H3+ can be converted to ortho-H3+ by subsequent reaction with H2. This is the first experimental study in which the H2 and H3+ nuclear spin selection rules have been observed at cold temperatures. The ions were produced from a pulsed solenoid valve source, cooled by supersonic expansion, and interrogated via continuous-wave cavity ringdown spectroscopy.

In 1911, Thomson1 made the first experimental observation of the simplest polyatomic molecular ion, H3+. Within 20 years, the existence of two species of molecular hydrogen, defined by the intrinsic spins of their protons, was predicted by Heisenberg and Hund.2,3 Shortly thereafter, Bonhoeffer and Harteck4 were able to experimentally prepare parahydrogen, in which the nuclear spins are antisymmetrically combined (I=0).

Hogness and Lunn5 discovered that H3+ is the dominant species in hydrogenic plasmas, formed by

(1)

(exothermicity of 1.7eV and Langevin rate constant, kL109cm3s1).6 The relationship between the ortho and para spin modifications of molecular hydrogen and the ortho- and para-H3+ products, however, was not studied for another 50 years. New insight was gained when spin selection rules were derived by Quack using group theoretical methods,7 and later (using an angular momentum formalism) by Oka,8 for reaction (1) and for the reaction

(2)

Reaction (2) occurs in one out of three ways: identity (2i), proton hop (2h), or hydrogen exchange (2e),

(2i)
(2h)
(2e)

Here, the hydrogens originally in the H2 reactant are designated as H̃ in order to illustrate the differences between the three reactions.

As discussed by Cordonnier et al.,9 each of these pathways must obey strict selection rules imposed by the conservation of nuclear spin angular momentum. The effects of these selection rules have been experimentally observed by Uy et al.10 and Cordonnier et al.9 in hot (300–500 K) plasmas. In addition, Gerlich11 studied the closely related D3+ and H2 system at much colder temperatures.

The selection rules for reaction (1) dictate that only para-H3+ will form from pure para-H2. However, in a hydrogenic plasma (where H2 is several orders of magnitude more abundant than H3+), reaction (2) will occur immediately following the formation of H3+ and will affect its ortho:para ratio. This process has been considered in detail by Cordonnier et al.;9 their Table IV presents the nuclear spin branching ratios for this reaction. The identity reaction (2i) clearly has no effect on the H3+ nuclear spin modification. If para-H3+ combines with para-H2 in the proton hop reaction (2h), the product H3+ also emerges without spin conversion. The exchange reaction (2e) is the only mechanism that converts para-H3+ to ortho-H3+ in pure para-H2. If ortho-H2 is present, then para-H3+ can also be converted to ortho-H3+ via reaction (2h).

In a high-temperature discharge of normal-H2(ortho:para=3:1), one would expect an H3+ ortho:para ratio of 1:1, as discussed by Cordonnier et al.9 These authors also calculated the expected ortho:para ratio of H3+ for a para-enriched H2 discharge and found an enhancement in para-H3+, in agreement with their experiments. These calculations took a statistical approach, assuming that product states will be formed from combinations of reactant states according only to the constraints imposed by nuclear spin conservation. While this assumption is reasonable at high temperatures, it will break down at lower temperatures where (for example) there may be insufficient thermal energy to convert J=0 para-H2 to J=1 ortho-H2. New approaches to solving this problem have recently been proposed12,13 and will need to be taken into account in plasma modeling.

The present study was motivated by a dissociative recombination experiment requiring a cold, highly enriched para-H3+ plasma.14 The work described in this Communication measured the para-H3+ enrichment obtained when using an enriched para-H2 feed gas along with dilutions intended to minimize the frequency of the hop (2h) and exchange (2e) reactions in the plasma. The experimental setup consisted of a closed-cycle helium cryostat capable of producing highly enriched para-H2(99.99%) and a system for testing the level of enrichment.15 The plasma was generated by a pulsed solenoid source, and the para-H3+ enrichment was measured using a continuous-wave cavity ringdown spectrometer built around a mid-IR difference frequency generation laser. Software was developed in order to synchronize the ringdown events with the pulsed source. The spectrometer was capable of probing transitions from the lowest H3+ states: R(1,1)u, R(1,0), and R(2,2) (see Ref. 16 for a description of the notation). A detailed discussion of the spectrometer, pulsed source hardware, and synchronization software can be found in an online supplement17 and in Ref. 18.

The experimental measurements had the following three objectives: (1) to determine the temperature of the expansion, (2) to measure the para-H3+ enrichment that resulted from using highly enriched para-H2, and (3) to observe the effect of dilution in an inert carrier gas on the fraction of para-H3+ in the expansion.

The temperature of the expansion was measured by comparing the relative abundances of the para and ortho spin modifications of H3+ formed from a normal-H2 precursor gas (where ortho:para=3:1). This so-called excitation temperature (Tex) has often been used as a proxy for the rotational temperature (Trot).19–21 The excitation temperature can be calculated using the equation

(3)

where the ratio of nuclear spin degeneracy g(1,0)/g(1,1)=4/2=2 and ΔE1,01,1=22.84cm1.16 In place of N(1,0) and N(1,1), we used the normalized peak absorbances of the rovibrational transitions R(1,0) and R(1,1)u for ortho- and para-H3+, respectively, divided by the squares of their transition dipole moments, μR(1,0)2=0.0259D2 and μR(1,1)u2=0.0158D2. These transitions are separated by only 0.32cm1, which made it easy to measure the peaks in quick succession. The results are presented in Table I.

Table I.

Excitation and rotational temperatures measured using normal- and para-H2. The “a” and “b” designations identify temperatures measured in close succession. The absorbance values are given in 106cm1.

 Feed gasAbsorbanceTemperature(K)
R(1,1)uR(1,0)R(2,2)TexTrot
normal-H2 0.35 0.84  105  
para-H2 0.41  0.07  62 
3a normal-H2 1.32 2.83  77  
3b normal-H2 1.32  0.43  85 
normal-H2 0.25 0.56  86  
5a normal-H2 0.98 2.1  77  
5b normal-H2 0.98  0.28  79 
 Feed gasAbsorbanceTemperature(K)
R(1,1)uR(1,0)R(2,2)TexTrot
normal-H2 0.35 0.84  105  
para-H2 0.41  0.07  62 
3a normal-H2 1.32 2.83  77  
3b normal-H2 1.32  0.43  85 
normal-H2 0.25 0.56  86  
5a normal-H2 0.98 2.1  77  
5b normal-H2 0.98  0.28  79 

In some instances, the rotational temperature itself was measured using transitions from the two lowest para-H3+ rotational states: R(1,1)u and R(2,2). Trot was calculated using an equation similar to Eq. (3), with ΔE(2,2)(1,1)=105.2cm1 (Ref. 16) and applicable degeneracy terms, along with Einstein A coefficients.22 In all cases there was good agreement between Trot and Tex.

The temperature of the expansion was sensitive to the condition of the poppet as well as how tightly the poppet was seated in the source pinhole. The probe region was approximately 3.8 cm downstream of the electrode and about 4 mm in front of a skimmer. Measurements of the temperature were taken throughout the experiment. If the temperature was too hot (>100K), the poppet would be “tuned” or replaced before proceeding. As can be seen from Table I, the typical temperature in the expansion was between 60 and 100 K, and the variations were likely due to the changing conditions of the poppet.

It is unclear why we did not observe temperatures colder than 60–100 K in our expansion. This same source produced ions at Tex=2060K a few years earlier.19 One possible cause was the gas-pulse/discharge-pulse sequencing. In the present experiment the gas pulse was embedded in a longer voltage pulse, which could have resulted in additional heating.

The intensities of the R(1,0) ortho-H3+ and the R(1,1)u para-H3+ peaks were measured for normal and highly enriched (99.99%) para-H2 precursor gases. The purpose of these measurements was to quantitatively characterize the dependence of the para-H3+ fraction in the plasma on the para enrichment of the precursor gas. The simple equation,

(4)

was used to derive the para-H3+ percentage, where the ΣN values were calculated using the measured intensities of the para- and ortho-H3+ ground state transitions. To go from the ground state intensities to the various ΣN, it was assumed that the rotational states within the para and ortho manifolds were thermally populated. Boltzmann distributions were applied assuming Trot=80±20K (based on the temperature measurements described above). At 80 K, almost 25% of para-H3+ ions are in rotationally excited states, whereas only 4% of ortho-H3+ are excited out of the ground state. The derived para-H3+ percentages are shown in Table II.

Table II.

The para-H3+ fraction observed with two different para-H2 enrichments, including argon dilution results for the higher enrichment. A Boltzmann distribution for Trot=80K has been applied.

Starting para-H2 (%)Percent H2apara-H3+b(%)
25 100 49.1±2.4 
99.99 100 78.5±2.2 
  15 78.0±1.8 
  70.9±2.2 
  0.8 83.3±1.8 
Starting para-H2 (%)Percent H2apara-H3+b(%)
25 100 49.1±2.4 
99.99 100 78.5±2.2 
  15 78.0±1.8 
  70.9±2.2 
  0.8 83.3±1.8 
a

The dilution was carried out using pressure (PH2/(PH2+PAr)).

b

The reported errors are calculated from the standard deviation (1σ) of multiple measurements at a particular point and a temperature uncertainty of ±20 K.

As expected, a discharge of normal-H2 (25% para-H2) gave results consistent with “normal-H3+” (50% para). However, using a highly enriched sample of para-H2 in the discharge resulted in a plasma with 78.5±2.2% para-H3+. Figure 1 depicts the changes in peak heights of R(1,0) and R(1,1)u as the enrichment of the para-H2 precursor gas was increased from that of normal-H2 to 99.99%.

FIG. 1.

Comparison of the spectra for H3+ for various precursor gases. Increasing the para-H2 enrichment of the feed gas resulted in a higher enrichment of para-H3+. The plots are shifted vertically for clarity.

FIG. 1.

Comparison of the spectra for H3+ for various precursor gases. Increasing the para-H2 enrichment of the feed gas resulted in a higher enrichment of para-H3+. The plots are shifted vertically for clarity.

Close modal

Measurements were also taken using dilutions of para-H2 in a nonhydrogenic gas to reduce the number of reactions between the para-H3+ ions and H2. The rate of reaction (2) for a given H3+ ion goes as k[H2], where k is the rate constant and [H2] is the number density of H2. If the overall number of molecules in the expansion remains the same, but [H2] is reduced by dilution in an inert gas, then the number of interactions between H3+ and H2 will decrease. Thus, dilution will reduce the deleterious effect of the exchange reaction (2e) on the para-H3+ enrichment of the plasma. As discussed earlier, the exchange is the primary mechanism by which para-H3+ is converted to ortho-H3+ in para-enriched plasmas.

The dilutions were carried out by premixing the desired pressures of H2 and argon or neon in order to provide 2 atm of backing pressure for the source. In all cases, the H3+ signal was substantially attenuated (by one or two orders of magnitude) by the dilution, as can be seen in Fig. 1. Not surprisingly, the results of the dilution experiments, graphically depicted in Fig. 2, show that the para-H3+ fraction has a dependence on the extent of the dilution. When the hydrogen was diluted between 5% and 15% in argon, an unexpected decrease in the fraction of [para-H3+]/[totalH3+] in the plasma was observed. The reason for this decrease is not understood at present but could have an impact on ArH3+ action spectroscopy schemes.23–25 Despite this, there was an increase in the para-H3+ fraction when H2 was diluted to 1% in argon.

FIG. 2.

The para-H3+ fraction vs argon dilution for 99.99% para-H2. Uncertainties are 1σ.

FIG. 2.

The para-H3+ fraction vs argon dilution for 99.99% para-H2. Uncertainties are 1σ.

Close modal

The para-H3+ fraction was also measured in a neon carrier gas. The 10% dilutions in neon resulted in a signal similar to that of the 15% dilution in argon; however, when an 1% dilution was analyzed, the H3+ signal was almost completely quenched.

In conclusion, we have observed for the first time the effects of the nuclear spin selection rules on the reaction between H3+ and H2 at low temperature and exploited them to produce a source of rotationally cold and highly para-enriched H3+. By diluting 99.99% para-H2 in argon to ∼1% by pressure, we have achieved a further enrichment to 83.3% para-H3+. We have also observed unexpected behavior in the derived para-H3+ fraction at intermediate argon dilutions, which warrants further investigation, perhaps by simultaneous laser and mass spectroscopic measurements. Such a source can be used for reaction dynamics experiments between H2 and H3+, along with experiments that measure properties of para-H3+ enriched plasmas at astrophysically relevant temperatures.

We are presently in the process of extending these measurements to a wider range of both temperature and para-H3+ enrichment using a more reliable source based on a piezo valve26 as well as a cryogenically cooled hollow cathode discharge. These measurements should provide more insight into the dynamics of reaction (2) and, in particular, into the branching ratio of reactions (2i), (2h), and (2e), and will be presented in a future publication.

We would like to thank Takeshi Oka for valuable discussions on the dynamics of the hop and exchange reactions, Dana Dlott for the loan of equipment, and Jim Wentz for his assistance in building many of the electronic devices used in this experiment. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation AMO Physics under Grant No. PHY-08-55633.

1.
J. J.
Thomson
,
Philos. Mag.
21
,
225
(
1911
).
2.
W.
Heisenberg
,
Z. Phys.
41
,
239
(
1927
).
4.
K. F.
Bonhoeffer
and
P.
Harteck
,
Z. Phys. Chem.
B4
,
113
(
1929
).
5.
T. R.
Hogness
and
E. G.
Lunn
,
Phys. Rev.
26
,
44
(
1925
).
8.
T.
Oka
,
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
228
,
635
(
2004
).
9.
M.
Cordonnier
,
D.
Uy
,
R. M.
Dickson
,
K. E.
Kerr
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
T.
Oka
,
J. Chem. Phys.
113
,
3181
(
2000
).
10.
D.
Uy
,
M.
Cordonnier
, and
T.
Oka
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
78
,
3844
(
1997
).
11.
D.
Gerlich
,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
89
,
2199
(
1993
).
12.
K.
Park
and
J. C.
Light
,
J. Chem. Phys.
126
,
044305
(
2007
).
13.
E.
Hugo
,
O.
Asvany
, and
S.
Schlemmer
,
J. Chem. Phys.
130
,
164302
(
2009
).
14.
B. A.
Tom
,
V.
Zhaunerchyk
,
M. B.
Wiczer
,
A. A.
Mills
,
K. N.
Crabtree
,
M.
Kaminska
,
W. D.
Geppert
,
M.
Hamberg
,
M.
af Ugglas
,
E.
Vigren
,
W. J.
van der Zande
,
M.
Larsson
,
R. D.
Thomas
, and
B. J.
McCall
,
J. Chem. Phys.
130
,
031101
(
2009
).
15.
B. A.
Tom
,
Y.
Miyamoto
,
S.
Bhasker
,
T.
Momose
, and
B. J.
McCall
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
80
,
016108
(
2009
).
16.
C. M.
Lindsay
and
B. J.
McCall
,
J. Mol. Spectrosc.
210
,
60
(
2001
).
17.
See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3322827 for a detailed description of the experimental method.
18.
B. A.
Tom
, “
Nuclear spin dependence in reactions of H3+ in the laboratory and the interstellar medium
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
,
2009
.
19.
B. J.
McCall
,
A. J.
Huneycutt
,
R. J.
Saykally
,
N.
Djuric
,
G. H.
Dunn
,
J.
Semaniak
,
O.
Novotny
,
A.
Al-Khalili
,
A.
Ehlerding
,
F.
Hellberg
,
S.
Kalhori
,
A.
Neau
,
R. D.
Thomas
,
A.
Paal
,
F.
Österdahl
, and
M.
Larsson
,
Phys. Rev. A
70
,
052716
(
2004
).
20.
T.
Oka
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
103
,
12235
(
2006
).
21.
N.
Indriolo
,
T. R.
Geballe
,
T.
Oka
, and
B. J.
McCall
,
Astrophys. J.
671
,
1736
(
2007
).
22.
L.
Neale
,
S.
Miller
, and
J.
Tennyson
,
Astrophys. J.
464
,
516
(
1996
).
23.
H.
Kreckel
,
A.
Petrignani
,
M.
Berg
,
D.
Bing
,
S.
Reinhardt
,
S.
Altevogt
,
H.
Buhr
,
M.
Froese
,
J.
Hoffmann
,
B.
Jordon-Thaden
,
C.
Krantz
,
M.
Lestinksy
,
M.
Mendes
,
O.
Novotný
,
S.
Novotny
,
H. B.
Pedersen
,
D. A.
Orlov
,
J.
Mikosch
,
R.
Wester
,
R.
Plašil
,
J.
Glosík
,
D.
Schwalm
,
D.
Zajfman
, and
A.
Wolf
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
88
,
012064
(
2007
).
24.
A.
Petrignani
,
H.
Kreckel
,
M. H.
Berg
,
S.
Altevogt
,
D.
Bing
,
H.
Buhr
,
M.
Froese
,
M.
Grieser
,
J.
Hoffmann
,
B.
Jordon-Thaden
,
C.
Krantz
,
M. B.
Mendes
,
O.
Novotný
,
S.
Novotny
,
D. A.
Orlov
,
S.
Reinhardt
, and
A.
Wolf
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
192
,
012022
(
2009
).
25.
H.
Kreckel
,
D.
Bing
,
S.
Reinhardt
,
A.
Petrignani
,
M.
Berg
, and
A.
Wolf
,
J. Chem. Phys.
129
,
164312
(
2008
).
26.
D.
Proch
and
T.
Trickl
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
60
,
713
(
1989
).

Supplementary Material