Erratum: “Homogeneous nucleation of n-pentanol in a laminar flow diffusion chamber” [J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10031 (2001)]

Lihavainen, Heikki; Viisanen, Yrjö; Kulmala, Markku

doi:10.1063/1.2890970

A mistake has been found while cross-checking the computer code of a mathematical model¹ for the laminar flow diffusion chamber (LFDC) with a fluid dynamics software FLUENT with fine particle model. The mathematical model describes a coupled mass and heat transfer inside the LFDC, and its solution provides (at particular boundary conditions in a steady state) profiles of temperature and vapor concentration in axial and radial directions.

The mistake resided in the implementation of the heat capacity mixing rule for ideal vapor-gas mixture. The pure components’ heat capacities in the code are defined in units of $J \times {kg}^{- 1} \times K^{- 1}$ because mass fractions together with a mass flow rate are used throughout the code when mass transfer is calculated. In our erroneous implementation, the heat capacity of a mixture was calculated as a mole fraction weighted average instead of a mass fraction weighted average. This error has been fixed and the experimental results published in Lihavainen et al.² Table 2 have been recalculated and they are presented in Table I.

The difference with the original results becomes larger as a function of nucleation temperature (Fig. 1). This is because the amount of $n$ -pentanol in the carrier gas and vapor mixture increases as the nucleation temperature increases. At $260 K$ the difference is only minor; in nucleation temperature 0.01%, in saturation ratio 0.8%, and in experimental nucleation rate about 1%. However, at $290 K$ the difference is clear; in nucleation temperature 0.1%, in saturation ratio 5.2%, and in experimental nucleation rate about 9%. Compared to the original results, the major difference is in the temperature dependency compared to classical nucleation theory (see Fig. 2). The original data had no or slightly increasing temperature dependency, which was in contrast to other measurements (e.g., Lihavainen et al.²). The recalculated results have decreasing temperature dependency, which is the same as what has been observed with other experimental setups.

FIG. 1.

View large Download slide

The experimental nucleation rates, $J_{\exp}$ as a function of saturation ratio $S$ of $n$ -pentanol. Filled symbols: LFDC data recalculated with corrected mixing rule for heat capacity. Open symbols: Original data.

FIG. 2.

View large Download slide

Ratios between experimental nucleation rate, $J_{\exp}$ ⁠, and theoretical nucleation rate, $J_{theor}$ ⁠, as a function of nucleation temperature. Filled symbols: LFDC data recalculated with corrected mixing rule for heat capacity. Open symbols: Original data.

The homogeneous nucleation rates of $n$ -pentanol measured in the LFDC are presented. $T_{S 2}$ (K) is the temperature of the preheater, $T_{C}$ (K) is the temperature of the condenser, $P$ (Pa) is the total pressure, $Q ({cm}^{3} ∕ s)$ is the average flow rate, $T_{lab}$ (K) is the temperature of the laboratory, $T_{S 1}$ (K) is the temperature of the saturator, $N ({cm}^{- 3})$ is the particle concentration, $T_{nuc}$ (K) is the calculated temperature at the nucleation maximum, $S_{nuc}$ is the saturation ratio at the nucleation maximum, $J_{\exp} ({cm}^{- 3} s^{- 1})$ is the experimental nucleation rate. Temperatures of the preheater, condenser, and laboratory, as well as pressure and flow rate, are averages over one measurement session of an isotherm.
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 26-08-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 16-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.53 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.21 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 700 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.00 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.79 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.36 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.01 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
285.53	22.22	259.66	9.79	1.54E 5	289.75	1.04	264.88	8.14	8.85E 3
285.22	5.34	259.61	9.55	3.87E 4	290.36	11.94	264.88	8.54	9.31E 4
284.99	2.09	259.61	9.37	1.57E 4	290.98	149.02	264.88	8.98	1.07E 6
284.75	0.67	259.61	9.18	5.21E 3	291.59	1531.71	264.90	9.42	1.01E 7
284.31	0.14	259.61	8.85	1.16E 3

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-08-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 19-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.45 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.21 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.74 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.36 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
286.12	121.24	259.70	10.28	7.70E 5	289.46	0.24	264.84	7.96	2.10E 3
286.48	629.59	259.70	10.59	3.81E 6	290.05	3.08	264.85	8.34	2.48E 4
286.75	1841.99	259.70	10.83	1.07E 7	290.65	39.30	264.87	8.75	2.91E 5
					291.25	455.27	264.89	9.17	3.10E 6
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 27-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.50 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.42 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 200 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.50 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.80 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.34 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.80 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
284.49	0.18	259.84	8.80	1.48E 3	289.56	0.44	264.82	8.04	3.87E 3
284.99	1.05	259.86	9.17	8.07E 3	289.88	2.66	264.83	8.25	2.20E 4
285.48	8.81	259.87	9.55	6.31E 4	290.49	22.45	264.85	8.65	1.71E 5
285.99	77.44	259.89	9.96	5.17E 5	291.00	179.45	264.86	9.01	1.27E 6
286.48	532.67	259.90	10.37	3.32E 6	291.00	191.54	264.86	9.01	1.36E 6
					291.47	1108.96	264.88	9.35	7.36E 6

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 08-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 29-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.31 K$ ⁠, $P = 102 200 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.02 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.49 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.06 K$ ⁠, $P = 96 600 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 292.79 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.66	1.03	269.82	7.37	9.15E 3	299.47	1.14	274.67	6.74	1.14E 4
295.26	14.75	269.82	7.72	1.20E 5	300.08	16.96	274.69	7.05	1.56E 5
295.86	172.35	269.89	8.06	1.29E 6	300.65	156.23	274.71	7.34	1.33E 6
296.43	1521.63	269.90	8.42	1.05E 7	301.28	1504.43	274.73	7.68	1.17E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 09-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 02-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.33 K$ ⁠, $P = 100 900 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.80 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.5 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.08 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 100 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.80 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.55 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.38	0.33	269.85	7.19	3.11E 3	299.18	0.30	274.67	6.60	3.02E 3
294.97	4.07	269.88	7.52	3.51E 4	299.84	3.99	274.70	6.92	3.72E 4
					300.37	40.75	274.72	7.19	3.52E 5
					300.93	373.78	274.73	7.48	2.99E 6

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 12-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 15-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.35 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.15 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.53 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.10 K$ ⁠, $P = 101 700 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.68 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.97	5.28	269.89	7.51	4.68E 4	299.45	0.51	274.70	6.72	4.86E 3
295.55	58.65	269.92	7.84	4.79E 5	299.91	3.39	274.71	6.95	3.04E 4
296.15	547.90	269.94	8.21	4.12E 6	300.45	32.11	274.73	7.22	2.68E 5
					300.96	241.17	274.75	7.49	1.87E 6
					301.46	1506.12	274.77	7.76	1.10E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 03-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.33 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 400 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.65 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.20 K$					$T_{S 2} = 311.65 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 278.26 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 220 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.86 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.65 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.54	0.60	269.86	7.28	5.57E 3	304.41	0.43	279.90	6.07	4.47E 3
294.98	3.86	269.88	7.53	3.38E 4	305.06	6.46	279.95	6.31	6.32E 4
295.46	33.77	269.90	7.80	2.76E 5	305.69	83.55	279.98	6.59	7.49E 5
296.03	312.27	269.92	8.15	2.36E 6	306.23	682.21	280.00	6.83	5.69E 6
296.47	1586.16	269.93	8.42	1.13E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 04-11-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 05-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 311.39 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 278.26 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 550 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.73 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 316.38 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 283.17 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 230 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.82 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 295.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
304.13	0.09	279.93	5.93	1.04E 3	309.23	0.20	284.96	5.48	2.34E 3
304.70	1.36	279.94	6.17	1.42E 4	309.55	0.69	284.94	5.61	8.04E 3
305.35	18.53	279.98	6.45	1.77E 5	309.81	2.18	284.94	5.70	2.43E 4
305.93	188.89	279.99	6.71	1.67E 6	310.21	11.56	284.96	5.85	1.22E 5
					310.41	29.63	284.98	5.93	3.05E 5
					310.77	138.19	284.99	6.07	1.36E 6
					311.05	379.39	285.00	6.18	3.59E 6
					311.33	997.57	285.02	6.29	9.09E 6
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 06-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 320.52 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 288.29 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.56 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
314.40	0.16	290.13	5.06	2.06E 3
314.68	0.50	290.16	5.14	6.26E 3
315.01	1.87	290.17	5.25	2.24E 4
315.32	7.15	290.19	5.35	8.21E 4
315.98	74.01	290.23	5.57	7.79E 5
315.98	186.26	290.25	5.66	1.89E 6

The homogeneous nucleation rates of $n$ -pentanol measured in the LFDC are presented. $T_{S 2}$ (K) is the temperature of the preheater, $T_{C}$ (K) is the temperature of the condenser, $P$ (Pa) is the total pressure, $Q ({cm}^{3} ∕ s)$ is the average flow rate, $T_{lab}$ (K) is the temperature of the laboratory, $T_{S 1}$ (K) is the temperature of the saturator, $N ({cm}^{- 3})$ is the particle concentration, $T_{nuc}$ (K) is the calculated temperature at the nucleation maximum, $S_{nuc}$ is the saturation ratio at the nucleation maximum, $J_{\exp} ({cm}^{- 3} s^{- 1})$ is the experimental nucleation rate. Temperatures of the preheater, condenser, and laboratory, as well as pressure and flow rate, are averages over one measurement session of an isotherm.
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 26-08-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 16-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.53 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.21 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 700 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.00 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.79 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.36 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.01 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
285.53	22.22	259.66	9.79	1.54E 5	289.75	1.04	264.88	8.14	8.85E 3
285.22	5.34	259.61	9.55	3.87E 4	290.36	11.94	264.88	8.54	9.31E 4
284.99	2.09	259.61	9.37	1.57E 4	290.98	149.02	264.88	8.98	1.07E 6
284.75	0.67	259.61	9.18	5.21E 3	291.59	1531.71	264.90	9.42	1.01E 7
284.31	0.14	259.61	8.85	1.16E 3

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-08-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 19-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.45 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.21 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.74 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.36 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 800 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
286.12	121.24	259.70	10.28	7.70E 5	289.46	0.24	264.84	7.96	2.10E 3
286.48	629.59	259.70	10.59	3.81E 6	290.05	3.08	264.85	8.34	2.48E 4
286.75	1841.99	259.70	10.83	1.07E 7	290.65	39.30	264.87	8.75	2.91E 5
					291.25	455.27	264.89	9.17	3.10E 6
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 27-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 291.50 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 258.42 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 200 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.50 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.80 K$					$T_{S 2} = 296.60 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 263.34 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.80 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
284.49	0.18	259.84	8.80	1.48E 3	289.56	0.44	264.82	8.04	3.87E 3
284.99	1.05	259.86	9.17	8.07E 3	289.88	2.66	264.83	8.25	2.20E 4
285.48	8.81	259.87	9.55	6.31E 4	290.49	22.45	264.85	8.65	1.71E 5
285.99	77.44	259.89	9.96	5.17E 5	291.00	179.45	264.86	9.01	1.27E 6
286.48	532.67	259.90	10.37	3.32E 6	291.00	191.54	264.86	9.01	1.36E 6
					291.47	1108.96	264.88	9.35	7.36E 6

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 08-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 29-10-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.31 K$ ⁠, $P = 102 200 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.02 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.49 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.06 K$ ⁠, $P = 96 600 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.67 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 292.79 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.66	1.03	269.82	7.37	9.15E 3	299.47	1.14	274.67	6.74	1.14E 4
295.26	14.75	269.82	7.72	1.20E 5	300.08	16.96	274.69	7.05	1.56E 5
295.86	172.35	269.89	8.06	1.29E 6	300.65	156.23	274.71	7.34	1.33E 6
296.43	1521.63	269.90	8.42	1.05E 7	301.28	1504.43	274.73	7.68	1.17E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 09-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 02-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.33 K$ ⁠, $P = 100 900 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.80 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.5 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.08 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 100 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.80 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.55 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.38	0.33	269.85	7.19	3.11E 3	299.18	0.30	274.67	6.60	3.02E 3
294.97	4.07	269.88	7.52	3.51E 4	299.84	3.99	274.70	6.92	3.72E 4
					300.37	40.75	274.72	7.19	3.52E 5
					300.93	373.78	274.73	7.48	2.99E 6

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 12-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 15-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.35 K$ ⁠, $P = 98 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 17.15 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 306.53 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 273.10 K$ ⁠, $P = 101 700 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.68 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.97	5.28	269.89	7.51	4.68E 4	299.45	0.51	274.70	6.72	4.86E 3
295.55	58.65	269.92	7.84	4.79E 5	299.91	3.39	274.71	6.95	3.04E 4
296.15	547.90	269.94	8.21	4.12E 6	300.45	32.11	274.73	7.22	2.68E 5
					300.96	241.17	274.75	7.49	1.87E 6
					301.46	1506.12	274.77	7.76	1.10E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 28-10-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 03-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 301.59 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 268.33 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 400 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.65 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.20 K$					$T_{S 2} = 311.65 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 278.26 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 220 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.86 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 293.65 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
294.54	0.60	269.86	7.28	5.57E 3	304.41	0.43	279.90	6.07	4.47E 3
294.98	3.86	269.88	7.53	3.38E 4	305.06	6.46	279.95	6.31	6.32E 4
295.46	33.77	269.90	7.80	2.76E 5	305.69	83.55	279.98	6.59	7.49E 5
296.03	312.27	269.92	8.15	2.36E 6	306.23	682.21	280.00	6.83	5.69E 6
296.47	1586.16	269.93	8.42	1.13E 7

$n$ -pentanol–helium, 04-11-1998					$n$ -pentanol–helium, 05-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 311.39 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 278.26 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 550 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.73 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.15 K$					$T_{S 2} = 316.38 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 283.17 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 230 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.82 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 295.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$	$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
304.13	0.09	279.93	5.93	1.04E 3	309.23	0.20	284.96	5.48	2.34E 3
304.70	1.36	279.94	6.17	1.42E 4	309.55	0.69	284.94	5.61	8.04E 3
305.35	18.53	279.98	6.45	1.77E 5	309.81	2.18	284.94	5.70	2.43E 4
305.93	188.89	279.99	6.71	1.67E 6	310.21	11.56	284.96	5.85	1.22E 5
					310.41	29.63	284.98	5.93	3.05E 5
					310.77	138.19	284.99	6.07	1.36E 6
					311.05	379.39	285.00	6.18	3.59E 6
					311.33	997.57	285.02	6.29	9.09E 6
$n$ -pentanol–helium, 06-11-1998
$T_{S 2} = 320.52 K$ ⁠, $T_{C} = 288.29 K$ ⁠, $P = 99 500 Pa$ ⁠, $Q = 16.56 {cm}^{3} ∕ s$ ⁠, $T_{lab} = 294.15 K$
$T_{S 1}$	$N$	$T_{nuc}$	$S_{nuc}$	$J_{\exp}$
314.40	0.16	290.13	5.06	2.06E 3
314.68	0.50	290.16	5.14	6.26E 3
315.01	1.87	290.17	5.25	2.24E 4
315.32	7.15	290.19	5.35	8.21E 4
315.98	74.01	290.23	5.57	7.79E 5
315.98	186.26	290.25	5.66	1.89E 6

REFERENCES

1.

H.

Lihavainen

and

Y.

Viisanen

,

J. Phys. Chem. B

https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011189j

,

105

,

11619

(

2001

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

2.

H.

Lihavainen

,

Y.

Viisanen

, and

M.

Kulmala

,

J. Chem. Phys.

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1368131

114

,

10031

(

2001

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

View Original Article

2008

American Institute of Physics

Erratum: “Homogeneous nucleation of $n$ -pentanol in a laminar flow diffusion chamber” [J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10031 (2001)]

REFERENCES

Citing articles via

Submit your article

Sign up for alerts

Resources

Explore

pubs.aip.org

Connect with AIP Publishing

Erratum: “Homogeneous nucleation of n-pentanol in a laminar flow diffusion chamber” [J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10031 (2001)] Free

REFERENCES

Citing articles via

Submit your article

Sign up for alerts

Related Content

Resources

Explore

pubs.aip.org

Connect with AIP Publishing

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Erratum: “Homogeneous nucleation of $n$ -pentanol in a laminar flow diffusion chamber” [J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10031 (2001)]