Limiting molar conductances of the K+ and Cl− ions in heavy and light water have been determined at 25 °C as a function of pressure up to 2 kbar from the measured conductances and transference numbers of KCl. The residual friction coefficients (Δζ) are obtained for the cation and the anion in D2O and H2O by using the determined limiting conductance and the bulk viscosity of solvent and compared with the corresponding values predicted by applying the Hubbard–Onsager (HO) dielectric friction theory at various pressures below 1 kbar. At atmospheric and high pressures Δζ of the K+ ion in D2O is larger than that in H2O just as predicted by the HO theory, but Δζ of the Cl− ion in D2O is smaller than that in H2O on the contrary to the theoretical prediction. The reverse solvent isotope effect on Δζ(Cl−) suggests that a microscopic viscosity in the vicinity of the relatively large ion is smaller than the bulk viscosity used in the continuum theory.
REFERENCES
1.
M.
Nakahara
, N.
Takisawa
, and J.
Osugi
, J. Phys. Chem.
85
, 112
(1981
).2.
N.
Takisawa
, J.
Osugi
, and M.
Nakahara
, J. Phys. Chem.
85
, 3582
(1981
).3.
M.
Nakahara
, T.
Török
, N.
Takisawa
, and J.
Osugi
, J. Chem. Phys.
76
, 5145
(1982
).4.
N.
Takisawa
, J.
Osugi
, and M.
Nakahara
, J. Chem. Phys.
77
, 4717
(1982
).5.
N.
Takisawa
, J.
Osugi
, and M.
Nakahara
, J. Chem. Phys.
78
, 2591
(1983
).6.
7.
M. Nakahara, N. Takisawa, and J. Osugi, in High Pressure in Science and Technology, edited by C. Homan, R. K. MacCrown, and E. Whalley (North‐Holland, New York, 1984), Part II, p. 169.
8.
9.
10.
This is not confirmed by an analysis, based on the harmonic approximation, of ratios of OH stretch frequencies of main peaks in to the corresponding ones in (taken from Ref. 11). One of the reasons for the difficulty is the broadness of the bands due to the complicated coupling and molecular fields in pure water, and moreover, since the lone‐pair electrons in oxygen are not so much localized as a point charge, the force constant may not be sensitive to the bending of the hydrogen bond.
11.
D. Eisenberg and W. Kauzmann, The Structure and Properties of Water (Oxford, London, 1969), p. 228.
12.
13.
G.
Pálinkás
, P.
Bopp
, G.
Jancsó
, and K.
Heinzinger
, Z. Naturforsch. Teil A
39
, 179
(1984
);14.
A. Harlow, Ph.D. thesis, London University, 1969.
15.
J.
Jonas
, T.
DeFries
, and D. J.
Wilbur
, J. Chem. Phys.
65
, 582
(1976
).16.
17.
18.
K. Ibuki and M. Nakahara (to be published).
19.
J. B. Hasted, in Water, edited by F. Franks (Plenum, New York, 1972), Vol. 1, Chap. 7.
20.
21.
J.
Osugi
, M.
Nakahara
, Y.
Matsubara
, and K.
Shimizu
, Rev. Phys. Chem. Jpn.
45
, 23
(1975
).22.
M.
Ueno
, S. I.
and K.
Shimizu
, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
56
, 846
(1983
).23.
The density data up to 1 kbar are taken from Ref. 24, and they are extrapolated up to 2 kbar based on the formula given in Ref. 24.
24.
25.
The value of η at 1 bar is obtained by averaging the values reported in Refs. 14, 26, and 27, and this is multiplied by the relative viscosity reported by the extensive work at high pressure in Ref. 14.
26.
F. J.
Millero
, R.
Dexter
, and E.
Hoff
, J. Chem. Eng. Data
16
, 85
(1971
).27.
R. C.
Hardy
and R. L.
Cottington
, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.
42
, 573
(1949
).28.
29.
The dielectric relaxation time of at high pressure P has been estimated using the following equation: Here, the values of and are taken from Refs. 30 and 31, respectively. The validity of the assumption of this type is verified with respect to the temperature dependence in Ref. 19.
30.
R.
Pottel
and E.
Asselborn
, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem.
83
, 29
(1979
).31.
J. B. Cappi, Ph.D. thesis, London University, 1964.
32.
R. M. Fuoss and F. Accascina, Electrolytic Conductance (Interscience, New York, 1959).
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
J. R.
Gwyther
, M.
Spiro
, R. L.
Kay
, and G.
Marx
, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
172
, 1419
(1976
);J. R.
Gwyther
and M.
Spiro
, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
72
, 1410
(1976
).38.
R. L.
Kay
and J. L.
Dye
, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
49
, 5
(1963
).39.
40.
41.
K. S. Pribadi, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie‐Mellon University, 1971;
R. L.
Kay
, K. S.
Pribadi
, and B.
Watson
, J. Phys. Chem.
74
, 2724
(1970
).42.
R. W.
Allgood
, D. J.
LeRoy
, and A. R.
Gordon
, J. Chem. Phys.
8
, 418
(1940
).43.
L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Cornell University, New York, 1960), p. 514.
44.
45.
From Ref. 18, and for slip; the positive terms are more important because of for the ion and for the ion.
46.
G.
Jancsó
, K.
Heinzinger
, and T.
Radnai
, Chem. Phys. Lett.
110
, 196
(1984
).47.
48.
P. J.
Stiles
, J. B.
Hubbard
, and R. F.
Kayser
, J. Chem. Phys.
77
, 6189
(1982
).49.
P.
Colonomos
and P. G.
Wolynes
, J. Chem. Phys.
71
, 2644
(1979
)., J. Chem. Phys.
50.
R. M.
Impey
, P. A.
Madden
, and I. R.
McDonald
, J. Phys. Chem.
87
, 5071
(1983
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1985 American Institute of Physics.
1985
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
