The mean lifetime of the fluorescence of diacetyl vapor has been determined by direct measurement with a phosphoroscope to be 1.65 × 10—3 sec. Quantitative measurement of the diffusion of the excited molecules from a beam of exciting illumination, at different pressures, has also been made and the results are compatible with this lifetime. Integration of the absorption coefficient over the band associated with the fluorescence leads, on the other hand, to a lifetime of the excited state of 10—5 sec. To explain this discrepancy and other facts known about the fluorescence various mechanisms are considered, of which the most satisfactory seems to be this: Following light absorption, X→A, the diacetyl molecule goes without radiation into a long‐lived state M, lying near A. Fluorescence occurs only upon return to A. M may correspond to a tautomeric rearrangement of the molecule. Acetone, radiated with λ3130, shows fluorescence identical with that of diacetyl radiated with λ4358, but the fluorescence grows with time. It can be produced immediately with high intensity by adding diacetyl. The growth curve has been determined and is of form, It = I0 (1 — e—kt). Diffusion experiments show the lifetime of the fluorescence in acetone to be equal to that in diacetyl and that the lifetime, or rate of decay, is independent of exciting intensity. The conclusion is that the same molecule, presumably diacetyl, is responsible for the fluorescence in both cases. Possible mechanisms for the excitation of diacetyl in acetone are discussed.

1.
Almy
,
Fuller
, and
Kinzer
,
J. Chem. Phys.
8
,
37
(
1940
).
2.
P. R. Gillette, Master’s Thesis, University of Illinois, 1939.
3.
Matheson
and
Noyes
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
60
,
1857
(
1938
).
4.
Heil
,
Zeits. f. Physik
77
,
563
(
1932
).
5.
From visual observation of the fluorescence pattern (reference 1) the lifetime had been estimated to be 10−5sec., or longer. The quantitative measurements show the visual method to be unreliable.
6.
See, for example, Kennard, Kinetic Theory of Gases (McGraw‐Hill, 1938), p. 194.
7.
See
Mulliken
,
J. Chem. Phys.
7
,
14
(
1939
) for a summary of intensity relations.
8.
Lardy, Dissertation, Zurich (1924).
9.
Chako
,
J. Chem. Phys.
2
,
644
(
1934
).
10.
Henriques
and
Noyes
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
62
,
1038
(
1940
).
11.
McMurry
and
Mulliken
,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
26
,
312
(
1940
).
12.
Unpublished measurements of Almy and Gillette. Also measured by Henriques and Noyes (reference 10) who found a somewhat more rapid change with temperature.
13.
Fuller
,
Phillips
, and
Almy
,
J. Chem. Phys.
7
,
973
(
1939
).
14.
Matheson
and
Zabor
,
J. Chem. Phys.
7
,
536
(
1939
).
15.
Spence and Wild, J. Chem. Soc. 352 (1937).
16.
Barak
and
Style
,
Nature
135
,
307
(
1935
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.