The nature of a critical complex may often be related to the change of the rate of the corresponding reaction when the solvent medium is varied by altering either the electrolyte concentration or the dielectric constant. It is necessary to take into consideration the ratio of volume concentration to mole fraction, the possibility of catalytic action, even that due to an ionic charge, and the possibility that the nature of the critical complex may change with changing composition. The critical complex of the bromoacetate‐thiosulfate reaction appears to be the two tangent ions. In the ammonium‐cyanate reaction there may be a partial de‐polarization of the tangent ions. The effect of changing dielectric constant on the solvolysis of tertiary butyl chloride indicates a rather wide separation of the ions in the critical complex.

Topics
Dielectric properties, Electrolytes, Chemical reaction dynamics, Catalysts and Catalysis, Chemical properties
1.
G.
Scatchard
,
Chem. Rev.
1
,
229
(
1932
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
This paper has been written after the Conference of the Section of Physics and Chemistry of the New York Academy of Sciences on February 24, 1939, at which papers in this field were presented by (a) Eyring and Laidler, (b) J. C. Warner, and (c) P. D. Bartlett; and after the presentation at the Baltimore meeting of the American Chemical Society of the paper by (d) Laidler and Eyring. Although many of the ideas were developed before these meetings and were put forward at the Conference, others arose from these papers and their discussion. The author has attempted to give proper credit, but it must be remembered that citations refer to a memory, which may not be accurate, of an oral report which may differ from the written paper.
3.
J. A.
Christiansen
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
113
,
35
(
1924
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
G.
Scatchard
 and
J. G.
Kirkwood
,
Physik. Zeits.
33
,
297
(
1932
).
Google Scholar
 
5.
J. G.
Kirkwood
,
J. Chem. Phys.
2
,
351
(
1934
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
F. H.
Westheimer
 and
J. G.
Kirkwood
,
J. Chem. Phys.
6
,
513
(
1938
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
J. G.
Kirkwood
,
Chem. Rev.
24
,
233
(
1939
), gives the effect of changing electrolyte concentration for an ellipsoidal model.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
V. K.
La Mer
,
J. Frank. Inst.
225
,
709
(
1938
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
D.
Straup‐Cope
 and
E. J.
Cohn
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
57
,
1794
(
1935
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
V. K.
La Mer
 and
M. E.
Kamner
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
57
,
2669
(
1935
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
The constants for a = 6.4A are readily obtained from Fig. 1 of
R. M.
Fuoss
 and
C. A.
Kraus
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
55
,
1019
(
1933
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
This theory differs from that of La Mer and Kamner, references 7 and 9, only in recognizing that the complex ions do not greatly outnumber the simple ions in the range of experimental measurements, and that their effect must vanish at zero concentration.
12.
E. S.
Amis
 and
V. K.
La Mer
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
61
,
905
(
1939
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
J. C.
Warner
 and
E. L.
Warrick
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
57
,
1491
(
1935
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
The most concentrated methanol point is from
W. J.
Svirbely
 and
A.
Schramm
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
60
,
330
(
1938
). The use of the volume‐concentration‐mole fraction relation makes a considerable difference in the energy of activation, or critical increment, calculated by Warner and Svirbely’s method of isodielectric variation of the temperature.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
J.
Lander
 and
W. J.
Svirbely
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
60
,
1613
(
1938
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
The activity coefficients of ions as determined by the solubilities of electrolytes behave qualitatively in the same manner.
16.
A. E.
Stearn
 and
H.
Eyring
,
J. Chem. Phys.
5
,
113
(
1937
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
A. R.
Olson
 and
R. S.
Halford
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
59
,
2644
(
1937
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
L. C. Bateman, E. D. Hughes and C. K. Ingold, J. Chem. Soc. (London) 881, (1938).
19.
M. T.
Farinacci
 and
L. P.
Hammett
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
59
,
2542
(
1937
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
20.
V. K.
LaMer
,
J. Frank. Inst.
225
,
709
(
1938
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
21.
V. K.
LaMer
,
J. Frank. Inst.
225
,
709
(
1938
), Fig. 5.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
Hazel M. Tomlinson, Dissertation Columbia University, Fig. 2.
22.
Fig. 5,
Amis
 and
LaMer
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
61
,
905
(
1939
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1939 American Institute of Physics.
1939
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.