Information theory was used in defining several measures of the topological properties of molecules, namely, information for adjacency, incidence, polynomial coefficients of the adjacency matrix, and for distances of molecular graphs. The latter was found to have a greater ability for discrimination between structural isomers than all known topological indices and to be a very appropriate measure of branching. All the quantities related to the distance matrix (two information measures, the Weiner number and the largest eigenvalue of the characteristic polynomial) were found to reflect in the same way the main features of molecular branching. On this basis, as well as on the basis of general expressions for information content and Wiener number derived for tree graphs, the essence of molecular branching was expressed in a number of rules. It was shown that these theoretical rules on branching are in agreement with the intuitive understanding of branching and are reflected in a large number of molecular properties.

1.
D. H.
Rouvray
,
RIC Rev.
4
,
173
(
1971
);
D. H.
Rouvray
,
Chem. Britain
10
,
11
(
1974
).
2.
I.
Gutman
and
N.
Trinajstić
,
Topics Curr. Chem.
42
,
49
(
1973
);
I.
Gutman
and
N.
Trinajstić
,
Croat. Chem. Acta
47
,
507
(
1975
).
3.
K. B.
Jacimirskij
,
Z. Chem. (Leipzig)
13
,
201
(
1973
).
4.
R. W.
Jotham
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2
,
457
(
1973
).
5.
V. Prelog, Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1975.
6.
H.
Wiener
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
69
,
17
(
1947
);
H.
Wiener
,
69
,
2636
(
1947
); ,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
H.
Wiener
,
J. Phys. Chem.
52
,
425
(
1948
).
7.
K.
Ruedenberg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
22
,
1878
(
1954
).
8.
R. A.
Marcus
,
J. Chem. Phys.
43
,
2643
(
1965
).
9.
H.
Hosoya
,
K.
Kawasaki
, and
K.
Mizutani
,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
45
,
3415
(
1972
).
10.
R. B.
Mallion
,
Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A
341
,
429
(
1975
).
11.
M.
Randić
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
97
,
6609
(
1975
).
12.
N. Trinajstić, in Semiempirical Methods of Electronic Structure Calculation—Part A: Techniques, Modern Theoretical Chemistry, edited by G. A. Segal (Plenum, New York, 1977), Vol. 7, p. 1.
13.
M. V.
Volkenstein
and
B. N.
Goldstein
,
Biokhimiya
31
,
541
(
1966
).
14.
W. C.
Herndon
,
Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Biol. Symp.
1
,
123
(
1974
);
W. C.
Herndon
,
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
36
,
200
(
1974
).
15.
L. B.
Kier
,
L. H.
Hall
,
W. J.
Murray
, and
M.
Randic
,
J. Pharm. Sci.
64
,
1971
(
1975
);
L. H.
Hall
,
L. B.
Kier
, and
W. J.
Murray
,
J. Pharm. Sci.
64
,
1974
(
1975
); ,
J. Pharm. Sci.
W. J.
Murray
,
L. H.
Hall
, and
L. B.
Kier
,
J. Pharm. Sci.
64
,
1978
(
1975
); ,
J. Pharm. Sci.
L. B.
Kier
,
W. J.
Murray
, and
L. H.
Hall
,
J. Med. Chem.
18
,
1272
(
1975
);
L. B.
Kier
,
W. J.
Murray
,
M.
Randić
, and
L. H.
Hall
,
J. Pharm. Sci.
65
,
1226
(
1976
).
16.
J. R.
Platt
,
J. Chem. Phys.
15
,
419
(
1947
);
J. R.
Platt
,
J. Phys. Chem.
56
,
328
(
1962
).
17.
M.
Gordon
and
G. R.
Scantlebury
,
Trans. Faraday Soc.
60
,
605
(
1964
).
18.
H.
Hosoya
,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
44
,
2332
(
1971
).
19.
I.
Gutman
,
B.
Ruščić
,
N.
Trinajstić
, and
C. F.
Wilcox
, Jr.
,
J. Chem. Phys.
62
,
3399
(
1975
).
20.
L.
Lovasz
and
J.
Pelikan
,
Period. Math. Hung.
3
,
175
(
1973
).
21.
I.
Gutman
and
M.
Randić
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
47
,
15
(
1977
).
22.
C. Shannon and W. Weaver, Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois, Urbana, 1949).
23.
L. Brillouin, Science and Information Theory (Academic, New York, 1956).
24.
W. R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Wiley, New York, 1956).
25.
V. Glushkov, On Cybernetics as a Science, in Cybernetics, Thinking, Life (Misl, Moscow, 1964), p. 53.
26.
A.
Young
,
Proc. London Math. Soc.
33
,
97
(
1901
).
27.
N.
Rashevsky
,
Bull. Math. Biophys.
17
,
229
(
1955
).
28.
E.
Trucco
,
Bull. Math. Biophys.
18
,
129
,
237
(
1956
).
29.
A.
Moshowitz
,
Bull. Math. Biophys.
30
,
175
,
225
387
,
533
(
1968
).
30.
D.
Bonchev
,
D.
Kamenski
, and
V.
Kamenska
,
Bull. Math. Biol.
38
,
119
(
1976
).
31.
N.
Rashevsky
,
Bull. Math. Biophys.
22
,
351
(
1960
).
32.
G.
Karreman
,
Bull. Math. Biophys.
17
,
279
(
1955
).
33.
F. Harary, Graph Theory (Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA, 1971), 2nd printing;
M. Behzad and G. Chartrand, Introduction to the Theory of Graphs (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1971).
34.
K.
Mizutani
,
K.
Kawasaki
, and
H.
Hosoya
,
Nat. Sci. Rep. Ochanomizu Univ.
22
,
39
(
1971
);
K.
Kawasaki
,
K.
Mizutani
, and
H.
Hosoya
,
Nat. Sci. Rep. Ochanomizu Univ.
24
,
27
(
1973
).,
Nat. Sci. Rep. Ochanomizu Univ.
35.
D. H.
Rouvray
,
Am. Scientist
61
,
729
(
1973
);
D. H.
Rouvray
,
Math. Chem. (informal communication)
1
,
125
(
1975
).
36.
E. Nosal, thesis, The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1970.
37.
D. Cvetković and I. Gutman (private communication).
38.
J.‐P.
Dodelet
,
K.
Shinsaka
, and
G. R.
Freeman
,
Can. J. Chem.
54
,
744
(
1976
);
P. Tancrede, D. Patterson, and V. T. Lam, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 1975, 985, and references therein.
39.
V. M. Tatevskii, V. A. Benderskii, and S. S. Yarovoi, Rules and Methods for Calculating the Physico‐Chemical Properties of Paraffinic Hydrocarbons (Pergamon, New York, 1961).
40.
D. Bonchev and N. Trinajstić (in preparation).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.