A simple description of the stimulated Raman emission of Stokes radiation, and of the induced absorption found by Stoicheff at the anti‐Stokes frequency, is based on the semiclassical theory of radiation. This theory gives the well‐known formulas for absorption and stimulated emission when carried to the first order in the time‐dependent perturbation due to the interaction of the light beam with the molecules. If there are two light beams of frequencies ωL and ω, the second‐order perturbation may be associated with stimulated emission at the Stokes frequency ω=ω−1L—ωR and with induced absorption at the anti‐Stokes frequency ω=ω1LR, where ωL is the laser frequency and ωR a Raman‐active vibrational frequency; in both cases, there is a molecular transition to the excited vibrational state. The highly directional and very sharp anti‐Stokes emission at ω1 arises from the conversion by molecules in intense beams at ωL and ω−1 of two ωL photons into an ω−1, ω1 pair. Like spontaneous emission from excited states, the production of this anti‐Stokes radiation requires the full quantum theory of radiation for an adequate description. The emission of ω1 and the observed directional absorption of ω−1 due to the reverse conversion ω−11→2ωL are explained. The anti‐Stokes emission is proportional to the Stokes intensity and to the square of that of the laser, and to the square of the molecular number density; its sharpness is due to the absence of a molecular transition. The generation of photon pairs ωnn, where ωnL+nωR, can occur for all values of n, but it is most efficient for n=1, due to resonance in the appropriate molecular hyperpolarizability and to the intensity of the Stokes beam at ω−1.

1.
G.
Eckhardt
,
R. W.
Hellwarth
,
F. J.
McClung
,
S. E.
Schwarz
,
D.
Weiner
, and
E. J.
Woodbury
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
9
,
455
(
1962
).
2.
R. W.
Terhune
,
Solid State Design
4
,
38
(November
1963
);
R. W.
Minck
,
R. W.
Terhune
, and
W. G.
Rado
,
Appl. Phys. Letters
3
,
181
(
1963
).
3.
B. P.
Stoicheff
,
Phys. Letters
7
,
186
(
1963
).
4.
H. J.
Zeiger
,
P. E.
Tannenwald
,
S.
Kern
, and
R.
Herendeen
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
11
,
419
(
1963
).
5.
R.
Chiao
and
B. P.
Stoicheff
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
12
,
290
(
1964
).
6.
W. J.
Jones
and
B. P.
Stoicheff
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
13
,
657
(
1964
).
7.
G. Placzek, Handbuch der Radiologie, edited by E. Marx (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1934), Vol. 6, Part 2, 205.
8.
A.
Javan
,
J. Phys. Radium
19
,
806
(
1958
);
J.
Weber
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
31
,
681
(
1959
).
9.
R. W.
Hellwarth
,
Phys. Rev.
130
,
1850
(
1963
).
10.
E.
Garmire
,
F.
Pandarese
, and
C. H.
Townes
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
11
,
160
(
1963
).
11.
N.
Bloembergen
and
Y. R.
Shen
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
12
,
504
(
1964
);
N.
Bloembergen
and
Y. R.
Shen
,
13
,
720
(
1964
).,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
12.
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1958), 4th ed., Chap. XII.
13.
E.
Schrödinger
,
Ann. Physik
79
,
734
(
1926
).
See also, L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1955), 2nd ed., Chap. X.
14.
P. A. M.
Dirac
,
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)
A114
,
243
(
1927
).
15.
W. Heitler, The Quantum Theory of Radiation (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1954), 3rd ed., Chaps. IV and V.
16.
G.
Breit
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
4
,
504
(
1932
), especially Sec. IV.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.