A new least‐squares procedure has been devised for interpreting electron‐diffraction patterns by a comparison of experimental total intensities with calculated intensities. It differs from all procedures published previously in its direct use of observed quantities in place of the customary ``reduced intensities'' derived subjectively from manually smoothed data. The computer is programmed to select the atomic background function needed to establish the molecular intensity and to refine the background as it refines the desired structural parameters. Operating characteristics of the new procedure are discussed. Results of its application in the structure determination of gaseous B(CH3)3 are presented and compared with results determined by the radial distribution method. Although the new procedure requires somewhat more accurate trial values of molecular parameters for convergence than does the radial distribution analysis, it is intrinsically a faster, and, in some ways, a more powerful tool for deducing optimum molecular parameters.

1.
R. A.
Bonham
and
L. S.
Bartell
,
J. Chem. Phys.
31
,
702
(
1959
).
2.
K.
Hedberg
and
M.
Iwasaki
,
Acta Cryst.
17
,
529
(
1964
);
M. Iwasaki, F. N. Frisch, and K. Hedberg, ibid., p. 533;
O. Bastiansen, F. N. Frisch, and K. Hedberg, ibid., p. 538.
3.
J.
Karle
and
I. L.
Karle
,
J. Chem. Phys.
18
,
957
(
1950
).
4.
W. C. Hamilton and V. Schomaker, thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1954;
M. E.
Jones
,
K.
Hedberg
, and
V.
Schomaker
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
77
,
5278
(
1955
).
5.
O.
Bastiansen
,
L.
Hedberg
, and
K.
Hedberg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
27
,
1311
(
1957
).
6.
Y.
Morino
,
K.
Kuchitsu
, and
Y.
Murata
,
Acta Cryst.
16
,
A129
(
1963
).
7.
L.
Bartell
,
J. Chem. Phys.
23
,
1219
(
1955
).
8.
K.
Kuchitsu
and
L. S.
Bartell
,
J. Chem. Phys.
35
,
1945
(
1961
).
9.
V.
Schomaker
and
R.
Glauber
,
Nature
170
,
290
(
1952
);
J. A.
Ibers
and
J. A.
Hoerni
,
Acta Cryst.
7
,
405
(
1954
).
10.
R. A.
Bonham
and
T.
Ukaji
,
J. Chem. Phys.
36
,
72
(
1962
).
11.
H. O.
Hartley
,
Technometrics
3
,
270
(
1961
).
12.
T. G.
Strand
,
D. A.
Kohl
, and
R. A.
Bonham
,
J. Chem. Phys.
39
,
1307
(
1963
).
13.
Such as the following cases: (1) If the emulsion calibration constant α in E = D(1+αD) has not been measured accurately, and D is roughly constant over the plate. (2) If a little of the gas sample is more or less uniformly delocalized in the diffraction chamber.
14.
Ideally the weight should be virtually the same, and an ingenious procedure to weight f(r) data to meet this requirement has been proposed by Morino, Kuchitsu, and Murata in Ref. 6.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.