Theoretical Considerations Concerning the Reactions Between Ethylene and the Halogens and Their Products

Sherman, Albert; Quimby, Oscar T.; Sutherland, Richard O.

doi:10.1063/1.1749778

Ethylene may react with a halogen by a substitution reaction to give a vinyl halide and hydrogen halide, or the halogen may add to the double bond to give 1,2‐dihalo‐ethane or rearrange and give ethylidene halide. It is found that the symmetrical addition is favored in the case of each halogen. 1,2‐dihalo‐ethane, or the corresponding ethylidene compound may decompose to give ethylene and the halogen, or the vinyl halide and hydrogen halide. It is found that ethylene formation is favored in the bromine and iodine derivatives, whereas, in agreement with experiment, vinyl chloride and HCl would be produced from either 1,2‐dichlor‐ethane or ethylidene chloride. In most of the reactions considered mechanisms involving free radicals are slightly more probable than the corresponding unimolecular or bimolecular reactions.

REFERENCES

1.

Sherman

and

Sun

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

56

,

1096

(

1934

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

2.

Sun

,

J. Chinese Chem. Soc.

41

,

98

(

1936

).

Google Scholar

3.

See for example,

Van Vleck

and

Sherman

,

Rev. Mod. Phys.

7

,

167

(

1935

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

4.

For a more exact definition see

Eyring

,

J. Chem. Phys.

3

,

107

(

1934

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

5.

We shall illustrate the method by deriving the given relation in this particular case. Let the k’s be the specific reaction rate constants of the reactions concerned, and let E denote

{CH}_{2} = {CH}_{2};

EX,

{CH}_{2} - {CH}_{2} X;

and K the equilibrium constant of reaction (1). Then, assuming that the rate of a reaction is proportional to the concentration of reacting substances, and the concentration of the free radicals do not change after the initial instant, we have

- \frac{d(E)}{dt} {= k}_{2} (X)(E)

;

- \frac{{d(X}_{2})}{dt} {= k}_{1} {(X}_{2} {)−k}_{1}^{'} {(X)}^{2} {+k}_{3} {(X}_{2})(EX)

,

\frac{d(X)}{dt} {= 2k}_{1} {(X}_{2} {)−k}_{1}^{'} {(X)}^{2} {−k}_{2} {(X)(E)+k}_{3} {(X}_{2})(EX) = 0

,

\frac{d(EX)}{dt} {= k}_{2} {(X)(E)−k}_{3} {(X}_{2})(EX) = 0

. Therefore

{2k}_{1} {(X}_{2} {) = k}_{1}^{'} {(X)}^{2},

or

(X) = \sqrt{\frac{{2k}_{1}}{k_{1}^{'}}} {(X}_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}} = \sqrt{2} K^{\frac{1}{2}} {(X}_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}

,

(EX) = \frac{k_{2}}{k_{3}} \sqrt{\frac{{2k}_{1}}{k_{1}^{'}}} \frac{{(X}_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}}{{(X}_{2})} (E)

,

- \frac{d(E)}{dt} = − \frac{{d(X}_{2})}{dt} = \sqrt{2} k_{2} K^{\frac{1}{2}} {(X}_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}} (E)

. But, neglecting entropy, and remembering

k = constant {⋅e}^{−A/RT},

constant {⋅e}^{−A/RT} = constant {⋅e}^{{−A}_{(2)} /RT} {⋅e}^{−ΔH/2RT} = const {⋅e}^{{−A}_{(2)} + \frac{1}{2} ΔH/RT}

or

{A = A}_{(2)} + \frac{1}{2} D_{X_{2}} .

6.

It is of course more probable that the monochlor‐ethylene free radical collide with the dichlor derivative than a chlorine atom, but the most likely chemical reaction would not be detectable in this case, i.e.,

{CH}_{2} Cl - {CH}_{2} Cl + {CH}_{2} - {CH}_{2} Cl \to {CH}_{2} Cl - {CH}_{2} + {CH}_{2} Cl - {CH}_{2} Cl .

7.

This value differs from the value given in reference 1 because in that paper

{ΔH}_{7}

of Table II was incorrectly calculated.

8.

This value differs from that given in reference 1 because there the same mechanism was assumed for the decomposition of the dichloride as for the other dihalide derivatives.

9.

F. O. Rice and O. K. Rice, Aliphatic Free Radicals (Johns Hopkins Press, 1935), pp. 70, 71, 184.

10.

L. S. Kassel, Kinetics of Homogeneous Gas Reactions (Chemical Catalog Company, 1932), p. 118.

11.

Cuthbertson

and

Kistiakowsky

,

J. Chem. Phys.

3

,

631

(

1935

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

12.

Stewart

and

Edlund

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

45

,

1014

(

1923

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

13.

Norrish

,

J. Chem. Soc.

123

,

3006

(

1923

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

14.

Davis

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

50

,

2769

(

1928

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

15.

G. Williams, J. Chem. Soc. 1747, 1758 (1932).

16.

D. M. Williams, ibid. 2911 (1932).

17.

Mitsukuri

,

Kinumaki

, and

Asaoda

,

J. Chem. Soc. Japan

54

,

1061

(

1933

).

Google Scholar

18.

Bahr

and

Zieler

,

Zeits. f. Angew. Chem.

43

,

233

(

1930

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

19.

Stewart

and

Smith

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

51

,

3082

(

1929

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

20.

Kinumaki

,

J. Chem. Soc. Japan

54

,

142

(

1933

).

Google Scholar

21.

Kharasch

,

McNab

, and

Mayo

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

55

,

2521

(

1933

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

22.

Kharasch

and

Hannum

,

J. Am. Chem. Soc.

56

,

712

(

1934

).

Google Scholar

Crossref

23.

Boeseken

and

Bastet

,

Rec. Trav. Chim.

32

,

187

(

1914

).

Google Scholar

Theoretical Considerations Concerning the Reactions Between Ethylene and the Halogens and Their Products

REFERENCES

Citing articles via

Submit your article

Sign up for alerts

Resources

Explore

pubs.aip.org

Connect with AIP Publishing

Theoretical Considerations Concerning the Reactions Between Ethylene and the Halogens and Their Products Available to Purchase

REFERENCES

Sign In

Citing articles via

Submit your article

Sign up for alerts

Related Content

Resources

Explore

pubs.aip.org

Connect with AIP Publishing

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Theoretical Considerations Concerning the Reactions Between Ethylene and the Halogens and Their Products