The magnetic susceptibilities of powdered specimens of Cu(HCO2)2·4H2O, Cu(HCO2)2·2H2O, and Mn(HCO2)2·2H2O have been measured by an audio‐frequency mutual‐inductance method between 1.3° and 4.2°K, and from 14° to 20°K. At hydrogen temperatures Cu(HCO2)2·2H2O and Mn(HCO2)2·2H2O exhibit Curie—Weiss behavior which, however, breaks down significantly in the helium region. The susceptibility of Cu(HCO2)2·4H2O rises to a pronounced peak at 16.8°K and is essentially constant below 4.2°K. The susceptibilities of single‐crystal Cu(HCO2)2·4H2O were measured along the three monoclinic axes in the same temperature intervals. χc and χb show sharp maxima at 16.8°, and are much larger in magnitude than χa. The possibility of this salt becoming weakly ferromagnetic below 16.8°K is considered, as is the unusual indirect‐exchange coupling of Cu++ moments via formate groups.

1.
B.
Bleaney
and
K. D.
Bowers
,
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)
A214
,
451
(
1952
);
H.
Kumagai
,
H.
Abe
, and
J.
Shimade
,
Phys. Rev.
76
,
385
(
1952
).
2.
H.
Abe
,
Phys. Rev.
92
,
1572
(
1953
);
H.
Abe
,
J. Phys. Soc. Japan
13
,
987
(
1958
).
3.
R. L. Martin and H. Waterman, J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 2545.
4.
J.
Shimada
,
H.
Abe
, and
K.
Ono
,
J. Phys. Soc. Japan
11
,
137
(
1956
).
5.
R.
Kiriyama
,
H.
Ibamoto
, and
K.
Matsuo
,
Acta Cryst.
7
,
482
(
1954
).
6.
R. B.
Flippen
and
S. A.
Friedberg
,
Phys. Rev.
121
,
1591
(
1961
).
7.
R. L. Martin and H. Waterman, J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1359.
8.
T. Haseda, A. R. Miedema, H. Kobayashi, and E. Kanda, Proc. Intern. Conf. Magnetism Cryst. (Kyoto, 1, 518 1961).
9.
Encyclopedia of Chemical Reactions, edited by C. A. Jacobson (Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1946), Vol. III, p. 354.
10.
L. Gmelin, Handbook of Chemistry, (London, 1852) Vol. VII, p. 279.
11.
These analyses were kindly performed for us by Q. Fernando, Chemistry Department, University of Pittsburgh.
12.
I.
Dzyaloshinsky
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
6
,
241
(
1958
).
13.
T.
Moriya
,
Phys. Rev.
117
,
635
(
1960
);
T.
Moriya
,
Phys. Rev. Letters
4
,
228
(
1960
);
T.
Moriya
,
Phys. Rev.
120
,
91
(
1960
).
14.
(a) J. Skalyo and S. A. Friedberg (unpublished).
(b)
Y. Y.
Li
,
Phys. Rev.
84
,
721
(
1951
);
T. Oguchi has kindly informed us that this conclusion is confirmed by spin‐wave and Green’s function treatments.
15.
S.
Geller
and
W. L.
Bond
,
J. Chem. Phys.
29
,
925
(
1958
).
16.
K. D.
Bowers
and
J.
Owen
,
Rept. Progr. Phys.
18
,
304
(
1955
).
17.
D. J. E.
Ingram
,
Phys. Rev.
90
,
711
(
1953
).
18.
W. G.
Penney
and
R.
Schlapp
,
Phys. Rev.
41
,
194
(
1932
).
19.
H. A.
Kramers
,
Proc. Acad. Sci. Amsterdam
35
,
1272
(
1932
);
H. A.
Kramers
,
36
,
17
(
1933
).
20.
A.
Abragam
and
M. H. L.
Pryce
,
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)
A205
,
135
(
1951
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.