Crystalline powders of the aromatic amino acids and the enzyme trypsin were exposed at 77°K to Co‐60 γ rays, and the spectral distribution (between 3000 and 6500 A) of the thermoluminescence emitted upon subsequent heating was determined using band‐pass filters. At a temperature corresponding to a particular peak in a plot of emission intensity vs T, a large fraction of the emission (except from phenylalanine) consisted of one characteristic spectral component. In general, the proportion of emission at the longer wavelengths increased with increasing temperature. The thermal‐activation energies of thermoluminescence, estimated from plots of lnIT vs 1/T (about 0.2 ev for the amino acids and 0.1 ev for trypsin), are lower than similar determinations at comparable temperatures for alkali halide crystals. The γ‐ray induced thermoluminescence from amino acid crystals is composed of longer wavelengths than the uv‐excited fluorescence (at room temperature) or long‐lived phosphorescence (at 77°K). The possible limitations within which lattice imperfections might account for these effects are discussed briefly. The spectral results for trypsin provide additional evidence that, in accord with previous predictions, at least some of the electronic rearrangements arising from γ‐ray interaction become preferentially localized in only a restricted number of configurations. The metastable species which persist at 77°K likely depend upon the native conformation of the protein, and the available evidence suggests that the decay of an excited triplet state of tryptophan accounts for the majority of the trypsin emission. Even so, the activation energies and spectra indicate that the initial trapping and untrapping does not occur at the aromatic amino acid residues. Accordingly, mechanisms are considered whereby electronic rearrangements at other sites in trypsin could lead to the excitation of an aromatic residue followed by phosphorescence from a tryptophan residue.

1.
J.
Randall
and
M.
Wilkins
,
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)
A184
,
366
(
1945
).
2.
F.
Seitz
,
Revs. Modern Phys.
26
,
7
(
1954
).
3.
A.
Halperin
and
A.
Braner
,
Phys. Rev.
117
,
408
(
1960
).
4.
A.
Halperin
,
A.
Braner
,
A.
Ben‐Zvi
, and
N.
Kristianpoller
,
Phys. Rev.
117
,
416
(
1960
).
5.
L.
Augenstine
,
J.
Carter
,
D.
Nelson
, and
H.
Yockey
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
19
(
1960
).
6.
L. Augenstine, Information Theory in Biology, edited by H. Quastler (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1953), p. 119.
7.
L.
Augenstine
and
R.
Ray
,
J. Phys. Chem.
61
,
1385
(
1957
).
8.
A glow curve is a plot of the measured intensity of luminescence as a function of sample temperature when an irradiated sample is heated at a constant rate.
9.
L. Augenstine, J. Carter, D. Nelson, and H. Yockey, Free Radicals in Biological Systems, edited by M. Blois (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1961), p. 149.
10.
G. Garlick, Preparation and Characteristics of Solid Luminescent Materials, edited by G. Fonda and F. Seitz (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1948), p. 87.
11.
J.
Ghormley
and
H.
Levy
,
J. Phys. Chem.
56
,
548
(
1952
).
12.
J.
Rieke
,
J. Phys. Chem.
61
,
633
(
1957
).
13.
J. Carter, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Rept. No. ORNL‐2970 (1960).
14.
L.
Augenstine
and
C.
Ghiron
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.
47
,
1530
(
1961
).
15.
W.
Gordy
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
1
,
491
(
1959
).
16.
Trypsin has a molecular weight of 23 800 and contains about 2% (∼3 residues) phenylalanine, 1% (∼2 residues) tryptophan and 5% (8–10 residues) tyrosine (e.g, 5,14).
17.
G.
Tollin
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
387
(
1960
).
18.
A.
Szent‐Gyorgyi
,
Science
93
,
609
(
1941
).
19.
C.
Garrett
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
340
(
1960
).
20.
L.
Stryer
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
432
(
1960
).
21.
R.
Mason
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
452
(
1960
).
22.
M.
Evans
and
J.
Gergeley
,
Biochim. et Biophys. Acta
3
,
188
(
1949
).
23.
M.
Cardew
and
D.
Eley
,
Discussions Faraday Soc.
27
,
115
(
1959
).
24.
B.
Rosenberg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
36
,
816
(
1962
).
25.
B.
Rosenberg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
29
,
1108
(
1958
).
26.
As previously reported, the shape of the peak in the glow curve for trypsin and the temperature at the maximum are essentially constant for doses of 107r or less.5 This is not unexpected, inasmuch as it requires 107r to produce an average of one inactivating event (at room temperature) per trypsin molecule in dried preparations.27
27.
L. Augenstine, Advances in Enzymology (to be published).
28.
In the symmetry method of analysis, activation energies are calculated by a relatively simple formula:
, (2) where Tg is the temperature corresponding to a peak in the glow curve, k is Boltzmann’s constant, δ the difference between Tg and the temperature on the high‐temperature side of the glow peak at “half intensity,” and q is a factor which can be computed from the shape of the peak in the glow curve. The values of the factor q depend upon the kinetics of the recombination process and the physical model postulated. Thus the nature of the recombination process which determines the shape of a peak in the glow curve may be inferred from a comparison of the average activation energies estimated from initial‐rise curves with values calculated according to Eq. (2). Alternatively, the skewness of a peak is also indicative of the kinetics involved. If the ratio of the initial concentration of trapped electrons to recombination centers is equal to unity, a first‐order recombination process should give values of the ratio δ/w = e−1(1+Δ), and second‐order recombination should give the ratio δ/w = 0.5(1+Δ).29 (Δ = 2kT/E and w is the difference in temperature between the two points on the ascending and descending portion of the peak at half‐maximum intensity.) For example, for a glow peak at temperature Tg = 120 °K and having an activation energy E = 0.20 ev,Δ≅0.1, so that a first‐order recombination would give δ/w = 0.40 and a second‐order recombination would give δ/w = 0.55. Intermediate values may result from “shoulders” on a peak or from a process which is of mixed order.
29.
In the present discussion “first‐order” refers to the situation where the intensity of thermoluminescence is determined only by the number of species being untrapped per unit time, whereas “second‐order” implies a relatively low probability for recombination compared to retrapping.
30.
The 13 filters were: Kodak Series VI Wratten Filters Nos. 23A, 21, 15, 8, 47B, and 25; and Corning Glass Works Filters Nos. 4303, 5030, 5543, 2404, 5113, 7–54 (dark thin) and 7–39 (dark thick). These were chosen so that no one filter corresponded to a multiple or combination of others, thus avoiding the introduction—by subtraction—of a column of zeros in the matrix inversion used for calculating the spectra.
31.
The absorption spectra of the various filters were measured with a Cary recording spectrophotometer and the average transmission calculated for each 250‐A interval.32 The spectral sensitivity of the 1P21 was calibrated with a standard tungsten lamp at room temperature (to ensure that the response of the tube used was in agreement with published values) and also when cooled with liquid‐nitrogen vapor to about 98 °K, i.e., the normal operating condition.32
32.
C. Weinberg, D. Nelson, J. Carter, and R. Birkhoff, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Rept. No. ORNL‐3115 (1961).
33.
W.
Burrus
,
IRE Trans. on Nuclear Sci.
NS‐7
(
2–3
),
102
(
1960
).
34.
S. Gass, Linear Programming, Methods and Application (McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1958).
35.
When ln(IT−I770) was plotted vs 1/T, the first 10 initial‐rise curves were concave downward. By the same token when ln(IT) was plotted vs 1/T, the plots were concave upward. Both types of plots are thus inconsistent with Eq. (1). However, the I770 measured between warming cycles decreased linearly while the last 10 initial‐rise curves were obtained. This linear decrease was extrapolated so as to obtain estimated values of I77e for each initial‐rise curve in the sequence. The difference between I77e and the observed I770 agreed with the intensity which—on the basis of Eq. (1)—would be expected to occur at 77 °K as a result of the processes responsible for the peak in the trypsin glow curve. When ln(IT−I770) was plotted vs 1/T, straight lines were obtained in agreement with Eq. (1). The use of ln(IT−I77e) in the Arrhenius plots implies that I77e arises from a process which is essentially temperature insensitive.
36.
P.
Debye
and
J.
Edwards
,
Science
116
,
143
(
1952
).
37.
I.
Sapenzhinskii
and
N.
Emanuel
,
Akad. Nauk. Doklady S.S.S.R.
131
,
1168
(
1960
).
38.
(a)
Y.
Vladimirov
,
Akad. Nauk. Izvest. S.S.S.R., Seriia fizicheskaia
23
,
86
(
1959
);
(b)
Y.
Vladimirov
and
F.
Litvin
,
Biofizika
5
, No.
2
,
127
(
1960
).
39.
F.
Bryant
,
A.
Bree
,
F.
Fielding
, and
W.
Schneider
,
Discussions Faraday Soc.
28
,
48
(
1959
).
40.
Seitz2 calculated that in an alkali halide crystal at room temperature, the closest distance of approach of an electron having a thermal energy of approximately 0.025 ev to a V3 center (consisting of only one electron vacancy associated with two negative ion vacancies) would be about 50 A and an activation energy of about 0.25 ev may be adequate to allow the electron to approach close enough for annihilation of the hole to occur.
41.
B.
Rosenberg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
34
,
812
(
1961
);
B. Rosenberg and J. Camiscoli (to be published).
42.
W.
Arnold
and
H.
Sherwood
,
J. Phys. Chem.
63
,
2
(
1959
).
43.
H.
Tsubomura
and
R. S.
Mulliken
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
82
,
5966
(
1962
).
44.
G.
Weber
and
F.
Teale
,
Biochem. J.
67
,
15P
(
1959
).
45.
S.
Konev
,
Akad. Nauk. Izvest. S.S.S.R., Ser. fiz.
23
,
90
(
1959
).
46.
R.
Setlow
and
B.
Doyle
,
Biochim. et Biophys. Acta
24
,
27
(
1957
).
47.
L.
Augenstine
,
C.
Ghiron
,
K.
Grist
, and
R.
Mason
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.
47
,
1733
(
1961
).
48.
L.
Augenstine
,
Science
129
,
718
(
1959
).
49.
T.
Brustad
,
Radiation Research
15
,
139
(
1961
).
50.
That is, neither the wavelength nor the intensity of emission from trypsin corresponds to that of its tyrosine component, whereas the shape of the glow curves from amino acid mixtures comparable to those in proteins is always characteristic of that from the tyrosine constituent.9,13 It is unlikely that this depends upon the fact that powdered samples were used, since Vladimirov found that the emission spectrum at room temperature of a phenylalanine powder with a minor admixture of tryptophan was clearly characteristic of tryptophan even though less than 0.1 of the exciting light was absorbed in that compound.38a
51.
M.
Kasha
,
Radiation Research Suppl.
2
,
243
(
1960
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.