The absolute rate of the recombination of three hydrogen atoms is calculated entirely theoretically. The manner in which rotation determines the dimensions of the activated complex in cases having little or no activation energy is discussed. The theoretical data are in good agreement with the experimental rates of Steiner and of Amdur. An immediate consequence of the theory is that energy transfer occurs most effectively among particles which can react with each other, free atoms being more efficient than molecules. A qualitative application of potential surfaces to the problem of energy transfer as met in velocity of sound experiments and in experiments on maintenance of high pressure rates of unimolecular reactions is made.

1.
Parker Traveling Fellow of Harvard University, 1934–5.
2.
(a)
Eyring
,
J. Chem. Phys.
3
,
107
(
1935
).
(b)
Gershinowitz
and
Eyring
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
57
,
985
(
1935
).
(c)
Wynne‐Jones
and
Eyring
,
J. Chem. Phys.
3
,
492
(
1935
).
3.
Eyring
and
Polanyi
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B12
,
279
(
1931
).
4.
(a)
Pelzer
and
Wigner
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B15
,
445
(
1932
).
(b)
Pelzer
,
Zeits. f. Electrochemie
39
,
608
(
1933
).
(c)
Wigner
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B19
,
203
(
1932
).
5.
Reference 2(a) Eq. (10). In accordance with the notation used in reference 2(c), κ has been substituted for c, the transmission coefficient, in order to avoid confusion with concentration.
6.
For an excited diatomic oscillator with a reasonable sized dipole the interval before radiation is frequently around 10−2sec. In the case of hydrogen, where there is no dipole but only a quadrupole moment, we should expect a mean life of the order of seconds, so that κ may well be as small as 1/ν≈10−14.
7.
See for example
Kimball
and
Eyring
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
54
,
3381
, etc. (
1932
) Figs. 1, 2, and 3 in which this feature is to be observed. In these particular cases, as well as for the three hydrogen atoms, the line makes equal angles with the coordinates r1 and r2.
8.
See Eyring and Polanyi, reference 3. Fig. 16 and accompanying text. Their coordinates −b and g correspond to our x1 and y1. We should also like to mention that in their Eq. (25) on p. 307 sin φ should be replaced by sin φ. Accordingly, the angle between b and c in Fig. 17 should be taken as 60°, as we have done in our Fig. 3, where r1 and r2 correspond to b and c, respectively. We are indebted to Dr. O. K. Rice for kindly pointing out this error in sign.
9.
Private communication.
10.
Amdur
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
57
,
856
(
1935
).
11.
Adams, Smithsonian Mathematical Formulae (1922), p. 105.
12.
Steiner
,
Trans. Faraday Soc.
31
,
623
(
1935
).
13.
Franck
and
Eucken
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B20
,
460
(
1933
).
14.
Eucken
and
Becher
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B20
,
467
(
1933
);
Kneser
and
Knudsen
,
Ann. d. Physik
21
,
682
(
1935
);
Richards
and
Reid
,
J. Chem. Phys.
2
,
206
(
1934
).
15.
Volmer
and
Froehlich
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
B19
,
89
(
1932
).
16.
Bonhoeffer
,
Zeits. f. Physik. Chemie
119
,
385
,
475
(
1926
).
17.
Senftleben
and
Hein
,
Ann. d. Physik
22
,
1
(
1935
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.